To place an obituary, please email the following information to [email protected]. Note that there is no option to place obituaries through our website. For any questions, feel free to contact our obituary desk at 651-228-5263.
**General Information:**
– Your full name
– Address (City, State, Zip Code)
– Phone number
– Alternate phone number (if any)
**Obituary Specifications:**
– Name of the deceased
– Obituary text
– A photo in JPEG or PDF format is preferred; TIF and other files are accepted. We will contact you if there are any issues with the photo.
– Ad run dates
There is a discount for running the obituary more than one day, but this must be scheduled on the first run date to apply. If a photo is used, it must be published on all run dates to qualify for the discount. Please contact us for more information.
**Policies:**
**Verification of Death:** To publish an obituary, we require the name and phone number of the funeral home or cremation society handling the arrangements. We must contact them during business hours to verify the death.
If the deceased’s body has been donated to the University of Minnesota Anatomy Bequest Program or a similar program, please provide their phone number for verification. Allow enough time for us to contact them, especially on weekends when hours may be limited.
Alternatively, a death certificate is acceptable for verification—only one of these two options is required.
**Guestbook and Outside Websites:**
We do not allow references to other media sources with guestbooks or obituaries placed elsewhere. We may include a funeral home website or a family email for contact instead. Contact us if you have questions about this policy.
**Obituary Process:**
Once your submission is complete, we will fax or email a proof for your review prior to publication. This proof includes the price and scheduled run dates. Please review it carefully. Notify us of any errors or changes before the notice appears in the Pioneer Press by the deadlines for each day. After publication, we are not responsible for errors missed during final proofing.
**Online Obituaries:**
Changes to online obituaries may be handled through the obituary desk. Contact us for details.
**Payment Procedure:**
Pre-payment is required for all obituary notices before the publication deadline. Payment methods include:
– Credit Card: Accepted by phone only (due to PCI regulations)
– EFT: Provide routing and account numbers by phone
– Cash: Accepted at our front counter Monday to Friday, 8:00 AM to 3:30 PM
Call 651-228-5263 with your payment information after you have reviewed and approved the proof.
**Rates:**
– Minimum charge: $162 for the first 10 lines
– Each additional line after the first 10: $12.20
– Ads under 10 lines are charged the minimum rate of $162
– For a second run date, the cost is $8.20 per line from the first line
– Each photo published costs $125 per day
For example, a 20-line ad on the first run date costs $164. Two photos published for two days would be charged as four photo charges totaling $500.
**Deadlines:**
Please adhere to deadlines to ensure your obituary is published on the requested day.
**Memoriam (Non-Obituary) Requests:**
Memoriam submissions are remembrances of loved ones and have different rates from obituaries. For more information, please email [email protected] or call 651-228-5280.
**Hours:** Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM (closed weekends and holidays).
—
### Supreme Court Decision on Sports Betting Explained
By Mark Sherman, Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — A 2018 Supreme Court decision opened the floodgates for the legalized sports-betting industry, now worth billions of dollars a year, despite controversy surrounding the ruling. This decision is back in the spotlight following arrests of more than 30 people, including an NBA player and coach, as part of investigations into criminal schemes involving rigged sports bets and poker games linked to Mafia families.
**What Did the Supreme Court Decide?**
The court struck down a 1992 federal law, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), which barred betting on football, basketball, baseball, and other sports in most states. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, stated that the way Congress prohibited states from authorizing sports betting violated the Constitution’s Tenth Amendment, which protects states’ powers.
“The legalization of sports gambling requires an important policy choice, but the choice is not ours to make,” Alito wrote. He added that the court’s role is to interpret whether the law Congress enacted aligns with the Constitution—and PASPA did not.
The trouble, Alito explained, was that Congress did not make sports betting a federal crime but instead barred states from legalizing it, infringing upon their authority.
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Anthony Kennedy, Neil Gorsuch, and Elena Kagan joined Alito’s opinion.
**Dissenting Views**
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, arguing that the court should have invalidated only the part of the law restricting states and preserved the rest, especially provisions affecting private parties and betting schemes. Writing for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer, she highlighted that courts generally seek to salvage rather than demolish a law. Breyer agreed that parts of the law should be struck down but disagreed that the entire law should fail.
Alito countered that Congress did not intend for the provisions to be treated separately.
**Concerns About Corruption**
Senator Bill Bradley of New Jersey, a former NBA star, sponsored PASPA to protect against the dangers of sports betting. Major professional sports leagues and the NCAA urged the court to uphold the law, fearing gambling would harm the integrity of their games. They also highlighted the additional resources needed to monitor betting patterns and investigate suspicious activity. The Trump administration supported maintaining the ban.
Alito acknowledged the controversy around legal sports gambling, citing historical scandals such as the 1919 “Black Sox Scandal” and 1950s college basketball point-shaving schemes as examples of risks to sports integrity.
Nevertheless, he concluded that Congress could not require states to maintain prohibitions against sports betting.
Originally published: October 24, 2025 at 11:10 AM CDT.
https://www.twincities.com/2025/10/24/sports-betting-supreme-court/
Be First to Comment