“There are very big markets China, Eastern Europe, Latin America where local platforms are simply stronger in trust, in loyalty, in payment behaviour”.
“There are very big markets China, Eastern Europe, Latin America where local platforms are simply stronger in trust, in loyalty, in payment behaviour”.
Knowing where to find Rusted Gears in ARC Raiders gives you a leg up on upgrading your Workshop, and you’ll need at least a few over the course of the game.
BlizzCon 2026 tickets go on sale Friday for September 2026 event
Marvel Games general manager Haluk Mentes gushed over collaboration with Insomniac, suggesting further collaborations will likely happen.
PlayStation Portal now lets you stream your own digital games to the handheld without a PS5, but you still need to have the most expensive version of PS Plus to do so
Grandmaster Mihai Suba, who died last week at the age of 78, had a distinguished career at the chessboard.
How to opt out of LinkedIn AI training
How to activate a Requiem Obelisk on Deimos – Warframe
The post Vitalik Buterin Calls for “Open Source and Verifiable” Self-Driving Cars appeared com. On November 2, Ethereum (ETH) co-founder Vitalik Buterin sent a short but pointed message into the tech ether: “We need open source and verifiable self-driving cars.” The tweet landed like a provocation and a challenge at once, a call for transparency in a field where code, models and sensor streams decide life-or-death outcomes, and where opaque, proprietary stacks have so far dominated the road. At first glance, the line reads like a principled manifesto: open source as a check against proprietary secrecy, and verifiability as a guardrail for trust and accountability. But there’s a deeper technical case folded into that phrase. Autonomous systems are not just software; they are sensor networks, machine-learning pipelines, communications infrastructures and legal constructs. Making them “verifiable” means building mechanisms to prove, to regulators, to courts, and to the public, that a vehicle was running a particular software version, that its decision-making process met a safety contract, or that a sensor reading was authentic and unaltered. Blockchain and modern cryptography offer practical ways to stitch those proofs together without turning every car into a streaming data breach. Immutable Ledger The simplest blockchain analogy is the immutable ledger. If a vehicle publishes cryptographic hashes of critical telemetry, software manifests, or signed attestations onto a permissioned ledger, investigators can later show that the evidence they examine matches what the car itself declared at the time. That is the idea behind several academic proposals and prototypes: fragmented ledgers for vehicle forensics, “vehicle passports” that anchor attestations off-chain while keeping proof on-chain, and permissioned blockchains that constrain who can write or read sensitive automotive records. Those systems aim to preserve privacy while maintaining tamper-evidence, a vital balance when the raw sensor logs from LIDAR, radar and cameras are privacy goldmines. But verifiability at the scale required by autonomous vehicles also.