‘Boat Houses Are Not Tourist Attractions’

While the influx of tourists has brought economic opportunities to Ine, it has also raised tensions with local residents, who face disruptions to their daily lives. The challenge now lies in balancing the benefits of tourism with the preservation of community life.

Located more than two hours by car from central Kyoto, Ine has a population of roughly 1,800. The town’s distinctive waterfront houses, known as funaya, have long been its symbol. Sightseeing boats offer views of the rows of homes from the sea, attracting visitors eager to experience this unique scenery.

After the COVID-19 pandemic, these iconic scenes went viral on social media, leading to a rise in the number of restaurants and shops. In fiscal 2024, Ine welcomed around 480,000 visitors—the highest figure on record.

However, the narrow streets of Ine, some barely wide enough for pedestrians to extend their arms, have struggled to cope with the surge in traffic. Tourist cars frequently clog the roads, creating dangerous situations in the cramped alleyways. Residents report that tourists often trespass onto private property, sometimes eating or drinking in their yards.

For fishermen, who rise early and need rest during the day, the constant activity has made it difficult to relax. “I can’t live peacefully anymore,” one resident said, recalling how strangers rolled their suitcases to his front door and spoke loudly in front of his home.

While some locals lament the disruption, others see tourism as a vital lifeline. Ine’s population has halved over the past 35 years, and the town has faced economic decline. Residents note that tourism has spurred the reopening of shops, created jobs, and drawn younger people back to work in the community. “It has become livelier,” said one resident, noting the increase in young business owners.

Still, measures to handle the influx remain limited. Parking lots and traffic control staff have been introduced, but space and resources are constrained.

About a decade ago, the town invested in a multipurpose facility to provide entertainment and workplaces for visitors and returning young people, in an effort to combine community needs with tourism. Yet local officials acknowledge that Ine was never originally a tourist destination and ask for residents’ patience.

The town’s tourism association has begun distributing leaflets to visitors, reminding them that boat houses are not tourist attractions and urging them not to enter private homes. The campaign stresses that Ine is a living community, not an open-air museum.

“We want visitors to understand that people live here, and to enjoy Ine while respecting that,” said one organizer.

For Ine, tourism is both a blessing and a burden—vital for sustaining its shrinking community, yet disruptive to its fragile way of life. With nearly half a million people now arriving each year, the town’s future depends on finding ways for visitors and residents to coexist.
https://newsonjapan.com/article/146993.php

Gatwick second runway plan approved by transport secretary

**Gatwick Second Runway Plan Approved by Transport Secretary**

*By Katy Austin, Transport Correspondent and Jamie Whitehead, BBC News*

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has approved plans for a second runway at London Gatwick Airport, marking a significant step as the government seeks new opportunities for economic growth.

The £2.2 billion privately-financed project essentially involves moving the current Northern Runway 12 metres to bring it into regular use, alongside other developments including terminal expansions. The airport says the plans will create jobs and boost the local economy.

Gatwick currently handles around 280,000 flights annually. The new plan would increase this number to approximately 389,000 flights by the late 2030s. A government source described the plan as a “no-brainer for growth,” adding that it is possible planes could be utilising a new full runway at Gatwick before the next general election.

Located in West Sussex, London Gatwick is currently Europe’s busiest single-runway airport, serving over 40 million passengers a year. The approved plans would add 40,000 more flights before the second runway opens, rising to 70,000 additional flights—nearly 190 per day—once the runway is fully operational. This expansion could see passenger numbers rise to as many as 80 million.

Currently, the Northern Runway is used only for taxiing or as a backup. The new second runway will primarily serve short-haul flights, while freeing up capacity on the main runway for more long-haul services.

The decision to approve the expansion was anticipated in February, when the transport secretary expressed that she was “minded to grant consent” for the Northern Runway planning application. Planning inspectors had raised concerns about the potential impact of the proposals on the surrounding area, including traffic congestion and noise pollution.

In response, in April Gatwick Airport agreed to implement stricter noise controls, an enhanced insulation scheme for nearby residents, and a target of having 54% of air passengers use public transport before the Northern Runway opens. To achieve this, the airport acknowledged that third parties, including the Department for Transport, would need to support the delivery of necessary infrastructure improvements—such as reinstating the full Gatwick Express rail service.

Before the Covid-19 pandemic, the Gatwick Express offered four non-stop trains per hour between the airport and London Victoria. This was reduced to two trains per hour in 2022.

To address road congestion concerns, Gatwick Airport has also proposed a cap on cars on the road if the 54% public transport target is not met prior to the runway’s first use. If neither the target nor the road traffic limit can be achieved, the runway plans would be delayed until £350 million in road improvements are completed. The airport stated this would ensure additional traffic flows can be accommodated without causing congestion.

A government source said, “This government has taken unprecedented steps to get this done, navigating a needlessly complex planning system, which our reforms will simplify in future.” They added, “Any airport expansion must be delivered in line with our legally binding climate change commitments and meet strict environmental requirements.”

However, there is strong opposition to the expansion, particularly from climate campaigners. Following the approval announcement, new Green Party leader Zack Polanski called it a “disaster for the climate crisis.”

In February, Greenpeace UK policy director Douglas Parr argued the extension would not drive economic growth. “The only thing it’s set to boost is air pollution, noise, and climate emissions,” he said.

Alex Chapman, senior economist at the left-leaning think tank New Economics Foundation, also contended the expansion would not create new jobs but rather shift them from other parts of the country. “People are already perfectly able to catch cheap flights on holiday or travel for business,” he added.

Unite the Union general secretary Sharon Graham voiced support for Gatwick having a second runway but cautioned it must come with “guarantees of well-paid, unionised jobs and proper facilities for workers.”

*This article will be updated as further developments occur.*
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9v7rz24z23o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss

Exit mobile version