TLDR Bitcoin treasury inflows fell to just 140 BTC per day, the lowest since June 2023. Institutional demand for Bitcoin slowed significantly after the October 6 price peak. About 25% of public Bitcoin treasury firms trade below their net asset value. Bitcoin’s price stabilization around $110,000 may be impacting institutional buying. Bitcoin treasuries, once seen as a major driver for Bitcoin’s market growth, have sharply reduced their purchases of the cryptocurrency in recent months. The sharp decline in daily inflows of Bitcoin to these firms indicates that the momentum seen earlier this year is waning, with many now questioning the sustainability of the digital asset treasury model. Institutional Demand for Bitcoin Drops Bitcoin digital asset treasuries (DATs) have seen a notable reduction in inflows, reflecting a significant cooling in institutional interest. The seven-day moving average of net daily inflows has dropped to 140 BTC, the lowest since mid-June. This marks a drastic decline from the peak in July, when inflows were as high as 8, 249 BTC, according to data from BitcoinTreasuries. net. In fact, recent daily activity has shown even weaker performance. Out of 15 days in October, 12 days recorded inflows of under 500 BTC, with several days experiencing no inflows at all. This trend suggests that the once-aggressive buying activity from institutional investors has significantly slowed down, possibly due to the current market conditions and uncertainty about Bitcoin’s future price movements. Price Stabilization and Market Consolidation Bitcoin’s price has also cooled after reaching an all-time high of over $126,000 on October 6. Currently, it has stabilized above the $110,000 mark, showing signs of market consolidation. According to market analysts, Bitcoin’s price has been range-bound since June, reflecting a balance between bullish optimism and profit-taking among investors. The stabilization of Bitcoin’s price could be playing a role in the decreased appetite for further acquisitions from firms holding digital asset treasuries. As the market experiences this phase of consolidation, the likelihood of significant price jumps in the short term appears to be decreasing, which may reduce the urgency for institutions to increase their holdings. Challenges Faced by Bitcoin Treasury Firms The business model behind Bitcoin treasuries relies heavily on borrowing fiat to acquire Bitcoin, betting that its price will continue to rise. However, this model faces several challenges, particularly the lack of inherent yield from Bitcoin itself. Unlike stocks or bonds, Bitcoin does not generate any regular income for its holders. Therefore, for companies that have borrowed funds to buy Bitcoin, the value of their holdings needs to appreciate significantly to justify the cost of the debt. For many digital asset treasury firms, this has resulted in a dilemma. They are exposed to potential market downturns and may face difficulties if Bitcoin’s price fails to continue rising. As a result, firms that once issued stock or debt to fund Bitcoin purchases now risk seeing their market valuations drop, especially as Bitcoin prices have shown signs of stabilizing or even declining. As NYDIG points out, the relationship between a firm’s net asset value (NAV) and its stock price is closely tied to Bitcoin’s price. A downtrend in Bitcoin could see firms’ market value fall below the value of the Bitcoin they hold. Market Sentiment and the Future of Digital Asset Treasuries While Bitcoin’s price recovery earlier in the year spurred a wave of institutional interest, the recent slowdown in treasury inflows may signal a shift in market sentiment. Moreover, some publicly traded Bitcoin treasury firms are now facing a situation where they trade below their NAV, meaning the value of their stock is less than the Bitcoin they hold. According to NYDIG, this development is concerning, as the premiums tied to Bitcoin’s price may evaporate in a market downturn. Approximately one in four of these publicly traded DATs now trade below their NAV, further highlighting the potential risks these firms face as Bitcoin’s market outlook remains uncertain. In the face of these challenges, it remains to be seen whether Bitcoin treasuries can continue to grow or if institutional interest in them will decline further. The recent reduction in inflows is a sign that firms may be reevaluating their strategies and waiting for clearer market signals before making further Bitcoin purchases.
https://coincentral.com/bitcoin-treasury-inflows-drop-to-lowest-levels-since-mid-june-2023/
Author: admin
Corn Trading Steady on Thursday Morning
Corn futures are holding steady on Thursday morning, with contracts remaining close to unchanged. On Wednesday, the corn market saw gains of 3 to 4 cents across most contracts. Preliminary open interest slipped by 6,238 contracts on Wednesday, signaling some shorts covering.
The CmdtyView national average cash corn price rose by 3¾ cents to $3.74.
Due to the Monday holiday, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) data release has been postponed to Thursday. Market watchers will be closely monitoring whether ethanol production can continue its recent rebound. Normally, Export Sales data would be released on Friday; however, the ongoing government shutdown has suspended this update. Traders estimate that corn bookings ranged between 0.9 to 2 million metric tons (MMT) for the week ending October 9.
In international news, two separate South Korean importers purchased a combined total of 269,000 metric tons of corn in private tenders on Wednesday. No official origins were listed for these purchases.
Corn Contract Closing Prices:
– December 2025 corn closed at $4.16¾, up 3¾ cents and is currently unchanged.
– Nearby cash corn was $3.74, up 3¾ cents.
– March 2026 corn closed at $4.32¼, up 3 cents and is currently unchanged.
– May 2026 corn closed at $4.41, up 3 cents and is currently up ¼ cent.
Disclaimer: As of the date of publication, Austin Schroeder does not hold positions, either directly or indirectly, in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data are provided solely for informational purposes. For more details, please refer to the [Barchart Disclosure Policy](https://www.barchart.com/disclosure).
Additional news from Barchart:
– Grain Traders React to Unexpected Deterioration in U.S.-China Relations
– Five Things to Watch for a Turnaround
– Will Cotton Ever Rally?
– As China Shuns U.S. Agricultural Products, Make This One Trade Now
– Corn and Soybean Bulls Faced Challenges Last Week: What to Watch Next
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.
https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/corn-trading-steady-thursday-morning
Chaos in one city shows what all of Trump’s America may soon become
On Tuesday, here in Chicago, America caught a glimpse of its possible future, and it was terrifying.
Federal agents, dressed like soldiers and armed with the weapons of war, rammed a civilian vehicle on 105th Street, using a maneuver outlawed by Chicago police, and then fired tear gas into a crowd of bystanders and local officers. The air filled with smoke and screams as parents fled with babies in their arms, teenagers were slammed to the pavement, and a young girl was struck in the head by a gas canister. One boy was detained for hours, denied his rights, his family left in the dark.
This was not a foreign regime or some distant “law-and-order” fantasy. It was an American city, in broad daylight, and it looked more like a militarized crackdown in a third-world dictatorship than traditional American law enforcement.
The question we have to ask is simple and chilling: Is this America that we are becoming, one where democracy dies behind clouds of tear gas?
Trump’s secret police are trying to provoke riots in the streets to justify a harsh crackdown on dissent and the Democratic Party. They’re kicking in doors and dragging screaming American citizen children into the cold night. They’re shooting priests in the head with pepperballs. And they say it’s all to “make America great again.”
Again?!? Like in 1861?
Trump and today’s Republican Party aren’t offering something new. They’re simply resurrecting the old Confederacy, dressing it up in the trappings of modern politics and media. Strip away the slogans and the tweets and you can see the same architecture: oligarchy instead of democracy, hierarchy instead of pluralism, the rule of the white wealthy few over the many.
This isn’t nostalgia for Dixie so much as a deliberate effort to bring back the very systems that tore our nation apart the last time the morbidly rich tried to end our democratic republic and replace it with an early fascist form of neo-feudalism.
At the heart of the old Confederacy was oligarchy, as I laid out in *The Hidden History of American Oligarchy.* A tiny elite of plantation owners controlled politics, law, and the economy across the entire region; by the mid-1850s democracy in the Old South was entirely dead. That same racist, fascist goal appears to animate today’s GOP, which fights tooth and nail to defend the interests of white people, billionaires, and giant corporations while undermining any effort to preserve genuine democracy.
Taxes on the morbidly rich are cut to the bone, while working people and the professional middle class carry the burden. Government subsidies flow to “friends of the administration,” while towns, industries, and communities that cross political leaders are punished with the withdrawal of federal support and attacks by ICE.
Racism, too, is baked into the GOP’s contemporary model. The Confederacy was built on human enslavement and white supremacy. Today’s Republican project echoes that same spirit by targeting immigrants, demonizing Black people (even in the military, per “Whiskey Pete” Hegseth), restricting voting rights in communities of color, and maintaining a system of informal but organized apartheid.
Housing segregation, school funding disparities, and the over-policing of Black and Hispanic neighborhoods today accomplish the same results as the old Jim Crow laws, just through different mechanisms.
Male supremacy is also apparently central to the new GOP Confederate order. Back in the day, women were property under the law, and patriarchy was woven into both religion and politics. The modern right’s war on reproductive freedom and equal rights for women is an almost perfect parallel. A woman’s autonomy and economic power, in their worldview, must always be subordinate to the demands of men and to a rigid religious orthodoxy.
The old Confederacy depended on cheap labor, and when it couldn’t enslave outright it invented systems like debt peonage and sharecropping. Today’s Republicans defend the use of prison slave labor, which is still constitutionally permitted under the 13th Amendment and most heavily deployed in Red states. They attack unions, push gig work without benefits, and refuse to raise minimum wages, ensuring that working people remain trapped in low-wage jobs without bargaining power.
The plantation economy itself was a form of monopoly: vast estates swallowed up smaller farms and drove independent competitors under to the point where a few hundred families controlled most of the region’s economy by the 1860s. Today the GOP defends monopolistic corporate power in much the same way, blocking antitrust efforts and encouraging consolidation across agriculture, media, energy, retail, insurance, medicine, and technology. Small business is starved out by giants, just as yeoman farmers in the South were once pushed off their land by the spread of the slave plantations.
The Confederacy was also defined by its propaganda. By the mid-1850s, virtually every anti-slavery or pro-democracy newspaper in the South had been shut down. Writers and publishers were imprisoned, hanged, or fled north to survive. What passed for “news” was propaganda controlled by morbidly rich elites.
Today, billionaire-owned Fox “News” and a constellation of billionaire-funded right-wing outlets play the same role, drowning out dissent and feeding a steady diet of disinformation to keep people angry and loyal. The very idea of objective truth has disintegrated in Republican-adjacent spaces as propaganda replaces journalism.
Another parallel is the fascist ideal of a mythic past. The Confederacy glorified a “golden age” of white rule and slave labor. When defeat came, the Lost Cause mythology grew up to claim victimhood and sanctify the old order. Trumpism and today’s GOP use the same trick. They conjure visions of an imagined past when “real Americans” controlled everything, erasing the ugly realities while promising “a return to greatness” if only people will give them absolute power.
The Confederacy’s legal system was never neutral. It protected the rich and powerful, treating enslaved people and poor whites as expendable, and punishing any who resisted. Today’s Republican project is similarly defined by a two-tier justice system. Elites like Tom Homan who back the movement are shielded, while dissenters and critics like James Comey are punished. Judges and even military lawyers are now carefully chosen for loyalty, not fairness, ensuring the law remains a weapon for the GOP to use rather than an instrument of justice.
Authoritarian capture of the military and judiciary today mirrors the way slave states stacked courts to defend slavery and property rights over liberty.
The Confederacy was also sustained by religious fundamentalism. Pastors preached that slavery was God’s will, and dissenters were driven out of the churches. In our time, white Christian nationalism functions the same way, sanctifying hierarchy and obedience while insisting based on lies about the Founders that religion must dictate law. The goal is not faith but control, and theology is being twisted into a tool for political power.
The Confederacy used culture war censorship to keep people ignorant. Teaching enslaved people to read was outlawed, abolitionist literature was banned, and abolitionist or pro-democracy speakers risked their lives if they crossed into the South. Today’s book bans and restrictions on curriculum are the modern equivalent. History is rewritten, ideas are suppressed, and young people are denied a full education to make sure they grow up docile and misinformed.
Violence has always been the enforcer of these systems. The Confederacy depended on slave patrols, irregular militias, and paramilitary terror to keep people in line. Reconstruction was undone by Klan terror and mob violence. Today’s GOP movement relies on heavily armed militias including ICE, groups like the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, and vigilante intimidation at polls and protests. The parallels are unmistakable: raw political power backed by the threat of force.
There is also the matter of dynastic families. The old South’s leadership was concentrated among interrelated planter aristocrats who controlled politics for generations. In modern America, political dynasties and billionaire networks serve the same role. Power is concentrated within circles of interlocking families and interests who use money, media, and influence to entrench their rule.
Regional economic hostage-taking was another weapon of the Confederacy. By controlling cotton exports and key resources, Southern elites tried to force concessions from the North and from Britain. Today, Republican leaders use their grip on energy, agriculture, and shipping industries in much the same way, holding national policy hostage to their own demands. Blue parts of the nation are told to bend or else face disruption in fuel, food, or logistics, and other nations’ leaders must publicly kiss Trump’s ass and give his children billions to avoid punishing tariffs.
The Confederacy also merged state power with its ruling economic class. Planters not only owned the land and the labor but controlled local courts, militias, and legislatures. Today, corporate monopolies and billionaire oligarchs have similarly captured our federal government and legislatures in the former Confederate states. The state becomes an extension of private wealth, fusing corporate and political power into a single apparatus of control.
Even in foreign policy, the parallels hold. The Confederacy was isolationist abroad, seeking recognition only to preserve its oligarchic order, but inwardly it was aggressive, unleashing violence on its own people. Trumpism follows the same pattern. International alliances are abandoned, democratic norms abroad are derided, while at home the state turns its power inward against dissenters and marginalized groups.
All of these threads tie together into a single tapestry.
As Barry Goldwater or John McCain would have been the first to tell you, what Trump and the GOP are selling today is not new and not even remotely conservative in any meaningful sense. It’s the Confederate model updated for the 21st century: a system of oligarchy, racism, patriarchy, cheap labor, monopoly, propaganda, religious control, violence, censorship, judicial capture, and economic extortion.
Trump, Vance, Miller, Johnson, and their GOP cronies aren’t looking forward to a better and freer future but backward to a mythic past where a narrow wealthy white male elite could rule unchecked.
The danger is not simply that Trump may win an election, or that Republicans may pass bad laws. The danger is that this model of governance, rooted in the Confederacy and refined by generations of oligarchs, is becoming normalized across the Red states and increasingly in the federal government. Under Trump, today’s Republican Party has become feudalistic, pseudo-royalist, and anti-democratic, and proclaims that they always will be.
America fought both a Civil War and a World War to defeat this system of government, and now we’re confronting it again here at home as the GOP slides deeper and deeper into autocratic capture.
The question today is whether we still have the clarity and courage to defeat it again, not with cannons and bayonets, but with ballots, organizing, and a renewed commitment to the democratic ideals that Confederates then and now have always hated and feared the most.
See you on No Kings Day!
https://www.rawstory.com/raw-investigates/2674196060/
For Mainers impacted by gun violence, red flag referendum is personal
James LaPlante remembers hearing how Robert Card was experiencing paranoia in the months before he killed 18 people and injured a dozen more in the Lewiston mass shooting. It sounded familiar.
Three years earlier, LaPlante’s brother, Stephen, was worried his friends were spreading lies that he was a pedophile and that a grocery store clerk who giggled was in on the rumor. Card had made similar claims to friends and family.
LaPlante contacted police after his brother started stockpiling guns, but police said there wasn’t enough evidence for them to intervene, and LaPlante was unable to get his brother the help he needed to stop him from acting on his worst impulses. In 2020, Stephen died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.
His brother’s death is the reason LaPlante now supports a red flag law in Maine—a proposal that would allow family members, in addition to police, to initiate a weapons removal process if a person poses a risk to themselves or others. The law also would eliminate the requirement in Maine’s existing yellow flag law that a person first be taken into custody for a mental health evaluation.
“The big thing for the red flag law for me is it enables family members to take action,” said LaPlante, who lives in South Portland. “And family members are the ones who are going to know if someone is in a mental health crisis.”
—
### Growing Support for Red Flag Laws in Maine
LaPlante is among dozens of Mainers who have pleaded with lawmakers over the last two years for stronger gun control. After the Legislature failed to take up a red flag proposal last year in the aftermath of the Lewiston mass shooting, gun safety advocates organized a signature gathering campaign to get a citizen’s initiative on the ballot.
That measure will now go to voters statewide on Nov. 4 as **Question 2**.
Many people directly impacted by gun violence support a red flag law—family members like LaPlante, friends who have lost loved ones to gun suicides, survivors of the Lewiston shooting, and victims of other crimes involving firearms.
Opponents, some of whom also survived the mass shooting, say it weakens due process for gun owners and have argued that a red flag law already in place in 21 other states would not have prevented what happened in Lewiston.
“They could have used the yellow flag here in Maine and they never did,” Destiny Johnson, a Lewiston survivor, says in a campaign video released this week urging people to vote no on Question 2.
—
### ‘It Could Have Allowed Me to Go to the Courts’
LaPlante encouraged his brother to move in with their mother in Naples after he got caught up in drugs and was “hanging with the wrong crowd” in Massachusetts, where the brothers had grown up.
At one point, he said, Stephen was voluntarily committed to a mental hospital after attempting suicide. The move to Maine was good for Stephen at first, LaPlante said, but he still struggled with bipolar disorder that prevented him from working. His mental health worsened when the pandemic hit.
He stopped playing guitar and started focusing on collecting replica and BB guns, and eventually real firearms.
“During COVID, his paranoid ideations very quickly went to, ‘Society is going to collapse and I have to be ready for it, and people are after my stuff,’” LaPlante said. “He started to just amass weapons.”
LaPlante said he got particularly concerned after his brother woke their mother up in the middle of the night while he was on the roof with a rifle looking for people he thought were coming to take their belongings.
Around the same time, he said Stephen became convinced friends of his from Massachusetts were spreading rumors that he was a pedophile.
“Being in that scenario was really hard,” LaPlante said. “I felt stuck.”
LaPlante said he contacted police but was told there wasn’t much they could do unless Stephen committed a crime.
In his research on the yellow flag law, which had just taken effect in July 2020, he found that police were struggling to arrange the mental health assessments needed to confiscate firearms. Stephen died in September.
LaPlante said he believes the outcome could have been different had a red flag law been in place.
“It could have allowed me to go to the courts and say as a family member that I’m concerned he has been suicidal in the past,” he said.
Supporters of the red flag law say it could be especially helpful in reducing firearm suicides, and research has shown that red flag laws in other states can be an effective part of suicide prevention.
—
### Lewiston Survivors’ Views
While police initially struggled to connect with medical practitioners to conduct the required mental health assessments in the early days of the yellow flag law, a telehealth contract with the Portland nonprofit behavioral health provider Spurwink has since helped streamline the process.
Then, a state investigation into the Lewiston shooting—which found the yellow flag law could have been used by law enforcement— increased awareness and training among police, and its use has skyrocketed.
State officials recently announced the law has been used more than 1,000 times, all but 81 of those coming after the Oct. 25, 2023, mass shooting.
But some survivors still say a red flag law would be beneficial.
Among the most vocal is Arthur Barnard, whose son Artie Strout was killed at Schemengees Bar & Grille. Barnard has lobbied at the State House in favor of the law and last month appeared in an ad on behalf of the Yes on Question 2 campaign.
“Nobody knows if a family member is off-kilter faster than a family member,” Barnard said in an interview. “I believe that. Who knows that person better than their family?”
Jennifer Zanca of Auburn, who was shot in the left shoulder at Schemengees, is also in favor of a red flag law.
Zanca said that while she generally favored gun safety laws prior to the shooting, it made her think harder about what can be done to prevent such violence.
“I just feel like what we’re doing is not working,” she said. “It’s getting worse.”
The red flag proposal offers a more streamlined alternative and gives families a way to remove weapons from a person in crisis, she said.
“I feel safe knowing there are laws in place to take away guns from people who are having a mental health crisis, or who have gone psychotic and their family members see that,” Zanca said.
She was part of a group of four friends who went to Schemengees for dinner following a golf outing the night of the shooting. Among them was Johnson, the woman who recently appeared in the video for Protect Maine − No Red Flag, a group opposing Question 2 that is led by the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine with a powerful lobby.
In testimony before the Legislature last spring, Johnson elaborated on her opposition to a red flag law, saying Mainers need to be able to defend themselves in public places.
“Why would the state of Maine put a red flag law in place now, when they never enforced the yellow flag law to begin with?” she said in written testimony.
—
### Is Maine’s Current Law Enough?
David Trahan, executive director of the Sportsman’s Alliance, who worked with Gov. Janet Mills to pass the yellow flag law, is a leading opponent of Question 2.
He said he empathizes with anyone impacted by gun violence, including the many victims and survivors who have testified to lawmakers in support of a red flag law.
“But I’d love to sit down and talk with some of them because I believe our (yellow flag) law is better than red flag, and so does the governor, and so do state police,” Trahan said, referring to Mills’ and Maine State Police’s opposition to the red flag proposal.
State police have said that family members can already initiate weapons removal by contacting law enforcement and have expressed concerns that it will be more dangerous for them to try and remove weapons because the changes could mean someone is not already in protective custody when police go to remove their guns.
Supporters of the red flag law refute the idea that weapons removal would be more dangerous, saying law enforcement have inherently dangerous jobs and red flag laws are already working safely in several other states.
Mills has said that the yellow flag law, which she helped draft with gun rights and safety groups, has already proven effective, while also protecting Second Amendment rights. She has argued it’s important for police to be involved in navigating what can be a confusing court process and that it’s the responsibility of law enforcement, not private citizens, to protect the public.
—
### Advocates Speak Out
LaPlante says he doesn’t see the option to use red flag as something that would be burdensome for family members and said it is set up to work more quickly than the existing law.
“You’re giving people the opportunity to seek help,” LaPlante said. “That’s not a burden.”
He and other proponents acknowledge that it’s not a guarantee to prevent a loved one’s suicide or another mass shooting, and point out that there are other steps Maine could also take to improve gun safety, such as closing background check loopholes and improving access to mental health care.
But they said it’s a step in the right direction and that there’s no harm in giving families the choice of another tool.
“This law is about preventing gun tragedies and saving lives,” said Judi Richardson, whose daughter, Darien Richardson, died after she was shot in a home invasion in Portland in 2010.
Richardson and her husband, Wayne, are gun owners who didn’t think too much about whether Maine’s laws could be improved prior to their daughter being killed, she said.
Then they started connecting with other families around the country who had been impacted by gun violence, and said it opened their eyes to the need for change.
While the home invasion and homicide are still unsolved, Richardson said she can’t say if a red flag law would have helped in her daughter’s case. But she said it can generally improve safety.
“It may not pertain in my situation, but if we can prevent other injuries and deaths, that’s what we’re advocating for,” Richardson said.
https://www.sunjournal.com/2025/10/16/for-mainers-impacted-by-gun-violence-red-flag-referendum-is-personal/
ICE activity in Carpentersville outside village hall, near Dundee-Crown High School
Agents from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement were present outside Carpentersville Village Hall on Wednesday. This information was shared through social media posts by the local police department.
https://www.dailyherald.com/20251016/news/ice-activity-in-carpentersville-outside-village-hall-near-dundee-crown-high-school/
Multiply Group kondigt plannen aan om 2PointZero en Ghitha Holding over te nemen via aandelenruil
ABU DHABI, Verenigde Arabische Emiraten – Multiply Group (ADX: MULTIPLY), de in Abu Dhabi gevestigde investeringsmaatschappij die wereldwijd investeert in en actief is in verschillende bedrijven, heeft vandaag bekendgemaakt dat haar raad van bestuur een voorstel heeft goedgekeurd om 2PointZero en Ghitha Holding over te nemen via een aandelenruiltransactie.
Volgens de voorgestelde voorwaarden zou Multiply Group aandelen aanbieden om 2PointZero en Ghitha Holding over te nemen, gev…
Ricky Saints Shares Emotional Update After WWE Loses To TNA Wrestling
WWE Superstar Ricky Saints (formerly known as Ricky Starks) recently took to social media to share an emotional message with his fans. The 35-year-old is currently a champion in the Stamford-based promotion and is quickly becoming a popular name in World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE).
At the NXT No Mercy event, Ricky Saints defeated Oba Femi to capture the NXT Championship, marking a significant milestone in his career. However, just days after this big win, Saints faced a tough loss in a major match.
Saints teamed up with Je’Von Evans, Myles Borne, and Trick Williams to represent WWE’s black and silver brand against TNA Wrestling’s Frankie Kazarian, Leon Slater, Mike Santana, and Moose at the NXT vs. TNA Showdown. Both teams delivered an incredible performance inside the ring, but the bout ultimately ended in favor of Kazarian’s team, resulting in a loss for WWE.
Following these events, Ricky Saints took to Instagram to celebrate a personal milestone. In his post, the 35-year-old revealed that he wrestled his first match fourteen years ago. Reflecting on his journey, Saints shared that despite the highs and lows, he wouldn’t change a thing.
He wrote:
_”I’m a day early, but I had my first match 14 years ago and I’ve never looked back. Thus far, I’ve had an incredible journey with high highs and some low lows, and I wouldn’t change anything. I am who I am because I kept going. May I be blessed to continue for some other odd years. I continue to be the wrestler and man 7-year-old me would enjoy (He loves the pose, prolly). Take every picture and know we all eventually will have to eat sh*t sometime, just make the most of it. It’ll make for a great story over a glass of tequila, I promise #Absolute.”_
You can check out his Instagram post [here](#).
In addition to his fans, notable WWE figures have shown support for Saints’ accomplishments. After Ricky Saints captured the NXT Championship by defeating Oba Femi, Cody Rhodes took to X/Twitter to send a congratulatory message. The American Nightmare hyped up Saints’ victory with a simple yet powerful two-word message: “Champ Rick.”
Looking ahead, it will be interesting to see what WWE legend Shawn Michaels has planned for Ricky Saints’ future on WWE’s developmental brand, NXT. With his growing popularity and recent successes, Saints is undoubtedly a star to watch in the coming months.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/wwe/news-ricky-saints-shares-emotional-update-after-wwe-loses-to-tna-wrestling
Tommy Fleetwood gets candid about yoga and meditation at the DP World India Championship 2025
Tommy Fleetwood is competing in Delhi this week at the DP World India Championship 2025.
The Englishman enters the DP World Tour event fresh off his recent successes, including wins at the Tour Championship and the Ryder Cup.
Fans will be watching closely to see if Fleetwood can continue his impressive form in this prestigious tournament.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/golf/news-tommy-fleetwood-gets-candid-yoga-meditation-dp-world-india-championship-2025
Virat Kohli & Rohit Sharma bat together in the nets ahead of AUS vs IND 2025 ODIs [Watch]
Team India stalwarts Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma were spotted batting side by side in adjacent nets ahead of the first ODI against Australia.
The practice session took place on Thursday, October 16, as both players geared up for the important match. Fans and experts alike eagerly anticipate their performance, hoping the duo’s preparation will translate into a strong start for India in the series.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/cricket/news-virat-kohli-rohit-sharma-bat-together-nets-ahead-aus-vs-ind-2025-odis-watch
CAC Rises After Government Survives No-confidence Votes
French stocks are trading in positive territory on Thursday, lifting the benchmark CAC 40 to an eight-month high. The market sentiment remains firm following the French government’s survival of no-confidence votes.
France’s reappointed Prime Minister, Sébastien Lecornu, successfully survived successive no-confidence votes in the National Assembly today. His narrow victory was secured thanks to sufficient support from moderates, helping to avert a second government collapse in as many weeks. Lecornu’s offer to suspend an unpopular pension reform played a key role in swaying the opposition Socialists, providing his government with a crucial lifeline in the deeply fragmented chamber.
The CAC 40 index was up 55.75 points, or 0.69%, at 8,132.75 a few minutes ago.
In the stock-specific developments, Pernod Ricard is climbing 3.7%. After a challenging first quarter, the French spirits maker expects sales to improve in fiscal year 2026. For the first quarter, Pernod Ricard recorded sales of EUR 2.384 billion, down from EUR 2.783 billion during the same period last year.
Other notable gainers include EssilorLuxottica, up 2.3%, while Michelin, Edenred, Thales, and Renault are up between 1.6% and 1.8%. Legrand, Societe Generale, Schneider Electric, Sanofi, Safran, STMicroElectronics, Publicis Groupe, and Stellantis saw increases ranging from 1% to 1.2%.
On the downside, Kering is declining by about 1.6%. Bouygues, Euronext, and Hermes International are down between 0.4% and 0.8%, while ArcelorMittal is down marginally.
*Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Nasdaq, Inc.*
https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/cac-rises-after-government-survives-no-confidence-votes
