Standard Chartered CEO Predicts Blockchain Settlement for All Transactions

Standard Chartered CEO Bill Winters announced on November 3 that both the bank and Hong Kong SAR leadership foresee eventual blockchain settlement for all transactions and full currency digitization. Winters’ statement underscores a strong institutional and governmental commitment to blockchain technology, which could drive significant shifts in financial markets and impact cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum amid global digital currency trends.

This bold prediction highlights Standard Chartered’s strategic alignment with governmental agendas, positioning the bank for potential first-mover advantages as blockchain frameworks become widespread. However, no public fund allocations or new projects were explicitly announced alongside this statement.

Geoffrey Kendrick, Head of Digital Assets Research at Standard Chartered, shared his outlook: “I would expect at least another $20 billion by year-end [in Bitcoin ETF inflows], a number which would make my $200,000 year-end forecast possible.”

**Blockchain Adoption’s Broader Financial Implications**

Did you know? Standard Chartered’s move echoes previous blockchain adoptions by global financial institutions, including pilot programs from BlackRock and JPMorgan. These developments reinforce the ongoing transition toward digital assets and signify a growing institutional embrace of blockchain technology.

According to CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin (BTC) is currently priced at $107,904.20, with a market capitalization of $2,152,011,730,482 and a dominance of 59.53%. It has experienced a 1.90% drop over the last 24 hours, contributing to a 5.56% decrease over the past 90 days. Meanwhile, trading volume surged by 71.14%, indicating an active and dynamic trading environment.

As blockchain integration gains momentum, the financial landscape is poised for transformation, with digital currencies and decentralized technologies playing increasingly central roles.
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/blockchain/standard-chartered-ceo-predicts-blockchain-settlement-for-all-transactions/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=standard-chartered-ceo-predicts-blockchain-settlement-for-all-transactions

Football outlasted by Penn in 28-21 loss

Despite rallying in the second half, the Brown football team (3-4, 0-4 Ivy) fell 28-21 to Penn (5-2, 3-1) on Halloween. Following an encouraging 3-1 start to the season, the Bears have slid to three consecutive losses and have yet to defeat an Ivy League opponent.

The Quakers put up 21 first-half points, jumping out to an early multiple-possession lead they never relinquished.

“I think we have to look at some ways to start a little faster,” Head Coach James Perry ’00 said in a post-game interview. “There was a stretch of really good football that we played… but we started the game poorly.”

Although Brown’s first drive started with an explosive play—receiver Trevor Foley ’28 high-pointed a one-on-one ball for 35 yards on the second play from scrimmage—movement quickly stalled. Facing a fourth-and-7 at Penn’s 28-yard line, quarterback James Murphy ’27 forced the ball into tight coverage. Penn defensive back Jayden Drayton tipped the ball into the air. His teammate, Josh Narcisse, snatched it and found a running lane, returning the ball for 30 yards.

The Quakers capitalized on the mistake, strategically plodding downfield with a stack of short gains. A low bullet by Penn quarterback Liam O’Brien sent his offense to the 1-yard line, where tailback Donte West took a run up the gut to create a 7-0 Penn lead.

The Bears did not let that slide. In just five plays, the offense moved to Penn’s 44-yard line, where the receiving corps put their stamp on the drive. Securing Murphy’s toss on a short crossing route, Ty Pezza ’26 cruised toward the goal line, running along the left hash. A firm red-zone block by Foley ensured Pezza remained untouched en route to tying up the match.

Continuing Penn’s attack, O’Brien conducted another strong performance. In 10 plays, the Quakers moved 70 yards downfield and across the goal line. A 21-yard rush by O’Brien propelled Penn to Bruno’s 9-yard line, and on the very next play, the Quakers scored on a completion to Bisi Owens.

After a quick response to Penn’s first touchdown, the Bears stalled on offense after the second. Creating only one first down, Brown faced a third-and-8 on their own 36-yard line. Rolling right, Murphy was chased by Quaker defenders and was forced to throw the ball away. A punt followed, sending the ball back to Penn.

Once more, a deftly designed charge put the Quakers into the end zone. After gradual movement to their own 48-yard line, Penn ramped up the intensity. O’Brien completed a 19-yard pass, then a 24-yarder, then an 8-yard checkdown to the 1-yard line. From there, running back Sean Williams Jr. leapt through a gap between Bruno’s defensive line, giving the Quakers a 21-7 advantage.

Suddenly facing a two-score uphill climb, Bruno’s offense was revived. Moving the sticks in two plays or less, Murphy completed each of his five pass attempts throughout the drive, taking the Bears to Penn’s 24-yard line. On a third-and-5, Brown turned to the passing game once more. Murphy put up a one-on-one ball for Solomon Miller ’26, who head-tapped his defender en route to the end zone.

For a breathtaking moment, Brown had sliced the lead in half. But then an offensive pass interference penalty dashed Bruno’s hopes, leading to yet another punt.

Penn’s drive to close out the half went 65 yards but the Quakers ultimately came up short after missing a 51-yard field goal, heading into halftime with a 14-point lead.

Coming out of the locker room, Bruno showed increased energy. After the Quakers managed to move the ball to Brown’s 32-yard line, the Bears’ defense took a stand. Ivy League sack leader Ike Odimegwu ’27 got to O’Brien on second down, and on third down, the defensive front kept up the pressure. Owen Clarke ’26 blew through a hole in the offensive line, and in a last-ditch attempt to escape a sack, O’Brien released a wayward pass. The ball drifted just above the head of running back Tommy Lafayette and into the waiting hands of Bruno linebacker John Perdue ’26.

Wasting no time, the Bears’ offense capitalized on the sudden turnover. Their second snap resulted in a 16-yard reception at the left sideline for Miller. Just a few plays later, on a third-and-15, tight end Levi Linowes ’27 found a seam, received the ball in stride, and held off a Penn defender to reach the Quakers’ 8-yard line.

On fourth down, after Penn stopped three consecutive goal-to-go attempts, Bruno unveiled some Halloween trickery. Before the snap, receiver Najih Rahman ’27 went in motion from the slot position. After passing in front of Murphy, he circled into the backfield, running a swing route to the right. Catching Murphy’s pitch, Rahman feigned a run before tossing a touchdown pass to Pearson Hill ’28.

Reflecting on Brown’s second-half start, Perry said, “I’m really proud of the guys, how we came out in the second half, how they worked, how they stuck together.”

But Penn had no intention of allowing Bruno to close the gap. On their first series, the Quakers caught the Bears off-guard on a third-down run, and Williams broke free, dashing 40 yards to the 1-yard line. Another rushing touchdown pushed Penn’s lead to 28-14.

On the subsequent kickoff, a flag for an invalid fair catch signal set the Bears back to their own 11-yard line. Undeterred, Murphy began his offense’s journey downfield. Aided by consecutive quick strikes to Pezza, a 15-yard roughing-the-passer penalty, and a 25-yard toss to Foley, the Bears reached Penn’s red zone. But there, the Quakers’ defensive front stood tall, forcing a fourth-and-10.

Drew Crabtree ’29 took the field for a 28-yard field goal attempt, but his kick sailed wide left, taking Bruno’s momentum with it.

The next three drives resulted in punts—two for Penn and one for Brown—taking valuable time off the game clock. When the Bears’ offense emerged for another drive, only eight minutes remained.

Following a second-down sack, on third-and-19, Foley created the contest’s premier play. Pinned against the right sideline and facing a high-arcing ball, Foley extended his right arm into the night sky while falling backwards, corralling the ball with just one palm. The play was later named SportsCenter’s top highlight of the day.

Energized by the miraculous grab, Brown eagerly bounded downfield toward the goal line. From Penn’s 14-yard line, Murphy delivered to Foley, who fought off Quaker defenders and lunged onto the navy turf of the end zone. Suddenly, the Bears were only one score behind and poised to endanger Penn’s once-assured victory.

But for a final time, the Quakers’ offense drove convincingly. Winding down the clock, Penn collected first down after first down, eventually progressing all the way to Brown’s 1-yard line before kneeling out for a victory.

“It’s really easy to be motivated,” Murphy reflected in a post-game interview. “We have three more opportunities to go play football and put it all on the line for the seniors.”

The Bears will be back in action when they host Yale (5-2, 3-1) on Saturday. Kickoff is slated for noon.
https://www.browndailyherald.com/article/2025/11/football-outlasted-by-penn-in-28-21-loss

Polkadot System Chains Upgrade Passes as DOT Tests Lower Bollinger Band Support at $2.88

**Polkadot (DOT) Price Analysis and Market Update**

**Quick Take**
– DOT trading at $2.88, down 2.7% in the last 24 hours
– Unanimous system chains upgrade referendum signals strong community backing
– Price currently testing lower Bollinger Band support at $2.83
– Follows Bitcoin’s weakness amid broader risk-off market sentiment

### Market Events Driving Polkadot Price Movement

This week’s most significant development for Polkadot was the unanimous passage of a referendum to upgrade all system chains and schedule the Asset Hub Migration. This technical advancement highlights robust community consensus and positions the network for enhanced functionality. Despite the current price weakness, this provides a positive fundamental backdrop for DOT.

Polkadot is also set to participate in Hong Kong Fintech Week from November 3-7. This event adds a further layer of institutional exposure, showcasing the network’s interoperability solutions to a global audience, which may prove beneficial for Polkadot’s medium-term outlook.

Conversely, the failure of the Staking Dashboard funding referendum reflects some community friction over resource allocation. However, this had minimal impact on the market.

In the absence of significant breaking news catalysts, DOT’s price action is primarily influenced by technical factors and broader cryptocurrency market sentiment. The token currently faces selling pressure, tracking Bitcoin and other major cryptocurrencies as risk-off sentiment dominates trading decisions.

### DOT Technical Analysis: Testing Critical Support Zone

**Price Action Context**
DOT price currently sits below all major moving averages, trading at $2.88 compared to the 20-day SMA at $3.01 and the 50-day SMA at $3.59. This positioning signals sustained bearish pressure, with the token down approximately 26% from its 52-week high of $5.31.

The price movement indicates that Polkadot is closely following Bitcoin’s weakness rather than exhibiting independent strength. Trading volume on Binance’s spot market reached $14.4 million over 24 hours, reflecting moderate institutional interest but lacking the momentum needed to trigger a sustained reversal.

**Key Technical Indicators**
– The Relative Strength Index (RSI) stands at 38.18, in neutral territory but approaching oversold conditions, which could signal potential for a technical bounce.
– The MACD histogram shows a slight bullish divergence at 0.0218, suggesting weakening selling pressure despite the overall negative MACD value of -0.1722.
– Most importantly, the %B indicator at 0.1532 shows DOT price near the lower Bollinger Band at $2.83, a level that has historically provided support in previous corrections.

### Critical Price Levels for Polkadot Traders

**Immediate Levels (Next 24-48 Hours):**
– **Resistance:** $3.01 (20-day moving average and psychological resistance)
– **Support:** $2.83 (lower Bollinger Band and recent 24-hour low)

**Potential Breakout/Breakdown Scenarios:**
– A break below the $2.83 support level could trigger further selling pressure, pushing the price toward the next major support zone at $2.77. Note that the 52-week low at $2.87 was recently breached.
– Conversely, a successful defense at $2.83 and a move above the $3.01 resistance could open the door for a rally toward the immediate resistance at $3.34.

### DOT Correlation Analysis

– **Bitcoin:** DOT’s price movements are closely correlated with Bitcoin’s bearish momentum, with both assets experiencing similar percentage declines in recent sessions.
– **Traditional Markets:** Risk-off sentiment spilling over from equity markets appears to be weighing on cryptocurrencies broadly.
– **Sector Peers:** Polkadot is currently underperforming some layer-1 competitors, indicating there may be specific selling pressure beyond the general market weakness.

### Trading Outlook: Polkadot Near-Term Prospects

**Bullish Case:**
If DOT can successfully defend the $2.83 lower Bollinger Band support, combined with positive momentum stemming from exposure during Hong Kong Fintech Week, a technical bounce toward $3.01 resistance is possible. Additionally, the unanimous referendum passage provides a supportive fundamental outlook for the medium-term.

**Bearish Case:**
Failure to hold current support levels amid continued Bitcoin weakness could see further declines toward the strong support zone around $2.77. Broader cryptocurrency market sentiment remains fragile, increasing the risk of additional downside.

**Risk Management:**
Traders are advised to consider tight stop-losses below $2.80, given the proximity to critical support. The daily Average True Range (ATR) of $0.23 suggests that position sizing should account for potential daily price swings of approximately 8% in either direction.

*Stay updated with the latest developments as Polkadot navigates a challenging market environment supported by strong community fundamentals.*
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/tech/polkadot-system-chains-upgrade-passes-as-dot-tests-lower-bollinger-band-support-at-2-88/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=polkadot-system-chains-upgrade-passes-as-dot-tests-lower-bollinger-band-support-at-2-88

Investigation underway after driver collides with BSO cruiser in Pompano Beach

POMPANO BEACH, FLA. (WSVN) – A Broward Sheriff’s Office deputy was involved in a crash with a white Jeep in Pompano Beach on Sunday night.

BSO officials responded to the scene at the intersection of Southeast 15th Street and South Federal Highway.

7News cameras captured footage showing debris from the impact scattered across the intersection.

As of late Sunday night, it remains unclear if there were any injuries resulting from the collision.

Please stay tuned to WSVN.com and 7News for the latest updates on this developing story.
https://wsvn.com/news/local/broward/investigation-underway-after-driver-collides-with-bso-cruiser-in-pompano-beach/

Dodgers Victory Parade 2025: Date, Time, Route, Ticket Details, and What to Expect

The Los Angeles Dodgers defeated the Toronto Blue Jays in a thrilling Game 7 of the World Series on Saturday at Rogers Centre, becoming the first team in over two decades to win back-to-back titles. Following their impressive repeat of last year’s heroics, Dodgers fans are eagerly looking forward to celebrating the triumph with the players and the team at their home stadium in California.

### When is the Dodgers Parade 2025?

The Dodgers will celebrate their consecutive World Series titles with a parade and stadium celebration scheduled for Monday afternoon. The festivities will kick off with a 1.7-mile parade starting at 11:00 AM EST from the intersection of Temple Street and Broadway. The parade route is expected to take approximately 45 minutes as the team makes its way to Dodger Stadium.

### Parade and Stadium Celebration Details

Once the parade reaches Dodger Stadium, the players will participate in the official championship celebration. Fans interested in attending the stadium event can purchase tickets, which went on sale Sunday at noon via the Dodgers’ official website. Tickets for the parade itself sold out within an hour, according to reports.

Attendees will be allowed to enter Dodger Stadium starting at 9:00 AM, with the main celebration beginning around 12:15 PM. During the parade, members of the Dodgers will travel atop double-decker buses along the route, greeting fans gathered from across the city.

### Important Notes for Fans

Due to logistical and timing constraints, fans will not be able to attend both the parade and the stadium celebration. The Dodgers have noted that this is to ensure the smooth flow of both events.

For those who cannot attend in person, the parade will be broadcast live on the Dodger Stadium scoreboard, allowing fans inside the ballpark to enjoy the event.

### Transportation and Traffic Information

Fans are strongly encouraged to use public transportation to avoid street congestion. “For the second year in a row, LA Metro is excited to offer safe, affordable, and convenient service to help Angelenos celebrate the World Series Champions Los Angeles Dodgers,” said Metro officials.

Additionally, police will close streets along the parade route starting at 7:00 AM on Monday to facilitate the event safely.

Get ready to cheer on the Dodgers as they celebrate another historic championship in front of their passionate fanbase!
https://www.sportskeeda.com/baseball/news-dodgers-victory-parade-2025-date-time-route-ticket-details-what-expect

Features of some hotel rooms (4,4) Crossword Clue

That should be all the information you need to solve the crossword clue: **Features of some hotel rooms (4, 4)**!

Be sure to check out more clues and answers on our Crossword Answers page for additional help and insights.

*The post Features of some hotel rooms (4, 4) Crossword Clue appeared first on Try Hard Guides.*
https://tryhardguides.com/features-of-some-hotel-rooms-44-crossword-clue/

South Australia Rounds Up Another 55 Suspects After High Court Backs Encrypted-App Sting

Police have filed roughly 800 new charges related to drug trafficking, firearms, and conspiracy offenses as part of Operation Ironside, a major law enforcement investigation targeting organized crime networks.

To date, cryptocurrency seizures connected to the probe total approximately A$58 million (US$37.9 million), according to estimates from the Australian Federal Police (AFP). These assets were traced through wallet addresses and associated accounts, highlighting the significant role that crypto plays in criminal activities uncovered by the investigation.

Operation Ironside originated from an FBI-built encrypted messaging platform called AN0M, which was secretly controlled by law enforcement from 2018 until June 2021. The app was installed on modified phones—stripped of cameras, GPS, and browsers—designed specifically for covert communication among criminal groups. These devices were sold through criminal intermediaries, helping the app quickly spread among drug traffickers, weapons dealers, and money launderers.

Rather than breaking the encryption itself, the FBI implemented a hidden system that captured messages before they were encrypted and transmitted. As the master holder of the encryption keys, the FBI automatically duplicated these messages to secure servers shared with the AFP, enabling authorities to monitor criminal networks in real time.

In Australia alone, at least 1,600 devices were operating with AN0M, with around 19.3 million messages intercepted during the first two waves of the operation. This unprecedented intelligence gathering has been instrumental in building cases against organized crime figures.

The investigation recently saw a significant development in South Australia, where police made 55 arrests over a weekend during the latest phase of Operation Ironside. This progress followed a High Court ruling allowing intercepted AN0M messages to be used as evidence in court. The ruling came after two suspects challenged the legality of the intercepts but were unsuccessful, clearing the way for law enforcement to continue leveraging the collected intelligence.

Deputy Commissioner Linda Williams described the ruling as pivotal, stating that it “paved the way [for us] to go to resolution today.”

While the global law enforcement collaboration, including efforts by Europol, continues to combat increasingly sophisticated criminal use of cryptocurrency, challenges remain. Europol has noted that crypto-related crime is becoming more complex and resource-intensive for police worldwide.

In Australia, despite growing government efforts to regulate cryptocurrency more closely, public mistrust persists due to its association with criminal enterprises uncovered in investigations like Operation Ironside.

Operation Ironside is a joint effort between the Australian Federal Police and the FBI and represents one of the most significant law enforcement operations targeting encrypted criminal communications to date. As the investigation continues, authorities remain committed to dismantling organized crime networks and recovering illicit assets funneled through digital channels.
https://decrypt.co/347136/south-australia-55-suspects-high-court-backs-encrypted-app

Broncos HC Sean Payton Delivers Reality Check About Texans After Win

Denver Broncos head coach Sean Payton did not mince words about the Houston Texans and the specific area his team and staff aimed to attack. They followed through on that plan, leaving the Texans searching for solutions while awaiting further updates on C. J. Stroud’s concussion status.

The Texans entered the game with a 3-4 record and were underdogs despite playing at home. If Houston hopes to salvage its season, paying close attention to Payton’s remarks could be crucial.

### Sean Payton Delivers Critical Reality Check After Broncos Beat Texans

Offense struggled on both sides, resulting in a close 18-15 victory for the Broncos, sealed by a game-winning field goal from kicker Wil Lutz. Despite the tight score, Payton confidently stated that his team “controlled” the trenches defensively.

Houston has faced numerous questions regarding their offensive line, which underwent significant changes during the offseason. On Sunday, the Broncos only outgained the Texans by three yards, yet Payton praised his squad’s efforts.

“I thought we controlled the line of scrimmage, really,” Payton told reporters on November 2. “If you want to know one thing, we controlled the line of scrimmage. We felt like there was a big advantage for us in this game: our front versus their offensive line.”

Payton did concede that the Texans generally began their drives closer to midfield than the Broncos, but his overall message remained strong, especially considering Stroud’s concussion.

### Injuries Complicate Texans’ Offensive Line Troubles

Adding to Houston’s challenges, two starting offensive linemen also left the game with injuries. Right guard Ed Ingram exited early due to a shin injury, while right tackle Tytus Howard was sidelined with a concussion and ruled out during the game.

The Texans have rotated Ingram with Juice Scruggs and replaced Howard with the experienced Blake Fisher, but the injuries certainly impacted their performance.

### DeMeco Ryans Laments Texans’ Shortcomings vs. Broncos

Houston head coach DeMeco Ryans did not hold back in expressing disappointment over his team’s “willpower” in the face of a strong Broncos unit that improved to 7-2 with the win. The Texans now sit at 3-5, grappling with many questions about their future.

Ryans stated bluntly that his team’s effort “wasn’t good enough,” despite battling injuries.

“We were in the red zone multiple times as an offense, there at the 1-yard line. Had multiple opportunities to get it in. That’s just about sheer willpower to me. It’s at the 1-yard line. We got to find a way to displace guys at the line of scrimmage and punch the football in, right? And that’s what it takes in that situation. We didn’t get it done,” Ryans said.

“Multiple other opportunities in the red zone. We came up short, right? We made it in the red zone three times. Like to see us convert and get in the end zone versus a really good Denver team.”

He credited the Broncos’ defense for their strong performance, noting, “They did an outstanding job defensively. They did a good job of getting stops when they needed to get stops.”

Ryans concluded, “We didn’t play well in the red zone. We didn’t play well on third down. So, if you don’t win in those situational, critical moments of the game, it’s going to be hard to win it.”

As the Texans regroup, addressing these issues—particularly in the trenches and red zone—will be vital if they hope to turn their season around.
https://heavy.com/sports/nfl/houston-texans/broncos-payton-reality-check-texans-ryans/

Unfortunate update on MJF’s AEW status after disappearing from TV- Reports

AEW star Maxwell Jacob Friedman (MJF) has been exploring new opportunities beyond the world of professional wrestling.

Over the past year, he has engaged in multiple projects, expanding his presence outside the ring and showcasing his versatility.

Fans can look forward to seeing more of MJF’s endeavors as he continues to grow both in and out of the wrestling industry.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/aew/rumor-unfortunate-update-mjf-s-aew-status-disappearing-tv-reports

10-Minute Challenge: A Vase of Flowers

You made it in time. If you want to look a little longer, just scroll back up and press “Continue.”

There’s a story about an ancient Greek painter named Zeuxis who, in a painting contest with a rival, painted grapes so realistic that birds flew down and tried to eat them. As I looked at these grapes by Margareta Haverman at the Metropolitan Museum of Art last week, I could imagine birds breaking through the ceiling, swooping right in.

A technical analysis of the painting revealed Haverman used up to seven layers of paint on the grapes, some added while the previous layer was still wet, to achieve the effect—evidence of an artist searching for the perfect form. Everywhere your eyes look, they encounter a torrent of detail: the intricate layers of the flower petals, the blushing of the fruit, the patterns on the wings of the bugs, the shine of the water droplets, and the veins on the leaves.

Interestingly, the leaves are bluer now than they would have been in 1716 because the yellow pigment Haverman used faded over time. Even with this bluer cast, there remains a wide range of color: shocking reds, paler blues, bright whites, and deep purples.

You can picture Haverman in her studio with this setup in front of her, looking, sketching, and painting—racing against the clock before her beautiful bouquet wilts and dies. Remember, it’s 1716: she can’t take a photograph.

But that’s not possible.

“This bouquet could never exist in reality,” said Adam Eaker, assistant curator in the Department of European Paintings at the Met. “These flowers don’t bloom at the same time of year, so Haverman would have slowly pieced this work together on the basis of individual studies.”

In all, there are 30 different types of fruit and flowers, two species of butterfly, five other types of insects, and a couple of garden snails. This is one of only two surviving works by Haverman.

Little is known about her life, but we do know she learned these techniques from a highly regarded flower painter, Jan van Huysum.

Take a look at this van Huysum painting from 1715. Can you see the similarities between Haverman (left) and van Huysum (right), particularly in the tulips? Haverman learned fast. She was good. Van Huysum was jealous.

A 1751 biography of the eccentric and secretive van Huysum — who came from a family of painters and wouldn’t even let his brothers see the inside of his studio — notes that Haverman’s “prowess aroused Jan’s envy to such a degree that he longed to be rid of her.”

Female painters were rare and often needed a family connection to enter the field. (Haverman’s father helped persuade van Huysum to take her on.) Many women were relegated to still life painting because they weren’t allowed to study nude models.

Still, Haverman excelled. The same biography notes she learned “not only to copy [van Huysum’s] paintings but also to paint beautifully from life; even to the amazement of connoisseurs, who came to see her work.”

Eventually, van Huysum found a reason to drop her as his student. (It was described at the time as a “misdeed.”)

Haverman’s self-assurance is clear in the decisions she makes in this painting. Notice how the dark background causes that streak of white flowers to push even more to the fore, providing a central anchor for your eye.

Zoom in (you may need to get up close) and you can just make out her signature at the bottom, almost etched into the plinth.

“I love the confidence of her signature and the strange sculptural ornamentation of the vase, lurking in the shadows,” Mr. Eaker said. “I think the signature gives a wonderful sense both of Haverman’s confidence as an artist and her skill at crafting an illusion.”

Flower painting like this was common in the Netherlands. Even a hundred years earlier, artists like Ambrosius Bosschaert the Elder were setting similarly striped tulips in arrangements against landscape backgrounds.

Around this time, in the early 1600s, so-called “tulip mania” hit the Netherlands. In the craze, the price of tulip bulbs was bid up and up—selling in one case for more than a Rembrandt painting—creating what some describe as the first financial bubble.

Eventually, the bubble burst and tulip prices came crashing down, leaving some tulip speculators bankrupt.

Tulip mania was later followed by the hyacinth mania of the 1700s. Haverman included blue and white varieties of hyacinth in our painting.

There’s a temptation to want to extract symbolism or meaning from these flowers. Maybe Haverman painted some parts of this bouquet not at their peak but in decay to remind us of the fragility of life.

“Some flowers do have symbolic meaning, but flower paintings generally weren’t meant to be ‘decoded,’” Mr. Eaker said.

In the end, the bouquet of flowers you bought from the corner store last weekend will die. This painting, with the help of art conservators, will live.

These are objects for close looking and admiration, Mr. Eaker said, “particularly on a cold gray Dutch winter’s day.”
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/11/02/upshot/ten-minute-challenge-flowers.html

Exit mobile version
Sitemap Index