admin - The Latremie Post

Ross Gerber Warns Inflation’s Persistence Diminishes Market Optimism For Stocks And Bonds

In a recent post on X, Ross Gerber shared his cautious outlook on the current market environment. He noted that sellers are stepping in more frequently and described the setup as “hard to be bullish at the moment.” Gerber directly tied this sentiment to inflation, emphasizing that “inflation is real and not going away soon.”

He framed the market shift as a change in who is controlling the tape, with downside activity becoming increasingly visible. According to Gerber, this dynamic makes it tougher for risk assets to find sustained support. He also pushed back against the notion that inflation risks have diminished, insisting that the problem remains persistent. This stance suggests that investors may need to continue factoring “higher-for-longer” inflationary pressures into their portfolio decisions.

### Is Inflation The Ultimate Market Spoiler?

Gerber argued that inflation is not just a macroeconomic talking point but an active constraint on markets. He stated that inflation “is neither good for stocks or bonds,” highlighting a scenario where both major asset classes can struggle simultaneously rather than offset each other. For diversified investors, this complicates the traditional playbook of balancing equity risk with bond exposure.

### Impact of Rising Fuel Prices on Investment Strategies

Gerber’s perspective on inflation aligns closely with his recent comments urging consumers to switch to electric vehicles (EVs) amid soaring fuel prices and escalating tensions in the Middle East. He pointed out that driving a gas-powered car has become “4-5 times more expensive” compared to electric vehicles. With the national average price for gasoline reaching $3.842 per gallon and Brent crude oil prices surging past $108 per barrel, many consumers could save “thousands of dollars a year” by making the switch.

This emphasis on cost-effective alternatives reflects broader economic pressures that complicate investment strategies, reinforcing the notion that inflation impacts both equities and bonds. As Gerber remarked, the current landscape necessitates a reevaluation of portfolio decisions—especially given the persistent inflationary environment that threatens traditional asset class performance.

### How Rising Prices Squeeze Investment Valuations

Higher inflation can pressure stock valuations by raising the bar for earnings growth and keeping discount rates elevated. At the same time, inflation can weigh on bonds by eroding real returns and pushing yields higher as markets reprice inflation expectations.

Gerber’s message focused on the near-term challenge for maintaining bullish positions when inflation shows no signs of easing. While his post did not mention specific companies or provide forecast numbers, it clearly linked the overall market tone to the prevailing inflation backdrop.
https://www.benzinga.com/markets/emerging-markets/26/03/51395923/ross-gerber-warns-inflations-persistence-diminishes-market-optimism-for-stocks-and-bonds

‘Faith. Fight. Freedom: The Legacy of Reverend Jesse Jackson’ explores civil rights icon’s impact

Remembering Reverend Jesse Jackson: A Legacy of Faith, Fight, and Freedom

CHICAGO (WLS) — ABC7 Chicago’s special, Faith. Fight. Freedom: The Legacy of Reverend Jesse Jackson, explores the lasting impact of the late civil rights icon on the world.

As of 2026, many of the giants from the Civil Rights movement have passed on—figures such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., John Lewis, Fannie Lou Hamer, and Rosa Parks, to name just a few. Now, Chicago and the world are saying goodbye to another monumental figure: Reverend Jesse Louis Jackson Sr., one of the last living fathers of the movement.

Reverend Jackson passed away on February 17 after a battle with health issues. ABC7 is honoring his legacy by remembering how he inspired and impacted millions through both his powerful words and unwavering actions.

An hour-long special dedicated to Reverend Jackson will air on ABC7 this Saturday from 6 to 7 p.m.

ABC7 Chicago is also now streaming 24/7. Click here to watch and witness the stories of courage and change that shaped history.

https://abc7chicago.com/post/faith-fight-freedom-legacy-reverend-jesse-jackson-explores-stories-late-civil-rights-icons-impact-world/18747313/

Judge strikes down restrictive Pentagon press policy, finding it violates First Amendment

A federal judge has struck down some of the Defense Department’s strict controls on how journalists with access to the Pentagon are allowed to report, effectively ending a policy that caused many news outlets to leave the Pentagon press pool.

U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman sided with The New York Times and reporter Julian E. Barnes, who sued in December claiming the Pentagon’s new policy violated the First Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, and the due process provision of the Constitution.

### Pentagon’s Controversial Press Access Policy

The Pentagon introduced its new press access policy last fall, requiring credentialed reporters to agree to a series of restrictions in order to maintain daily access to the building. Many major media organizations, including CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, CNN, and Fox News, declined to sign the new rules and stopped working inside the Pentagon on a day-to-day basis.

As a result, the Pentagon’s in-house press corps is now primarily made up of conservative media outlets that accepted the restrictions.

### Judge Friedman’s Ruling

Judge Friedman’s ruling halts some of the most contentious restrictions, including a provision that suggested reporters who “solicit” classified or sensitive information from military personnel could be considered security risks and barred from the building. He also struck down a section of the policy that described Pentagon access as a “privilege” rather than a “right.”

However, some rules remain in place, such as restrictions on where reporters can go inside the Pentagon without an escort.

### Pentagon’s Defense and Journalists’ Concerns

The Pentagon has maintained that it is not forcing reporters to clear their stories with the military, but is instead aiming to protect national security by preventing leaks of highly sensitive information. The military also asserts it has negotiated with news outlets.

Nonetheless, many reporters covering the military, along with the Pentagon Press Association, argued the policy could effectively restrict journalists from interacting with sources without explicit government permission.

### Impact of the Ruling

Judge Friedman ordered the Pentagon to reinstate Barnes’s and several other Times reporters’ press passes and vacated key parts of the policy. The ruling’s impact on other news organizations remains unclear.

In his statement, Friedman acknowledged the importance of protecting national security, troops, and war plans but emphasized the necessity for the public to have access to diverse perspectives about government actions, especially amid recent events like the country’s incursion into Venezuela and ongoing conflict with Iran.

“It is more important than ever that the public have access to information from a variety of perspectives about what its government is doing — so that the public can support government policies, if it wants to support them; protest, if it wants to protest; and decide based on full, complete, and open information who they are going to vote for in the next election,” he said.

### Concerns Over Vague and Discriminatory Restrictions

Friedman found the policy’s restrictions on “soliciting” information to be so vague that journalists could not clearly understand what behavior was prohibited, potentially discouraging them from asking any questions out of fear of losing their credentials.

He also ruled that the policy violated the First Amendment by engaging in viewpoint discrimination, effectively chilling critical speech and seeking to exclude “disfavored journalists.”

The Pentagon countered that the policy was not intended to punish certain outlets or discriminate against particular viewpoints, citing its efforts to negotiate with news organizations.

### Evidence of Bias Against Mainstream Media

Judge Friedman pointed to instances where Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and other top Pentagon officials harshly criticized news outlets, highlighting a pattern of hostility toward the “mainstream media” while favoring more supportive outlets.

He also noted a notable inconsistency: right-wing influencer Laura Loomer was granted Pentagon access despite setting up a “tip line,” whereas a similar tip line initiative by The Washington Post was deemed inappropriate.

During a court hearing, Friedman challenged Justice Department lawyers on this discrepancy:

“Is the Washington Post tip line criminal solicitation?” the judge asked.

“I don’t think so, Your Honor,” responded DOJ attorney Michael Bruns.

“So, you’re not clear whether the Washington Post tip line constitutes criminal solicitation?” Friedman pressed.

“No, Your Honor,” Bruns replied.

“So, if you’re not clear, how can they be clear?” Friedman asked pointedly.

Bruns explained that The Washington Post’s tip line asked for information directly from military members, whereas Loomer’s tip line was more general in nature.

### Judge’s Reflection on the Role of the Press

In a tense exchange during the hearing, Friedman shared his personal experience, having lived through many military and national security conflicts, from the Vietnam War to the September 11 attacks. He underscored the critical role the press has played in helping the American public understand government actions throughout these events.

Reflecting on the Vietnam War, he noted, “the public, I think it’s fair to say, was lied to about a lot of things.” He added, “A lot of things need to be held tightly and securely, but openness and transparency allow members of the public to know what their government is doing.”

### Response from the Justice Department and Pentagon

The Justice Department and Pentagon have not yet responded to requests for comment on the ruling.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-strikes-down-restrictive-pentagon-press-policy-finding-it-violates-first-amendment/

Jury finds Elon Musk misled investors during Twitter purchase, absolves him of some fraud claims

A jury has found Elon Musk liable for misleading investors by deliberately driving down Twitter’s stock price in the tumultuous months leading up to his 2022 acquisition of the social media company for $44 billion. However, the jury absolved him of some fraud allegations, determining that he did not “scheme” to mislead investors.

The civil trial, held in San Francisco, centered around a class-action lawsuit filed just before Musk took control of Twitter, which he later renamed X. Jurors were asked to decide whether two tweets and comments Musk made during a May 2022 podcast amounted to intentional fraud against Twitter shareholders who sold their shares based on Musk’s statements.

After nearly four days of deliberation and nearly three weeks since the trial began on March 2, the nine-person jury delivered their verdict. They concluded that while Musk was liable for misleading investors with two tweets—including one stating the Twitter deal was “temporarily on hold”—he did not do so with a statement made on the podcast, which they ruled was an opinion. Furthermore, the jury found that Musk did not intentionally “scheme” to defraud investors.

The jury awarded shareholders damages ranging from about $3 to $8 per stock per day. Plaintiffs’ lawyers estimate this amounts to approximately $2.1 billion. Musk’s fortune is currently valued at about $814 billion, much of it tied up in Tesla shares.

“It’s an important victory, not just for investors of Twitter, but for the public markets,” said Joseph Cotchett, an attorney representing the plaintiffs. “I think the jury’s verdict sends a strong message that just because you’re a rich and powerful person, you still have to obey the law, and no man is above the law.”

Musk’s lawyers declined to comment as they left the courtroom.

### Focus on Bot Account Claims

Much of the trial scrutinized Musk’s claims regarding the number of bots on Twitter. Musk testified that Twitter had a much higher number of fake and spam accounts than the roughly 5% disclosed in regulatory filings. He cited what he described as Twitter’s misrepresentation of fake account numbers as a rationale for attempting to back out of the purchase.

Following Musk’s attempt to withdraw from the deal, Twitter filed a lawsuit in Delaware aiming to force him to honor the original agreement. Just before that case was scheduled to go to trial, Musk reversed course again and agreed to complete the acquisition at the original agreed price.

### The Central Issue: Misleading Tweets

At the heart of the case was whether Musk’s tweets—particularly one on May 13, 2022, declaring the Twitter deal “temporarily on hold” while seeking more information on fake account numbers—constituted a deliberate scheme to tank Twitter’s stock price.

The jury found that Musk did mislead investors with two tweets, but the podcast statement was opinion-based and not fraudulent. They also cleared Musk of the charge that he intended to scheme to drive down the stock.

### Trial Proceedings and Testimonies

The nearly three-week trial took place in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and featured testimony from former Twitter executives including CEO Parag Agrawal and CFO Ned Segal. Musk himself testified for over a day.

During his testimony, Musk maintained that Twitter’s leadership lied about the number of bots on the platform and withheld information regarding how those counts were calculated.

“I did make it clear that I thought it was BS,” Musk said regarding Twitter’s claim that only about 5% of its accounts were bots.

Musk also asserted that by ultimately proceeding with the acquisition at the original price, he delivered a significant financial benefit to most Twitter shareholders.

However, Twitter’s stock price fell below $33—about 40% below Musk’s purchase price—during the period when the deal was uncertain. The plaintiffs argued this decline was caused by Musk’s misleading statements, resulting in losses for shareholders who sold during that time.

“I can’t control whether people sell their stock, but everyone who held the stock fared extremely well,” Musk said.

### Plaintiffs’ Arguments

The plaintiffs argued that as Tesla’s stock price declined and the Twitter acquisition became increasingly costly for Musk, he posted tweets aimed at driving down Twitter’s stock price, hoping to renegotiate the deal at a lower price or to entirely exit the transaction.

“These tweets were not just innocent mistakes or impulsive comments,” said plaintiffs’ attorney Mark Molumphy. “They were carefully calculated moves to depress Twitter’s stock.”

In his closing arguments, Molumphy urged jurors to hold Musk accountable and compensate thousands of investors who lost money due to tweets Musk sent, including the May 13, 2022, tweet stating the deal was “on hold.”

“He knew what he was doing,” Molumphy concluded.

### Defense Motions and Past Litigation

Musk’s lawyers sought a mistrial multiple times during the contentious proceedings, arguing that the Tesla CEO could not receive a fair trial in San Francisco due to local public animosity toward him.

This case is not Musk’s first courtroom battle over social media posts. Three years prior, he testified for approximately eight hours in a San Francisco federal trial regarding his plans to take Tesla private at $420 per share in a proposed 2018 deal that never materialized. In that case, a nine-member jury cleared Musk of wrongdoing.

—

This verdict highlights the ongoing scrutiny over Musk’s use of social media and its impact on investors, reaffirming that wealth and power do not exempt one from legal accountability.
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-03-20/jury-finds-elon-musk-misled-investors-during-twitter-purchase-absolves-him-of-some-fraud-claims

We talked to ‘Bachelorette’ Taylor Frankie Paul. Then reality hit pause on her TV career

“The best way I can describe it is, it’s an addiction,” says Taylor Frankie Paul. The star of *The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives* is seated by a window in an empty Starbucks within a downtown Salt Lake City hotel, reflecting on her relationship troubles in an interview on Feb. 19.

Followers of Paul’s screen life are all too familiar with the drama. Now, others can’t escape knowing about it too. Days later, a dispute with her on-again, off-again partner would lead to a police investigation that surfaced in multiple news reports this week. Then, on Thursday, the release of a video recording of a separate dispute from 2023 led to a pause on *The Bachelorette*, her latest starring role on reality TV, just three days before the show was set to premiere.

—

### From #MomTok to Reality Fame

Paul’s brush with fame began with #MomTok, as the self-proclaimed founder of the Utah-based group of Mormon moms. This group spawned a corner of TikTok where members shared choreographed dance videos and light lifestyle content. But in 2022, Paul rose to notoriety after revealing in a TikTok Live session details about an arrangement she had with her then-husband, Tate Paul. They had agreed to pursue intimate relations with other consenting couples—without having extramarital sex. However, she confessed to violating their agreement by having an emotional affair.

This salacious revelation, dubbed the “soft-swinging” scandal, lit up social media and eventually inspired Hulu’s breakout hit *The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives*.

Much of Paul’s story across the show’s four seasons has revolved around her rocky relationship with Dakota Mortensen, the man she began dating following her divorce. Even as the show documented the lead-up to Paul becoming the new face of *The Bachelorette*, her biggest screen opportunity yet, the pair’s on-again, off-again dynamic remained turbulent and confusing—lasting right up to the *Mormon Wives* season finale.

—

### Turmoil Amid Stardom

A despondent Paul nearly upended the start of production on ABC’s dating series when she missed her flight to Los Angeles after sleeping with Mortensen—the father of her youngest son, Ever—the night prior. (She eventually took a later flight.)

“I was just still stuck in the cycle,” she says, noting she hasn’t watched the *Mormon Wives* finale. “That’s why I knew I had to leave [to do ‘The Bachelorette’], if that makes sense. I can’t help people understand it because my own brain doesn’t understand it. The only thing I can relate it to is, it is a drug; the toxicity is a drug. It’s always a mind game and I fall for it every time, and I cave and it’s just so dumb. I get exhausted saying it to people because I’m like, ‘I don’t blame you guys. I’m mad at me.’”

The hook of a 31-year-old mother of three trying to find love who unapologetically wears her troubles on her sleeve was supposed to make her a desirable candidate for the latest crossover experiment in Disney’s reality TV universe.

—

### Investigation and Show Pause

In the week leading up to Sunday’s Season 22 premiere of *The Bachelorette*, reports surfaced detailing allegations of domestic violence involving Paul and Mortensen. Utah’s Draper City Police Department confirmed an open investigation involving the pair but declined to share further details amid the ongoing inquiry.

According to a person familiar with the situation, allegations were made by both parties regarding incidents on Feb. 24 and Feb. 25—less than a week after our interview. No charges have been filed in connection to this case.

Paul was previously arrested and charged in 2023 for a separate dispute involving Mortensen, eventually pleading guilty to one count of aggravated assault; other charges were dropped. Part of that earlier incident was documented in the first season of *Mormon Wives*.

On Thursday, TMZ published a video of the 2023 incident, prompting Disney Entertainment Television to pause the planned premiere of *The Bachelorette*.

“In light of the newly released video just surfaced today, we have made the decision to not move forward with the new season of *The Bachelorette* at this time, and our focus is on supporting the family,” the statement from Disney read.

Whether the season will be released later or re-edited remains unknown, according to a source familiar with the matter.

—

### Statements from Paul and Producers

“Taylor is very grateful for ABC’s support as she prioritizes her family’s safety and security,” read a statement from Paul’s representative. The statement added that Paul suffered “extensive mental and physical abuse as well as threats of retaliation.”

While Season 5 of *The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives* began production in January, cameras were not following Paul during the recent incidents; she was focused on publicity commitments for *The Bachelorette*.

Hulu and ABC declined to comment on the ongoing investigation. Mortensen could not be reached for comment.

Production on *Mormon Wives* is currently on pause, and a decision about Paul’s status as a cast member has not been made, according to a person briefed on the situation.

—

### The Impact on Both Shows

Paul’s chaotic reality now casts a shadow on both *The Bachelorette* and *Mormon Wives*. The programming experiment aimed at blending the audiences of ABC’s veteran dating series and Hulu’s emerging “Real Housewives” alternative has become an example of how rapid expansion and crossover success can backfire.

The situation also highlights the ongoing discourse around vetting failures and oversights in reality TV, as well as the voyeuristic nature of viewers attracted to this genre’s often sordid personal drama.

—

### How the ‘Mormon Wives’ Crossover Took Shape

As traditional television faces steep challenges due to changing viewing habits influenced by streaming and social media, Disney has been blurring the lines between its linear and streaming properties ABC and Hulu to maximize reach.

*Mormon Wives*, which has released four seasons in less than two years, has become a key asset in this strategy.

Earlier this year, two cast members, Jen Affleck and Whitney Leavitt, competed against each other on *Dancing With the Stars* (DWTS). Paul’s casting as *The Bachelorette* made her the first heroine who was not a contestant on a previous *Bachelor* season.

Before the reports about Paul surfaced, The Times spoke with Robert Mills, head of Walt Disney Television Alternative, and show producers about efforts to collaborate within the company’s broadcasting universe. This approach rewards viewer curiosity and differentiates the company from competitors by building Hulu’s unscripted slate.

Mills recalled that talks of crossovers began even before *Mormon Wives* launch, with producers envisioning cast members appearing on DWTS to coincide with the show’s arrival.

“When the show took off, then it became, ‘OK, now we know we’re doing it,’” Mills said.

Having cast members compete on DWTS added curiosity for audiences of both shows. Adding the journey’s narrative into *The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives* enhanced the viewing experience. Two *Mormon Wives* cast members competing in the same DWTS season heightened this dynamic.

The casting process was featured in Season 3 of *Mormon Wives*, including their pitch to ABC executives. Their DWTS journey, including relocating families to Los Angeles and their falling out, was part of Season 4.

—

### Corporate Synergy and Challenges

Corporate synergy within the Disney portfolio is nothing new. *Dancing With the Stars* regularly features Disney-themed episodes and has hosted *Bachelor* franchise stars before. Navigating intertwined storylines requires coordination.

“We basically carved out times where they [the ‘Mormon Wives’ crew] could film rehearsals and we always had a producer present just in case something happened that was dramatically important for our show,” said Conrad Green, showrunner of DWTS.

“It’s like a gentleman’s agreement—we’re borrowing talent off another show so we have to work together, and it works for everyone’s benefit.”

Mills noted that spin-offs and further expansion conversations were ongoing with *Mormon Wives* as of the interview.

The crossover strategy became a key feature of the show’s identity, featuring other Hulu series like *Vanderpump Villa*, where cast members and spouses engaged in shared storylines full of drama.

—

### A New Direction for *The Bachelor* Franchise

Paul’s casting on *The Bachelor* universe continues an effort to revamp the long-running franchise, which has seen milestones like its first Black male lead in 2021 and a senior citizen dating spin-off, *Golden Bachelor*, last year.

After Paul posted a tongue-in-cheek TikTok in June 2025 announcing her “bid” as a single mother looking for love, Disney’s publicity department took notice, sparking discussions about her potential role.

Showrunner Scott Teti did his homework before agreeing.

“Of course, I had heard of her—it’s hard not to hear that name,” he said. “But I had to familiarize myself with it because I hadn’t watched her show. Instantly, you realize how honest and truthful she is, almost to a fault. Although she’s unrelatable in many ways due to media and social media attention, she has a layered story that I think is very relatable to many people—a single mother who hasn’t found relationship success but still wants to find love.”

Teti added that although Paul was a “fish out of water” on the first night, she showed vulnerability that made the season compelling.

“That is why this season is so big, and there are so many pivotal points in the season that will leave you on the edge of your seat.”

—

### Behind the Scenes with Paul

When we met, Paul was dressed casually in beige lounge pants and an oversized mushroom-adorned T-shirt. Despite a sluggish demeanor as she navigated her schedule between *Mormon Wives* Season 4 and *The Bachelorette*, she remained affable.

She shared TikTok videos expressing her current mental state, illustrating her emotional challenges.

No stranger to viral success, Paul views the show crossovers as “genius marketing,” while acknowledging potential risks to the #MomTok community.

“I think it’s really cool to see all the different opportunities you can venture off into,” she said. “The con is that with all these opportunities, it kind of spreads us apart. We’re doing our own thing. It could break friendships. You get envious. You get competitive.”

As the cast’s fame grows—inside and outside Disney—showrunner Andrea Metz says the key to keeping the series interesting is to incorporate these moments openly rather than pretending they don’t exist.

“We have not shied away from breaking the fourth wall,” Metz said. “We have not shied away from talking about what is really happening with them. I think people like that. The trajectory of their fame and their stars rising has been very quick, but it’s also been really exciting.”

—

### Was She Ready for ‘The Bachelorette’?

The power and unity of #MomTok has become a concern each season as personal conflicts make headlines. Even before recent allegations emerged, Paul’s entanglement with Mortensen caused some viewers to question whether she approached *The Bachelorette* seriously.

The break between wrapping *Mormon Wives* and starting *The Bachelorette* filming was just one day.

Paul admits she wasn’t sure if she was ready.

“I might not have been ready, but ready is a decision—just do it,” she said. “It was like a rehab, almost. It’s full detox. I had no contact—no world where it happens with the co-parent. Whether or not I was ready, it was what I so needed, at the very least to just get away from it. And I wanted to find someone and love.”

*The Bachelorette* became one of her hardest yet most rewarding experiences.

“I have my kids back home. I’m not just here looking for me. The emotional exhaustion was a lot. I’m dating 20-something guys. I am putting my all into one conversation after another, every single day, all day. Your brain is just kind of fried.”

When asked whether she feels like the show helped break the cycle she had with Mortensen, she said:

“Yeah, I feel like it helped. Obviously, things were within the process of the show; I can’t speak on it yet. But you’ll see it all unravel.”

—

Taylor Frankie Paul’s story is one of complexity, vulnerability, and the unpredictable nature of reality TV fame—where real-life struggles frequently collide with on-screen drama.
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/tv/story/2026-03-19/taylor-frankie-paul-bachelorette-secret-lives-of-mormon-wives-crossover

Getting a vehicle ready for Van Life

**John Paul, AAA Northeast’s Car Doctor Answers Your Automotive Questions**

—

### Converting a RAM Van into a Camper — Power Solutions Without a Gas Generator

**Q:** I am converting a RAM van to a camper—not four-wheel drive for overlanding, just to try the Van Life. I have some appliances I want to use and will be working remotely while on the road. I don’t want, nor have room for, a gas generator, so I’m looking for another solution. I’ve checked out battery power stations but they’re beyond my budget. Any ideas?

**A:** The best approach is to add a second battery dedicated to your camper setup. Consider a deep cycle battery or a Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO₄) battery. Lithium iron phosphate batteries are ideal for this kind of application because of their longevity and efficiency, but they require dedicated chargers.

Once you have the auxiliary battery installed, you’ll need a voltage inverter to convert 12-volt DC power from the battery to 120-volt AC power for your appliances and electronics. If you’re running sensitive electronics or appliances, opt for a pure sine wave inverter rather than a modified sine wave one, since pure sine wave provides cleaner, more stable power.

Next, determine your total wattage needs. Many camper setups operate well within 1,000 to 2,000 watts.

For charging the auxiliary battery, you can rely on the vehicle’s alternator—depending on the battery type and setup—or better yet, install a rooftop solar panel paired with a charge controller to maintain and recharge the battery while parked.

—

### Does My 2017 Volkswagen Passat Have a Timing Belt or Chain?

**Q:** After reading one of your previous articles, I’m curious whether my car has a timing belt or a timing chain. I drive a 2017 Volkswagen Passat SEL Premium with a 1.8-liter turbo engine. It has been a great car with 120,000 miles, and I hope to keep it for another five years. Anything else I should do to maintain it? Also, have you ever considered using an AI search tool to find your past answers?

**A:** Volkswagen has alternated between timing belts and timing chains over the years. Your 2017 Passat with the 1.8-liter turbo engine uses a timing chain. While earlier models had some issues with timing chain guides, with proper maintenance, the chain should last the life of your vehicle.

To keep your Passat running smoothly, follow the service schedule in your owner’s manual and have a trusted mechanic perform an annual checkup. This helps catch small problems before they become costly.

Regarding using an AI search tool for past answers—not yet! For now, readers can email questions to [cardoctor@aaane.com](mailto:cardoctor@aaane.com), and every query receives a personal, human response.

—

### Troubleshooting a 1985 Chrysler LeBaron Convertible Running Poorly

**Q:** I just bought a 1985 Chrysler LeBaron convertible as a summer fun car, but it’s running poorly. I’m trying to find a scan tool for this engine, but all I find are OBD1-to-OBD2 adapter cables. Can I use one with an OBD2 scanner (1996–2022) on my car? My mechanic already replaced the computer, distributor cap, rotor, and spark plugs. However, it still runs poorly, has a high idle, and poor fuel mileage.

**A:** Your Chrysler’s 2.2- or 2.5-liter engine utilizes diagnostic systems that don’t require a scan tool. Instead, try cycling the ignition key ON-OFF-ON-OFF-ON within five seconds, then use the “check engine” light flashes to read the codes. The flashes correspond to trouble codes; a code ‘55’ signals the end of the code sequence. If you only get 55, there are no stored hard codes.

For the 2.6-liter Mitsubishi engine variant, an analog voltmeter and jumper wire attached to the diagnostic port can help read codes.

If vacuum leaks and the idle speed control motor aren’t the problem, check for a poor electrical ground. The main ground near the thermostat housing often corrodes or loosens over time, causing drivability problems.

—

### Choosing a Large SUV for a Blended Family

**Q:** I’m looking for a big SUV for our blended family. While the Chevrolet Suburban would work, my husband thinks it’s too large. I have narrowed choices to the Nissan Armada or Toyota Sequoia. Any thoughts or other suggestions?

**A:** I would recommend the Toyota Sequoia, known for legendary reliability, solid engineering, and strong resale value.

The Nissan Armada is a good vehicle—I was impressed during my last road test—but I have reservations about Nissan as a company given their significant financial losses in 2024 and 2025, even though they are pursuing a restructuring plan.

Additionally, consider the Hyundai Palisade, which offers strong value and an excellent warranty. The Kia Carnival, though technically a minivan/MPV, provides ample space, comfortable seating, and a smooth ride—making it worth considering depending on your family’s needs.

—

### Addressing Slow Tire Leaks on a Saturn SC2 Coupe

**Q:** I own a Saturn SC2 three-door coupe with only 88,000 miles. The car is parked outside under a carport at my winter home in Florida. I installed four new Cooper Cobra tires about 3,000 miles and four years ago. Upon returning this winter, three of the tires were almost flat. Two tire shops found no leaks. Could the original rims be the problem? Can I add sealant to fix the leaks?

**A:** Tire sealant can sometimes work but should be considered a last resort. It’s better to remove the tires and thoroughly clean the rims before reinstalling them. Applying a bead sealer around the tire-rim interface often fixes slow leaks caused by corrosion, especially on alloy wheels.

Corroded wheels often cause very slow leaks as the bead sealing surface deteriorates over time. Proper cleaning and sealing typically resolve these issues and prevent future flat tires.

—

For any automotive questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to John Paul at [cardoctor@aaane.com](mailto:cardoctor@aaane.com). Every question receives a personal response!
https://www.boston.com/cars/how-to/2026/03/19/car-doctor-getting-a-vehicle-ready-for-van-life/

Breaking down U.S.-Israeli targets hit in Iran since war began

According to U.S. Central Command, the U.S. and Israel have struck more than 7,800 targets in Iran.

The CBS News data team conducted an in-depth examination of these specific targets.

Their findings are detailed in “The Daily Report,” providing insights into the scope and impact of these operations.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/examining-us-israeli-targets-iran/

Senate votes down effort to restrict Trump’s Iran war powers

**Senate Defeats War Powers Resolution Aimed at Limiting Military Action Against Iran**

Washington – The Senate defeated a war powers resolution on Wednesday that sought to block President Trump from escalating the conflict with Iran, as the operation approached its fourth week.

In a 53 to 47 vote, a Democrat-led effort to restrict Mr. Trump from taking military action in Iran fell short for the third time. Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania was the only Democrat to vote against advancing the resolution, while GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky supported it.

The resolution, led by Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey, would have required the president to “remove the United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Iran, unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or a specific authorization for use of military force.” Notably, Congress has not authorized military force against Iran.

The vote took place amidst an unusual and lengthy debate among Republicans over elections legislation, which was being pushed by Mr. Trump. The president has threatened to withhold his signature from other bills until this measure passes. Despite this “floor takeover,” Democrats were able to force the war powers vote because the resolution is privileged.

This was not the first attempt to limit Mr. Trump’s war powers regarding Iran. The Senate had previously defeated a similar resolution introduced by Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia on March 4. This marks the second time in less than a year that an effort to rein in the president’s ability to strike Iran was turned down, the first being after U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites last June.

As the war in Iran nears the one-month mark, Mr. Trump has yet to outline a clear exit strategy and has not ruled out deploying ground forces. The president has said he expects the conflict to end “soon,” but has not provided a specific timeline.

Following the early March defeat, a group of Democratic senators vowed to keep pushing the issue. They demanded that Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testify publicly about the war. In a letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, these senators indicated they would drop votes on several resolutions if the Trump officials appeared at public hearings.

“We’re going to use every lever that we have to stop business as usual and force the Senate to do what it should have done already,” Booker told reporters earlier this month.

Sen. Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, accused the Trump administration of avoiding public hearings on Iran out of fear of losing public support for the war.

“I don’t think they can defend this war,” Murphy said. “I think they’ll lose votes in the Senate if they actually have to go in front of the American public and explain why gas prices are so high, explain whether we’re engaged in regime change or not, and explain how they’re going to secure nuclear weapons and materials without a ground invasion.”

On Wednesday, the Trump administration’s top intelligence officials testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee during a hearing centered on the release of the annual worldwide threats assessment. However, questions largely focused on Iran. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard deferred to Mr. Trump when pressed on the president’s claims that Iran posed an “imminent” threat to the United States.

The administration and most congressional Republicans argue that Mr. Trump acted within his legal authority when ordering strikes against Iran. In a letter to Congress in early March, the president justified the strikes as necessary to eliminate threats.

“Despite my Administration’s repeated efforts to achieve a diplomatic solution to Iran’s malign behavior, the threat to the United States and its allies and partners became untenable,” the president wrote. He acknowledged, however, that “it is not possible at this time to know the full scope and duration of military operations that may be necessary.”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/senate-defeats-trump-iran-war-powers-vote-booker/

‘Lanterns’ co-creator Damon Lindelof apologizes for ‘dumb joke’ that upset DC fans and a comics icon

**Damon Lindelof Sets the Record Straight on “Lanterns”: “Green is f- awesome”**

Damon Lindelof, co-creator and executive producer of the upcoming HBO Max superhero drama *Lanterns*, is addressing the backlash following his previous comments about the show’s title. In a heartfelt apology posted to Instagram on Monday, the prolific TV writer—known for his work on *Lost*—clarified his stance and expressed his genuine admiration for the Green Lantern legacy.

“I made a dumb joke on a comedy podcast,” Lindelof wrote alongside a photo of himself wearing a very green T-shirt emblazoned with the Green Lantern symbol at his first Comic-Con appearance. “I’m not going to bob and weave about context, the joke was dumb, the fandom is not. I owe them an explanation and a genuine reflection of my actual feelings.”

The joke that sparked controversy originated from Lindelof’s appearance on a 2024 episode of *Pod Save America* co-host Jon Lovett’s podcast, *Lovett or Leave It*. When asked about the show’s title, Lindelof said, “It’s called ‘Lanterns’ because we all agreed that the ‘Green’ was stupid.”

These remarks resurfaced recently after the release of the first *Lanterns* teaser earlier this month, during which some fans noticed an apparent lack of green. The resulting uproar caught the attention of comic book legend Grant Morrison, who penned a direct response in a Sunday Substack post. Morrison questioned Lindelof’s involvement with the project, writing:

“Why does a writer attach himself to this kind of narrative if he thinks it’s fundamentally ‘stupid’? What is this jockish dismissal of superhero conventions intended to prove anyway? Does Lindelof imagine it makes him seem less nerdy? The only people who give a [f-] about the ‘Lanterns’ TV series are Green Lantern fans. Why alienate them at the start? That feels more like ‘stupid.’”

Lindelof acknowledged Morrison’s criticism and took responsibility for his remarks. He also shared a personal reflection on what the Green Lantern character Hal Jordan meant to him growing up:

“For a quiet, uncoordinated kid, there was nothing cooler than a hero whose superpower was his imagination,” Lindelof wrote. “And green is not stupid, it is my lifelong favorite color and I have a questionnaire that I filled out in third grade to prove it.”

He went on to emphasize his pride in being part of the *Lanterns* creative team:

“More importantly, it would be a betrayal to everyone I worked for and alongside to say anything other than I was absolutely honored to be a part of the team that manifested the incredible construct that is *Lanterns*, because it was,” Lindelof added. “I was sloppy and careless with my words, ironic considering I care so much about Hal, John and the entire Corps. I can and will do better to be worthy of the oath. Until then, I’ll let the show speak for itself and I can’t wait for you all to hear what it has to say.”

Support soon followed in the comments section of Lindelof’s Instagram post. Among those sending encouragement were *Superman* actor Nathan Fillion—whose Green Lantern Corps member Guy Gardner will appear in *Lanterns*—and DC Studios president James Gunn.

“The joke was funny. No harm, no foul! Keep up the great work, we appreciate you!” Fillion wrote, including a green glove emoji. Gunn expressed his support more succinctly, sharing a single green heart emoji.

With the apology and positive reinforcement from notable figures in the DC fandom, Lindelof looks to move forward confidently as *Lanterns* gears up for its highly anticipated debut.
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/tv/story/2026-03-17/green-lanterns-damon-lindelof-apology

Where the Nancy Guthrie investigation stands nearly 50 days since her disappearance

Nearly 50 days after Nancy Guthrie disappeared, the suspected abduction remains unsolved.

CBS has learned that investigators have recovered additional images from Guthrie’s surveillance cameras.

Jonathan Vigliotti has the latest updates on the case.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/where-the-nancy-guthrie-investigation-stands-nearly-50-days-since-her-disappearance/