5 Pakistani F-16, JF-17 jets destroyed during Op Sindoor: IAF

Indian Air Force (IAF) chief Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh has revealed more details about Operation Sindoor.

In a recent statement, he provided insights into the strategic planning and execution of the operation, highlighting its significance for national security. The revelation marks a significant step in understanding the complexities involved in such missions carried out by the IAF.

Further details on Operation Sindoor are expected to shed light on the challenges faced and the courageous efforts of the personnel involved. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/india/longest-kill-was-300kms-air-force-reveals-op-sindoor-feat/story

Trump has ‘determined’ the U.S. is in ‘armed conflict’ with cartels, administration tells Congress

The Trump administration informed Congress in a confidential notice this week that President Donald Trump has “determined” that the United States is in an armed conflict with drug cartels. According to the notice, members of these organizations can be targeted as unlawful combatants.

The President classified these cartels as non-state armed groups, designated them as terrorist organizations, and determined that their actions constitute an armed attack against the United States. The notice stated, “In response, based upon the cumulative effects of these hostile acts against the citizens and interests of the United States and friendly foreign nations, the President determined that the United States is in a non-international armed conflict with these designated terrorist organizations.”

This designation essentially places drug cartels in the same legal category as terrorist groups like Al Qaeda or the Islamic State.

In recent weeks, the U.S. military reportedly struck at least three boats from Venezuela allegedly carrying narco-traffickers and drugs that could threaten Americans, President Trump said on Truth Social.

The notice to Congress included examples of actions the President could take in targeting the cartels and cited an attack on September 15 that killed approximately three unlawful combatants. The White House has defended these strikes, emphasizing their legality.

“As we have said many times, the President acted in line with the law of armed conflict to protect our country from those trying to bring deadly poison to our shores,” White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement Thursday. “He is delivering on his promise to take on the cartels and eliminate these national security threats from murdering more Americans.”

NBC News reported last month that the administration is considering strikes on drug cartels operating inside Venezuela. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has denied any role in drug trafficking and has repeatedly alleged that the United States is trying to force him from power.

However, many critics of the strikes, including congressional Democrats and some Republicans, argue that the administration does not have the legal authority to target drug cartels using the U.S. military. They maintain that drug trafficking remains a law enforcement matter best addressed through interdiction.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is also serving as acting national security adviser, has declared interdiction efforts ineffective, underscoring the administration’s rationale for the military approach.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-determined-us-armed-conflict-cartels-congress-notice-rcna235294

Trump has ‘determined’ the U.S. is in ‘armed conflict’ with cartels, administration tells Congress

The Trump administration informed Congress in a confidential notice this week that President Donald Trump has “determined” that the United States is in an armed conflict with drug cartels and that members of these organizations can be targeted as unlawful combatants.

According to the notice, the President classified these cartels as non-state armed groups, designated them as terrorist organizations, and determined that their actions constitute an armed attack against the United States.

“In response, based upon the cumulative effects of these hostile acts against the citizens and interests of the United States and friendly foreign nations, the President determined that the United States is in a non-international armed conflict with these designated terrorist organizations,” the notice added.

This designation effectively places drug cartels in the same legal category as terrorist groups like Al Qaeda and the Islamic State.

In recent weeks, the U.S. military reportedly struck at least three boats originating from Venezuela that were allegedly carrying narco-traffickers and drugs posing a threat to Americans. President Trump mentioned these actions on Truth Social.

The notice to Congress outlined potential actions the President could take in targeting the cartels and cited an attack on September 15 that resulted in the deaths of approximately three unlawful combatants.

The White House has defended these strikes. “As we have said many times, the President acted in line with the law of armed conflict to protect our country from those trying to bring deadly poison to our shores, and he is delivering on his promise to take on the cartels and eliminate these national security threats from murdering more Americans,” White House spokesperson Anna Kelly stated on Thursday.

NBC News reported last month that the administration is considering further strikes on drug cartels inside Venezuela.

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has denied any involvement in drug trafficking and has repeatedly accused the United States of attempting to force him from power.

However, many critics of the strikes—including congressional Democrats and some Republicans—argue that the administration does not yet have the legal authority to target drug cartels using the U.S. military. They maintain that this issue remains primarily a law enforcement matter, best addressed through interdiction efforts.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is also serving as acting national security adviser, has declared that interdiction efforts have been ineffective in combating the cartels.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-determined-us-armed-conflict-cartels-congress-notice-rcna235294

Any aggression in Sir Creek will be met with historic response: Rajnath Singh

Highlighting the Indian Army’s achievements, the defence minister stated that the objectives of Operation Sindoor had been successfully met. He emphasized that the aim was not to escalate tensions into a full-scale war, according to PTI.

However, his comments on the Sir Creek area drew particular attention. “Any aggression by Pakistan in the Sir Creek area will be met with a resounding response that will change both history and geography,” Singh warned. He added, “In the 1965 war, the Indian Army had demonstrated the capability to reach Lahore. Today, in 2025, Pakistan should remember that one route to Karachi passes through the creek.”

Sir Creek is a 96-km-long tidal estuary located between Gujarat’s Rann of Kutch and Pakistan. The area remains disputed due to differing interpretations of maritime boundaries. The defence minister pointed out, “Despite 78 years of independence, the border dispute continues in the Sir Creek area. India has repeatedly tried to resolve this issue through dialogue, but Pakistan’s intentions remain flawed and unclear.”

Singh also expressed concern over Pakistan’s recent expansion of military infrastructure near the creek, describing it as a worrying sign. He reiterated that the Indian Army and Border Security Force vigilantly guard the country’s borders to ensure national security.

Regarding Operation Sindoor, which was launched in response to the Pahalgam terror attack on May 7, Singh stated, “Pakistan made an unsuccessful attempt to penetrate India’s defence system from Leh to Sir Creek. However, in retaliatory action, Indian forces completely exposed the Pakistani air defence system and sent a message to the world that Indian forces can inflict heavy losses on Pakistan whenever and wherever they wish.”

Stressing India’s restraint during the operation, the Union Minister added, “Escalating it and starting a war was not the objective of Operation Sindoor. I am happy that Indian forces have successfully achieved all military objectives. But our fight against terrorism continues.”

He also praised the joint efforts of India’s armed forces, saying, “It was the jointness of our Army, Air Force, and Navy that executed Operation Sindoor in record time. Your strategy, courage, and capability have proven that India can defeat the enemy in every situation.”

Describing the three services as the “pillars” of India’s strength, Singh concluded, “When these services work together, we can effectively face every challenge.”

On the occasion of Dussehra, while performing the ‘shastra puja,’ Singh reflected, “For us, weapons are not just tools or displays of power. Weapons are a means to establish righteousness.”
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/rajnath-singh-celebrates-dussehra-2025-in-bhuj-warns-pakistan-against-aggression-in-sir-creek-23596895

IDF kills terrorists in attempted shooting, ramming of West Bank soldiers as Yom Kippur ends

**IDF Kills Terrorists in Attempted Shooting and Ramming Attack on West Bank Soldiers as Yom Kippur Ends**

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) thwarted an attempted terror attack in the West Bank involving both shooting and ramming aimed at Israeli soldiers. In the incident, the IDF neutralized both terrorists involved, and no soldiers were harmed.

The attack occurred as Yom Kippur was concluding, highlighting ongoing security challenges in the region. The IDF promptly responded to the threat, ensuring the safety of its personnel and preventing further escalation.

*IDF responds to terror attack in West Bank, September 28, 2025.*
(Photo credit: TPS-IL)

— Jerusalem Post Staff
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-869261

Macron says oil tanker off France is linked to Russia’s shadow fleet

French President Emmanuel Macron announced on Wednesday that an oil tanker immobilized off the French Atlantic coast had committed “very serious wrongdoings.” He linked the vessel to Russia’s shadow fleet, which is reportedly evading Western sanctions imposed over Moscow’s war in Ukraine.

The tanker, which was sailing last week near the coast of Denmark, has been cited by European naval experts as possibly involved in drone flights over the country. French naval forces forcibly boarded the ship a few days ago at the request of prosecutors who suspected illegal activities, a military official confirmed on Wednesday.

The prosecutor’s office in the western French city of Brest opened a judicial investigation into the crew’s “refusal to cooperate” and “failure to justify the nationality of the vessel.” Meanwhile, the ship has been ordered to remain in place pending further investigation, according to the official.

On Wednesday, French naval forces boarded the ship again to provide food and fuel to the crew aboard. The official who shared this information was not authorized to be publicly named due to the ongoing nature of the investigation.

According to the Marine Traffic monitoring website, the ship departed the Russian oil terminal in Primorsk near Saint Petersburg on September 20. It sailed off the coast of Denmark before staying off the French western port of Saint-Nazaire since Sunday.

Macron suggested the ship was stopped due to French authorities’ “intervention.” Speaking on the sidelines of a European Union leaders’ summit in Copenhagen, Denmark, he stated:
“I think it’s a good thing that this work has been done and that we’ve been able to stop it. There were some very serious wrongdoings made by this crew, which is why there are legal proceedings in the case.”
He declined to provide further details.

The Russian Embassy in Paris did not respond to requests for comment from The Associated Press.

When asked about the ship’s connection to drone incidents in Denmark and reports of two detainees aboard, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen refrained from commenting on specifics. However, she acknowledged the broader issue:
“I can say in more general terms that we are facing a lot of problems with the shadow fleet. And that has been the case, especially in the Baltic Sea for quite a long time. And we are working very closely together to battle this situation.”

Highlighting the ongoing threat, on Christmas Day 2024, a Russian shadow fleet oil tanker known as the Eagle S triggered a nationwide alarm in Finland. The tanker was suspected of deliberately severing a critical undersea electric cable located 50 miles off the coast.

A seven-month investigation by “60 Minutes” revealed that this incident was not isolated. It uncovered that a major Russian oil company was hiding ownership of the tanker behind layers of shell companies to evade Western sanctions.

In response, NATO launched “Baltic Sentry,” a mission deploying ships and planes to monitor the shadow fleet and protect vital seabed infrastructure. According to British Admiral Keith Blount, NATO’s deputy supreme allied commander Europe, no cable-cutting incidents have occurred since.

Macron emphasized that the current incident underscores “the existence and the reality of a phenomenon that we have been describing and denouncing for a long time,” referring to the “notorious shadow fleet.” This fleet represents tens of billions of euros for Russia’s budget and is estimated to finance around 40% of Russia’s war effort.

The tanker, known as “Pushpa” or “Boracay” — names it has used interchangeably — sailed under the flag of Benin and appears on the European Union’s list of ships targeted by sanctions against Russia.

The shadow fleet consists mainly of aging tankers purchased secondhand, often by opaque entities registered in countries that do not impose sanctions. These ships operate under flags from non-sanctioning nations and play a crucial role in helping Russia’s oil exporters bypass the price caps imposed by Ukraine’s allies.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/macron-russia-shadow-fleet-oil-tanker-off-france/

Trump reveals plan to use US cities to train military and end ‘woke culture’

President Donald Trump revealed plans to use American cities as training grounds for the armed forces and declared an end to woke culture alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday. The announcement came during an unusual gathering of hundreds of top U.S. military officials who were abruptly summoned to Virginia from around the world.

Mr. Hegseth introduced new directives for troops, including the implementation of gender-neutral or male-level standards for physical fitness. Meanwhile, Mr. Trump highlighted the strength of U.S. nuclear capabilities and warned that America is under invasion from within.

“After spending trillions of dollars defending the borders of foreign countries, with your help, we’re defending the borders of our country,” Mr. Trump said.

The military summit took place at the Marine Corps base in Quantico, near Washington. Mr. Hegseth had called military leaders without publicly revealing the reason until the morning of the event. His address focused heavily on his well-known talking points, painting a picture of a military hampered by woke policies. He further urged military leaders who opposed his new approach to resign, calling it the honorable course of action.

While meetings between top military brass and civilian leaders are common, the suddenness and secrecy surrounding this summit fueled speculation about its purpose. Admirals and generals deployed in conflict zones across the Middle East and elsewhere were summoned for a lecture on race and gender in the military. This underscored how the country’s culture wars have become a central agenda item for Mr. Hegseth’s Pentagon, even amid significant global security concerns.

Mr. Trump, accustomed to boisterous crowds of supporters who laugh at his jokes and applaud his boasts, did not receive the same reaction from the assembled generals and admirals. In keeping with the nonpartisan tradition of the armed services, military leaders remained mostly stone-faced during Mr. Trump’s politicized remarks, a stark contrast to the enthusiastic rank-and-file soldiers who cheered during his summer speech at Fort Bragg.

During his nearly hour-long speech, Mr. Hegseth criticized the military for promoting too many leaders based on race, gender quotas, and historic firsts rather than merit. “The era of politically correct, overly sensitive don’t-hurt-anyone’s-feelings leadership ends right now at every level,” he declared.

Echoing this sentiment, Mr. Trump stated, “The purpose of America’s military is not to protect anyone’s feelings. It’s to protect our republic. We will not be politically correct when it comes to defending American freedom. And we will be a fighting and winning machine.”

Mr. Hegseth also announced a loosening of disciplinary rules and a reduction in hazing protections, emphasizing the removal of many guardrails put in place after numerous military scandals and investigations. He ordered a review of the Department of Defense’s definitions of toxic leadership, bullying, and hazing to empower leaders to enforce standards without fear of retribution or second-guessing.

Additionally, the defense secretary called for changes regarding the retention of adverse information in personnel records. His goal is to allow leaders with forgivable, earnest, or minor infractions to avoid being burdened by those mistakes indefinitely.

“People make honest mistakes, and our mistakes should not define an entire career,” Mr. Hegseth said. “Otherwise, we only try not to make mistakes.”

This policy shift comes amid ongoing concerns over bullying and toxic leadership, which have been linked to numerous military suicides in recent years. Notably, the suicide of Brandon Caserta, a young sailor who took his life in 2018, was tied to belligerence and brash leadership from his supervisors, according to a Navy investigation.

Throughout the address, Mr. Hegseth criticized environmental policies and transgender troops, emphasizing the military’s renewed focus on the warrior ethos and peace through strength. He dismissed previous administrations’ emphasis on diversity as an “insane fallacy,” referencing dizzying diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and LGBTQE+ statements.

“They were told females and males are the same thing, or that males who think they’re females is totally normal,” he said, also calling out policies such as electric tanks and COVID vaccine mandates as mistakes.

Regarding physical standards, Mr. Hegseth stressed that jobs requiring physical power in combat must maintain high and gender-neutral standards. “If women can make it, excellent,” he said. “If not, it is what it is. If that means no women qualify for some combat jobs, so be it. That is not the intent, but it could be the result.”

Mr. Hegseth’s remarks come at a critical time as the country faces a potential government shutdown this week. Having emphasized a focus on lethality, he has made several unusual and unexplained decisions, including ordering cuts to the number of general officers and the firing of other top military leaders.

Under the Trump-Hegseth administration, the military has also played an active role in domestic security efforts, including securing the U.S.-Mexico border, deploying to American cities as part of law enforcement surges, and conducting strikes on boats in the Caribbean targeting drug traffickers.

As the Pentagon shifts its agenda towards traditional military priorities and away from social policies, the recent summit at Quantico highlights the ongoing tensions between cultural issues and national security within the U.S. armed forces.
https://www.breakingnews.ie/world/trump-reveals-plan-to-use-us-cities-to-train-military-and-end-woke-culture-1813111.html

IDF destroys over 1,000 buildings, kills under 200 Hamas terrorists in Gaza City

IDF Destroys Over 1,000 Buildings, Kills Under 200 Hamas Terrorists in Gaza City

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have reportedly destroyed more than 1,000 buildings and eliminated fewer than 200 Hamas terrorists in Gaza City. These operations are part of ongoing efforts to target militant infrastructure within the Gaza Strip.

There are also reports indicating that a few hundred Palestinian civilians have been killed during the conflicts. While these reports have been disputed by the IDF, the military has not yet provided alternative casualty figures.

IDF soldiers operating in the Gaza Strip, September 28, 2025.
(Photo credit: IDF Spokesperson’s Unit)

By Yonah Jeremy Bob

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-869146

Indian Army celebrates Diamond Jubilee of 1965 Indo-Pak War victory

**Golden Arrow Division Commemorates Diamond Jubilee of 1965 War Victory at Asal Uttar**

The Golden Arrow Division of the Indian Army’s Vajra Corps on Tuesday commemorated the Diamond Jubilee of India’s victory against Pakistan in the 1965 War at Asal Uttar in Punjab, according to news agency ANI.

Punjab Governor Gulab Chand Kataria, who was the chief guest at the event, was present alongside Lieutenant General Manoj Kumar Katiyar, Param Vishisht Seva Medal (PVSM), Uttam Yudh Seva Medal (UYSM), Ati Vishisht Seva Medal (AVSM), General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Western Command. The gathering also included other military commanders, war veterans, Veer Naris, civil dignitaries, students, and a large contingent of local citizens, as reported by the Government of India.

During the commemoration, tribute was paid to the gallant soldiers of the Battle of Asal Uttar and the Battle of Barki, whose indomitable courage and supreme sacrifice turned the tide of the 1965 War in India’s favour. Special homage was also offered to Company Quarter Master Havildar (CQMH) Abdul Hamid, Param Vir Chakra (Posthumous), whose unmatched bravery in destroying advanced enemy tanks, coupled with his ultimate sacrifice, continues to inspire future generations.

In his address, Governor Kataria expressed deep gratitude to the Indian Army for its unwavering commitment to safeguarding the nation’s sovereignty and preserving India’s proud military heritage.

He highlighted that the inauguration of the Archives-cum-Museum and the Hamid Gallery would not only immortalize the heroes of 1965 but also serve as valuable sources of education, knowledge, and inspiration for future generations. He further lauded the army and the Indian National Trust for Art & Cultural Heritage (INTACH) for their initiative to promote border tourism and strengthen the connection between citizens and soldiers.

The governor also emphasized the trust the nation places in the Indian Army to meet any future challenges, whether traditional or emerging. “As India marches ahead into the era of Amrit Kaal, the Army will continue to play a pivotal role in ensuring national security, fostering unity, and inspiring the youth to dedicate themselves to the service of the Nation with courage, discipline, and integrity,” he added.

The event also saw war veterans and Veer Naris honoured in recognition of their sacrifices. The newly inaugurated Archives-cum-Museum will serve as a permanent repository of the 1965 War, preserving history, artefacts, and stories of valor for posterity.

The Hamid Gallery, dedicated to the memory of CQMH Abdul Hamid, Param Vir Chakra (PVC), was opened to the public as a mark of gratitude to one of India’s bravest and most fearless heroes.

Additionally, a 72-foot high national flag was hoisted at the War Memorial by Lieutenant General Manoj Kumar Katiyar, PVSM, UYSM, AVSM.

The Centre stated that the Diamond Jubilee celebrations at Asal Uttar reinforced the enduring bond between the armed forces and Indian citizens.

*With ANI inputs*
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/1965-india-pakistan-war-diamond-jubilee-celebrations-kick-off-in-punjab-tributes-paid-to-bravehearts-23596544

Bagram back in play

If Afghanistan doesn’t return Bagram Airbase to those who built it—the United States of America—bad things are going to happen, warned former US President Donald Trump.

Bagram Airbase, the largest US military site in Afghanistan, has been described as the “original sin” of the evacuation in *Left Behind*, the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations minority report released in February 2022. President Trump recently reiterated his intention to regain control of Bagram during his state visit to the UK. However, this isn’t the first time he has brought up the issue.

When the US withdrew from Afghanistan in 2021, many Republicans criticized the Biden administration for not retaining Bagram Airbase. They argued that the US could have at least kept control of this crucial facility. From this standpoint, Trump’s focus on Bagram makes sense, as it addresses a grievance among his supporters regarding the previous administration’s handling of the US exit, explains Dr. Paul Poast, Deputy Dean of Doctoral Education, Social Science Division, and Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Chicago.

Trump has claimed that the US effectively “gave the Taliban Bagram for nothing.” It is important to recall, however, that the decision to withdraw US forces was based on an agreement struck in 2020 during Trump’s first term, with the withdrawal itself completed under President Joe Biden in 2021.

According to *Left Behind*, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin defended the decision to vacate Bagram during testimony before the House Armed Services Committee. Austin argued that maintaining the airbase would have required putting as many as 5,000 US troops in harm’s way just to operate and defend the facility.

In March, speaking to the BBC, Trump shared that his desire to retain Bagram Airbase was not primarily about Afghanistan, but about countering China. During a press conference on his UK state visit alongside British Premier Keir Starmer, Trump emphasized the strategic importance of Bagram, saying, “It’s an hour away from where China makes its nuclear weapons.”

What Trump referred to is most likely China’s Lop Nur nuclear testing site located in the desert of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. Under the Doha Agreement, however, the United States pledged not to use or threaten force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Afghanistan, nor interfere in its internal affairs.

Professor Poast notes that having access to the Bagram Airbase could be quite useful for the US. It would enhance American capabilities to conduct operations in or near China—as Trump himself indicated—and Iran. This suggests that Trump might have recognized the broader value of maintaining a strong US global military presence.

A BBC Verify investigation conducted in July found that the nuclear testing facility lies roughly 2,000 km away in northwestern China. After reviewing 30 satellite images from late 2020 through 2025, the investigation found minimal activity at the base since the Taliban’s return and uncovered no evidence of any Chinese military presence there.

Zabihullah Mujahid, the chief Taliban spokesman, addressed the issue on X (formerly Twitter), urging Washington to pursue realism and rationality rather than repeating past mistakes. He reaffirmed that the Islamic Emirate prioritizes Afghanistan’s independence and territorial integrity in all bilateral negotiations with the United States.

Mujahid emphasized that, under the Doha Agreement, the US pledged not to use force against Afghanistan’s sovereignty or interfere in its internal affairs. Therefore, the Taliban expects Washington to remain faithful to these commitments and adopt a policy grounded in realism and rationality instead of repeating failed approaches.

The regional implications of any attempt by the US to re-establish its presence at Bagram could be significant. Neighboring countries should be cautious of the potential consequences. Pakistan, which has recently risen in prominence and walks a fine geopolitical balance between the US and China, must be particularly wary of an American base in the region.

Furthermore, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are now bound by a landmark Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement, which treats an attack on either country as an attack on both. The world is watching closely, and some Arab nations may enter into similar mutual defense deals.

The re-establishment of a US presence at Bagram Airbase could force Pakistan into a perilous geopolitical tightrope, caught between its alliances and regional security concerns. The situation remains complex, and the international community awaits developments with keen interest.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/tns/detail/1346842-bagram-back-in-play

Exit mobile version