What’s next for former Prince Andrew after his arrest? International attorney Ann Olivarius breaks down potential criminal pathways, jurisdictional hurdles and investigative next steps.
https://abcnews.com/International/video/whats-former-prince-andrew-after-arrest-130316202
Category: law
Man admits plotting to bribe juror at ex-heavyweight boxer’s drug trafficking trial
NEW YORK — A man charged with trying to bribe a juror with up to $100,000 at the drug trafficking trial of a former heavyweight boxer pleaded guilty Thursday to obstructing justice. Mustafa Fteja entered the plea in Brooklyn federal court, where a plea agreement with the government called for him to serve roughly five to six years in prison when he is sentenced on June 23. He was among three men charged in Novembe r in the plot to corrupt the trial of boxer Goran Gogic. Gogic’s trial, originally set to begin in November, has not yet taken place. He has pleaded not guilty to violating and conspiring to violate the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act. If convicted, he faces a sentence of 10 years to life in prison. Fteja has remained free on $150,000 bail since his arrest. According to court records, Fteja already knew a juror described in court papers as “John Doe #1” when he called him multiple times on his cellphone to get him to meet him on Staten Island. Over the span of two meetings over three days, Fteja told the juror that associates in the Bronx were willing to pay him between $50,000 and $100,000 to return a not guilty verdict, according to charging documents. Investigators said evidence included several recorded conversations of the defendants planning the bribery plot as they spoke in Albanian and English.
https://abcnews.com/US/wireStory/man-admits-plotting-bribe-juror-heavyweight-boxers-drug-130320227
Pam Bondi and House Democrats trade fiery barbs at Epstein hearing
A shouting match broke out as Attorney General Pam Bondi sparred with critics in Congress over her handling of the Justice Department’s release of files related to Jeffrey Epstein.
The heated exchange underscored the intense scrutiny surrounding the case and the department’s transparency.
Scott MacFarlane has more on this developing story.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/pam-bondi-and-house-democrats-trade-fiery-barbs-at-epstein-hearing/
Debate heats up over potential court expansion in Utah
A bill seeking to expand Utah’s judiciary, both in the lower courts and up to the Supreme Court, was introduced with heavy discussion and debate in a state Senate committee on Thursday. The initiative, led by GOP lawmakers, aims to help the court system manage its growing caseload.
The bill, SB134, advanced with a 9-to-1 vote, with Sen. Stephanie Pitcher, D-Millcreek, casting the sole dissenting vote. It proposes adding more judges to the state Supreme Court and Court of Appeals. Additionally, amendments to the bill would add one district court judge each in Salt Lake City, St. George, and Provo.
Currently, the Utah Supreme Court consists of five justices, while the Court of Appeals has seven judges. Sen. Chris Wilson, R-Logan, the bill’s chief sponsor, is proposing to increase the highest court to seven justices and the appellate court to nine judges.
Wilson noted, “In 1896, when Utah became a state, we had 276,000 people and a Supreme Court of three justices. That was expanded to five justices in 1917 when the population was roughly 444,000.” He added, “In 1987, we created the Court of Appeals with seven judges when the state had a population of 1.7 million. Since that time, our population has doubled to 3.5 million.” Utah is now the 30th largest state in the country.
Wilson also pointed out that “there are roughly 35 states with either seven or nine justices. Of those, 10 of the closest states in population to Utah have somewhere between seven and nine justices on their Supreme Courts.” His argument centers on the fact that a growing population naturally leads to a growing judicial caseload.
If the bill passes the Legislature and is signed by Governor Spencer Cox—as expected, since he suggested the idea last month—it would mark the first time since 2016 that a state has increased the number of judges on its Supreme Court bench.
However, not everyone supports the expansion. Sen. Stephanie Pitcher previously told the Deseret News that she views the Supreme Court expansion as politically motivated rather than a response to caseload concerns. She stated, “It has everything to do with the fact that my colleagues are getting rulings they’re not happy with.”
Recent contentious issues, such as abortion and the state’s most recent redistricting dispute, have heightened tensions between the legislature and judiciary.
Most public comments during Thursday’s hearing expressed little concern about adding judges to the lower courts; opposition primarily focused on increasing the number of Supreme Court justices. Law professors, attorneys, and concerned citizens criticized the proposed increase as an attempt by GOP leadership to engage in court-packing—a legislative-driven change versus a voter-initiated change.
Opponents also argued that the legislature should prioritize addressing judicial needs only as identified by the judiciary itself.
Earlier this week, during his State of the Judiciary address, Chief Justice Matthew B. Durrant made it clear that adding more justices to the Supreme Court was not the court’s preference. Regarding caseload concerns, Durrant noted that in 2025, the state’s Supreme Court finally cleared the backlog caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, and its caseload is now considered normal.
“Disagreement is inherent in our system of government. Public disparagement of another branch is not,” Durrant told the Legislature. “While polarized ‘us versus them’ rhetoric has become common in national circles, it is not and should not be the norm here.”
https://www.deseret.com/utah/2026/01/22/utah-bill-seeks-supreme-court-lower-court-expansion-public-dissent/
Bill Belichick’s Nightmare: NFL Legend’s ‘Childish’ Girlfriend Jordon Hudson, 24, Threatens to Sue Podcaster for Defamation After ‘Embarrassing’ Social Media Tantrum
Nov. 25 2025, Published 4:20 p.m. ET University of North Carolina head football coach Bill Belichick’s girlfriend, Jordon Hudson, has warned investigative journalist and podcast host Pablo Torre she’s going to sue him for defamation, following a social media tantrum over claims she lied about her birthday on a UNC “internal document,” RadarOnline.com can reveal. In a dispute over reporting questioning her age, Hudson didn’t do herself any favors as social media users bashed her “childish” posts aimed at the journalist. Hudson’s ‘Childish’ Lawsuit Threat After being romantically linked in 2023, Belichick, 73, and Hudson, 24, have raised eyebrows and made headlines as rumors swirled about the 24-year-old being “controlling” and critics questioned her motives for dating the legendary former NFL coach. Torre has covered the May-December relationship in several episodes of his podcast, Pablo Torre Finds Out, and previously reported claims alleging Hudson was banned from UNC practice facilities following backlash over her level of involvement with the team. Back in May, Torre shared a March 2024 video from the Miss Maine USA pageant, in which Hudson said she was 22 years old, and reported she put the incorrect birthdate on an “internal document” for the university’s football program. Hudson denied Torre’s claims, and on Monday, November 24, she shared screenshots of a conversation with UNC Athletics Chief of Personnel Emily Muse admitting to adding the incorrect birth year on the form. She wrote on X: “One of MANY inaccurate and materially defamatory reports about me by Pablo Torre. I did not fill out any UNC internal documents or forms pertaining to the family directory.” The post followed a selfie she shared on Instagram, in which she flashed an official UNC “2025 All Access” badge while making a smirking face, captioned: “P.S. I’m suing you @pstorre.” In the photo, Hudson donned a necklace reading “Banned” in blinged-out script. She has not shared any details about filing a legal complaint against Torre. Instagram users flocked to the comment section and called out Hudson for threatening legal action against Torre. “Discovery is gonna be fun as hell,” wrote one user as another pointed out, “Not to mention that she has made herself a public figure, which makes proving defamation even harder.” Another comment read: “Jordan, get a life and move on. You are the most childish 24-year-old I’ve ever seen. Grow up.” Others chimed in, accusing Hudson of being “addicted to attention,” a “grifter,” and “embarrassing.” Pablo Torre Hits Back Meanwhile, Torre hit back at Hudson on X and shared a video insinuating she manipulated the screenshot of her conversation with Muse. He wrote: “Hi Jordon: Any idea why your screenshot looks like this after you adjust the exposure and highlights (@JohnnyBlan57495, who provided the below video, was asking about Adobe Photoshop.) Thanks, Pablo.” The video suggested Hudson had manipulated the image to hide redactions from the conversation with Muse. As RadarOnline.com reported, Hudson caught backlash in April following Belichick’s humiliating CBS Sunday Morning interview, in which she awkwardly interrupted and stopped the sit-down chat when the coach was asked about how they met. Jennifer Belichick, the wife of the iconic coach’s oldest son, Stephen, slammed Hudson for not acting “professional” after she stormed out of the interview over the harmless question.
https://radaronline.com/p/bill-belichick-girlfriend-jordon-hudson-sues-podcaster-defamation/
New Jersey organ procurement organization under congressional investigation after ‘alarming’ whistleblower claims
The House Ways and Means Committee has investigated several organ procurement organizations over what the lawmakers say is behavior considered unacceptable. The US House Ways and Means Committee said Wednesday that it is investigating the organ procurement organization for the New Jersey region for what it called “extreme abuse of public trust” and possible illegal activity, including trying to procure organs from people who didn’t volunteer to be donors and, in at least one case, trying to continue with the organ recovery process in a patient who had “reanimated.” The allegations were discussed in a letter the committee sent to the New Jersey Organ and Tissue Sharing Network, one of 55 organ procurement organizations that are federally designated nonprofits tasked with the multibillion-dollar business of managing the recovery of organs for transplantation in the United States. The committee, which has investigated several organ procurement organizations over what the lawmakers say is behavior considered unacceptable, says it has been asking the New Jersey network for records and information at least since July. Investigators spoke with nearly a dozen whistleblowers, the letter says. One of the incidents it highlights involves an unnamed patient at the Virtua Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital in Camden, New Jersey. The patient was pronounced dead and the network started the process to recover their organs, the letter says, but soon after the recovery process began, the person “reanimated.” The procurement team called the network’s chief executive officer to find out what to do. Witnesses told the committee that the CEO instructed the NJTO staff on site to “proceed with recovery,” according to the letter. “However, hospital staff intervened, and recovery did not move forward.” Neither the hospital nor the procurement organization responded to CNN’s requests for comment. The committee described the case as “shocking” and “alarming” and said several whistleblowers told investigators that documents with regard to details about the case were deleted or manipulated. The committee’s letter also alleges that the New Jersey Sharing Network misused documents to tell patients’ families it had authority to remove organs, even if the patient was not currently listed as an organ donor on their driver’s license or, in some cases, had withdrawn their permission to donate; may have procured and thrown out hundreds of organs just to meet federal metrics; and gave organs to people out of sequence on the transplant list. “This is unacceptable,” the letter says. “The organs procured by every [organ procurement organization] across the country belong to the individuals on the waitlist who are ranked and matched using medical criteria. They do not belong to the OPOs, and it is not NJTO’s role to pick winners and losers on the transplant waiting list.” The letter also says the organization has made misleading statements to Congress throughout the investigation. “These allegations raise questions about whether NJTO should keep its tax-exempt status and highlights the need for potential legislative reforms,” the letter says. The House Ways and Means Committee has asked the New Jersey organization to send additional documents including any complaints it has received, documents from the head of the organization and staff communications, as well as any more unredacted documents related to the patient in the Camden case. The letter is the latest development in the committee’s focus on the nation’s organ procurement groups. In July, the committee sent a letter to the Indiana Donor Network with regard to its use of private jets for non-mission charter flights. It also demanded documents from the Miami-area Life Alliance Organ Recovery Agency, and after its investigation, the US Department of Health and Human Services moved to decertify the organization – essentially shutting the operation down – in September. The investigation found unsafe practices, staff shortages and paperwork errors, according to HHS. Agency Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said at the time that the move was meant as a “clear warning” to other donor organizations. In September, the committee sent a letter to the Network for Hope, a Kentucky-based organ procurement organization, that demanded documents related to practices it considered unsafe. In one case four years ago in Richmond, Kentucky, a man says he woke up on the operating table while a recovery team was shaving his chest to take his organs. Witnesses say the hospital staffers were pressured by people within the organization to continue with the procedure, but a local surgeon refused to continue the operation when she saw that the man wasn’t dead. The Kentucky Attorney General’s Office has also been investigating the case. Stay informed and connected — subscribe to The Philadelphia Tribune NOW! Click Here Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Don’t Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. Be Truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything. Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person. Be Proactive. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts. Share with Us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/health/new-jersey-organ-procurement-organization-under-congressional-investigation-after-alarming-whistleblower-claims/article_857704a9-2558-4c5d-a282-52e1569f3360.html
Trump, Polling, and the Fourth Wall – Liberty Nation News
A conundrum sits in the middle of President Donald Trump’s polling numbers. On the one hand, verifiable data show that both the economy and international trade with the United States are up, and that illegal border crossings and crime are down. On the other hand, the president’s approval ratings in each of the sectors are plummeting. Certainly, part of the paradox could come from media spin or poor messaging, but perhaps the real issue is that Trump has done something no other politician has done before: broken the fourth wall. Expectations and Experience To quote the renowned punk band The Jam, “the public gets what the public wants.” Over the years, electorates in almost all Western nations have created a relatively consistent model of what a politician is and can do. So when an unconventional candidate comes along, he or she may be described as shattering a “glass ceiling” – moving beyond the staid, steady, and unexpected. The glass ceiling was impervious to two major political stars in recent history. Hillary Clinton was immensely “qualified” to be president and yet was, to many, an entirely unlikable figure, and denigrating a significant chunk of the voting public as “deplorables” did her no favors. Similarly, former Vice President Kamala Harris was mostly held back from office because of her inability to communicate effectively and her cowardice in dealing with any media not in her camp. Their gender, perhaps common sensically, did not blind the electorate to their weaknesses. When Trump won the presidency in 2016, he was a wrecking ball to the known world of politics. When he won again in 2024, he became precision detonation. Why then do his approval ratings not match the enthusiasm level with which he was elected? Pulling Back the Curtain on Trump Steady, deliberative, and cool-headed are qualities that have been lauded in any politician’s campaign ads. Successful presidents are known for presenting clear and well-laid plans to satisfy the voters who look to them for steadfast and unwavering leadership. Trump, in this aspect as well as others, is notably different. What the public sees from the commander-in-chief is often the thought process involved. Instead of engaging in closed-door confabs or, God forbid, policy focus groups, the president tells the public directly where he is in his thinking – at the current time. In the theater world, breaking character and speaking directly to the audience is a bold move that fails more often than it succeeds; they don’t call it “breaking” the fourth wall without reason. And yet when done well, it creates something quite special. Consider Ferris Bueller’s interactions with the audience, or William Goldman’s immensely popular novel The Princess Bride, which acts as a book within a book. When Trump says he is considering military action against Venezuela’s government, this shouldn’t be understood as he has met with his generals and determined how best to strike – but rather that an incursion is one of a number of possibilities. Is such public revelation a prudent practice? Well, that depends on who has tickets to the opening night. Warnings and Wish Lists The American public hears Trump’s ideas come and go, as he provides unprecedented access to his thought processes. Certainly, such unfiltered openness and transparency is quite a difference from the previous administration, marked by an elusive president and befuddled communications from his team. Instead of operating in the traditional DC manner – through leaks and veiled ministerial policy hints – Trump has taken it upon himself to keep everyone guessing while inviting the American people along for the ride. But also looking on are the likes of Venezuelan President Nicholas Maduro, Chinese President Xi Jinping, and other leaders both outside and inside the United States who seemingly never quite know how to deal with Trump. This president has made an art form of strategic ambiguity. Now that the political Fourth Wall has been broken, however, will such insights become the new expectation of a public so used to secrecy and top-down exposure?
https://www.libertynation.com/trump-polling-and-the-fourth-wall/
House votes overwhelmingly to force release of Epstein files, sending bill to Senate
WASHINGTON — The House voted overwhelmingly in favor of a bill Tuesday to force the Justice Department to publicly release its files on the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a remarkable display of approval for an effort that had struggled for months to overcome opposition from President Donald Trump and Republican leadership. When a small, bipartisan group of House lawmakers introduced a petition in July to maneuver around House Speaker Mike Johnson’s control of which bills reach the House floor, it appeared a longshot effort — especially as Trump urged his supporters to dismiss the matter as a “hoax.” But both Trump and Johnson failed in their efforts to prevent the vote. Now the president has bowed to the growing momentum behind the bill and even said he will sign it if it also passes the Senate. Moments after the House vote, Senate Majority Leader John Thune said his chamber will act swiftly on the bill. The bill passed the House 427-1, with the only no vote coming from Rep. Clay Higgins, a Louisiana Republican who is a fervent supporter of Trump. He said in a statement that he opposed the bill because it could release information on innocent people mentioned in the federal investigation. The decisive, bipartisan work in Congress Tuesday further showed the pressure mounting on lawmakers and the Trump administration to meet long-held demands that the Justice Department release its case files on Epstein, a well-connected financier who killed himself in a Manhattan jail while awaiting trial in 2019 on charges he sexually abused and trafficked underage girls. “These women have fought the most horrific fight that no woman should have to fight. And they did it by banding together and never giving up,” said Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene as she stood with some of the abuse survivors outside the Capitol Tuesday morning. “That’s what we did by fighting so hard against the most powerful people in the world, even the president of the United States, in order to make this vote happen today,” added Greene, a Georgia Republican and longtime Trump loyalist. The bill’s passage would be a pivotal moment in a yearslong push by the survivors for accountability for Epstein’s abuse and reckoning over how law enforcement officials failed to act under multiple presidential administrations. A separate investigation conducted by the House Oversight Committee has released thousands of pages of emails and other documents from Epstein’s estate, showing his connections to global leaders, Wall Street powerbrokers, influential political figures and Trump himself. In the United Kingdom, King Charles III stripped his disgraced brother Prince Andrew of his remaining titles and evicted him from his royal residence after pressure to act over his relationship with Epstein. The bill forces the release within 30 days of all files and communications related to Epstein, as well as any information about the investigation into his death in federal prison. It would allow the Justice Department to redact information about Epstein’s victims or continuing federal investigations, but not information due to “embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.” Trump’s reversal on the Epstein files Trump has said he cut ties with Epstein years ago, but tried for months to move past the demands for disclosure. Still, many in the Republican base have continued to demand the release of the files. Adding to that pressure, survivors of Epstein’s abuse rallied outside the Capitol Tuesday morning. Bundled in jackets against the November chill and holding photos of themselves as teenagers, they recounted their stories of abuse. “We are exhausted from surviving the trauma and then surviving the politics that swirl around it,” said one of the survivors. Another, Jena-Lisa Jones, said she had voted for Trump and had a message for the president: “I beg you Donald Trump, please stop making this political.” The group of women also met with Johnson and rallied outside the Capitol in September, but have had to wait months for the vote. That’s because Johnson kept the House closed for legislative business for nearly two months and refused to swear-in Democratic Rep. Adelita Grijalva of Arizona during the government shutdown. After winning a special election on Sept. 23, Grijalva had pledged to provide the crucial 218th vote to the petition for the Epstein files bill. But only after she was sworn into office last week could she sign her name to the discharge petition to give it majority support in the 435-member House. It quickly became obvious the bill would pass, and both Johnson and Trump began to fold. Trump on Sunday said Republicans should vote for the bill. Yet Greene told reporters that Trump’s decision to fight the bill had betrayed his Make America Great Again political movement. “Watching this turn into a fight has ripped MAGA apart,” she said. How Johnson is handling the bill Rather than waiting until next week for the discharge position to officially take effect, Johnson held the vote under a procedure that requires a two-thirds majority. But Johnson also spent a morning news conference listing off problems that he sees with the legislation. He argued that the bill could have unintended consequences by disclosing parts of federal investigations that are usually kept private, including information on victims. “This is a raw and obvious political exercise,” Johnson said. Still, he voted for the bill. “None of us want to go on record and in any way be accused of not being for maximum transparency,” he explained. Meanwhile, House Democrats celebrated the vote as a rare win. House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries described it as “a complete and total surrender.” Senate plans to act quickly Even as the bill cleared his chamber, Johnson pressed for the Senate to amend the bill to protect the information of “victims and whistleblowers.” But Senate Majority Leader John Thune showed little interest in that notion, saying he doubted that “amending it is going to be in the cards.” Thune said he would quickly assess senators’ views on the bill to see if there were any objections. He said the bill could be brought forward in the Senate as soon as Tuesday evening and almost certainly by the end of the week. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer also indicated he would attempt to pass the bill Tuesday. “The American people have waited long enough,” he said. Meanwhile, the bipartisan pair who sponsored the bill, Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Ro Khanna, D-Calif., warned senators against doing anything that would “muck it up,” saying they would face the same public uproar that forced both Trump and Johnson to back down. “We’ve needlessly dragged this out for four months,” Massie said, adding that those raising problems with the bill “are afraid that people will be embarrassed. Well, that’s the whole point here.”
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/house-votes-overwhelmingly-to-force-release-of-epstein-files/article_470345c5-423f-4507-af2b-6da69f34926d.html
ASIC Confirms Stablecoins and Tokenised Assets Fall Under Financial Law
**Regulator Grants No-Action Period for Crypto Firms Until June 2026**
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has introduced a sector-wide no-action position for crypto firms, effective until June 30, 2026. During this period, ASIC will not take enforcement action against unlicensed providers who are making genuine efforts to comply with existing financial regulations. This temporary relief offers stability to the sector as firms adjust ahead of future legislative reforms.
—
### Temporary Relief for Stablecoin and Wrapped Token Distributors
ASIC also plans to provide temporary relief for distributors of stablecoins, wrapped tokens, and custodians of digital assets that qualify as financial products. The regulator is currently seeking public feedback on these draft relief measures until November 12, 2025.
—
### Clarifying How Financial Laws Apply to Digital Assets
This update from ASIC clarifies how current financial laws apply to various digital assets, aiming to give investors stronger protections and provide firms with clearer regulatory guidelines.
ASIC’s new guidance confirms that stablecoins, wrapped tokens, tokenised securities, and digital asset wallets are considered financial products under existing laws. Consequently, many providers offering these products will need to hold a financial services licence to operate legally.
—
### ASIC Commissioner Comments
ASIC Commissioner Alan Kirkland highlighted the significance of distributed ledger technology and tokenisation in transforming global finance. He emphasized that ASIC’s guidance provides much-needed clarity, allowing firms to operate confidently within the law. Kirkland also noted that licensing ensures consumers have legal protections and enables ASIC to take action against misconduct that harms the market or consumers.
—
### Public Consultation and Past Behaviour Considerations
In addition to the no-action position, ASIC released a summary of industry feedback from Consultation Paper 381, which focused on digital asset financial products and services. The feedback has helped shape the current guidance, including the proposed relief measures.
While the no-action position provides some leniency, ASIC affirmed that it will continue to take action against serious misconduct or practices causing significant consumer harm. The regulator will also consider the no-action position when evaluating past behaviour from firms in this space.
—
### About ASIC
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is Australia’s primary regulator for corporate, markets, financial services, and consumer credit. Established under the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act of 2001, ASIC is empowered to facilitate, regulate, and enforce Australian financial laws. It was initially formed as the Australian Securities Commission based on the 1989 ASC Act.
—
### About the Author
**Tareq Sikder**
A Forex technical analyst and financial writer with 12 years of experience, Tareq Sikder has authored over 1,800 articles covering the latest developments in finance and cryptocurrency.
—
*Stay informed with Finance Magnates Daily Update – Get all the top financial news delivered straight to your inbox.*
[Subscribe Here]
*By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.*
https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/asic-confirms-stablecoins-and-tokenised-assets-fall-under-financial-law/
Judge extends order barring Trump administration from firing federal workers amid shutdown
Love 0 | Funny 0 | Wow 0 | Sad 0 | Angry 0
—
**Sign up for our Crime & Courts newsletter**
Get the latest in local public safety news with this weekly email.
*By signing up, you understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its [User Agreement](#) and [Privacy Policy](#).*
https://oanow.com/news/nation-world/crime-courts/article_e1d39f75-33a8-5e2a-beeb-40489437417d.html
