Zubeen Garg’s death: Event organizer moves SC, calls allegations ‘ludicrous’

Shyamkanu Mahanta, the organizer of the North East India Festival and an accused in the case related to the death of Assamese singer Zubeen Garg, has approached the Supreme Court.

He is seeking the transfer of the ongoing Assam Police investigation to a central agency. Mahanta’s plea requests a more impartial and thorough probe into the matter, amid concerns over the current investigation’s progress.

The Supreme Court will now consider his request for the case to be handled by a federal investigative body.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/plea-for-fair-investigation-into-zubeen-garg-s-death/story

Zubeen Garg’s death: Event organizer moves SC, calls allegations ‘ludicrous’

Shyamkanu Mahanta, the organizer of the North East India Festival and an accused in the case related to Assamese singer Zubeen Garg’s death, has approached the Supreme Court.

He is seeking a transfer of the ongoing Assam Police probe to a central agency.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/plea-for-fair-investigation-into-zubeen-garg-s-death/story

Murder charge dismissed in shooting death of STL teen

Last month, the family of Kristina Curry, 16, shared the agony they endured while waiting for justice.

They described the pain of waiting more than six years for an arrest related to her death.
https://fox2now.com/news/missouri/murder-charge-dismissed-in-shooting-death-of-stl-teen/

Trump has ‘determined’ the U.S. is in ‘armed conflict’ with cartels, administration tells Congress

The Trump administration informed Congress in a confidential notice this week that President Donald Trump has “determined” that the United States is in an armed conflict with drug cartels. According to the notice, members of these organizations can be targeted as unlawful combatants.

The President classified these cartels as non-state armed groups, designated them as terrorist organizations, and determined that their actions constitute an armed attack against the United States. The notice stated, “In response, based upon the cumulative effects of these hostile acts against the citizens and interests of the United States and friendly foreign nations, the President determined that the United States is in a non-international armed conflict with these designated terrorist organizations.”

This designation essentially places drug cartels in the same legal category as terrorist groups like Al Qaeda or the Islamic State.

In recent weeks, the U.S. military reportedly struck at least three boats from Venezuela allegedly carrying narco-traffickers and drugs that could threaten Americans, President Trump said on Truth Social.

The notice to Congress included examples of actions the President could take in targeting the cartels and cited an attack on September 15 that killed approximately three unlawful combatants. The White House has defended these strikes, emphasizing their legality.

“As we have said many times, the President acted in line with the law of armed conflict to protect our country from those trying to bring deadly poison to our shores,” White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement Thursday. “He is delivering on his promise to take on the cartels and eliminate these national security threats from murdering more Americans.”

NBC News reported last month that the administration is considering strikes on drug cartels operating inside Venezuela. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has denied any role in drug trafficking and has repeatedly alleged that the United States is trying to force him from power.

However, many critics of the strikes, including congressional Democrats and some Republicans, argue that the administration does not have the legal authority to target drug cartels using the U.S. military. They maintain that drug trafficking remains a law enforcement matter best addressed through interdiction.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is also serving as acting national security adviser, has declared interdiction efforts ineffective, underscoring the administration’s rationale for the military approach.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-determined-us-armed-conflict-cartels-congress-notice-rcna235294

Trump has ‘determined’ the U.S. is in ‘armed conflict’ with cartels, administration tells Congress

The Trump administration informed Congress in a confidential notice this week that President Donald Trump has “determined” that the United States is in an armed conflict with drug cartels and that members of these organizations can be targeted as unlawful combatants.

According to the notice, the President classified these cartels as non-state armed groups, designated them as terrorist organizations, and determined that their actions constitute an armed attack against the United States.

“In response, based upon the cumulative effects of these hostile acts against the citizens and interests of the United States and friendly foreign nations, the President determined that the United States is in a non-international armed conflict with these designated terrorist organizations,” the notice added.

This designation effectively places drug cartels in the same legal category as terrorist groups like Al Qaeda and the Islamic State.

In recent weeks, the U.S. military reportedly struck at least three boats originating from Venezuela that were allegedly carrying narco-traffickers and drugs posing a threat to Americans. President Trump mentioned these actions on Truth Social.

The notice to Congress outlined potential actions the President could take in targeting the cartels and cited an attack on September 15 that resulted in the deaths of approximately three unlawful combatants.

The White House has defended these strikes. “As we have said many times, the President acted in line with the law of armed conflict to protect our country from those trying to bring deadly poison to our shores, and he is delivering on his promise to take on the cartels and eliminate these national security threats from murdering more Americans,” White House spokesperson Anna Kelly stated on Thursday.

NBC News reported last month that the administration is considering further strikes on drug cartels inside Venezuela.

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has denied any involvement in drug trafficking and has repeatedly accused the United States of attempting to force him from power.

However, many critics of the strikes—including congressional Democrats and some Republicans—argue that the administration does not yet have the legal authority to target drug cartels using the U.S. military. They maintain that this issue remains primarily a law enforcement matter, best addressed through interdiction efforts.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is also serving as acting national security adviser, has declared that interdiction efforts have been ineffective in combating the cartels.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-determined-us-armed-conflict-cartels-congress-notice-rcna235294

Bombay HC Grants Relief To 2 Youths Disqualified Over Height In CAPF Recruitment

Bombay High Court Grants Relief to Candidates Disqualified Over Minor Height Deficiency in CAPF Recruitment

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has come to the aid of two 21-year-olds who were disqualified from recruitment in the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) after they fell short of the prescribed height limit by a fraction of a centimetre. The court directed the authorities to extend the benefit of relaxation available under the 2015 Revised Uniform Guidelines, noting that the disqualification was “illegal and arbitrary.”

Details of the Candidates and Recruitment Process

A division bench comprising Justices Ravindra Ghuge and Ashwin Bhobe heard petitions filed by Sushant Sarode from Malegaon and Sahil Patil from Kolhapur. Both candidates were barred from proceeding to the Detailed Medical Examination (DME) stage despite clearing earlier phases.

Sarode and Patil had applied for the posts of Constable (General Duty) in CAPF and SSF, Rifleman (GD) in Assam Rifles, and Sepoy in the Narcotics Control Bureau Examination, 2025. The recruitment process consists of three stages: a computer-based test, a physical standard and efficiency test, and finally a medical examination.

Both candidates successfully cleared the written test and the physical efficiency test. However, they were declared ineligible during the physical standard test conducted in Pune. Their heights were measured at 164.7 cm and 164.6 cm, respectively, just short of the required minimum of 165 cm. Consequently, rejection slips were issued on August 23 and August 25.

Legal Arguments and High Court Decision

Challenging their disqualification, their advocate V.A. Shastry cited clause 2(d) of the Uniform Guidelines for Medical Examination in CAPFs and Assam Rifles dated May 20, 2015. This clause specifies that “fractions of a centimetre less than 0.5 cm will be ignored and 0.5 cm or more will be rounded off to the next higher cm.”

Shastry argued that, based on this rule, both petitioners should have been considered as meeting the 165 cm height criterion.

The central government’s counsel, P.B. Chavan, opposed the plea, contending that the rounding-off rule applies only at the medical examination stage and not during the physical standard test. She urged the court to uphold the disqualification.

However, the bench disagreed with the government’s stance. It observed that the petitioners had applied under the ‘Maratha’ category, which itself prescribes a minimum height of 165 cm. Furthermore, the guidelines extend relaxation benefits to Marathas as well as certain other communities and regions.

Court Verdict

“Disqualifying the petitioners at the stage of physical standard test on account of their height being 164.7 cm and 164.6 cm, respectively, is illegal and arbitrary,” the judges held. “We are of the considered opinion that the petitioners are entitled to the benefit of height relaxation.”

Allowing both petitions, the High Court directed that Sarode and Patil be declared eligible to proceed to the detailed medical examination stage.

To get details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai and surrounding regions, visit https://budgetproperties.in/

https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/bombay-hc-grants-relief-to-2-youths-disqualified-over-height-in-capf-recruitment

Dhanush’s ‘Idli Kadai’: Makers issue piracy warning

**Dhanush’s ‘Idli Kadai’: Makers Issue Piracy Warning**

*By Apoorva Rastogi | Oct 02, 2025, 09:56 AM*

The production house behind Dhanush’s latest film, *Idli Kadai*, has issued a stern warning against piracy following the movie’s release on Wednesday.

In a statement posted on X (formerly Twitter), Dawn Pictures emphasized that any leaked or pirated content from *Idli Kadai* will be taken down immediately without prior notice. The studio also threatened legal action against individuals or entities involved in promoting or distributing unauthorized copies of the film.

**A Call to Audience: Support Against Piracy**

Dawn Pictures urged viewers to actively report any pirated content or spoilers to protect the film and the wider cinema industry. “Protect cinema. Report pirated content or spoilers immediately. Your support is the industry’s strongest defense,” the production house stated, providing multiple links for easy reporting of piracy.

**Anticipation Builds Around *Idli Kadai***

Starring Dhanush, Arun Vijay, and Nithya Menen in lead roles, *Idli Kadai* has generated significant excitement among fans and film enthusiasts alike. The movie also features Shalini Pandey and Sathyaraj in pivotal roles and is co-produced by Wunderbar Films alongside Dawn Pictures.

**Dhanush on the Film’s Message**

Dhanush, who also directed the film, shared insights about its underlying theme. He explained that *Idli Kadai* emphasizes the importance of staying connected to one’s roots. “Our identity lies in our ancestral roots. The lives of our father, grandfather shouldn’t just dissipate in the air,” he said in a recent statement.

As *Idli Kadai* garners attention, the makers continue to stand firm against piracy, calling on audiences to support the film industry by safeguarding creative content.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/makers-of-idli-kadai-warn-against-film-piracy/story

Israeli navy intercepts Flotilla, detains Greta Thunberg along with activists

Israeli Troops Detain Activists from Hamas-Sumud Flotilla Attempting to Break Gaza Blockade

Israeli naval forces intercepted several boats from the Global Sumud Flotilla on Friday night as they attempted to break the maritime blockade of Gaza. Out of a convoy of 47 ships, Israeli troops raided only six vessels and detained more than 150 activists onboard, hailing from 37 different countries, according to Al Jazeera.

The Israel Ministry posted a video announcing the operation, stating, “Already several vessels of the Hamas-Sumud flotilla have been safely stopped and their passengers are being transferred to an Israeli port. Greta and her friends are safe and healthy.”

Earlier, Israel’s Foreign Ministry, citing documents recovered by its troops in Gaza, alleged that Hamas was directly involved in the activist flotilla currently trying to breach the blockade. According to The Times of Israel, these documents indicate links between the flotilla’s leaders and Hamas’s foreign arm, the Palestinian Conference for Palestinians (PCPA).

Flotilla spokesperson Saif Abukeshek provided a social media update on Wednesday, stating that 13 vessels had been intercepted so far, while around 30 others remained at sea, determined to continue their journey to Gaza. “They are motivated, and they are doing everything within their hand to break this siege by early morning,” he said. He added that more than 200 activists from 37 countries were on board, representing groups from Spain, Italy, Turkiye, and Malaysia.

According to The Times of Israel, Israeli forces had issued several warnings for the flotilla to change course and return before moving in. The flotilla, carrying aid and hundreds of activists from over 30 countries, was sailing through international waters when the interception took place. The Israeli Foreign Ministry described the effort as the “Hamas-Sumud flotilla,” accusing the activists of aiding the militant group.

To halt the boats, the Israeli navy used water cannons, electronic jamming, and boarding parties. The operation quickly drew criticism from various quarters.

Former British diplomat Craig Murray argued on X that Israel’s actions violated international law, noting that the flotilla was in international waters and not within Israel’s territorial jurisdiction. “The possession of vessels and the abduction of crews at sea can be pursued as crimes in domestic jurisdictions,” he wrote.

UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese and Colombian President Gustavo Petro had earlier urged Israel to allow the flotilla to proceed unharmed, according to Al Jazeera.

Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim condemned the operation strongly, calling it “intimidation and coercion” against unarmed civilians. “By blocking a humanitarian mission, Israel has shown utter contempt not only for the rights of the Palestinian people but also for the conscience of the world,” he stated. Anwar Ibrahim also affirmed that Malaysia would use “all legitimate and lawful means” to protect its citizens aboard the flotilla.

Despite the arrests and seizures, flotilla organisers insisted their mission to deliver humanitarian aid and challenge the blockade would continue. “The illegal Israeli interceptions won’t deter us,” they said in a statement.

Notably, in June this year, Israel also detained Swedish activist Greta Thunberg along with the crew of another Gaza-bound aid ship, the Madleen.

*This story has been sourced from a third-party syndicated feed and agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for the dependability, trustworthiness, reliability, or data of the text. Mid-day management and mid-day.com reserve the sole right to alter, delete, or remove content at their absolute discretion without prior notice.*
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/israeli-navy-intercepts-flotilla-detains-greta-thunberg-along-with-activists-on-over-10-ships-23596842

Georgia’s highest court sides with slave descendants fighting to protect threatened island community

FILE — Cornelia Bailey sits on the front porch of the Sapelo Island Cultural and Revitalization Society in the Hog Hammock community of Sapelo Island, Ga., on Thursday, May 16, 2013. (AP Photo/David Goldman, File)

FILE — The new Nathan Deal Judicial Center was dedicated to the former governor that bears its name on February 11, 2020, in Atlanta. (AP Photo/John Amis, File)

FILE — J.J. Wilson, 9, rides a school bus to catch a ferry to his school on the mainland from his home in the Hog Hammock community of Sapelo Island, Ga., on Wednesday, May 15, 2013. (AP Photo/David Goldman, File)

**ATLANTA —** Georgia’s highest court on Tuesday sided with Black landowners in a fight over zoning changes that weakened long-standing protections for one of the South’s last Gullah-Geechee communities founded by freed slaves.

The state Supreme Court unanimously reversed a lower court ruling that had stopped a referendum to consider repealing a revised zoning ordinance passed by McIntosh County officials two years ago.

Residents of Sapelo Island opposed the zoning amendments that doubled the size of homes allowed in a tiny enclave called Hog Hammock. Homeowners feared the change would result in one of the nation’s most historically and culturally unique Black communities facing unaffordable tax increases.

Last year, residents and their supporters submitted a petition with more than 2,300 signatures from registered voters seeking a referendum in the coastal county, which lies 60 miles (96 kilometers) south of Savannah.

However, McIntosh County commissioners sued to stop the referendum, and a lower court ruled that it would be illegal, halting the vote with less than a week to go before Election Day. Hundreds of people had already cast early ballots in the referendum.

On Tuesday, the high court found that the lower court was wrong to conclude that the zoning ordinance was not subject to referendum procedures provided for in the Georgia Constitution’s Home Rule Provision.

“Nothing in the text of the Zoning Provision in any way restricts a county electorate’s authority to seek repeal of a zoning ordinance,” Supreme Court Justice John Ellington wrote in the opinion.

“We feel vindicated,” said Jazz Watts, a Hog Hammock homeowner who helped organize the referendum effort. “The election should not have been stopped. It was stopping the voice of the people.”

It is not immediately clear when the referendum might be rescheduled. But attorney Dana Braun, who represents the Hog Hammock residents, said the ruling will give county residents “some real say” in whether they support the zoning change.

McIntosh County attorney Ken Jarrard expressed that the county commissioners are “obviously disappointed” by the order but respect the high court’s ruling. Jarrard had asserted during oral arguments at the Supreme Court in April that zoning powers are different from others entrusted to county governments by the state Constitution and, therefore, cannot be challenged by referendum.

Philip Thompson, an attorney representing the Hog Hammock residents, argued that they have a constitutional right to a referendum on the zoning changes so that they can defend a place that’s “a cultural and historical treasure.”

Approximately 30 to 50 Black residents live in Hog Hammock, a community of dirt roads and modest homes founded by their enslaved ancestors who worked the cotton plantation of Thomas Spalding. The community is among a dwindling number of small settlements started by emancipated island slaves—known collectively as Gullah, or Geechee, in Georgia—scattered along the coast from North Carolina to Florida.

Scholars say the island’s separation from the mainland allowed the communities to retain much of their African heritage, from their unique dialect to skills and crafts such as cast-net fishing and weaving baskets.

In 1996, Hog Hammock earned a place on the National Register of Historic Places, the official list of treasured U.S. historic sites.

Residents depend on the local government in McIntosh County, where 65% of the 11,100 residents are white, to maintain protections that preserve the community.

The state Supreme Court was not weighing whether Hog Hammock deserves special protections. Instead, the justices considered technical questions about whether local zoning laws can be challenged by referendum and whether McIntosh County commissioners had a right to sue to stop the vote last October.

*Stay informed and connected — subscribe to The Philadelphia Tribune NOW!*

**Comment Guidelines**

– Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist, or sexually-oriented language.
– PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
– Don’t Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
– Be Truthful. Don’t knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
– Be Nice. No racism, sexism, or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
– Be Proactive. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
– Share with Us. We’d love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/across_america/georgias-highest-court-sides-with-slave-descendants-fighting-to-protect-threatened-island-community/article_89423039-aec7-49c1-b0f1-8a21812a7292.html

Couple ‘deliberately starved’ three-year-old daughter to death, London court told

A couple deliberately starved their three-year-old daughter to death over many months, a UK court has heard.

Jaskiret Singh Uppal, 36, and Manpreet Jatana, 34, appeared at the Old Bailey in London on Tuesday charged with the murder of Penelope Chandrie.

Prosecutor Philip McGhee stated that the prosecution’s case is that the defendants mistreated their daughter over an extended period and deliberately starved her, leading to her death.

The London court heard that the couple failed to register Penelope’s birth, provide her with GP care or education, as they isolated themselves from the wider world. When the child died, it is alleged that they initially considered cremating the body in the back garden of their home in Hayes, west London, before contacting a funeral director.

On December 17, 2023, police found Penelope’s very emaciated body wrapped in a sheet, with bruising to her neck, the court was told. An examination of her body found the cause of death to be malnutrition. Pathological findings indicated starvation over a prolonged period of many months, culminating in fatal ketoacidosis, Mr McGhee explained.

There were also marks on her neck consistent with the use of bindings, and injuries to her hands consistent with a sharp object such as a knife, the court heard.

At the time Penelope died, officers found the defendants’ home to be in poor condition. The family’s vegetarian diet mainly consisted of yoghurt, lentils, and butter, Mr McGhee added. What appeared to be a ligature was found attached to the bannisters on the stairs.

The defendants, who met at university, had not worked for some time and lived in a house belonging to Uppal’s father.

On Tuesday, Uppal appeared in the dock at the Old Bailey, while Jatana appeared via videolink from Bronzefield prison. Both spoke only to confirm their identities.

In addition to the murder charge, the defendants are accused of manslaughter, causing or allowing the death of a child, and abandoning a child or causing them unnecessary suffering or injury.

Judge Lynn Tayton KC set a timetable for the case, with a plea hearing scheduled for December 16. A provisional trial date will be confirmed later. She remanded the defendants into custody.
https://www.breakingnews.ie/world/couple-deliberately-starved-three-year-old-daughter-to-death-court-told-1813133.html

Exit mobile version