No One Should Be Forced to Conform to the Views of the State

Should You Think Twice Before Posting a Protest Flyer on Your Instagram Story?

Or feel pressure to delete that bold JD Vance meme you shared? Now imagine that you could get kicked out of the country—potentially losing your job or education—based on the Trump administration’s dislike of your views on social media.

That threat to free expression and dissent is happening right now, but we won’t let it stand.

“…they’re not just targeting individuals—they’re targeting the very idea of freedom itself.”

Lawsuit Against Viewpoint-Based Surveillance and Suppression

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and co-counsel are representing the United Automobile Workers (UAW), Communications Workers of America (CWA), and American Federation of Teachers (AFT) in a lawsuit against the U.S. State Department and Department of Homeland Security. The suit challenges their viewpoint-based surveillance and suppression of noncitizens’ First Amendment-protected speech online.

The lawsuit asks a federal court to stop the government’s unconstitutional surveillance program, which has silenced both citizens and noncitizens. It has even hindered unions’ ability to associate and communicate with their members.

Press Release | Full Complaint in UAW v. State Department

Targeting the Idea of Freedom

“When they spy on, silence, and fire union members for speaking out, they’re not just targeting individuals—they’re targeting the very idea of freedom itself,” said UAW President Shawn Fain.

The Trump administration built this mass surveillance program to monitor the constitutionally protected online speech of noncitizens lawfully present in the U.S. The program uses AI and automated technologies to scour social media and other online platforms to identify and punish individuals who express viewpoints the government considers “hostile” to “our culture” and “our civilization.”

But make no mistake: no one should be forced to conform to the views of the state.

The Foundation of Democracy

Your free expression and privacy are fundamental human rights, and democracy crumbles without them. We have an opportunity to fight back, but we need you.

EFF’s team of lawyers, activists, researchers, and technologists have been on a mission to protect your freedom online since 1990—and we’re just getting started.

Donate and become a member of EFF today. Your support helps protect crucial rights, online and offline, for everyone.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/10/no-one-should-be-forced-conform-views-state

Graham Platner dismisses old Reddit posts as ‘stupid joke comments’

U.S. Senate candidate Graham Platner is disavowing a series of now-deleted social media posts in which he criticized police and said that white rural Americans “actually are” racist and stupid.

Platner, a veteran and oyster farmer from Hancock County, is running to challenge Sen. Susan Collins. His Reddit posts from 2020 and 2021 were resurfaced this week by CNN, which reported that they were deleted prior to Platner’s campaign launch in August.

In an interview with the Press Herald Thursday, Platner said the posts came from a time when he was disillusioned and angry, and expressed those sentiments online. He said the comments don’t reflect who he is today.

“A lot of it isn’t even things I believed then,” Platner said. “A lot of them are just stupid joke comments. I look back now and I don’t mean to be flippant, but it was just dumb stuff on the internet and when I stopped being lonely and isolated I didn’t use that as an outlet anymore.”

In one since-removed post from 2020, Platner responded to a thread titled “White people aren’t as racist or stupid as Trump thinks” by writing, “Living in white rural America, I’m afraid to tell you they actually are.”

In another comment from 2021, Platner responded in a thread about a Black army lieutenant who was held at gunpoint and pepper-sprayed by police during a traffic stop. One Reddit user wrote, “Bastards. Cops are bastards,” to which Platner replied, “All of them, in fact.”

Other posts addressed Platner’s political views and how his military service reshaped his perspective. Platner served three deployments to Iraq with the Marine Corps and was deployed to Afghanistan with the Army National Guard before settling in Sullivan, where he grew up.

In one post, he reflected on his life after the military, saying he was “a vegetable growing, psychedelics taking socialist these days. After the war, I’ve pretty much stopped believing in any of the patriotic nonsense that got me there in the first place, and am a firm believer that the best thing a person can do is help their neighbors and live a loving life.”

Platner is a leading contender for the Democratic nomination to challenge Collins. Governor Janet Mills, who is finishing up her second term, announced Tuesday that she is also running.

This story will be updated.
https://www.pressherald.com/2025/10/16/graham-platner-dismisses-old-reddit-posts-as-stupid-joke-comments/

O’Reilly Confronts Tom Homan About ABC Smear, Homan Claps Back Hard [WATCH]

Border Czar Tom Homan pushed back forcefully against accusations aired on ABC claiming he accepted a $50,000 bribe, calling the story false and politically motivated during an exchange with Bill O’Reilly.

O’Reilly opened the discussion by referencing comments made by ABC’s George Stephanopoulos. “I know George Stephanopoulos is one of your best friends. He convicted you on television, okay, of a $50,000 bribe. Stephanopoulos did this on ABC. The Vice President JD Vance defended you, and I thought he did so pretty well, because due process is important. You want to clarify anything about that situation?” O’Reilly asked.

Homan was direct in his denial. “I didn’t take $50,000 from anybody,” he said.

O’Reilly followed up by asking how the accusation reached national coverage. “Okay, how did that get into the mainstream, do you think?”

Homan responded that he believed the story was part of an ongoing campaign against him by left-wing media outlets. “Do you think I have no idea? Look, there’s been hit pieces on me since I came back to this administration,” he explained. “There have to be 30-40 hit pieces on me about how I’m involved with contracts or government deals, when, in fact, day one I came back, I recused myself from any discussions of any contract or any monetary decisions like that, because I used to have a company that did consulting, so I cleared myself.”

Homan emphasized that rather than profiting from his role, he made a personal sacrifice to serve. “Day one, what people don’t talk about is I took a significant, huge pay cut to come back and serve my nation, and I’m not enriching myself doing this job,” he said.

O’Reilly asked whether the repeated attacks bothered him personally. “Does this make you angry that they’re coming at you this way?” he inquired.

Homan replied that he was unfazed by the criticism, saying his focus remains on duty and integrity. “I don’t care what people think about me because I know who I am. I work for the greatest precedent in the history of this nation in my family, and we’re doing the right thing every day,” Homan stated.

The ABC segment that prompted the exchange sparked backlash among conservatives, with many calling it another politically driven attack against Trump administration officials.

Homan’s comments reinforced his reputation for blunt honesty and commitment to border enforcement despite ongoing media scrutiny.
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/10/oreilly-confronts-tom-homan-about-abc-smear-homan-claps-back-hard-watch/

Trump’s new $100K visa fee could worsen state doctor shortages, experts say

In Kentucky, patients often drive up to two hours to see Dr. Manikya Kuriti, one of the few endocrinologists serving the rural communities surrounding Louisville. Her expertise is crucial for residents who otherwise have limited access to specialized medical care.

Dr. Kuriti’s husband, a pulmonologist, also plays a vital role in supporting rural healthcare. He travels from Louisville to small hospitals located an hour south and north in Indiana. There, he assists small medical teams in treating critically ill patients, bringing much-needed expertise to these underserved areas.

Rural communities have long struggled with limited access to specialized medical services, making the contributions of medical professionals like Dr. Kuriti and her husband invaluable to the health and well-being of these populations.
https://ncnewsline.com/2025/10/16/repub/trumps-new-100k-visa-fee-could-worsen-state-doctor-shortages-experts-say/

For Mainers impacted by gun violence, red flag referendum is personal

James LaPlante remembers hearing how Robert Card was experiencing paranoia in the months before he killed 18 people and injured a dozen more in the Lewiston mass shooting. It sounded familiar.

Three years earlier, LaPlante’s brother, Stephen, was worried his friends were spreading lies that he was a pedophile and that a grocery store clerk who giggled was in on the rumor. Card had made similar claims to friends and family.

LaPlante contacted police after his brother started stockpiling guns, but police said there wasn’t enough evidence for them to intervene, and LaPlante was unable to get his brother the help he needed to stop him from acting on his worst impulses. In 2020, Stephen died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

His brother’s death is the reason LaPlante now supports a red flag law in Maine—a proposal that would allow family members, in addition to police, to initiate a weapons removal process if a person poses a risk to themselves or others. The law also would eliminate the requirement in Maine’s existing yellow flag law that a person first be taken into custody for a mental health evaluation.

“The big thing for the red flag law for me is it enables family members to take action,” said LaPlante, who lives in South Portland. “And family members are the ones who are going to know if someone is in a mental health crisis.”

### Growing Support for Red Flag Laws in Maine

LaPlante is among dozens of Mainers who have pleaded with lawmakers over the last two years for stronger gun control. After the Legislature failed to take up a red flag proposal last year in the aftermath of the Lewiston mass shooting, gun safety advocates organized a signature gathering campaign to get a citizen’s initiative on the ballot.

That measure will now go to voters statewide on Nov. 4 as **Question 2**.

Many people directly impacted by gun violence support a red flag law—family members like LaPlante, friends who have lost loved ones to gun suicides, survivors of the Lewiston shooting, and victims of other crimes involving firearms.

Opponents, some of whom also survived the mass shooting, say it weakens due process for gun owners and have argued that a red flag law already in place in 21 other states would not have prevented what happened in Lewiston.

“They could have used the yellow flag here in Maine and they never did,” Destiny Johnson, a Lewiston survivor, says in a campaign video released this week urging people to vote no on Question 2.

### ‘It Could Have Allowed Me to Go to the Courts’

LaPlante encouraged his brother to move in with their mother in Naples after he got caught up in drugs and was “hanging with the wrong crowd” in Massachusetts, where the brothers had grown up.

At one point, he said, Stephen was voluntarily committed to a mental hospital after attempting suicide. The move to Maine was good for Stephen at first, LaPlante said, but he still struggled with bipolar disorder that prevented him from working. His mental health worsened when the pandemic hit.

He stopped playing guitar and started focusing on collecting replica and BB guns, and eventually real firearms.

“During COVID, his paranoid ideations very quickly went to, ‘Society is going to collapse and I have to be ready for it, and people are after my stuff,’” LaPlante said. “He started to just amass weapons.”

LaPlante said he got particularly concerned after his brother woke their mother up in the middle of the night while he was on the roof with a rifle looking for people he thought were coming to take their belongings.

Around the same time, he said Stephen became convinced friends of his from Massachusetts were spreading rumors that he was a pedophile.

“Being in that scenario was really hard,” LaPlante said. “I felt stuck.”

LaPlante said he contacted police but was told there wasn’t much they could do unless Stephen committed a crime.

In his research on the yellow flag law, which had just taken effect in July 2020, he found that police were struggling to arrange the mental health assessments needed to confiscate firearms. Stephen died in September.

LaPlante said he believes the outcome could have been different had a red flag law been in place.

“It could have allowed me to go to the courts and say as a family member that I’m concerned he has been suicidal in the past,” he said.

Supporters of the red flag law say it could be especially helpful in reducing firearm suicides, and research has shown that red flag laws in other states can be an effective part of suicide prevention.

### Lewiston Survivors’ Views

While police initially struggled to connect with medical practitioners to conduct the required mental health assessments in the early days of the yellow flag law, a telehealth contract with the Portland nonprofit behavioral health provider Spurwink has since helped streamline the process.

Then, a state investigation into the Lewiston shooting—which found the yellow flag law could have been used by law enforcement— increased awareness and training among police, and its use has skyrocketed.

State officials recently announced the law has been used more than 1,000 times, all but 81 of those coming after the Oct. 25, 2023, mass shooting.

But some survivors still say a red flag law would be beneficial.

Among the most vocal is Arthur Barnard, whose son Artie Strout was killed at Schemengees Bar & Grille. Barnard has lobbied at the State House in favor of the law and last month appeared in an ad on behalf of the Yes on Question 2 campaign.

“Nobody knows if a family member is off-kilter faster than a family member,” Barnard said in an interview. “I believe that. Who knows that person better than their family?”

Jennifer Zanca of Auburn, who was shot in the left shoulder at Schemengees, is also in favor of a red flag law.

Zanca said that while she generally favored gun safety laws prior to the shooting, it made her think harder about what can be done to prevent such violence.

“I just feel like what we’re doing is not working,” she said. “It’s getting worse.”

The red flag proposal offers a more streamlined alternative and gives families a way to remove weapons from a person in crisis, she said.

“I feel safe knowing there are laws in place to take away guns from people who are having a mental health crisis, or who have gone psychotic and their family members see that,” Zanca said.

She was part of a group of four friends who went to Schemengees for dinner following a golf outing the night of the shooting. Among them was Johnson, the woman who recently appeared in the video for Protect Maine − No Red Flag, a group opposing Question 2 that is led by the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine with a powerful lobby.

In testimony before the Legislature last spring, Johnson elaborated on her opposition to a red flag law, saying Mainers need to be able to defend themselves in public places.

“Why would the state of Maine put a red flag law in place now, when they never enforced the yellow flag law to begin with?” she said in written testimony.

### Is Maine’s Current Law Enough?

David Trahan, executive director of the Sportsman’s Alliance, who worked with Gov. Janet Mills to pass the yellow flag law, is a leading opponent of Question 2.

He said he empathizes with anyone impacted by gun violence, including the many victims and survivors who have testified to lawmakers in support of a red flag law.

“But I’d love to sit down and talk with some of them because I believe our (yellow flag) law is better than red flag, and so does the governor, and so do state police,” Trahan said, referring to Mills’ and Maine State Police’s opposition to the red flag proposal.

State police have said that family members can already initiate weapons removal by contacting law enforcement and have expressed concerns that it will be more dangerous for them to try and remove weapons because the changes could mean someone is not already in protective custody when police go to remove their guns.

Supporters of the red flag law refute the idea that weapons removal would be more dangerous, saying law enforcement have inherently dangerous jobs and red flag laws are already working safely in several other states.

Mills has said that the yellow flag law, which she helped draft with gun rights and safety groups, has already proven effective, while also protecting Second Amendment rights. She has argued it’s important for police to be involved in navigating what can be a confusing court process and that it’s the responsibility of law enforcement, not private citizens, to protect the public.

### Advocates Speak Out

LaPlante says he doesn’t see the option to use red flag as something that would be burdensome for family members and said it is set up to work more quickly than the existing law.

“You’re giving people the opportunity to seek help,” LaPlante said. “That’s not a burden.”

He and other proponents acknowledge that it’s not a guarantee to prevent a loved one’s suicide or another mass shooting, and point out that there are other steps Maine could also take to improve gun safety, such as closing background check loopholes and improving access to mental health care.

But they said it’s a step in the right direction and that there’s no harm in giving families the choice of another tool.

“This law is about preventing gun tragedies and saving lives,” said Judi Richardson, whose daughter, Darien Richardson, died after she was shot in a home invasion in Portland in 2010.

Richardson and her husband, Wayne, are gun owners who didn’t think too much about whether Maine’s laws could be improved prior to their daughter being killed, she said.

Then they started connecting with other families around the country who had been impacted by gun violence, and said it opened their eyes to the need for change.

While the home invasion and homicide are still unsolved, Richardson said she can’t say if a red flag law would have helped in her daughter’s case. But she said it can generally improve safety.

“It may not pertain in my situation, but if we can prevent other injuries and deaths, that’s what we’re advocating for,” Richardson said.
https://www.sunjournal.com/2025/10/16/for-mainers-impacted-by-gun-violence-red-flag-referendum-is-personal/

CAC Rises After Government Survives No-confidence Votes

French stocks are trading in positive territory on Thursday, lifting the benchmark CAC 40 to an eight-month high. The market sentiment remains firm following the French government’s survival of no-confidence votes.

France’s reappointed Prime Minister, Sébastien Lecornu, successfully survived successive no-confidence votes in the National Assembly today. His narrow victory was secured thanks to sufficient support from moderates, helping to avert a second government collapse in as many weeks. Lecornu’s offer to suspend an unpopular pension reform played a key role in swaying the opposition Socialists, providing his government with a crucial lifeline in the deeply fragmented chamber.

The CAC 40 index was up 55.75 points, or 0.69%, at 8,132.75 a few minutes ago.

In the stock-specific developments, Pernod Ricard is climbing 3.7%. After a challenging first quarter, the French spirits maker expects sales to improve in fiscal year 2026. For the first quarter, Pernod Ricard recorded sales of EUR 2.384 billion, down from EUR 2.783 billion during the same period last year.

Other notable gainers include EssilorLuxottica, up 2.3%, while Michelin, Edenred, Thales, and Renault are up between 1.6% and 1.8%. Legrand, Societe Generale, Schneider Electric, Sanofi, Safran, STMicroElectronics, Publicis Groupe, and Stellantis saw increases ranging from 1% to 1.2%.

On the downside, Kering is declining by about 1.6%. Bouygues, Euronext, and Hermes International are down between 0.4% and 0.8%, while ArcelorMittal is down marginally.

*Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Nasdaq, Inc.*
https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/cac-rises-after-government-survives-no-confidence-votes

Gold hits new highs as safe-haven buying and Fed outlook fuels momentum

**Gold (XAU/USD) Extends Rally to Fifth Day, Hits New Record Highs Amid Global Uncertainties**

Gold continues its impressive uptrend for the fifth consecutive day, scaling new record highs during the Asian session on Thursday. The persistent rise in gold prices reflects mounting global anxieties among investors, who remain increasingly concerned about economic risks associated with the US government shutdown, heightened US-China trade tensions, and escalating geopolitical conflicts. These factors continue to drive capital flows towards the traditional safe-haven asset—bullion.

Adding to gold’s appeal are dovish expectations for the US Federal Reserve (Fed). Market participants appear to have nearly fully priced in the possibility of two additional rate cuts by the Fed this year, bolstering demand for the non-yielding yellow metal. This outlook weighs on the US Dollar (USD), which has slipped to a more than one-week low, further strengthening the case for gold’s near-term appreciation.

Despite extremely overbought conditions visible on short-term charts, gold bulls remain undeterred. This resilience solidifies a positive near-term outlook for the commodity ahead of upcoming speeches from influential Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) members.

### Market Movers: Gold Supported by Flight to Safety, Dovish Fed, and Weaker USD

The partial US federal government shutdown has now stretched into its third week, with no resolution in sight. On Wednesday, a Republican-backed stopgap funding bill failed for the ninth time in the Senate, intensifying concerns about the economic fallout from a prolonged shutdown. A Treasury official estimated that the shutdown could cost the US economy $15 billion per week in lost output, revising an earlier statement from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

Meanwhile, US-China trade tensions escalated further as both countries imposed reciprocal port fees this week. President Donald Trump also indicated he was considering ending the cooking oil trade with China in retaliation for China’s refusal to purchase American soybeans. Trump described the situation as an all-out trade war between the two nations.

On the other hand, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent proposed a potential pause on import duties for Chinese goods beyond three months if China halts its planned export controls on rare-earth elements—offering a glimmer of hope for easing tensions.

### Geopolitical Concerns and Fed Dovishness Support Gold

Geopolitically, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth warned Russia about possible consequences should the Ukraine conflict continue unabated. Adding to the tensions, President Trump mentioned the possibility of supplying Ukraine with longer-range Tomahawk cruise missiles.

In a dovish signal on Tuesday, Fed Chair Jerome Powell highlighted an ongoing sluggish labor market, characterized by low hiring and firing activity through September. This reaffirmed market expectations for two 25 basis point rate cuts in the Fed’s October and December meetings.

### USD Under Pressure as Gold Extends Gains

The US Dollar has continued its downtrend for the third straight day, reaching its lowest level in over a week during Thursday’s Asian session. This decline supports gold’s record-breaking rally and suggests further upside potential for the yellow metal in the near term.

With no major economic releases on the immediate horizon, all eyes will be on speeches from key FOMC members for clues on upcoming rate adjustments. These communications are expected to play a crucial role in shaping USD demand and providing momentum to gold prices.

### Technical Outlook: Gold Bulls Defy Overbought Signals

The XAU/USD pair has steadily trended higher along an upward-sloping trend line over the past month. Notably, gold’s recent sustained break and hold above the $4,200 psychological level has acted as a fresh catalyst for bullish momentum.

However, an extremely overbought daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) calls for caution before traders consider further long positions. Any corrective pullback could attract buyers near the $4,200 mark, potentially limiting downside pressure toward the $4,180-$4,175 support zone.

If gold breaks convincingly below this level, technical selling may intensify, driving prices toward the intermediate support area around $4,135 en route to the $4,100 level. The next critical support zone lies near $4,060-$4,055. A decisive break below this could signal that the XAU/USD pair has reached a near-term peak.

**In summary, gold’s uptrend remains robust, supported by an intricate mix of economic uncertainties, dovish Fed expectations, and a weakening US dollar. Traders should monitor key support levels closely while staying attuned to upcoming FOMC remarks, which will likely influence the metals market direction in the short term.**
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/finance/gold-hits-new-highs-as-safe-haven-buying-and-fed-outlook-fuels-momentum/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=gold-hits-new-highs-as-safe-haven-buying-and-fed-outlook-fuels-momentum

A Message to Young Conservatives: Get Involved

Over the past year, Gen Z has experienced an unprecedented shift to the right. In particular, Gen Z men shifted to the right by 13 percent from 2020 to 2024. More recently, the assassination of Charlie Kirk has become an inflection point for young conservatives. But where to now?

The younger generation is not shifting to the right because of low taxes or deregulation. They are not shifting to the right for any concrete policy point. It is important to understand that the reason behind Gen Z’s rightward swing is that this generation, more than any other, has a front-row seat to the visceral decay of America.
*(RELATED: The Role Model Generation Z Needed Charlie Kirk)*

Gen Z’s conservative bent stems from one event more than any other: COVID. The COVID lockdowns prevented my generation from engaging in social interaction during the most crucial developmental phases in our lives. Worse still, the COVID lockdowns coincided with a period of rampant social media use among my generation. When Gen Z was not forced to interact, they shelled up online.
*(RELATED: Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Exposes a Generation in Crisis)*

COVID spawned four years of boys in girls’ locker rooms, shameless DEI initiatives, and unprecedented illegal immigration. The culmination of 2020-2024 was an erosion of the societal basis of America, the likes of which we have never seen before. My generation was on the frontlines of America’s cultural baptism in critical theory, DEI, and the products of the Frankfurt School. More than any other, Gen Z was exposed to the most shameless of these ideologies. At the ballot box, these uniquely un-American ideas were rejected.

The zeitgeist of a Gen Z conservative is markedly different from older conservatives. We are based on one guiding principle: America is a uniquely amazing country; therefore, in every way, America and her people must be put first.

For decades, this simple principle has been violated in every conceivable way. From endless foreign wars to economic policies that benefit elites who treat America as nothing more than a means to amass their own power, the leaders of our nation have violated the sovereignty of the American people.

This has resulted in a new consensus in my generation: what we are doing is simply not working.

For many, this is a case for dismay and despair, a reason to write America off. This is fundamentally wrong; America, despite its recent flaws, has given each and every one of us a unique opportunity to succeed. The idea that the “American Experiment” has failed and should be written off should be repulsive to any American.

This is because America is not simply an abstract idea or experiment, but a people, a nation, and a home. We must regain the things that made America special. We must return to a guiding principle that every American is uniquely endowed by our founding principles and therefore should be the unparalleled focus of our government.

While conservative energy has welled up online in my generation, the only way to accomplish our goals is to regain the reins of self-government—in modern terms: get involved.

My message to my fellow young conservatives is exactly that: email your local GOP office, make the phone calls, meet your state representative, and express your viewpoint. You cannot expect your government to reflect your views if you are not collectively and intentionally involved.

Social media can be helpful, but it cannot be a substitute for personal engagement because there is no accountability for bad ideas.

There are multiple emerging campus organizations attempting to remedy this. For example, American Destiny is an up-and-coming nonprofit connecting right-wing college and high school students with right-wing campaigns and causes. More of this is needed.

If Generation Z wants to seriously make a change to put America and her people first, they must have a seat at the table. Now, if you want that seat, you need either a large amount of wealth or focused political capital. The only way to amass the second and effect change is to get involved early and often.

Voicing your opinion on social media is no longer enough; it’s time to take action.

Our founders were perfect examples of this. Our nation was founded because a group of highly engaged and involved young men were ready to sacrifice anything to preserve their right to govern themselves. We must regain our right to govern ourselves.

**READ MORE:**
– Conservatism Can Help Gen Z Conquer Its Biggest Struggle
– Young Conservatives Cannot Afford to Be Neutral on Family
– Liberals Aren’t Pretending Education Is Value-Neutral, and Neither Should We
https://spectator.org/a-message-to-young-conservatives-get-involved/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=a-message-to-young-conservatives-get-involved

米、友好国と中国に対抗 レアアース輸出規制巡り

経済 米、友好国と中国に対抗 レアアース輸出規制巡り

2025/10/16 6:47(2025/10/16 6:49 更新)

【ワシントン共同】ベセント米財務長官は15日、中国によるレアアース(希土類)の輸出規制を巡り、友好国と連携して対抗する考えを示した。日本とも協調する意向とみられる。

ベセント氏は「中国対世界の戦いだ」と述べ、複数の国と連携して中国の動きに対抗していく姿勢を強調した。

(この記事は有料会員限定です。残り492文字。7日間無料トライアルあり 1日37円で読み放題。年払いならさらにお得。)

https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1411855/

イスラエル、ガザへの支援物資搬入制限を通知 ハマスの遺体返還遅れに対抗

【社会・国際】イスラエル、ガザへの支援物資搬入制限を通知 〜ハマスの遺体返還遅れに対抗〜
2025年10月16日 6:00
※この記事は有料会員限定です。

【エルサレム/ニューヨーク共同】
国連人道問題調整室(OCHA)は14日、パレスチナ自治区ガザでの停戦発効に伴い、過去3日間で数千トンの支援物資が搬入されたことを明らかにしました。

しかしながら、同日イスラエルは国連に対して、ハマスによる遺体返還の遅れに対抗する形で、ガザへの支援物資搬入に制限を設けることを通知しました。

▶ 関連記事
ハマス、ガザ支配復活の動き 街頭に戦闘員、武装勢力と衝突 住民「次は内戦か」

※残りの本文(596文字)は有料会員限定での公開となります。
7日間の無料トライアルもご用意しております。1日37円で読み放題。年払いならさらにお得です。

【クリップ機能は有料会員の方のみご利用いただけます。】

西日本新聞meとは?
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1411810/

Exit mobile version