House votes overwhelmingly to force release of Epstein files, sending bill to Senate

WASHINGTON — The House voted overwhelmingly in favor of a bill Tuesday to force the Justice Department to publicly release its files on the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a remarkable display of approval for an effort that had struggled for months to overcome opposition from President Donald Trump and Republican leadership. When a small, bipartisan group of House lawmakers introduced a petition in July to maneuver around House Speaker Mike Johnson’s control of which bills reach the House floor, it appeared a longshot effort — especially as Trump urged his supporters to dismiss the matter as a “hoax.” But both Trump and Johnson failed in their efforts to prevent the vote. Now the president has bowed to the growing momentum behind the bill and even said he will sign it if it also passes the Senate. Moments after the House vote, Senate Majority Leader John Thune said his chamber will act swiftly on the bill. The bill passed the House 427-1, with the only no vote coming from Rep. Clay Higgins, a Louisiana Republican who is a fervent supporter of Trump. He said in a statement that he opposed the bill because it could release information on innocent people mentioned in the federal investigation. The decisive, bipartisan work in Congress Tuesday further showed the pressure mounting on lawmakers and the Trump administration to meet long-held demands that the Justice Department release its case files on Epstein, a well-connected financier who killed himself in a Manhattan jail while awaiting trial in 2019 on charges he sexually abused and trafficked underage girls. “These women have fought the most horrific fight that no woman should have to fight. And they did it by banding together and never giving up,” said Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene as she stood with some of the abuse survivors outside the Capitol Tuesday morning. “That’s what we did by fighting so hard against the most powerful people in the world, even the president of the United States, in order to make this vote happen today,” added Greene, a Georgia Republican and longtime Trump loyalist. The bill’s passage would be a pivotal moment in a yearslong push by the survivors for accountability for Epstein’s abuse and reckoning over how law enforcement officials failed to act under multiple presidential administrations. A separate investigation conducted by the House Oversight Committee has released thousands of pages of emails and other documents from Epstein’s estate, showing his connections to global leaders, Wall Street powerbrokers, influential political figures and Trump himself. In the United Kingdom, King Charles III stripped his disgraced brother Prince Andrew of his remaining titles and evicted him from his royal residence after pressure to act over his relationship with Epstein. The bill forces the release within 30 days of all files and communications related to Epstein, as well as any information about the investigation into his death in federal prison. It would allow the Justice Department to redact information about Epstein’s victims or continuing federal investigations, but not information due to “embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.” Trump’s reversal on the Epstein files Trump has said he cut ties with Epstein years ago, but tried for months to move past the demands for disclosure. Still, many in the Republican base have continued to demand the release of the files. Adding to that pressure, survivors of Epstein’s abuse rallied outside the Capitol Tuesday morning. Bundled in jackets against the November chill and holding photos of themselves as teenagers, they recounted their stories of abuse. “We are exhausted from surviving the trauma and then surviving the politics that swirl around it,” said one of the survivors. Another, Jena-Lisa Jones, said she had voted for Trump and had a message for the president: “I beg you Donald Trump, please stop making this political.” The group of women also met with Johnson and rallied outside the Capitol in September, but have had to wait months for the vote. That’s because Johnson kept the House closed for legislative business for nearly two months and refused to swear-in Democratic Rep. Adelita Grijalva of Arizona during the government shutdown. After winning a special election on Sept. 23, Grijalva had pledged to provide the crucial 218th vote to the petition for the Epstein files bill. But only after she was sworn into office last week could she sign her name to the discharge petition to give it majority support in the 435-member House. It quickly became obvious the bill would pass, and both Johnson and Trump began to fold. Trump on Sunday said Republicans should vote for the bill. Yet Greene told reporters that Trump’s decision to fight the bill had betrayed his Make America Great Again political movement. “Watching this turn into a fight has ripped MAGA apart,” she said. How Johnson is handling the bill Rather than waiting until next week for the discharge position to officially take effect, Johnson held the vote under a procedure that requires a two-thirds majority. But Johnson also spent a morning news conference listing off problems that he sees with the legislation. He argued that the bill could have unintended consequences by disclosing parts of federal investigations that are usually kept private, including information on victims. “This is a raw and obvious political exercise,” Johnson said. Still, he voted for the bill. “None of us want to go on record and in any way be accused of not being for maximum transparency,” he explained. Meanwhile, House Democrats celebrated the vote as a rare win. House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries described it as “a complete and total surrender.” Senate plans to act quickly Even as the bill cleared his chamber, Johnson pressed for the Senate to amend the bill to protect the information of “victims and whistleblowers.” But Senate Majority Leader John Thune showed little interest in that notion, saying he doubted that “amending it is going to be in the cards.” Thune said he would quickly assess senators’ views on the bill to see if there were any objections. He said the bill could be brought forward in the Senate as soon as Tuesday evening and almost certainly by the end of the week. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer also indicated he would attempt to pass the bill Tuesday. “The American people have waited long enough,” he said. Meanwhile, the bipartisan pair who sponsored the bill, Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Ro Khanna, D-Calif., warned senators against doing anything that would “muck it up,” saying they would face the same public uproar that forced both Trump and Johnson to back down. “We’ve needlessly dragged this out for four months,” Massie said, adding that those raising problems with the bill “are afraid that people will be embarrassed. Well, that’s the whole point here.”
https://www.phillytrib.com/news/house-votes-overwhelmingly-to-force-release-of-epstein-files/article_470345c5-423f-4507-af2b-6da69f34926d.html

‘Retribution’: Trump calls for Epstein inquiry into Democrats

President Donald Trump is intensifying his efforts to thwart attempts to force the release of the Epstein files, even as the House moves toward a vote that could send disclosure legislation to his desk for his signature or veto. This development further heightens scrutiny of his past ties to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

On Friday, the president announced he will ask the U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation “to investigate Jeffrey Epstein’s involvement and relationship with Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, Reid Hoffman, J.P. Morgan, Chase, and many other people and institutions, to determine what was going on with them, and him.”

The New York Times reported that the “inquiry appeared to be retribution for the renewed focus on his own ties to Mr. Epstein.”

After White House officials reportedly held a Situation Room meeting with Republican Congresswoman Lauren Boebert on Wednesday to convince her—unsuccessfully—to remove her name from the discharge petition, the president took a different approach on Friday. He appeared both to try to wash his hands of the entire ordeal while refocusing attention on his political opponents and others.

“Epstein was a Democrat, and he is the Democrat’s problem, not the Republican’s problem!” Trump railed on his Truth Social website, while attacking Democrats.

“The Democrats are doing everything in their withering power to push the Epstein Hoax again, despite the DOJ releasing 50,000 pages of documents, in order to deflect from all of their bad policies and losses, especially the SHUTDOWN EMBARRASSMENT, where their party is in total disarray, and has no idea what to do,” Trump alleged.

“Some Weak Republicans have fallen into their clutches because they are soft and foolish,” the president continued. “Epstein was a Democrat, and he is the Democrat’s problem, not the Republican’s problem!”

“Ask Bill Clinton, Reid Hoffman, and Larry Summers about Epstein, they know all about him, don’t waste your time with Trump. I have a Country to run!”

Deadline on Friday noted that “Since the email release, Trump has avoided answering reporters’ questions about Epstein.”

Pointing to Trump’s Friday remarks, Politico’s Kyle Cheney remarked, “Trump again pleads with Republicans to stop talking about Epstein. The pressure hasn’t worked as well as it usually does. Also, the emails show Epstein was politically amorphous, deriding Ds just as much as Rs. And these latest emails were from the Epstein estate, not DOJ.”
https://www.alternet.org/smartnews/trump-clinton-epstein/

‘Is that a hint?’ Epstein helped top Trump advisor attack Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser

One of the emails from convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein recently released by the House Oversight Committee reportedly shows correspondence with Steve Bannon, one of President Donald Trump’s longtime advisors, about getting Trump’s embattled second Supreme Court nominee through a major controversy.

On Wednesday, journalist Sean Morrow of More Perfect Union posted a September 2018 email exchange between Epstein and Bannon. In the exchange, the two discuss a potential line of attack on Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who accused then-Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of assaulting her at a high school party.

According to the emails, Epstein suggested that Kavanaugh’s attorneys press Ford about medications she may have been using, which can sometimes cause memory loss. Epstein wrote from a personal Gmail account, “I delayed my trip a day. So I’m still around.” Bannon responded, “Tell [Kavanaugh attorney Bill Burck] they should make sure they ask Ford about her medications, what type and for how long. My guess is that [Ford lawyer Debra Katz] won’t let her answer.”

Epstein then sent Bannon a link to a 2015 Pharmacy Times article entitled “8 Medications That May Cause Memory Loss.” Bannon replied, “Is this a hint,” to which Epstein responded, “Duh.”

The convicted child predator followed up with another email containing a link to a 2017 University of São Paulo study titled “False Memories in Social Anxiety Disorder.” Bannon later wrote back, “She couldn’t recall if the lie detector was given the same day as her mother’s funeral or the next day? MEDS. Oh I get it now.”

Although Bannon was no longer Trump’s White House chief strategist after August 2017, The Washington Post reported several months after his firing that Bannon and Trump kept in regular contact through phone calls, with Trump usually initiating them. According to the Post, Bannon continued to address Trump as “sir,” despite no longer being an administration employee.
https://www.alternet.org/epstein-trump-kavanaugh/

Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Pivot From Trump, Explained

Marjorie Taylor Greene, the firebrand Georgia Republican, has been breaking ranks with President Donald Trump and the GOP leadership in Congress on an increasingly long list of issues.

She wants Congress to end the government shutdown by agreeing to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits.

Additionally, Greene has demanded the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files and called for a pathway to citizenship for immigrants.

She has also blasted the White House’s funding of wars in Ukraine and Israel.

Most recently, she torched the…
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2025-10-26/marjorie-taylor-greene-s-trump-pivot-explained

Maxwell, Epstein pleaded for Virginia Giuffre to ‘have our baby’ — prompting teen to hatch escape plan: Memoir

**Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s Disturbing Proposal to Virginia Roberts Giuffre: “Have Our Baby”**

In a chilling revelation from her posthumous memoir, *Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice*, Virginia Roberts Giuffre exposed a sinister request from Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The pair pleaded with the then-teenage Giuffre to “have our baby,” a disturbing proposition that left her fearful they intended to breed children for their sex trafficking ring.

The proposal came with promises that sounded almost like a dream: round-the-clock nannies, a mansion either in Palm Beach or New York, and a staggering $200,000 monthly allowance. However, the generous offer was sealed with harsh conditions. Giuffre would have to sign over all legal rights to the child to Epstein, travel wherever he wished with the baby, and attest in writing that Epstein and she were not a couple. Worse still, if Epstein and Maxwell ever had a falling out, the child would remain with Epstein.

> “Everything about Epstein and Maxwell’s brazen request felt wrong,” Giuffre wrote.
> “There was no way I wanted to bring a child into the world for them to raise. What if the baby were female? Was the plan for Epstein and Maxwell to have me bring that little girl up until she reached puberty, then hand her over for them to abuse?”

At the time, Giuffre was just 18 years old and had been under the control of Epstein and Maxwell for two years. During that harrowing period, she endured repeated abuse by elite figures including disgraced royal Prince Andrew and an unnamed Prime Minister, who allegedly left her “bloodied and beaten.” (Prince Andrew has consistently denied these allegations.)

The request to bear their child “pushed me past my breaking point,” Giuffre revealed. The shocking question came after an afternoon snorkeling on Epstein’s private island in the US Virgin Islands. Epstein had spent the day lavishing her with compliments and appreciation for her “devotion” to his lifestyle.

> “Then he came out with it: ‘Jenna, I want you to have our baby,’” Giuffre recalled, referencing the nickname Epstein and Maxwell gave her.
> “Though I’d heard him talk hypothetically about seeding the human race with his DNA, his proposal shocked me.”

Despite Maxwell’s promises of luxury living and financial security, the conditions made clear the disturbing extent of control Epstein and Maxwell wanted to exert—not just over Giuffre, but over any potential child.

Giuffre stressed that the idea of pregnancy itself was daunting, given the trauma and abuse she had endured.

> “Epstein and Maxwell had made so many demands that I had met, ignoring my own feelings in the hope of pleasing them. But this proposal would endanger another person: a helpless child. It was a bridge too far.”

Fully aware that outright refusal would be dangerous, Giuffre began secretly planning her escape.

> “With perfect clarity, I simply knew that I couldn’t agree to their proposal. That said, I also knew I couldn’t just tell Epstein and Maxwell no. That was too dangerous. For the first time in more than two years, I began actively seeking a way to escape, buying time by pretending to think over their offer.”

Eventually, Giuffre agreed to the proposal—but only on the condition that Epstein and Maxwell finally uphold their promise to send her to professional training as a masseuse.

Epstein followed through by sending her to the International Training Massage School in Thailand. While she was expected to continue recruiting girls for Epstein’s trafficking ring, Giuffre instead met her future husband, Robert Giuffre. With his support, she escaped Epstein and Maxwell’s grasp. The couple went on to have three children of their own.

Neither Epstein nor Maxwell ever had children.

Giuffre’s memoir, which contains this haunting account, is set to be released next week. She completed the book in the years before her tragic suicide in April at the age of 41—a reminder of the deep scars left by her years of abuse and her courageous fight for justice.
https://nypost.com/2025/10/18/us-news/maxwell-epstein-pleaded-for-virginia-giuffre-to-have-our-baby-she-wrote-in-memoir/

Prince Andrew says he’s giving up the royal Duke of York title

Prince Andrew announced on Friday that he is relinquishing his royal title of Duke of York amid renewed public scrutiny over his association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The younger brother of King Charles III stated that he and the royal family agreed the ongoing allegations against him have become a distraction from the work of His Majesty and the royal household. A statement released by Buckingham Palace confirmed the decision.

This development comes as excerpts from an upcoming posthumous memoir by Virginia Giuffre have been published. Giuffre alleges that she was trafficked by Epstein and that she had sexual encounters with Prince Andrew when she was 17 years old.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
https://abc7.com/post/buckingham-palace-says-prince-andrew-stop-using-titles-honors-including-duke-york/18026867/

Five Charities Cut Off Ties With Britain’s Duchess Of York Over Links With Epstein

Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, has lost patronage from five charities following the emergence of an email in which she referred to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as a “supreme friend.” The backlash over her ties to Epstein has prompted several organizations to sever their links with her.

The controversy began on Monday after reports surfaced showing Ferguson’s email addressing Epstein with the phrase “steadfast, generous and supreme friend.” Epstein had pleaded guilty in 2008 to a state prostitution charge in Florida.

The Guardian reported that Ferguson’s apology to Epstein followed an interview published in the Evening Standard in March 2011, where she admitted making a “terrible, terrible error of judgment” by accepting £15,000 from Epstein to pay off her debts. She added: “I abhor paedophilia.”

According to The Sun, Ferguson—ex-wife of King Charles’s brother, Prince Andrew—sent the apology email to Epstein in 2011, weeks after stating in an interview that she would never contact him again.

In response to the email revelations, The Telegraph quoted James Henderson, Ferguson’s spokesperson at the time, saying that the email was sent after a “really menacing and nasty” phone call from Epstein, during which he reportedly spoke with a “Hannibal Lecter-type voice.” Henderson described the call as chilling and expressed disbelief that anyone could have maintained a friendship with Epstein given his behavior.

Henderson added, “He said he would destroy the York family and he was quite clear on that. He said he would destroy me. He wasn’t shouting. He had a Hannibal Lecter-type voice. It was very cold and calm and really menacing and nasty.”

He further explained the immense pressure Ferguson faced to protect her family, suggesting there may have been legal actions involved. “This was long before the duke’s life had been ruined by his association with Epstein. It was 14 years ago, and everyone will do what they have to do to protect their family. Her family and children will always come first for her,” Henderson said.

CNN reported that Ferguson’s former spokesperson declined to comment on the charities’ decisions but had previously stated that she sent the email to Epstein to counter the threat of a defamation lawsuit.

On Monday, five charities announced that the Duchess of York would no longer serve as their patron. Nadim and Tanya Ednan-Laperouse, founders of the Natasha Allergy Research Foundation, said in a statement: “We were disturbed to read of Sarah, Duchess of York’s, correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein. She was a patron but, in light of the recent revelations, we have taken the decision that it would be inappropriate for her to continue to be associated with the charity.”

The fallout reflects a broader distancing from Epstein’s associates. In 2022, Prince Andrew was stripped of most of his titles and removed from royal duties due to his connections to the financier. Firms and charities also distanced themselves from him, CNN reported.

This development marks a significant moment in the ongoing repercussions faced by those linked to Jeffrey Epstein as public scrutiny intensifies.
https://www.news18.com/world/five-charities-cuts-off-ties-with-britains-duchess-of-york-over-links-with-epstein-ws-l-9592562.html

Five Charities Cut Off Ties With Britain’s Duchess Of York Over Links With Epstein

Sarah Ferguson Lost Patronage from Five Charities Following Email Revealing Ties to Jeffrey Epstein

Several charities severed their links with Britain’s Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson, after reports emerged that she had described the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as a “supreme friend” in an email. The revelation sparked significant backlash over her association with Epstein.

Background

Jeffrey Epstein had pleaded guilty in 2008 to a state prostitution charge in Florida. In March 2011, Ferguson gave an interview to the Evening Standard, admitting that she had made a “terrible, terrible error of judgment” by accepting £15,000 from Epstein to pay off her debts. She also emphasized, “I abhor paedophilia.”

The Controversial Email

According to The Sun, Ferguson sent an apology email to Epstein in 2011, weeks after her interview in which she stated she would never contact him again. In that email, she referred to Epstein as a “steadfast, generous and supreme friend.”

James Henderson, who was Ferguson’s spokesperson at the time, told The Telegraph that the email was sent following a “really menacing and nasty” phone call from Epstein. Henderson described Epstein’s voice during the call as similar to the chilling tone of Hannibal Lecter. He recalled, “People don’t understand how terrible Epstein was. I can remember everything about that call. It was a chilling call, and I’m surprised anybody was ever friends with him given the way he talked to me.”

Henderson further revealed that Epstein threatened to destroy both Ferguson and her family, stating, “He said he would destroy the York family and he was quite clear on that. He wasn’t shouting. He had a Hannibal Lecter-type voice. It was very cold and calm and really menacing and nasty.”

He added that the pressure on Ferguson to protect her family must have been immense. “I am sure there were legal actions. And this was long before the duke’s life had been ruined by his association with Epstein. It was 14 years ago and everyone will do what they have to do to protect their family. Her family and children will always come first for her.”

Charities Sever Ties

On Monday, five charities announced that the Duchess could no longer be their patron. Nadim and Tanya Ednan-Laperouse, founders of the Natasha Allergy Research Foundation, issued a statement saying, “We were disturbed to read of Sarah, Duchess of York’s, correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein. She was a patron but, in light of the recent revelations, we have taken the decision that it would be inappropriate for her to continue to be associated with the charity.”

Ferguson’s former spokesperson declined to comment specifically on the charities’ decisions but previously stated that the email was sent to counter a potential defamation lawsuit from Epstein.

Wider Impact

In 2022, Prince Andrew, the ex-husband of Sarah Ferguson and brother of King Charles, was stripped of most of his titles and removed from royal duties due to his connections to Epstein. Subsequently, firms and charities also distanced themselves from him, as reported by CNN.

The fallout continues to affect members of the royal family and those associated with Epstein, highlighting the enduring consequences of their ties to the disgraced financier.
https://www.news18.com/world/five-charities-cuts-off-ties-with-britains-duchess-of-york-over-links-with-epstein-ws-l-9592562.html

Exit mobile version