US Supreme Court’s new term will examine Trump’s presidential power

**US Supreme Court’s New Term to Examine Trump’s Presidential Powers**

*By Chanshimla Varah | October 7, 2025, 11:20 AM*

The United States Supreme Court opened its new term on Monday, with Chief Justice John Roberts swiftly rejecting over 800 pending appeals. Among these was a notable appeal from Ghislaine Maxwell, who challenged her conviction for luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by her late partner, Jeffrey Epstein.

### Focus on Trump’s Expansive Presidential Power

Over the next ten months, a primary focus for the justices will be assessing former President Donald Trump’s broad claims of presidential power. Several key cases related to his administration’s actions are set to be heard this term.

### LGBTQ+ Rights: Therapy Ban Cases

One of the initial cases the court will review concerns state bans on therapy aimed at changing sexual orientation or gender identity. Nearly half of the U.S. states have enacted such bans, making this a critical case for LGBTQ+ rights nationwide.

### Trade and Tariff Case

On November 5, the court will hear a major case addressing Trump’s imposition of tariffs on imports. Two lower courts have ruled that Trump lacked the statutory authority to impose these tariffs, setting the stage for a significant Supreme Court decision.

### Authority Over Independent Agencies

In December, the court will consider a case regarding Trump’s authority to remove members of independent agencies at will. This case has the potential to overturn or significantly narrow a 90-year-old precedent surrounding presidential powers.

### Birthright Citizenship Executive Order

Another significant case pending before the court involves Trump’s executive order that sought to deny birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are either in the country illegally or temporarily. The Trump administration has appealed lower court rulings declaring this order unconstitutional. Arguments on this case may take place in late winter or early spring.

### Federal Reserve Board Dispute

The justices will also conduct an expedited review of Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from her position as a governor on the Federal Reserve Board, a key and influential institution in U.S. financial policy.

### National Guard Troop Deployment Legal Battle

The term will also see a legal dispute stemming from Trump’s efforts to seize control of state National Guard troops and deploy them in cities where he alleged rampant crime, despite opposition from local and state leaders. A federal court in Oregon has barred Trump’s proposed troop deployment to Portland, and an appeals court is set to review this decision in the coming days.

As the Supreme Court embarks on this term, many of the cases will have far-reaching consequences on the bounds of presidential authority and the legal landscape surrounding policy and civil rights.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/world/new-supreme-court-term-will-examine-trump-s-presidential-power/story

US Supreme Court’s new term will examine Trump’s presidential power

**US Supreme Court’s New Term to Examine Trump’s Presidential Power**

*By Chanshimla Varah | October 7, 2025 | 11:20 AM*

The United States Supreme Court opened its new term on Monday, marking the beginning of what promises to be a significant judicial session. Chief Justice John Roberts commenced the term by rejecting over 800 pending appeals, including a notable case from Ghislaine Maxwell, who is challenging her conviction related to luring teenage girls for sexual abuse by her late partner, Jeffrey Epstein.

### Focus on Trump’s Presidential Power

A key focus over the next 10 months will be the Court’s examination of former President Donald Trump’s expansive claims of presidential authority. Several high-profile cases connected to Trump’s actions and executive orders are set to be heard, shaping the legal boundaries of presidential power.

### LGBTQ Rights and Conversion Therapy Ban

One of the early cases on the docket involves state bans on therapy aimed at changing sexual orientation or gender identity. Nearly half of the U.S. states have enacted such bans, and the Court’s ruling will have a major impact on LGBTQ rights nationwide.

### Tariffs Imposed by Trump

On November 5, the Supreme Court will hear a significant case revolving around Trump’s imposition of tariffs on imports. Two lower courts previously ruled that Trump lacked the statutory authority to impose these tariffs, and the Court’s decision will clarify the extent of presidential powers in trade matters.

### Case on Removing Independent Agency Members

In December, justices will consider arguments in a case regarding Trump’s authority to remove members of independent agencies at will. This case could overturn or drastically narrow a 90-year-old precedent, significantly altering administrative law.

### Birthright Citizenship Executive Order

The Court has also received a case concerning Trump’s executive order seeking to deny birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are in the country illegally or temporarily. The Trump administration has appealed lower-court rulings that declared the order unconstitutional. This case might be heard later this winter or early spring.

### Federal Reserve Board Dispute

An expedited review is also expected regarding Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from her position as a governor on the Federal Reserve Board, a vital institution in U.S. financial policy.

### National Guard Troop Deployment Legal Battle

The latest legal battle involves Trump’s attempts to deploy state National Guard troops in cities with high crime rates, against objections from local and state officials. A federal court in Oregon recently barred Trump’s troop deployment to Portland, with an appeals court set to review that decision in the coming days.

The Supreme Court’s upcoming term is set to define critical aspects of presidential power and constitutional interpretation, with several landmark cases involving former President Trump likely to have wide-ranging implications. Stay tuned for updates as these cases unfold.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/world/new-supreme-court-term-will-examine-trump-s-presidential-power/story

Lawyer tries to hurl shoe towards CJI Gavai in courtroom

A lawyer allegedly attempted to hurl a shoe at Chief Justice of India BR Gavai during proceedings in the Supreme Court on Monday, according to reports from lawyers present.

The incident took place while a Bench led by the CJI was hearing the mentioning of cases by lawyers. The lawyer approached the dais, removed his shoe, and tried to throw it towards the judge. Alert security personnel inside the courtroom immediately intervened and prevented the attack.

The lawyer was swiftly escorted out of the court premises. As he was being taken away, he was heard shouting, “Sanatan ka apman nahi sahenge” (We will not tolerate insult of Sanatan Dharma).

Despite the disruption, the Chief Justice remained composed and urged the lawyers present to continue with their arguments. “Don’t get distracted by all this. We are not distracted. These things do not affect me,” the CJI remarked.

The apex court’s security unit has initiated an inquiry into the incident. Further details about the lawyer and the possible motives behind the act are awaited.

*This story has been sourced from a third-party syndicated feed and agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for the dependability, trustworthiness, reliability, or accuracy of the information. Mid-day management and mid-day.com reserve the sole right to alter, delete, or remove content without notice at their absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.*
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/lawyer-tries-to-hurl-shoe-towards-cji-gavai-in-courtroom-23597429

Three ex-Shin Bet chiefs to High Court: Cancel Netanyahu’s appointment of David Zini

Three Ex-Shin Bet Chiefs to High Court: Cancel Netanyahu’s Appointment of David Zini

Multiple government officials have expressed opposition to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s appointment of Maj.-Gen. (Res.) David Zini.

The move has sparked significant controversy, with three former Shin Bet chiefs petitioning the High Court to cancel the appointment.

Maj.-Gen. (Res.) David Zini and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Photo Credit: MAAYAN TOAF/GPO

By SARAH BEN-NUN

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-869533

Mumbai: Businessman Files Police Complaint Against Kurla’s Fauziya Hospital For Alleged Negligence Toward Elderly Mother

**Businessman Files Complaint Against Kurla’s Fauziya Hospital Over Alleged Negligence**

Haji Arafat Alamgir Shaikh, a businessman, former Chairman of the Maharashtra State Minority Commission, and BJP Transport Cell President, has lodged a police complaint against Kurla’s Fauziya Hospital. The complaint accuses the hospital management and staff of gross negligence and mistreatment of his 71-year-old mother, Shama Shaikh, who was admitted for treatment.

**Background of the Case**

According to the complaint filed at VB Road Police Station, Shama Shaikh has been suffering from diabetes for five years and had previously experienced a paralysis attack. She was admitted to Fauziya Hospital on September 15 following complaints of vomiting.

**Alleged Fall Due to Safety Lapses**

On September 16, while asleep on her hospital bed, Shama Shaikh allegedly fell to the floor because the bed lacked safety railings. She sustained injuries to her face, eyes, stomach, legs, and knees. Haji Arafat claims that although a domestic aide sounded an alarm, no nurse or ward boy attended to her for nearly 20 minutes.

When the hospital staff finally did respond, the night doctor reportedly dismissed the incident saying, “These small things happen in hospitals. Shift the old woman, we’ll see in the morning.”

**Delayed Medical Attention**

Despite her injuries, Shaikh’s mother reportedly received no medical treatment for over 12 hours. No doctor attended to her until 10 a.m. the following day, by which time swelling and black marks had appeared on her face and under her eyes due to internal bleeding.

Haji Arafat further alleged that it was only after his family doctor, Sohail Khan, visited and insisted on immediate treatment that medical procedures were initiated.

**Accusations Against Hospital Staff**

The complaint names hospital director Dr. Anjum Deshmukh, administrator Usman Shaikh, and duty nurses Amisha Mali and Pratima Gupta as responsible for the negligence. Additionally, Riyaz Shaikh, a hospital staff member who arrived to conduct an X-ray 24 hours later, allegedly behaved rudely towards the elderly patient, reportedly saying in an insulting tone: “Eat later, don’t you understand? I don’t have time for this now.”

**Police Action**

Citing neglect, irresponsibility, and inhumane behavior, Haji Arafat filed a formal complaint at VB Road Police Station. Based on his statement, a case has been registered against the hospital’s directors and staff. The V. B. Marg Police have initiated further investigation into the matter.

This incident raises concerns about patient safety and the quality of care in healthcare institutions, underscoring the importance of strict adherence to medical protocols and compassionate treatment of elderly patients.
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/mumbai-businessman-files-police-complaint-against-kurlas-fauziya-hospital-for-alleged-negligence-toward-elderly-mother

Mumbai Shocker! 18-Year-Old Found Eight Months Pregnant, Investigation Reveals Minor Boyfriend Involved; Booked Under Relevant Sections

**Mumbai Teen’s False Assault Claim Leads to Revelation of Underage Pregnancy**

In a shocking case from Mumbai, an 18-year-old girl who was found to be eight months pregnant during a medical examination at Cama Hospital initially gave a false statement to police in an attempt to protect her boyfriend. The matter came to light after doctors, suspecting she was underage, informed the police, prompting a detailed investigation.

**The Initial Misleading Claim**

According to the initial report, the victim stated that she was sexually assaulted by an unknown man while on a trip to Matheran with friends. She alleged that the man, despite knowing she was underage, forced himself on her at a lodge. Based on this account, the Matheran Police launched an investigation into the alleged assault.

**The Truth Unfolds**

The investigation took a turn when police interrogated the victim’s close friend. The friend confirmed that she and another companion had traveled to Matheran in July, but the victim had not accompanied them. This directly contradicted the victim’s earlier story.

When confronted with this evidence, the victim admitted in a supplementary statement recorded on September 25 that her initial account was fabricated.

**The Actual Sequence of Events**

The victim revealed that her 17-year-old boyfriend was responsible for her pregnancy. She stated that he had repeatedly engaged in sexual relations with her when she was still a minor, around January or February 2024, at his maternal uncle’s residence.

**Case Transfer and Charges**

Based on the revised statements and corroboration from her friends, investigators established that the offence took place within the jurisdiction of the Wadala TT Police Station. Consequently, the Matheran Police have officially transferred the case to Wadala TT Police for further investigation.

The 17-year-old boyfriend has been booked under relevant sections, and further inquiries are currently underway.
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/mumbai-shocker-18-year-old-found-eight-months-pregnant-investigation-reveals-minor-boyfriend-involved-booked-under-relevant-sections

Sean Combs ‘Has Genuine Psychological Challenges’ and ‘Suffers PTSD’ Due to Father’s Murder, Disgraced Rapper’s Lawyer Claimed Before Judge Sent Him to Prison

**Sean “Diddy” Combs Sentenced to Four Years in Prison: Lawyer Highlights Mental Health Struggles During Hearing**

*Published: Oct. 3, 2025, 5:05 p.m. ET*

Sean “Diddy” Combs was sentenced to four years in prison following a dramatic sentencing hearing, RadarOnline.com can reveal. Prior to the judge’s ruling, Combs’ attorneys and supporters made impassioned pleas on his behalf, highlighting the rapper and entrepreneur’s troubled past and mental health challenges.

### Combs’ Lawyer Details Psychological Struggles

Combs’ attorney, Marc Agnifilo, urged the court to consider the impact of Combs’ past on his current situation. Speaking before the sentencing, Agnifilo revealed that Combs has long suffered from mental health issues.

“We are asking for a lot, a 14-month sentence, and I want to give the court some reasons,” Agnifilo said. He pointed to traumatic events in Combs’ childhood, specifically the murder of his father, as a significant factor.

“Sean Combs has genuine psychological challenges,” Agnifilo explained. “In 2014, 2017, and 2020, he reported to three different doctors, and he was diagnosed with PTSD.”

### Plans for Post-Release Engagements

Earlier in the day, another attorney representing Combs, Xavier Donaldson, spoke about his client’s plans following release. According to Donaldson, Combs already had community-focused speaking engagements scheduled.

“Contrary to what the government said, we do need something for him to do if he gets out today,” Donaldson shared. He described these commitments as “teaching” opportunities aimed at helping formerly convicted individuals prepare for life after prison.

“These are teaching engagements that we contacted them about if the court lets him out,” Donaldson added.

### Support From a Pastor

A Miami pastor also appeared in court to advocate for Combs’ release. Rev. Gary Johnson emphasized that incarceration would unlikely change Combs’ behavior or character.

“The government equates Sean Combs with a pimp. I want to be clear, Mr. Combs is not a pimp,” the pastor told the court. “A pimp is in the business of subjugating women; therefore, he should not and cannot be considered a pimp.”

Rev. Johnson continued, “As Michael Jordan said, these sneakers are just sneakers – but when Sean does things, he turns them into opportunities. Sean needs an opportunity. I am asking you to give him to us, and we won’t let you down.”

### Combs’ Emotional Statement

In a heartfelt statement prior to sentencing, Combs addressed the court directly, expressing remorse for his actions.

“One of the hardest things I’ve had to handle was having to be quiet and not being able to express how sorry I am for my actions,” he said.

Combs apologized specifically to Cassie Ventura, acknowledging any emotional or physical harm he caused her.

“I want to personally apologize to Cassie Ventura for any harm I have caused her emotionally or physically. I don’t take that lightly. I would like to apologize to her family. I am so sorry. I would like to apologize to Jane. I’m sorry. I brought you into my mess,” he added.

He described his behavior as “disgusting, shameful, and sick,” admitting struggles with substance abuse.

“I was sick, sick from the drugs. I was out of control, I needed help, and I didn’t get the help, and I cannot make no excuse because my mother taught me,” Combs continued. “I got lost in my dream of life. I am not this larger-than-life person. I am just a human being. I was trying my best, I got lost in my excess.”

### Guilty Verdict

Before his sentencing, Combs was found guilty on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, charges that have added to the gravity of his legal battle.

This case highlights the complex intersections of celebrity, mental health, and the legal system, bringing Sean “Diddy” Combs’ personal struggles into the public eye as he begins his prison sentence.
https://radaronline.com/p/sean-coms-psychological-challenges-ptsd-lawyer-claims/

EXCLUSIVE: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Taking ‘Massive Risk’ By Speaking at Sentencing… as Disgraced Sex Beast Faces 20 Years Behind Bars

**Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ Risky Move Ahead of Sentencing Could Backfire**

*Published Oct. 2, 2025, 6:57 p.m. ET*

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ decision to address the court just before his sentencing on Friday, October 3, could be a risky gamble, RadarOnline.com can exclusively report. The music mogul is facing the possibility of up to 20 years in prison after being found guilty on two felony counts of transportation to engage in prostitution.

While Combs passed on the chance to testify during his trial, his lawyers have revealed that he will finally speak at sentencing to plead for leniency. However, legal experts warn that this move might do more harm than good.

### Legal Experts Weigh In

Attorney Tony Buzbee, who previously established a hotline for alleged victims of Combs and received thousands of calls and accusations, told Radar, “What can he say? The conduct we saw at the trial, and the conduct alleged in the civil cases, is reprehensible.”

Buzbee believes the producer is merely “grasping at straws” with this last-minute decision. “I’ve always believed when you are digging yourself a hole, stop digging,” he added.

### The Risk Is Real

Government prosecutors are pushing for a prison sentence of at least 11 years. In contrast, Combs’ defense team is aiming for no more than 14 months, which would mean time served and effectively immediate release.

Judge Arun Subramanian, who presided over the case, holds the final decision. Brian C. Stewart, a trial attorney at Parker & McConkie, told Radar that the actual sentence will likely fall somewhere in between.

“Fourteen months is probably wishful thinking, and eleven years may be too heavy-handed,” Stewart said. “I would expect it to be somewhere in the middle, around four to six years.”

Stewart also noted the importance of Combs’ statement at sentencing: “This is his one opportunity to influence the judge’s decision, and he should take it with a short, sincere, and remorseful statement. If he stands up and owns it, that can shave years off; if he makes excuses, it could add them.”

### Combs’ Final Attempts at Leniency

Recently, Combs has been urging family and friends to write letters to Judge Subramanian, seeking leniency on his behalf. However, Stewart doubts such letters will have much impact.

“Good behavior and supportive letters can’t hurt, but they seem unlikely to carry much weight with the judge under these circumstances,” he said.

In a last note to the court on Thursday, Combs’ lawyers tried to humanize their client:

> “Like all human beings, Mr. Combs is flawed. But he is the first to admit he has made many serious mistakes, and he has been working very hard to better himself and make the most of his time behind bars.
> We respectfully submit that he deserves a chance to continue his rehabilitation outside the walls of a prison, and ask the Court to be merciful and afford him that opportunity.”

### Charm Offensive in Court

Combs is reportedly confident that he can sway the judge with his personal charm. A source told Hollywood Insider Rob Shuter, who reports on Substack, “He thinks his words can change everything. It’s arrogant, but it’s worked for him before.”

Shuter revealed that Combs’ legal team has requested permission for him to wear street clothes instead of the standard prison jumpsuit during the hearing, aiming to appear more humane and humbled.

Combs has also promised to be “dignified and respectful” in court as he tries to leverage his charisma to buy his freedom.

“He’s empowered,” another insider told Shuter. “He thinks if anyone can flip a judge at the last minute, it’s him.”

As Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs prepares to face sentencing, all eyes are on whether his courtroom speech will tip the scales toward leniency or further incarceration. The outcome remains uncertain, but the risks of his decision to speak are clear.
https://radaronline.com/p/sean-diddy-combs-sentencing-speech-judge-big-risk-addressing-court/

EXCLUSIVE: Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Taking ‘Massive Risk’ By Speaking at Sentencing… as Disgraced Sex Beast Faces 20 Years Behind Bars

**Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ Risky Move Ahead of Sentencing Could Backfire, Experts Say**

*Published Oct. 2, 2025, 6:57 p.m. ET*

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ decision to address the court just before his sentencing on Friday, October 3, could be a risky gamble, RadarOnline.com can exclusively report. The disgraced music mogul faces up to 20 years in prison after being found guilty on two felony counts of transportation to engage in prostitution.

During his trial, Combs chose not to take the stand or testify on his own behalf. However, as he prepares to beg for leniency, his legal team confirms he will finally speak in court. But according to attorney Tony Buzbee, this could be a mistake.

**Legal Experts Caution Against Speaking**

Buzbee, who has been heavily involved in the case and even set up a hotline for alleged victims to come forward, tells Radar, “What can he say? The conduct we saw at the trial, and the conduct alleged in the civil cases, is reprehensible.” He added that Combs now appears to be “grasping at straws.”

“I’ve always believed when you are digging yourself a hole, stop digging,” Buzbee noted, underscoring the risk involved.

**Sentencing Discrepancies Highlight Situation**

Government prosecutors are pushing for a prison sentence of at least 11 years, while Combs’ defense team is lobbying for no more than 14 months — essentially time served. Judge Arun Subramanian, who presides over the case, holds the final decision.

Brian C. Stewart, a trial attorney at Parker & McConkie, shared with Radar that he expects the sentence will likely fall somewhere in the middle.

“Fourteen months is probably wishful thinking, and eleven years may be too heavy-handed. I would expect it to be somewhere around four to six years,” Stewart said.

He also warned that Combs’ choice to speak in court is a double-edged sword.

“This is his one opportunity to influence the judge’s decision, and he should take it with a short, sincere, and remorseful statement. If he stands up and owns it, that can shave years off; if he makes excuses, it could add them,” Stewart explained.

**Combs Seeks Support from Loved Ones**

Recently, Combs has been urging family and friends to write letters to Judge Subramanian asking for leniency. However, Stewart doubts these letters will significantly influence the judge’s decision.

“Good behavior and supportive letters can’t hurt, but they seem unlikely to carry much weight with the judge under these circumstances,” he added.

In a final statement to the judge on Thursday, Combs’ attorneys aimed to humanize their client:

“Like all human beings, Mr. Combs is flawed. But he is the first to admit he has made many serious mistakes, and he has been working very hard to better himself and make the most of his time behind bars.

We respectfully submit that he deserves a chance to continue his rehabilitation outside the walls of a prison, and ask the Court to be merciful and afford him that opportunity.”

**Charm Offensive Planned for Court Appearance**

Combs is reportedly confident that his charm can sway the judge. A source told Hollywood Insider Rob Shuter, who reports on Substack, “He thinks his words can change everything. It’s arrogant, but it’s worked for him before.”

Furthermore, Combs’ lawyers have requested that he be allowed to wear “street clothes” instead of the standard prison jumpsuit during the hearing — an attempt to appear more humane and humbled.

Combs has also promised to be “dignified and respectful” in court as he tries to buy his freedom with charm.

“He’s empowered,” another insider told Shuter. “He thinks if anyone can flip a judge at the last minute, it’s him.”

*Stay tuned for updates as the sentencing unfolds.*
https://radaronline.com/p/sean-diddy-combs-sentencing-speech-judge-big-risk-addressing-court/

EXCLUSIVE: Nicole Kidman’s ‘$600K Per Year Drug Clause’ for Keith Urban Under Scrutiny After Split — ‘A Decision’ to Separate ‘Wasn’t Made Lightly,’ Legal Expert Claims

**Sept. 30, 2025, Published 3:03 p.m. ET**

As Nicole Kidman’s separation drama from Keith Urban unfolds, a divorce attorney has exclusively spoken to RadarOnline.com about an intriguing detail in their prenuptial agreement — the so-called “cocaine clause.”

According to reports, this “cocaine clause” stated that Urban would be eligible for $600,000 annually, but only if he abstained from drugs and alcohol during their marriage.

### A Legal Expert Dishes on the Alleged Provision in Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban’s Prenuptial Agreement

Lois Liberman, a partner in Blank Rome’s Matrimonial and Family Law Group, shared her insights exclusively with RadarOnline.com about this pertinent clause.

“It is more than likely that, in addition to the alleged provision which provides Keith with $600,000 per year from Nicole for every year of marriage, there would be additional clauses that specify what Keith acquired in his own name as his separate property,” Liberman explained. “For those assets that the parties held jointly, there would presumably be some distributable interest in those assets. Any drug use would not diminish his interest in those assets.”

### Keith Urban’s Separation Likely Not a Light Decision, Says Legal Expert

Liberman noted it’s “possible” that the monies Keith was to receive annually — as compensation for waiving claims to assets Nicole acquired during the marriage — could be forfeited for years in which he did not have his drug use “under control.”

She added, “Given that it has been reported that the decision to separate was Keith’s, it is likely that if there were such a huge financial penalty — whereby he would have lost $11,400,000 ($600,000 x 19 years) — that such a decision would not have been made lightly. Alternatively, he may have felt financially secure enough to proceed with the divorce regardless.”

### Possible Post-Nuptial Agreement May Have Addressed Sobriety Issues

Liberman also suggested that Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban might have created a post-nuptial agreement during their marriage to address Urban’s “initial sobriety slip.”

“This may have clarified whether he would still be entitled to such monies if he remained clean and sober throughout the rest of the marriage,” she concluded.

### Keith Urban’s Struggles and Recovery During His Marriage to Nicole Kidman

In October 2006, only a few months after marrying Kidman, Keith Urban entered rehab for drug and alcohol addiction. Reports say Kidman planned an intervention, which Urban credits as a pivotal moment in his recovery.

He has described Kidman’s support during this period as critical, saying he was “very, very blessed” to have her by his side as he worked toward sobriety.

### Separation Outed: Split Said to Be One-Sided

As RadarOnline.com reported, the couple’s separation was revealed on September 29. Sources claim the split is one-sided, with Kidman doing everything she can to save their marriage.

Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.
https://radaronline.com/p/nicole-kidman-keith-urban-drug-clause-prenup-under-scrutiny-divorce/

Exit mobile version