Oregon child attacked by coyote during game of hide-and-seek in backyard, state officials sound alarm

A 9-year-old child in Oregon was bitten by a coyote while playing hide-and-seek in a Portland neighborhood, prompting state wildlife officials to warn parents to closely supervise children outdoors and to scare off any coyotes that appear.

According to the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), the incident occurred Thursday evening around 6:15 p.m. in Portland’s Alameda neighborhood. Two children, ages 9 and 3, were playing outside when a coyote approached the older child and grabbed their foot. The child, who was wearing socks but no shoes, managed to shake free and run away while the coyote gave chase.

The child’s father shouted from the porch, causing the animal to flee. The 9-year-old was taken to a local hospital and treated for minor injuries.

In response, ODFW staff immediately launched an investigation, canvassed the neighborhood, and posted flyers warning residents. Officials have continued to monitor the area and are working with city, state, and federal partners to determine appropriate next steps.

Residents are urged to supervise young children, keep pets leashed or indoors, remove food attractants such as garbage and pet food, and use loud noises or thrown objects to scare away bold coyotes.

“Under no circumstances should people provide food to coyotes or other predators,” ODFW emphasized. “Feeding by humans is frequently associated with attacks and aggressive behavior.”

Coyotes are common throughout Oregon, including in Portland neighborhoods, and typically feed on rodents, fruit, and nuts.

For more information and safety tips, residents are encouraged to stay informed and cautious when spending time outdoors.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/oregon-child-attacked-coyote-during-game-hide-and-seek-backyard-state-officials-sound-alarm

Woman, 19-month-old killed in Route 222 crash in Berks

A 19-year-old woman and a 19-month-old child were killed Monday in a crash on Route 222 at the overpass for Kutztown Road in Richmond Township, police said.

The woman and child, both residents of Columbia, Lancaster County, were passengers in a car driven by a 27-year-old woman from Pottsville, according to Fleetwood police, who provide coverage in the township. Police confirmed that the child was in a safety seat, but it remains unknown whether the adult passenger was wearing a seat belt.

The driver and a 7-year-old boy, who was also a passenger in the car, sustained serious injuries. Authorities stated that the driver was not wearing a seat belt, and it is unclear if the boy was secured in a safety seat.

Here is the police account of the incident: The car was traveling southbound on Route 222 at approximately 10:50 a.m. Monday. As it entered a curve, the vehicle went off the road, crossed the center median, and entered the left northbound lane, where it collided with an SUV driven by a 44-year-old woman from White Marsh, Maryland. The car then went over the bridge and crashed onto the road below.

Tragically, three of the four occupants of the car were ejected from the vehicle.

Following the collision, the SUV spun and was struck by a tractor-trailer driven by a 42-year-old male. The SUV ended up partially underneath the trailer. The SUV driver was wearing a seat belt and suffered minor injuries. The truck driver was also wearing a seat belt and was not injured.

The injured parties were transported to Lehigh Valley Cedar Crest Hospital for treatment.

Police have not released the names of those involved. Northbound traffic on Route 222 was detoured for more than five hours while the investigation continued.

Authorities are still investigating the crash. Further updates will be provided as more information becomes available.
https://www.mcall.com/2025/10/28/woman-19-month-old-killed-in-route-222-crash-in-berks/

Capitals assistant coach fired after domestic abuse investigation

The Washington Capitals have started their defense of the Metropolitan Division title with a 6-3-0 record in the 2025-26 NHL season. However, an NHL investigation concluded on Sunday has resulted in significant changes to Spencer Carbery’s coaching staff.

The Capitals have fired assistant coach Mitch Love following an NHL investigation into domestic abuse accusations. According to Frank Seravalli, “Sources say NHL has suspended [Capitals] assistant coach Mitch Love for the entirety of the 2025-26 season following an investigation into alleged domestic abuse. The victim reported allegations directly to the NHL and teams Love interviewed with over the summer for head coach vacancies.”

In response to the findings, the Capitals released a statement via their official public relations social media account: “Mitch Love has been relieved of his duties as an assistant coach, effective immediately. This decision follows the findings of an NHL-led investigation into past allegations. The organization is committed to maintaining the highest standards of conduct and accountability.”

Mitch Love joined the Capitals coaching staff in the 2023-24 season when Spencer Carbery took over as head coach. Prior to his tenure in Washington, Love spent time as head coach of the Stockton Heat and Calgary Wranglers, both American Hockey League (AHL) teams.

Seravalli also noted that Love had been considered for NHL head coaching positions last summer, but these allegations affected his opportunities. The Capitals placed Love on leave on September 14, when the investigation began. While specific details of the allegations have not been disclosed, both the NHL and the team deemed the findings serious enough to warrant his suspension and termination.

Love will be eligible to seek new employment in the NHL after the 2025-26 season. However, this investigation has already impacted his career prospects and will likely continue to affect any future job opportunities.

The Washington Capitals are set to return to action on Tuesday with a road game against the Dallas Stars.
https://clutchpoints.com/nhl/washington-capitals/capitals-news-assistant-coach-fired-domestic-abuse-investigation

‘What he did was wrong’: Denver judge under investigation for allegedly paying defendant’s $1 bond

A Denver County Court judge is under investigation after allegedly paying a $1 bond for a defendant in his courtroom in August, Denver7 Investigates has learned.

Judge Barry Schwartz has been reassigned and is not hearing cases while the investigation continues.

The incident in question occurred during an August 15 court appearance where Schwartz was overseeing a bond forfeiture hearing for a probation violation in a 2016 misdemeanor assault case. A representative for the defendant told the court that although bond is typically set at $1 in these cases, she was asking for a personal recognizance bond because she did not have a dollar.

Denver7 Investigates obtained an audio recording of a roughly three-minute portion of the hearing in which Schwartz is heard telling the attorney, “We have a dollar.”

“It’s pretty black and white,” said Denver-based attorney Harvey Steinberg. “What he did was wrong.”

Denver7 Investigates asked Steinberg and retired Pueblo Chief Judge Dennis Maes to independently review the audio recording. Both said they have never heard of a judge acting in this manner.

“It shocked me,” Maes said. “We’re supposed to be impartial. We are not to let our emotions get carried away in the courtrooms so that we can make solid courtroom decisions.”

A Denver County Court spokesperson confirmed in a statement that they received a complaint about one of their judges and referred the matter to the Colorado Commission on Judicial Discipline.

Maes added that the amount of money — just $1 — doesn’t excuse what Schwartz did, and that it would be just as problematic if the bond was $1,000. He also pointed to the Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct, a set of rules and regulations that judges are sworn to uphold.

Canon Two of the code states:
“A judge should respect and comply with the law and should conduct himself or herself at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.”

Canon Three is subtitled:
“A judge should perform the duties of his or her office impartially and diligently.”

“Judges don’t assist defendants,” Steinberg said. “You’re in the middle. You’re supposed to be the person who makes sure that the law is followed. You’re supposed to be the sense of propriety. You’re supposed to have a sense of fairness. What he did clearly crosses the line.”

Regarding the investigation, both Steinberg and Maes feel that Schwartz should be able to keep his job despite his misstep.

“I would not remove him permanently from the bench,” Maes said. “He thought in his heart he was doing the right thing and he let his emotions get in the way for a while. While it’s serious, it would not, to me, rise to the level of removal.”

Steinberg added, “Now the question is, for what I’m going to call a foolish mistake, should he lose his job? I don’t think so. I think he did what he felt was an act of kindness. I would like to see more judges act kindly and compassionately toward defendants, but he also has to realize his role in the system and not step down from the bench and take sides.”

Denver7 Investigates requested an interview with Schwartz. A spokesperson responding on his behalf declined, stating it would be inappropriate to comment while the matter is pending. A request for a copy of the complaint was also denied.

Sources tell Denver7 Investigates that Schwartz is still receiving full pay but is currently doing office work and processing warrants while the investigation continues.

In response to Denver7’s investigation, a spokesperson with the Denver County Court sent the following full statement:
[Statement to be inserted here]
https://www.denver7.com/news/investigations/what-he-did-was-wrong-denver-judge-under-investigation-for-allegedly-paying-defendants-1-bond

Sushant Singh Rajput’s family alleges CBI probe into his death to be “incomplete and misleading,” to file protest petition

**Sushant Singh Rajput’s Family to Contest CBI Closure Report Five Years After Actor’s Death**

Five years after the tragic death of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, his family has decided to challenge the Central Bureau of Investigation’s (CBI) closure report. The report, which concluded that the 34-year-old star died by suicide, cleared actor Rhea Chakraborty of all allegations. However, Sushant’s family strongly disputes these findings, labeling the investigation as “incomplete” and “misleading.”

The CBI’s March 2025 report ruled out any foul play in Rajput’s death. It stated there was no evidence to prove that Rhea Chakraborty abetted the actor’s suicide or misappropriated his finances. The agency highlighted that Sushant was alone in his Bandra apartment between June 8 and June 14, 2020—the day he was found dead—and noted that neither Rhea nor her brother Showik visited him during this period.

Despite these findings, Sushant’s family remains unconvinced. According to a report by Mid-Day, their lawyer, Advocate Varun Singh, criticized the report for a lax investigation approach.

“This is nothing but an eyewash. If the CBI wanted to uncover the truth, it should have submitted all supporting documents—chats, technical data, witness statements, and medical records. We will file a protest petition against this closure report, which is based on a shoddy investigation,” Singh said.

The CBI’s submission included two closure reports filed earlier this year. The first addressed a complaint lodged by Sushant’s father, K. K. Singh, in Patna, accusing Rhea and her family of driving the actor to suicide and mishandling his finances. The second involved a case Rhea had registered against Sushant’s sisters in Mumbai.

The agency’s findings also stated that Rajput’s financial matters were transparently handled by his chartered accountant and lawyer. It further deemed the actor’s expenses on Rhea—including their 2019 Europe trip—legitimate and voluntary.

Responding to these claims, Advocate Varun Singh argued the CBI’s conclusions lacked transparency. “Merely claiming that funds weren’t withdrawn from Sushant’s account isn’t enough. The CBI must present detailed bank statements to substantiate its conclusion. This flimsy report won’t hold in court,” he asserted.

The case is scheduled for hearing in a Patna court on December 20, where Sushant’s family intends to formally challenge the CBI’s closure report.

**Also Read:**
Rhea Chakraborty shares an emotional moment of dancing in jail after bail in Sushant Singh Rajput case; says, “I did naagin dance on the day of my bail.”

*BOLLYWOOD NEWS LIVE UPDATES*
https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/sushant-singh-rajputs-family-alleges-cbi-probe-death-incomplete-misleading-file-protest-petition/

Louvre Museum in Paris closed after robbery, France’s culture minister says

France’s Culture Minister, Rachida Dati, confirmed that a theft occurred at the Louvre Museum on Sunday, leading to the museum’s closure for the day.

“A robbery took place this morning at the opening of the Louvre Museum,” Dati wrote on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter.

The Louvre announced it would close “for exceptional reasons” but did not provide further details about the incident. Fortunately, no injuries were reported.

Dati also mentioned that she was present at the site and that an investigation into the theft is currently underway.
https://nypost.com/2025/10/19/world-news/louvre-museum-in-paris-closed-after-robbery-frances-culture-minister-says/

Jack Smith’s former right-hand man joins Comey’s defense team

Comey became the first former FBI director in history to face arraignment earlier this month after being indicted in September. He has suggested that he faces a politically motivated case driven by antagonists within President Donald Trump’s Justice Department. Comey is pleading not guilty to two felony counts related to his 2020 Senate testimony. These charges include allegedly lying to Congress about authorizing a subordinate to speak with reporters and obstructing a congressional proceeding.

David Dreeben, who previously led Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team in delivering arguments before the Supreme Court regarding former President Trump’s legal immunity, has been assigned to Comey’s case. Dreeben and Smith had argued that Trump does not have absolute immunity for official acts. This debate around absolute immunity arose when Smith led the Biden Justice Department’s prosecution against Trump for election interference.

Trump argued that the case was weaponized against him for political purposes. He maintained his innocence against DOJ charges alleging that he sought to overturn the 2020 election through his actions on January 6, 2021. Trump’s defense rested on his interpretation of the Constitution, claiming absolute immunity for acts committed as president. However, the Supreme Court issued a ruling last year largely in Trump’s favor, delivering a setback to Dreeben and Smith’s election-interference case.

Similarly, Comey contends that his indictment is politically motivated retribution for the investigations he led as FBI director. Under Comey’s direction, the FBI launched a 2016 investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russian efforts to influence the election. Trump has long dismissed this investigation as a “hoax” after it ultimately fizzled out following years of scrutiny.

Comey received a slight boost in his legal battle earlier this week when a judge rejected federal prosecutors’ attempt to impose broad restrictions on the evidence that Comey can access ahead of his trial.

Dreeben’s involvement in Comey’s case comes after his work on former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team. Mueller’s team probed Trump over suspicions of colluding with Russia to win the 2016 election. After nearly two years of scrutiny, Mueller closed the investigation in 2019, concluding that there was no evidence that the Trump campaign coordinated with the Russian government.

Trump has consistently framed the investigation as a “witch hunt,” portraying it as an effort by the so-called deep state to end his career.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/3855792/jack-smith-former-right-hand-man-comey-defense-team/

‘It’s a dictatorship’: Lawmaker fears future Dems may never be sworn in under Mike Johnson

WASHINGTON Former House Leader Steney Hoyer (D-MD) warned this week that Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) could be slow-walking Congress into an era where he refuses to swear in more members of the Democratic caucus. Speaking to Raw Story on Thursday about Johnson’s refusal to swear in Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ), Hoyer said that if Johnson hadn’t already sworn in two Republicans, he might have a valid argument. “It is a dictatorship,” said Hoyer. “You cannot do that. The people of Arizona elected her by a very substantial vote. And he won’t swear her in! This business of not swearing in a member of Congress. What if he decided in the next Congress, he’s an elected Speaker, and then he decides not to swear in 25% of our people?” Raw Story also spoke with Sens. Rick Scott (R-FL), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Jim Banks (R-IN), all of whom dismissed the issue as either unimportant or claimed they don’t know who she is. “Nope,” Graham said simply when asked if he’d heard about Grijalva. “Who?” asked Scott when Raw Story mentioned her name. “They’re not in session.” Raw Story mentioned the two lawmakers from Florida who were also sworn in during a pro-forma session, which is how Grijalva would be sworn in if Johnson chose to. “I don’t know. I can’t imagine there’s any politics involved,” said Scott. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) added her name to the list of furious Democrats. “The people of her district are being denied representation,” Warren said, harkening back to the rallying cry from American colonists protesting British taxes. “The speaker of the House is too frightened to swear her in. That’s not how democracy works. There was an election. The election has been certified. She needs to be sworn in. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) has been one of the outspoken voices from the Arizona delegation demanding that Grijalva be seated. He and Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) confronted Johnson in the Capitol last week, demanding answers. Kelly recalled that Johnson had previously said he would swear in the winner of the race as soon as they wished. Now, however, he’s changed his story. He also agreed it was related to the discharge petition that would be approved if Grijalva were sworn in. A discharge petition would mandate a vote on a measure that would require the Justice Department to release the investigation files of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. As it stands, the petition requires one additional vote to bring the legislation to the House floor for a vote. “He should embrace the term rip off the bandaid,” quipped Kelly, noting that Johnson will eventually be forced to swear Grijalva into her seat and that the discharge petition is coming even if he wants to stop it. “Just get it done and over with. But there are a lot of women out there who deserve for there to be some accountability,” said Kelly.
https://www.rawstory.com/raw-investigates/adelita-grijalva-2674206538/

Two Arrested for Tracking Women by GPS and Forcing Into Prostitution

According to the Metropolitan Police Department, Suzuki and fellow staff member Aya Tano forced a woman to live inside the bar’s premises. During this time, they subjected her to verbal abuse, including remarks such as “Your appearance is bad, that’s why sales are low” and “Go stand on the street.” Additionally, they compelled her to solicit clients around Okubo Park in Shinjuku.

Investigators believe the suspects coerced the woman into having sex with approximately 400 customers. It is alleged that they pocketed about 6 million yen in earnings from these encounters.

The police are continuing their investigation to uncover the full extent of the operation and to identify possible additional victims.
https://newsonjapan.com/article/147289.php

From Drug Raids to Visa Violations: Inside Japan’s Night Patrol Operations

TOKYO, Oct 15 — A police officer approaches a parked car in a dark city parking lot. What emerges from inside is shocking. How do professionals detect crimes that hide in the night? This investigation delves into the work of officers on the front line.

### The Automobile Patrol Unit: Nighttime Crime Prevention

The theme of today’s investigation is the work of the specialist patrol unit that conducts street-level checks at night to prevent crime: the Automobile Patrol Unit.

“Please pull over to the left side of the road. Stop your vehicle on the left,” the officer instructed as he stopped a man driving a white car.

From the trunk, something unexpected appeared.

“What’s this? Be honest.”

“This is for smoking cannabis, isn’t it?”

“Yes.”

“How long ago?”

“About three or four years ago.”

The man had tools used for smoking marijuana. But why were they still in his trunk?

“I didn’t have anywhere else to put them, and I thought I might need them again,” he explained.

### Illegal Immigration: A Growing Concern

Alongside drug-related offenses, illegal immigration presents another serious problem.

Suddenly, a man bolts from the scene — a foreigner.

“This isn’t his neighborhood.”

“He’s an overstayer,” an officer noted.

The problem is deep-rooted.

“Do you have other friends?”

“Yes, lots of them.”

“Also overstayers?”

“Many. A lot.”

With this in mind, the patrol investigated what kinds of crimes hide in the city at night, and how police spot them.

### Enforcing Vehicle Maintenance and Safety

At around 11 p.m. in Saitama, a black car left a convenience store.

“Look, one of the license plate lights is out,” an officer observed.

Noticing the broken light illuminating the license plate, the officer signaled the driver to pull over.

“Please stop completely.”

Because the car was in violation of maintenance standards, the officer stopped it and spoke with the driver.

“You don’t often see this, but please fix it as soon as possible,” the officer advised.

The driver, a man in his 20s, appeared unaware that the light was out.

“I also don’t have my driver’s license with me,” he admitted.

The man had committed two violations: driving with faulty equipment and not carrying his license.

### Suspicious Items and Minor Offenses

Sensing something suspicious, the officer checked inside the car.

“What’s this? Pepper spray?”

Yes, a canister of pepper spray was found in a pocket beside the driver’s seat.

“Why do you have this?”

“For when someone tries to tailgate me.”

“I see. It’s for self-defense?”

“Yes.”

Even if not used, carrying such an item in public without a legitimate reason can violate the Minor Offenses Act.

“Please come with us to the station.”

“You’re not under arrest, but we need to investigate.”

Police escorted the man for questioning on suspicion of violating the Minor Offenses Act.

### Visa Overstayers: A Persistent Issue

Just before 1 a.m. in Kawaguchi, officers on patrol spotted a man who, upon noticing the police car, suddenly ran away.

“What happened? Why did you run?” officers asked.

The man’s erratic behavior raised suspicion. Officers followed him into a nearby building.

“Why did you run? What’s going on?” they questioned.

The man, in his 20s and Vietnamese, was brought outside and questioned.

“Do you have a residence card?”

“No.”

“Are you sure?”

“Yes.”

“Do you have a visa?”

“No.”

After further questioning, the man admitted he had overstayed his visa.

“Are you overstaying?”

“Yes.”

Although he initially claimed there was “nothing” wrong, his passport revealed his visa had expired two years earlier, in 2023. He had been working illegally at demolition sites since then.

While officers were questioning him, his phone rang repeatedly.

“Who’s calling you?”

“Friends.”

“Friends who are also overstayers?”

“Yes. Many.”

The man was arrested on the spot for violating immigration laws.

### Another Overstayer Apprehended

In another case at 9 p.m. in Kawaguchi, police attempted to question a Vietnamese man in a parking lot.

The man ran, dropping his jacket as an officer grabbed it.

He was eventually surrounded by police and collapsed on the road.

His shoes and jacket were left behind during the chase.

“Are you overstaying?”

“Yes.”

Japan currently has around 75,000 people living illegally, some of whom are involved in criminal activities.

Police are strengthening their crackdown on such offenses.

### Drug-Related Offenses on the Rise

Drug crimes are another major focus of these patrols.

While on duty, officers noticed a man trying to avoid eye contact.

As they approached his vehicle, they asked, “Do you have anything dangerous in the car?”

The man complied at first but then became agitated.

“I’m in trouble.”

“Why are you in trouble?”

He tried to hide something inside the car.

“Police! Don’t resist!”

Officers restrained him. After about 30 minutes, drug enforcement officers arrived.

“We suspect you’re involved with drugs.”

“Are you using?”

“No.”

“Are you carrying?”

“No.”

The man refused to provide a urine sample.

However, over an hour later, his statements became vague.

“Did you use today?”

“I don’t know. Maybe three days ago.”

He eventually hinted that he had used drugs.

The man, a single father, admitted he had turned to drugs due to stress from work.

A search of his bag revealed MDMA and methamphetamine.

He was arrested on suspicion of violating the Stimulants Control Act.

A woman with him also tested positive for drugs and was arrested.

### Marijuana Possession and Usage

Another patrol in Saitama stopped a black car leaving a parking lot after its driver appeared startled by police presence.

“Do you have anything dangerous with you?”

“No.”

But when asked to allow a search, the man became defensive.

“Please tell us what’s inside.”

“There’s nothing.”

“Are you sure?”

“Yes.”

The officer persisted, saying, “We can smell something.”

The man eventually admitted he had marijuana in his possession and had used it that day.

“How long have you been using?”

“For over a year.”

The man, a construction worker in his 30s, had two children in elementary school.

The officer urged him to stop, warning, “If you keep this up, it could lead to stronger drugs like cocaine or methamphetamine, and then it’s too late.”

A further search of the car found marijuana residue under the seat.

The man tested positive and was arrested.

### Conclusion

Through these cases, the work of the Automobile Patrol Unit demonstrates that crimes can be found in the most ordinary places.

Police officers remain vigilant, noticing even the smallest irregularities to protect the safety of the community.
https://newsonjapan.com/article/147288.php

Exit mobile version