2025年10月10日 20:27（20:30更新）
[有料会員限定記事]
記者会見で質問者を指名する公明党の斉藤代表＝10日午後、国会
四半世紀にわたる協力関係が幕を下ろす。公明党の斉藤鉄夫代表は10日、就任したばかりの自民党・高市早苗総裁に連立政権からの離脱を伝えた。
取材に応じたトップ2人はいずれも緊張した面持ちを見せ、「国民の感情とか…」と語った。
この記事は有料会員限定です。残り452文字。7日間無料トライアル実施中。1日37円で読み放題、年払いならさらにお得。
Category: government
護送官付き強制送還が倍増、入管 「ゼロプラン」で実施
護送官付き強制送還が倍増、入管「ゼロプラン」で実施
2025年10月10日 11:58（同日12:00更新）
出入国在留管理庁は10日、退去強制命令を受けた外国人の速やかな帰国実現を柱とした「不法滞在者ゼロプラン」の実施状況を公表しました。
今年6月から8月にかけて、護送官を伴う強制送還が速報値で119人に上り、前年2024年の同時期と比べて倍増しています。
なお、本記事の続きは有料会員限定となっております。
公明、連立離脱の是非判断 高市、斉藤氏が午後会談
—
title: 公明党、連立離脱の是非判断へ 高市総裁と斉藤代表が午後会談
date: 2025-10-10 09:55
categories: 政治, 社会
—
自民党の高市早苗総裁と公明党の斉藤鉄夫代表は10日午後、国会内で会談を行う予定です。
斉藤氏は、自民党との連立に関して、派閥裏金事件の真相解明および企業・団体献金の規制強化を条件に挙げています。このため、会談では高市氏からの回答を踏まえ、連立を維持するかどうかの判断が示される見込みです。
なお、本記事は有料会員限定となっており、全文の閲覧には会員登録が必要です。
【西日本新聞me】
7日間無料トライアルを利用すると、1日あたり37円で読み放題となり、年払い契約ならさらにお得です。
—
*この記事のクリップ機能は有料会員のみご利用いただけます。*
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1409713/
米、管制官の欠勤増で旅客便遅延 政府閉鎖の影響、予算また否決
経済 米、管制官の欠勤増で旅客便遅延 政府閉鎖の影響、予算また否決
2025/10/10 7:37 (2025/10/10 7:39 更新)
【ワシントン共同】ダフィー米運輸長官は9日、予算切れに伴う連邦政府の一部閉鎖の影響で、欠勤する航空管制官が増え、旅客便の遅延が増加していると危機感を示した。
議会上院はこの日もつなぎ予算案の採決に進む状況が続いており、政府閉鎖の長期化に対する懸念が高まっている。
（この記事は有料会員限定です。残り440文字。7日間無料トライアルで1日37円から読み放題。年払いならさらにお得。）
Disaster fund gets P716M
MANILA, Philippines – Approximately 425,000 families affected by recent disasters can expect additional assistance as the Quick Response Fund (QRF) receives a ₱716.15-million top-up.
The Department of Budget and Management (DBM) has approved the release of this amount for this year’s QRF, which is administered by the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD).
Budget Secretary [Name] emphasized the importance of timely support to help affected families recover and rebuild their lives.
https://business.inquirer.net/551847/disaster-fund-gets-p716m
公明、自民と連立解消も 10日に党首会談、裏金焦点
—
title: 公明、自民と連立解消も 10日に党首会談、裏金焦点
date: 2025-10-09 22:24
categories: 政治, 社会
—
改めて開かれる公明党の中央幹事会へ出席するため、党本部に入る斉藤代表＝9日夜、東京都新宿区。
—
この記事は有料会員限定です。
残り910文字
7日間無料トライアル、1日37円で読み放題。年払いならもっとお得です。
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1409557/
自民税調会長に小野寺氏 宮沢氏の後任
【政治】自民党、税制調査会長に小野寺氏が就任 宮沢氏の後任に
2025年10月9日 20:28（10月9日 20:30 更新）
自民党は、退任する宮沢洋一税制調査会長の後任に、小野寺五典前政調会長を起用する方向で調整に入ったことが、関係者の話で明らかになった。
高市早苗総裁は、前向きなガソリン税の暫定税率廃止や所得税に関わる政策を推進しており、小野寺氏の起用はこれらの課題に対応する狙いがあるとみられている。
（※この記事は有料会員限定です。残り115文字。7日間無料トライアルあり。1日37円で読み放題。年払いならさらにお得。）
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1409502/
What Is this? You Can’t Discuss The Paper? Delhi HC Raises Questions Over SSC’s Social Media Gag On Exam
Delhi High Court Raises Concerns Over SSC Directive Banning Discussion of Exam Question Papers
The Delhi High Court has expressed serious concern over a recent directive issued by the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) that prohibits candidates from discussing, analysing, or sharing question papers of conducted exams on social media. The court termed such restrictions as potential “gag orders.”
HC Bench Critiques SSC Directive
A bench comprising Chief Justice DK Upadhyay and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela raised the issue while hearing a petition filed by Vikas Kumar Mishra, which challenges the SSC’s notification dated September 8. The court observed, “After coming out of the exam hall, the first thing that we used to do was… what is this? How is this being prohibited in the notification? You can’t put such gag orders…you can’t discuss the paper?,” as reported by Law Trend.
The bench has issued notices to the Centre and the SSC, directing them to submit their responses before the next hearing scheduled for December 17, 2025.
Petition Challenges SSC’s Action
According to a Hindustan Times report, the plea argues that the SSC directive is “illegal, arbitrary, and perverse,” claiming it violates the right to freedom of speech guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The petition further states that the notification imposes “unreasonable restrictions” on post-exam discussions and should therefore be quashed.
SSC’s Stand: Protecting Exam Integrity
Last month, the SSC issued a caution against sharing or posting question papers on social media under the newly enacted Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 (PEA Act, 2024). The commission cited instances where candidates and content creators shared examination material, asserting that such acts fall under “unfair means.”
Key provisions under the PEA Act, 2024, include:
- Section 3: Prohibits leakage, access, possession, or sharing of exam papers without proper authority.
- Section 9: Specifies that all offences are cognisable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable.
- Section 10: Prescribes strict punishments:
– Individuals: 3–5 years imprisonment plus ₹10 lakh fine
– Institutions/Service Providers: Fine up to ₹1 crore plus disqualification from exams
– Organised crime: 5–10 years imprisonment plus fine of ₹1 crore or more
The SSC emphasized that any violations will result in immediate legal action and urged candidates, content creators, and social media platforms to refrain from posting or analysing question papers.
Student Reaction and Controversy
The SSC directive has sparked criticism among aspirants on social media. Many argue that this restriction hampers open discussion of exam strategies, peer learning, and transparency. Some candidates expressed concerns that limiting such conversations may negatively impact their ability to learn from shared experiences following exams.
The matter continues to unfold as the High Court prepares to hear responses from the government and the SSC in the upcoming hearing.
Bombay HC Restrains Use Of ‘Jio’ Trademark For Taxi Services, Grants Interim Relief To Reliance Industries
**Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Reliance Industries to Restrain Use of ‘JIO’ Trademark by Jiocabs**
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has granted an interim injunction in favor of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), restraining certain parties from using its registered ‘JIO’ trademark for taxi services being offered under the domain name www.jiocabs.com.
**Prima Facie Case Established**
Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, on Tuesday, granted the interim protection after observing that Reliance had established a strong prima facie case. The court highlighted that continued use of the well-known brand by unauthorized parties could cause serious harm to Reliance’s goodwill.
“The continued usage of a well-known and protected brand name would indeed cause grave injury,” the court noted. It further added that, “considering the mending of ways by the Defendants, even the balance of convenience would be in favour of grant of the ad-interim relief.”
**Arguments Presented by Reliance**
Vinod Bhahat, advocate representing Reliance, argued that the company is the registered proprietor of the ‘JIO’ mark, which is protected across multiple classes. Reliance contended that the use of the mark ‘Jiocabs’ and the associated domain name amounted to trademark infringement and passing off.
The website and its promotional material allegedly used names, logos, and artistic elements identical or deceptively similar to Reliance’s registered marks.
**History and Evidence**
RIL informed the court that it had adopted the JIO mark in 2016, with registrations dating back to 2011 and 2012. The company described the mark as a “well-known trademark,” supported by extensive evidence including screenshots, WhatsApp conversations, and promotional images illustrating active misuse of its brand identity.
**Defendants’ Conduct Noted**
Although the defendants had altered some content after receiving a legal notice, Reliance submitted that they continued to hold and operate the disputed domain name. This, Reliance argued, perpetuated confusion among consumers.
The court noted that despite being served, the defendants had not entered an appearance. However, they acknowledged that the defendants appeared to have “mended their approach” by shifting to a new name, though the domain www.jiocabs.com remained active.
**Interim Relief Granted**
After considering the rival marks, labels, and the conduct of the parties, the court held that an urgent interim order was justified. The bench restrained the defendants from using the ‘JIO’ mark, the impugned domain name, or any logos, labels, or artwork identical or deceptively similar to Reliance’s trademarks or copyrighted material.
**Next Hearing**
The defendants have been permitted to file their affidavit in reply within four weeks. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on November 28, 2025.
—
*Also Watch:* For exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai and surrounding regions, visit: [https://budgetproperties.in/](https://budgetproperties.in/)
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/bombay-hc-restrains-use-of-jio-trademark-for-taxi-services-grants-interim-relief-to-reliance-industries
Uneasy Questions Arise In Haryana IGP Y Puran Kumar’s Suicide Case
**Chandigarh:** A day after Inspector General of Police (IGP) Y Puran Kumar allegedly died by suicide, controversy has erupted over the inclusion of his name—without the state government’s prior sanction—in an FIR lodged against his former aide. The aide is accused of demanding a bribe from a liquor contractor in Kumar’s name.
District Rohtak police arrested Head Constable Sushil, a former aide of IGP Kumar, on Monday. He was sent to judicial custody on Tuesday. Sushil was arrested for allegedly demanding a bribe in the name of the deceased IPS officer, despite Kumar not being summoned to join the investigation.
According to police sources, Sushil had previously worked with IGP Kumar during his tenure as IG, Rohtak range. Kumar reportedly continued to keep Sushil on his team even after Kumar’s transfer as IG, Police Training Centre, Sunaria, Rohtak.
The arrest stems from allegations that Sushil demanded Rs 2.5 lakh monthly from a liquor businessman, invoking IGP Kumar’s name. The FIR was filed based on a written complaint and video footage provided by the businessman. Police added that Sushil allegedly threatened the businessman by warning that failure to pay the bribe could result in implicating him in a liquor smuggling case.
Sources suggest this bribery case might have been one of the reasons that led Kumar to take the extreme step of suicide.
### Vocal Advocate for Officers’ Rights and Seniority
IGP Y Puran Kumar, a 2001-batch IPS officer, was known for his vocal stance on issues concerning the rights and seniority of officers. He frequently challenged the government on matters such as promotions granted to certain batches and the representation of Scheduled Caste (SC) officers in police ranks.
Though an official statement on Kumar’s suicide note has not yet been released, it is reported that the note mentioned several serving and former top IPS officers who allegedly “authorised” a campaign aimed at humiliating him.
Reports revealed that Kumar had written to Chief Minister Nayab Saini, expressing that his representations had been ignored, particularly those concerning himself and his batch-mates from the SC category. He also claimed that in the state home department, even routine files that did not require legal opinions were unnecessarily being sent for such reviews.
Kumar had reportedly filed five complaints alleging harassment and humiliation by a senior IAS officer. He objected to the formation of a committee comprising three former IAS officers tasked with probing his allegations.
### Allegations of Intentional Humiliation
In March 2023, while posted as IGP, Home Guards, Kumar informed then Chief Secretary Sanjeev Kaushal that the position he was assigned was not a cadre post. He stated that the Home Department had told the Punjab and Haryana High Court the same year that the state government had never formally created this post. Kumar alleged that his posting was intended to insult and humiliate him publicly.
—
This tragic incident has brought to light underlying tensions within the police department regarding seniority, caste representation, and internal politics. Further updates are awaited as investigations continue.
https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/uneasy-questions-arise-in-haryana-igp-y-puran-kumars-suicide-case