law 7 - The Latremie Post

What Is this? You Can’t Discuss The Paper? Delhi HC Raises Questions Over SSC’s Social Media Gag On Exam

Delhi High Court Raises Concerns Over SSC Directive Banning Discussion of Exam Question Papers

The Delhi High Court has expressed serious concern over a recent directive issued by the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) that prohibits candidates from discussing, analysing, or sharing question papers of conducted exams on social media. The court termed such restrictions as potential “gag orders.”

HC Bench Critiques SSC Directive

A bench comprising Chief Justice DK Upadhyay and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela raised the issue while hearing a petition filed by Vikas Kumar Mishra, which challenges the SSC’s notification dated September 8. The court observed, “After coming out of the exam hall, the first thing that we used to do was… what is this? How is this being prohibited in the notification? You can’t put such gag orders…you can’t discuss the paper?,” as reported by Law Trend.

The bench has issued notices to the Centre and the SSC, directing them to submit their responses before the next hearing scheduled for December 17, 2025.

Petition Challenges SSC’s Action

According to a Hindustan Times report, the plea argues that the SSC directive is “illegal, arbitrary, and perverse,” claiming it violates the right to freedom of speech guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The petition further states that the notification imposes “unreasonable restrictions” on post-exam discussions and should therefore be quashed.

SSC’s Stand: Protecting Exam Integrity

Last month, the SSC issued a caution against sharing or posting question papers on social media under the newly enacted Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 (PEA Act, 2024). The commission cited instances where candidates and content creators shared examination material, asserting that such acts fall under “unfair means.”

Key provisions under the PEA Act, 2024, include:

Section 3: Prohibits leakage, access, possession, or sharing of exam papers without proper authority.
Section 9: Specifies that all offences are cognisable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable.
Section 10: Prescribes strict punishments:
– Individuals: 3–5 years imprisonment plus ₹10 lakh fine
– Institutions/Service Providers: Fine up to ₹1 crore plus disqualification from exams
– Organised crime: 5–10 years imprisonment plus fine of ₹1 crore or more

The SSC emphasized that any violations will result in immediate legal action and urged candidates, content creators, and social media platforms to refrain from posting or analysing question papers.

Student Reaction and Controversy

The SSC directive has sparked criticism among aspirants on social media. Many argue that this restriction hampers open discussion of exam strategies, peer learning, and transparency. Some candidates expressed concerns that limiting such conversations may negatively impact their ability to learn from shared experiences following exams.

The matter continues to unfold as the High Court prepares to hear responses from the government and the SSC in the upcoming hearing.

https://www.freepressjournal.in/education/what-is-this-you-cant-discuss-the-paper-delhi-hc-raises-questions-over-sscs-social-media-gag-on-exam-paper-discussions

Mumbai: Bombay HC Commutes Death Penalty To Life In Prison For Man Who Killed 2 In 2017 Bandra Arson Attack

**Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in 2017 Double Murder Case**

The Bombay High Court on Thursday commuted the death sentence of a man convicted of killing a woman and her tenant’s two-year-old daughter in 2017. The incident occurred after the victim reportedly called the accused derogatory names such as “hijra” or “chakka.”

The accused, Deepak Jath, had poured petrol on the woman, Amravati, and set her on fire. Tragically, Angel, the two-year-old daughter of Amravati’s tenant, who was sitting beside her at the time, also caught fire. Both victims succumbed to their injuries after being hospitalized for two weeks.

While the court upheld Jath’s conviction for the murders of Amravati and Angel, it reduced his death sentence to life imprisonment. The bench, consisting of Justices Revati Mohite-Dere and Shyam Chandak, noted that the offence did not meet the “rarest of rare” criteria necessary to warrant the death penalty.

> “We do not find that this case, in any way, falls in the category of ‘rarest of rare case’ warranting death sentence to the accused. Hence, the death sentence awarded to the accused for causing the death of Amravati and Angel requires to be commuted,” the bench stated.

The High Court’s order came while hearing a plea filed by the State government seeking confirmation of Jath’s death sentence. It is important to note that a death sentence can only be executed after confirmation by the High Court.

**Background of the Case**

In 2023, a sessions court convicted Deepak Jath and sentenced him to death, deeming the crime to be among the rarest of rare. The prosecution presented facts stating that on April 14, 2017, Amravati and her daughter Rohini, who sold bracelets, were sitting outside their home in Bandra when Jath approached and doused them with petrol.

Rohini escaped by running inside and raising an alarm. Some of the petrol splashed onto Kanta, Amravati’s tenant, and her daughter Angel, who were also nearby. All victims were rushed to the hospital, where Amravati and Angel later died from burn injuries. Kanta suffered 60% burn injuries but survived.

**Defendant’s Statement and Legal Proceedings**

During his statement to the magistrate, Jath explained that he committed the act because Amravati and others repeatedly teased him by calling him “hijra” or “chakka.” He claimed that, in an attempt to prove he was not one of these, he had even exposed himself to them.

Jath’s lawyer, Farhana Shah, argued for leniency on the grounds of mental instability. She presented medical documents showing that Jath was declared unfit to stand trial on October 23, 2021, and that the trial began only after he was declared fit on June 10, 2022.

Despite these claims, the court observed that Jath himself admitted to committing the offense and justified it on the basis of the teasing he endured. Consequently, while the court maintained his conviction, it opted for life imprisonment rather than the death penalty.

—

*This case highlights the judiciary’s careful consideration in differentiating between crimes that warrant the death penalty and those that do not, emphasizing the principle of “rarest of rare” to decide capital punishment.*
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/mumbai-bombay-hc-commutes-death-penalty-to-life-in-prison-for-man-who-killed-2-in-2017-bandra-arson-attack

Bombay HC Restrains Use Of ‘Jio’ Trademark For Taxi Services, Grants Interim Relief To Reliance Industries

**Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Reliance Industries to Restrain Use of ‘JIO’ Trademark by Jiocabs**

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has granted an interim injunction in favor of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), restraining certain parties from using its registered ‘JIO’ trademark for taxi services being offered under the domain name www.jiocabs.com.

**Prima Facie Case Established**

Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, on Tuesday, granted the interim protection after observing that Reliance had established a strong prima facie case. The court highlighted that continued use of the well-known brand by unauthorized parties could cause serious harm to Reliance’s goodwill.

“The continued usage of a well-known and protected brand name would indeed cause grave injury,” the court noted. It further added that, “considering the mending of ways by the Defendants, even the balance of convenience would be in favour of grant of the ad-interim relief.”

**Arguments Presented by Reliance**

Vinod Bhahat, advocate representing Reliance, argued that the company is the registered proprietor of the ‘JIO’ mark, which is protected across multiple classes. Reliance contended that the use of the mark ‘Jiocabs’ and the associated domain name amounted to trademark infringement and passing off.

The website and its promotional material allegedly used names, logos, and artistic elements identical or deceptively similar to Reliance’s registered marks.

**History and Evidence**

RIL informed the court that it had adopted the JIO mark in 2016, with registrations dating back to 2011 and 2012. The company described the mark as a “well-known trademark,” supported by extensive evidence including screenshots, WhatsApp conversations, and promotional images illustrating active misuse of its brand identity.

**Defendants’ Conduct Noted**

Although the defendants had altered some content after receiving a legal notice, Reliance submitted that they continued to hold and operate the disputed domain name. This, Reliance argued, perpetuated confusion among consumers.

The court noted that despite being served, the defendants had not entered an appearance. However, they acknowledged that the defendants appeared to have “mended their approach” by shifting to a new name, though the domain www.jiocabs.com remained active.

**Interim Relief Granted**

After considering the rival marks, labels, and the conduct of the parties, the court held that an urgent interim order was justified. The bench restrained the defendants from using the ‘JIO’ mark, the impugned domain name, or any logos, labels, or artwork identical or deceptively similar to Reliance’s trademarks or copyrighted material.

**Next Hearing**

The defendants have been permitted to file their affidavit in reply within four weeks. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on November 28, 2025.

—

*Also Watch:* For exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai and surrounding regions, visit: [https://budgetproperties.in/](https://budgetproperties.in/)
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/bombay-hc-restrains-use-of-jio-trademark-for-taxi-services-grants-interim-relief-to-reliance-industries

Israel optimistic about prospects of reaching a Gaza deal, sources tell ‘Post’

Israel Optimistic About Prospects of Reaching a Gaza Deal, Sources Tell ‘Post’

An additional source stated that, as the deal currently stands, Marwan Barghouti and Ahmad Saadat will not be released.

Families of Israelis held hostage by Hamas terrorists in Gaza built a sukkah outside the Prime Minister’s residence in Jerusalem, displaying photographs of the hostages on October 5, 2025.

(Photo Credit: Chaim Goldbeg/FLASH90)

By AMICHAI STEIN, Jerusalem Post Staff
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-869809

Two men on trial in UK over alleged plot against Jewish community

Two Men on Trial in UK Over Alleged Plot Against Jewish Community

Two men are currently on trial in the United Kingdom over an alleged plot targeting the Jewish community. According to court documents, the defendants planned to smuggle multiple firearms into the UK with the intention of attacking a “mass gathering of Jews.”

The case has drawn significant attention due to the seriousness of the alleged conspiracy and its implications for community safety.

*Illustration of ISIS terrorists. (Photo credit: Corbis/Medyan Dairieh, Wikipedia)*

By REUTERS
https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/article-869814

Uneasy Questions Arise In Haryana IGP Y Puran Kumar’s Suicide Case

**Chandigarh:** A day after Inspector General of Police (IGP) Y Puran Kumar allegedly died by suicide, controversy has erupted over the inclusion of his name—without the state government’s prior sanction—in an FIR lodged against his former aide. The aide is accused of demanding a bribe from a liquor contractor in Kumar’s name.

District Rohtak police arrested Head Constable Sushil, a former aide of IGP Kumar, on Monday. He was sent to judicial custody on Tuesday. Sushil was arrested for allegedly demanding a bribe in the name of the deceased IPS officer, despite Kumar not being summoned to join the investigation.

According to police sources, Sushil had previously worked with IGP Kumar during his tenure as IG, Rohtak range. Kumar reportedly continued to keep Sushil on his team even after Kumar’s transfer as IG, Police Training Centre, Sunaria, Rohtak.

The arrest stems from allegations that Sushil demanded Rs 2.5 lakh monthly from a liquor businessman, invoking IGP Kumar’s name. The FIR was filed based on a written complaint and video footage provided by the businessman. Police added that Sushil allegedly threatened the businessman by warning that failure to pay the bribe could result in implicating him in a liquor smuggling case.

Sources suggest this bribery case might have been one of the reasons that led Kumar to take the extreme step of suicide.

### Vocal Advocate for Officers’ Rights and Seniority

IGP Y Puran Kumar, a 2001-batch IPS officer, was known for his vocal stance on issues concerning the rights and seniority of officers. He frequently challenged the government on matters such as promotions granted to certain batches and the representation of Scheduled Caste (SC) officers in police ranks.

Though an official statement on Kumar’s suicide note has not yet been released, it is reported that the note mentioned several serving and former top IPS officers who allegedly “authorised” a campaign aimed at humiliating him.

Reports revealed that Kumar had written to Chief Minister Nayab Saini, expressing that his representations had been ignored, particularly those concerning himself and his batch-mates from the SC category. He also claimed that in the state home department, even routine files that did not require legal opinions were unnecessarily being sent for such reviews.

Kumar had reportedly filed five complaints alleging harassment and humiliation by a senior IAS officer. He objected to the formation of a committee comprising three former IAS officers tasked with probing his allegations.

### Allegations of Intentional Humiliation

In March 2023, while posted as IGP, Home Guards, Kumar informed then Chief Secretary Sanjeev Kaushal that the position he was assigned was not a cadre post. He stated that the Home Department had told the Punjab and Haryana High Court the same year that the state government had never formally created this post. Kumar alleged that his posting was intended to insult and humiliate him publicly.

—

This tragic incident has brought to light underlying tensions within the police department regarding seniority, caste representation, and internal politics. Further updates are awaited as investigations continue.
https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/uneasy-questions-arise-in-haryana-igp-y-puran-kumars-suicide-case

Jack the Ripper copycat who murdered two women after stalking the streets of Whitechapel dies in prison aged 64

A Jack the Ripper copycat who murdered two women after stalking them through the streets of London like the notorious Victorian murderer has died at the age of 64.

Derek Brown, dubbed the ‘Modern Ripper,’ was jailed for a minimum of 30 years on October 6, 2008, after being found guilty of murdering DVD seller Xiao Mei Guo, 29, and prostitute Bonnie Barrett, 24. He denied murder but admitted to paying both women for sex before their disappearances in 2007.

The previously convicted rapist found his victims in the Whitechapel area of London, famously associated with Jack the Ripper in the 1880s. A search of Brown’s Rotherhithe flat uncovered traces of blood belonging to both women, as well as a receipt for a bow saw, heavy-duty gloves, rubble sacks, and cleaning materials. It is believed that he hacked his victims apart before disposing of their remains.

Brown was serving his sentence in HMP Wakefield when he reportedly became unwell on September 27. He was taken to hospital and died two days later, just days before his 65th birthday.

The remorseless killer’s victims’ remains have never been found.

A source close to former delivery driver Brown said:
“He was in critical care since Saturday. They found him in his cell on Saturday, and he was in critical care since Saturday 5 pm until Monday when he died at 3 pm.”

At the time of the murders, police believed Brown sought notoriety for the killings. Detective Chief Inspector Mark Kandiah said:
“If he kept killing prostitutes from the Whitechapel area, then that link (with Jack the Ripper) would be made. If this was a spree, it seems likely that we stopped him at number two.”

During his court case, sentencing Judge Martin Stephens told Brown:
“You have shown not a sliver of remorse. You murdered two women. Both were vulnerable, plying their trade on the streets, in each case falling into your hands precisely because of their availability and their lack of protection. What you did to each of those women before you killed them we can only speculate about. How you killed them we cannot know. What we do know is you disposed of their bodies with frightening efficiency so that not a trace of either woman has been found.”

Mrs. Guo was last seen in August 2007 selling DVDs at Whitechapel Market. CCTV footage showed her with Brown near Whitechapel Tube station, the court heard. Miss Barrett disappeared from the same area on September 18, 2007.

Police spent over 800 hours searching for their bodies, including specialist diver searches in the Thames. Judge Stephens noted that there was clear circumstantial evidence proving Brown dismembered and disposed of the bodies.
“The only person who could prove this not to be true would be you, if you ever chose to tell the police where their bodies or remains could be found,” the judge added. “The anguish of both victims’ families is exacerbated, made much worse by their inability to lay each lady to rest.”

The prosecution stated that Brown targeted the women because they were “soft targets” and would not be missed.

Commenting on his death, a Prison Service spokesman said:
“Derek Brown died in hospital on September 29 while serving a sentence at HMP Wakefield. As with all deaths in custody, the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman will investigate.”
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15172811/Jack-Ripper-copycat-murdered-two-women-stalking-streets-Whitechapel-dies-prison-aged-64.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Bravo Bombshell: ‘Real Housewives of Miami’ Star Todd Nepola Files $11Million Defamation Lawsuit Against Network, Claims Show ‘Lied About His Finances For Juicy Storyline’

**Oct. 7, 2025, Published 3:51 p.m. ET**

Real Housewives of Miami star Alexia Nepola’s ex-husband, Todd Nepola, is suing Bravo and NBCUniversal, RadarOnline.com can reveal.

In the lawsuit, Todd specifically alleges defamation and unauthorized use of his name and likeness in connection with recent seasons of the show.

### Todd Nepola Alleges Lies About His Finances Were Told

In the filing, Todd states the network told lies about his finances for storylines during Seasons 6 and 7 of *Real Housewives of Miami*, using “manipulated storylines and unauthorized footage.”

Todd claims he is worth $100 million and insists he never bounced a check, missed a payment, or had any financial trouble. However, the show allegedly portrayed him as struggling financially to make Alexia’s storyline more “juicy” for viewers.

### Multiple ‘RHOM’ Episodes Are Called Into Question in Todd Nepola’s Lawsuit

The legal filing calls into question multiple episodes, including one where cast member Adriana de Moura allegedly spread false claims about Todd.

Specifically, Todd referenced allegations suggesting his business was failing and claims that he might have to break his lease and downgrade his apartment.

Todd’s lawyer, Scott J. Weiselberg of Kopelowitz Ostrow Ferguson Weiselberg Gilbert, insists these claims were fabricated and that Bravo knowingly presented misleading information.

During filming, Todd’s side claims he purchased more than $115 million in real estate, all financed legitimately through bank loans.

### Todd ‘Wanted to Be Alexia’s Husband, Not Her Storyline’

The complaint also states that Bravo and NBCUniversal used Todd’s “image and personal storyline without consent.”

“Mr. Nepola wanted to be Alexia’s husband, not her storyline,” the filing notes. “Enough is enough.”

Todd is seeking $10 million in damages for defamation and $1 million for unauthorized use of his name and likeness. Additionally, he requests injunctive relief to prevent further misuse or rebroadcast of his image.

### The Demise of Alexia and Todd’s Relationship

After marrying in December 2021, their marriage fell apart when Todd filed for divorce in April 2024. Alexia was reportedly blindsided by the filing, calling it “shocking and heartbreaking.”

“I will take comfort in the fact that my friends and family will be by my side, supporting me during this difficult time. I’m praying for better times ahead,” she said at the time.

In March 2025, it was confirmed that Alexia and Todd had finalized their divorce.

“After thoughtful reflection, Todd and I have reached an amicable divorce settlement,” Alexia said in a statement. “While our marriage has legally ended, our relationship has not.”

“We continue to love and support each other as we navigate this next chapter,” she added. “We appreciate the understanding, love, and support from our family, friends, and fans.”
https://radaronline.com/p/todd-nepola-rhom-files-lawsuit-against-bravo-nbcuniversal-defamation/

US Supreme Court’s new term will examine Trump’s presidential power

**US Supreme Court’s New Term to Examine Trump’s Presidential Powers**

*By Chanshimla Varah | October 7, 2025, 11:20 AM*

The United States Supreme Court opened its new term on Monday, with Chief Justice John Roberts swiftly rejecting over 800 pending appeals. Among these was a notable appeal from Ghislaine Maxwell, who challenged her conviction for luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by her late partner, Jeffrey Epstein.

### Focus on Trump’s Expansive Presidential Power

Over the next ten months, a primary focus for the justices will be assessing former President Donald Trump’s broad claims of presidential power. Several key cases related to his administration’s actions are set to be heard this term.

### LGBTQ+ Rights: Therapy Ban Cases

One of the initial cases the court will review concerns state bans on therapy aimed at changing sexual orientation or gender identity. Nearly half of the U.S. states have enacted such bans, making this a critical case for LGBTQ+ rights nationwide.

### Trade and Tariff Case

On November 5, the court will hear a major case addressing Trump’s imposition of tariffs on imports. Two lower courts have ruled that Trump lacked the statutory authority to impose these tariffs, setting the stage for a significant Supreme Court decision.

### Authority Over Independent Agencies

In December, the court will consider a case regarding Trump’s authority to remove members of independent agencies at will. This case has the potential to overturn or significantly narrow a 90-year-old precedent surrounding presidential powers.

### Birthright Citizenship Executive Order

Another significant case pending before the court involves Trump’s executive order that sought to deny birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are either in the country illegally or temporarily. The Trump administration has appealed lower court rulings declaring this order unconstitutional. Arguments on this case may take place in late winter or early spring.

### Federal Reserve Board Dispute

The justices will also conduct an expedited review of Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from her position as a governor on the Federal Reserve Board, a key and influential institution in U.S. financial policy.

### National Guard Troop Deployment Legal Battle

The term will also see a legal dispute stemming from Trump’s efforts to seize control of state National Guard troops and deploy them in cities where he alleged rampant crime, despite opposition from local and state leaders. A federal court in Oregon has barred Trump’s proposed troop deployment to Portland, and an appeals court is set to review this decision in the coming days.

—

As the Supreme Court embarks on this term, many of the cases will have far-reaching consequences on the bounds of presidential authority and the legal landscape surrounding policy and civil rights.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/world/new-supreme-court-term-will-examine-trump-s-presidential-power/story

Bank Insider Gets 9-Year Jail Term for Gold and Cash Theft

TOKYO, Oct 7 — The Tokyo District Court sentenced former Mitsubishi UFJ Bank assistant branch manager Yukari Yamazaki to nine years in prison on October 6 for stealing approximately 400 million yen worth of gold bars and cash from a bank safe deposit vault.

During the trial, the defense argued that weaknesses in the bank’s security system had allowed Yamazaki to repeatedly commit the thefts. However, the court dismissed this claim in its ruling.

The court stated that the defendant, who had earned the bank’s trust and held a position of responsibility, exploited security systems in a way that only someone in her limited position could, effectively rendering the safeguards powerless.

The court further declared that Yamazaki’s actions were strongly deserving of condemnation.

https://newsonjapan.com/article/147179.php