護送官付き強制送還が倍増、入管「ゼロプラン」で実施
2025年10月10日 11:58（同日12:00更新）
出入国在留管理庁は10日、退去強制命令を受けた外国人の速やかな帰国実現を柱とした「不法滞在者ゼロプラン」の実施状況を公表しました。
今年6月から8月にかけて、護送官を伴う強制送還が速報値で119人に上り、前年2024年の同時期と比べて倍増しています。
なお、本記事の続きは有料会員限定となっております。
Category: law
国外詐欺拠点へ誘拐疑い 6人逮捕、男性かけ子に
—
title: 社会｜国外詐欺拠点へ誘拐疑いで6人逮捕、男性かけ子に
date: 2025-10-10 10:29
updated: 2025-10-10 10:30
categories: 社会
—
西日本新聞の有料会員限定記事より、国外の詐欺拠点へ誘拐した疑いで6人が逮捕されたことが報じられました。
被害に遭った男性は「かけ子」として利用されていたとみられています。
詳細な内容は有料会員のみ閲覧可能であり、残り291文字の記事全文は、7日間の無料トライアル（1日37円）または年払いのプランで読み放題となっています。
—
※この記事のクリップ機能は有料会員のみご利用いただけます。
※西日本新聞meについての詳細もご確認ください。
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1409723/
佐賀市の20歳男をストーカー規正法違反容疑で逮捕
—
title: 佐賀市の20歳男性をストーカー規正法違反容疑で逮捕
date: 2025-10-10 06:00
categories: [佐賀, 社会]
—
佐賀県警鳥栖署は、佐賀市に住む20歳の男性をストーカー規正法違反の容疑で逮捕しました。詳細な情報については、有料会員限定記事となっております。
なお、同県内では先日、小城市の県道で80代の女性が車にはねられ、死亡する事故も発生しています。
こちらの記事は残り161文字分が有料会員限定となっております。7日間の無料トライアル（1日37円）で読み放題、年払いならさらにお得にご利用いただけます。
【関連情報】
– 佐賀県警鳥栖署の対応について
– 佐賀県内での交通事故情報
※クリップ機能は有料会員の方のみご利用いただけます。
—
※西日本新聞meとは何かについての詳細は公式サイトをご覧ください。
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1409632/
トルコ、ガザ合意「監視」 死亡人質の捜索に参加も
—
title: トルコ、ガザ合意「監視」に参加 死亡人質の捜索にも協力へ
date: 2025-10-09 23:37
categories: 国際
—
【イスタンブール共同】トルコのエルドアン大統領は9日、首都アンカラで演説し、パレスチナ自治区ガザを巡る和平計画「第1段階」の合意に関して、「履行状況を監視するタスクフォースに参加する」と述べました。
また、死亡した人質の捜索にも参加する意向を示しています。
ロイター通信によると、この動きはガザ地区の安定化と和平促進に向けた国際的な取り組みの一環とされています。
（この記事は有料会員限定です。残り165文字）
7日間無料トライアルあり。
1日37円で読み放題、年払いならさらにお得です。
欧州委員長の不信任案を否決 3カ月で3本、異例の事態
国際
欧州委員長の不信任案を否決 3カ月で3本、異例の事態
2025/10/9 19:52 (2025/10/9 19:54 更新) [有料会員限定記事]
【ブリュッセル共同】欧州連合（EU）欧州議会は9日、フォンデアライエン欧州委員長に対し、極左と極右の議員グループがそれぞれ提出した不信任決議案2本をいずれも否決しました。フォンデアライエン氏には7月にも同様の不信任案が提出されており、3カ月の間に3本の不信任決議案が提出されるという異例の事態となっています。
この記事は有料会員限定です。残り 357 文字
7日間無料トライアル 1日37円で読み放題
年払いならもっとお得
※クリップ機能は有料会員の方のみご利用いただけます。
What Is this? You Can’t Discuss The Paper? Delhi HC Raises Questions Over SSC’s Social Media Gag On Exam
Delhi High Court Raises Concerns Over SSC Directive Banning Discussion of Exam Question Papers
The Delhi High Court has expressed serious concern over a recent directive issued by the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) that prohibits candidates from discussing, analysing, or sharing question papers of conducted exams on social media. The court termed such restrictions as potential “gag orders.”
HC Bench Critiques SSC Directive
A bench comprising Chief Justice DK Upadhyay and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela raised the issue while hearing a petition filed by Vikas Kumar Mishra, which challenges the SSC’s notification dated September 8. The court observed, “After coming out of the exam hall, the first thing that we used to do was… what is this? How is this being prohibited in the notification? You can’t put such gag orders…you can’t discuss the paper?,” as reported by Law Trend.
The bench has issued notices to the Centre and the SSC, directing them to submit their responses before the next hearing scheduled for December 17, 2025.
Petition Challenges SSC’s Action
According to a Hindustan Times report, the plea argues that the SSC directive is “illegal, arbitrary, and perverse,” claiming it violates the right to freedom of speech guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The petition further states that the notification imposes “unreasonable restrictions” on post-exam discussions and should therefore be quashed.
SSC’s Stand: Protecting Exam Integrity
Last month, the SSC issued a caution against sharing or posting question papers on social media under the newly enacted Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 (PEA Act, 2024). The commission cited instances where candidates and content creators shared examination material, asserting that such acts fall under “unfair means.”
Key provisions under the PEA Act, 2024, include:
- Section 3: Prohibits leakage, access, possession, or sharing of exam papers without proper authority.
- Section 9: Specifies that all offences are cognisable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable.
- Section 10: Prescribes strict punishments:
– Individuals: 3–5 years imprisonment plus ₹10 lakh fine
– Institutions/Service Providers: Fine up to ₹1 crore plus disqualification from exams
– Organised crime: 5–10 years imprisonment plus fine of ₹1 crore or more
The SSC emphasized that any violations will result in immediate legal action and urged candidates, content creators, and social media platforms to refrain from posting or analysing question papers.
Student Reaction and Controversy
The SSC directive has sparked criticism among aspirants on social media. Many argue that this restriction hampers open discussion of exam strategies, peer learning, and transparency. Some candidates expressed concerns that limiting such conversations may negatively impact their ability to learn from shared experiences following exams.
The matter continues to unfold as the High Court prepares to hear responses from the government and the SSC in the upcoming hearing.
Mumbai: Bombay HC Commutes Death Penalty To Life In Prison For Man Who Killed 2 In 2017 Bandra Arson Attack
**Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in 2017 Double Murder Case**
The Bombay High Court on Thursday commuted the death sentence of a man convicted of killing a woman and her tenant’s two-year-old daughter in 2017. The incident occurred after the victim reportedly called the accused derogatory names such as “hijra” or “chakka.”
The accused, Deepak Jath, had poured petrol on the woman, Amravati, and set her on fire. Tragically, Angel, the two-year-old daughter of Amravati’s tenant, who was sitting beside her at the time, also caught fire. Both victims succumbed to their injuries after being hospitalized for two weeks.
While the court upheld Jath’s conviction for the murders of Amravati and Angel, it reduced his death sentence to life imprisonment. The bench, consisting of Justices Revati Mohite-Dere and Shyam Chandak, noted that the offence did not meet the “rarest of rare” criteria necessary to warrant the death penalty.
> “We do not find that this case, in any way, falls in the category of ‘rarest of rare case’ warranting death sentence to the accused. Hence, the death sentence awarded to the accused for causing the death of Amravati and Angel requires to be commuted,” the bench stated.
The High Court’s order came while hearing a plea filed by the State government seeking confirmation of Jath’s death sentence. It is important to note that a death sentence can only be executed after confirmation by the High Court.
**Background of the Case**
In 2023, a sessions court convicted Deepak Jath and sentenced him to death, deeming the crime to be among the rarest of rare. The prosecution presented facts stating that on April 14, 2017, Amravati and her daughter Rohini, who sold bracelets, were sitting outside their home in Bandra when Jath approached and doused them with petrol.
Rohini escaped by running inside and raising an alarm. Some of the petrol splashed onto Kanta, Amravati’s tenant, and her daughter Angel, who were also nearby. All victims were rushed to the hospital, where Amravati and Angel later died from burn injuries. Kanta suffered 60% burn injuries but survived.
**Defendant’s Statement and Legal Proceedings**
During his statement to the magistrate, Jath explained that he committed the act because Amravati and others repeatedly teased him by calling him “hijra” or “chakka.” He claimed that, in an attempt to prove he was not one of these, he had even exposed himself to them.
Jath’s lawyer, Farhana Shah, argued for leniency on the grounds of mental instability. She presented medical documents showing that Jath was declared unfit to stand trial on October 23, 2021, and that the trial began only after he was declared fit on June 10, 2022.
Despite these claims, the court observed that Jath himself admitted to committing the offense and justified it on the basis of the teasing he endured. Consequently, while the court maintained his conviction, it opted for life imprisonment rather than the death penalty.
—
*This case highlights the judiciary’s careful consideration in differentiating between crimes that warrant the death penalty and those that do not, emphasizing the principle of “rarest of rare” to decide capital punishment.*
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/mumbai-bombay-hc-commutes-death-penalty-to-life-in-prison-for-man-who-killed-2-in-2017-bandra-arson-attack
Bombay HC Restrains Use Of ‘Jio’ Trademark For Taxi Services, Grants Interim Relief To Reliance Industries
**Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Reliance Industries to Restrain Use of ‘JIO’ Trademark by Jiocabs**
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has granted an interim injunction in favor of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), restraining certain parties from using its registered ‘JIO’ trademark for taxi services being offered under the domain name www.jiocabs.com.
**Prima Facie Case Established**
Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, on Tuesday, granted the interim protection after observing that Reliance had established a strong prima facie case. The court highlighted that continued use of the well-known brand by unauthorized parties could cause serious harm to Reliance’s goodwill.
“The continued usage of a well-known and protected brand name would indeed cause grave injury,” the court noted. It further added that, “considering the mending of ways by the Defendants, even the balance of convenience would be in favour of grant of the ad-interim relief.”
**Arguments Presented by Reliance**
Vinod Bhahat, advocate representing Reliance, argued that the company is the registered proprietor of the ‘JIO’ mark, which is protected across multiple classes. Reliance contended that the use of the mark ‘Jiocabs’ and the associated domain name amounted to trademark infringement and passing off.
The website and its promotional material allegedly used names, logos, and artistic elements identical or deceptively similar to Reliance’s registered marks.
**History and Evidence**
RIL informed the court that it had adopted the JIO mark in 2016, with registrations dating back to 2011 and 2012. The company described the mark as a “well-known trademark,” supported by extensive evidence including screenshots, WhatsApp conversations, and promotional images illustrating active misuse of its brand identity.
**Defendants’ Conduct Noted**
Although the defendants had altered some content after receiving a legal notice, Reliance submitted that they continued to hold and operate the disputed domain name. This, Reliance argued, perpetuated confusion among consumers.
The court noted that despite being served, the defendants had not entered an appearance. However, they acknowledged that the defendants appeared to have “mended their approach” by shifting to a new name, though the domain www.jiocabs.com remained active.
**Interim Relief Granted**
After considering the rival marks, labels, and the conduct of the parties, the court held that an urgent interim order was justified. The bench restrained the defendants from using the ‘JIO’ mark, the impugned domain name, or any logos, labels, or artwork identical or deceptively similar to Reliance’s trademarks or copyrighted material.
**Next Hearing**
The defendants have been permitted to file their affidavit in reply within four weeks. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on November 28, 2025.
—
*Also Watch:* For exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai and surrounding regions, visit: [https://budgetproperties.in/](https://budgetproperties.in/)
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/bombay-hc-restrains-use-of-jio-trademark-for-taxi-services-grants-interim-relief-to-reliance-industries
Israel optimistic about prospects of reaching a Gaza deal, sources tell ‘Post’
Israel Optimistic About Prospects of Reaching a Gaza Deal, Sources Tell ‘Post’
An additional source stated that, as the deal currently stands, Marwan Barghouti and Ahmad Saadat will not be released.
Families of Israelis held hostage by Hamas terrorists in Gaza built a sukkah outside the Prime Minister’s residence in Jerusalem, displaying photographs of the hostages on October 5, 2025.
(Photo Credit: Chaim Goldbeg/FLASH90)
By AMICHAI STEIN, Jerusalem Post Staff
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-869809
Two men on trial in UK over alleged plot against Jewish community
Two Men on Trial in UK Over Alleged Plot Against Jewish Community
Two men are currently on trial in the United Kingdom over an alleged plot targeting the Jewish community. According to court documents, the defendants planned to smuggle multiple firearms into the UK with the intention of attacking a “mass gathering of Jews.”
The case has drawn significant attention due to the seriousness of the alleged conspiracy and its implications for community safety.
*Illustration of ISIS terrorists. (Photo credit: Corbis/Medyan Dairieh, Wikipedia)*