—
title: 市職員の妻「早く元の生活に」 前橋市長とホテル面会
date: 2025-10-14 18:31
categories: [社会]
tags: [前橋市, 小川晶, 市職員, コメント, 面会]
—
前橋市の小川晶市長とラブホテルで複数回面会した男性職員の妻は、14日、代理人弁護士を通じて次のコメントを文書で報道機関に公表しました。
「一日も早く元通りの平穏な生活に戻りたい」
また、妻は市長を訴えることは考えていないとしています。
—
※この記事は有料会員限定記事の一部です。全文をお読みいただくには会員登録が必要です。
7日間無料トライアルもございますので、ご興味のある方はご利用ください。
https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1411167/
MANILA, Philippines – The market regulation arm of the Philippine Stock Exchange has lifted the involuntary suspension issued against Globalinks Securities and Stocks Inc. after three months.
Capital Markets Integrity Corp. (CMIC) announced in a memorandum on Tuesday that the stock brokerage house now has enough capital to continue operating.
CMIC stated that it had received documents from Globalinks demonstrating the firm’s improved financial standing, allowing the resumption of its activities in the market.
https://business.inquirer.net/552505/pse-lifts-globalinks-suspension
2025/10/12 15:46 (2025/10/12 15:48 更新) [有料会員限定記事]
【イスタンブール共同】パレスチナ自治区ガザに船団で支援物資を届けようとしてイスラエル軍に拘束されたオランダ在住の会社員、安村美香子さん（62）＝大津市出身＝が12日までに電話取材に応じました。
安村さんは、10月1日に拘束され、その間「人間扱いされなかった」と語っています。
詳細な内容は有料会員限定の記事となっており、残りの文は購読者向けです。
7日間無料トライアルもあり、1日37円で読み放題。年払いプランならさらにお得です。
東京メトロ前社長、取締役を辞任 内部通報、社員へ不適切な言動
2025年10月10日 17:46（2025年10月10日 17:48 更新）
東京メトロは10日、社員に対して不適切な言動を行ったとして、前社長の山村明義取締役が辞任したと発表しました。
同社の内部窓口に8月に通報があり、外部弁護士が調査を実施。その結果、不適切な言動が事実であると認定されました。指名・報酬委員会でもこの問題が取り上げられています。
この記事は有料会員限定です。残り182文字。
**Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Reliance Industries to Restrain Use of ‘JIO’ Trademark by Jiocabs**
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has granted an interim injunction in favor of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), restraining certain parties from using its registered ‘JIO’ trademark for taxi services being offered under the domain name www.jiocabs.com.
**Prima Facie Case Established**
Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, on Tuesday, granted the interim protection after observing that Reliance had established a strong prima facie case. The court highlighted that continued use of the well-known brand by unauthorized parties could cause serious harm to Reliance’s goodwill.
“The continued usage of a well-known and protected brand name would indeed cause grave injury,” the court noted. It further added that, “considering the mending of ways by the Defendants, even the balance of convenience would be in favour of grant of the ad-interim relief.”
**Arguments Presented by Reliance**
Vinod Bhahat, advocate representing Reliance, argued that the company is the registered proprietor of the ‘JIO’ mark, which is protected across multiple classes. Reliance contended that the use of the mark ‘Jiocabs’ and the associated domain name amounted to trademark infringement and passing off.
The website and its promotional material allegedly used names, logos, and artistic elements identical or deceptively similar to Reliance’s registered marks.
**History and Evidence**
RIL informed the court that it had adopted the JIO mark in 2016, with registrations dating back to 2011 and 2012. The company described the mark as a “well-known trademark,” supported by extensive evidence including screenshots, WhatsApp conversations, and promotional images illustrating active misuse of its brand identity.
**Defendants’ Conduct Noted**
Although the defendants had altered some content after receiving a legal notice, Reliance submitted that they continued to hold and operate the disputed domain name. This, Reliance argued, perpetuated confusion among consumers.
The court noted that despite being served, the defendants had not entered an appearance. However, they acknowledged that the defendants appeared to have “mended their approach” by shifting to a new name, though the domain www.jiocabs.com remained active.
**Interim Relief Granted**
After considering the rival marks, labels, and the conduct of the parties, the court held that an urgent interim order was justified. The bench restrained the defendants from using the ‘JIO’ mark, the impugned domain name, or any logos, labels, or artwork identical or deceptively similar to Reliance’s trademarks or copyrighted material.
**Next Hearing**
The defendants have been permitted to file their affidavit in reply within four weeks. The matter is scheduled for further hearing on November 28, 2025.
—
*Also Watch:* For exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai and surrounding regions, visit: [https://budgetproperties.in/](https://budgetproperties.in/)
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/bombay-hc-restrains-use-of-jio-trademark-for-taxi-services-grants-interim-relief-to-reliance-industries
**Madhur Bhandarkar Raises Objection to Title ‘Chandni Bar Returns’; Producers Claim Legal Rights Secured**
Filmmaker Madhur Bhandarkar has expressed objections to the use of the title *Chandni Bar Returns* by producer Sandeep Singh and director Ajay Bahl. Bhandarkar, who directed the original *Chandni Bar* (2001) starring Tabu, has lodged a complaint with the Indian Motion Picture Producers’ Association (IMPPA). He claims the makers of the sequel are using his registered title without proper consent.
The 2001 drama, which won multiple National Awards and established Bhandarkar’s name in Indian cinema, remains one of his most acclaimed works. In his complaint, he alleged that the title *Chandni Bar* belongs to him, and that Singh and Bahl have proceeded without authorisation.
Following Bhandarkar’s grievance, IMPPA has reportedly instructed the makers to halt the use of the title until the dispute is resolved.
### Producers Respond with Legal Clarification
In response, Sandeep Singh’s Legend Studios issued an official statement countering Bhandarkar’s claims. The studio asserted that they hold all necessary rights to proceed with the project.
Legend Studios clarified that they acquired the option rights to the title from the original producers of *Chandni Bar*, represented by the late R. Mohan’s wife, Lata Mohan Iyer. She is listed as the proprietor in the Government of India’s Trademark Registry.
Co-producer Vishal Gurnani stated:
“Sandeep Singh’s Legend Studios has acquired the Option Rights of the said title from the Original Producers, who are also the owners of the Registered Trademark and IP rights of the original cult classic *Chandni Bar* (2001). We want to state that no other banner can legally make the said film. Our IP lawyers are replying to the concerned trade associations and are taking all necessary steps to validate and protect our legal rights.”
Additionally, the studio shared the official trademark certificate (Application Number 1662053, Class 41), listing Lata Mohan Iyer as the proprietor, substantiating their claim to the title.
### The Road Ahead for *Chandni Bar Returns*
Despite Bhandarkar’s objection, Legend Studios has confirmed that the sequel is moving forward. Directed by Ajay Bahl, *Chandni Bar Returns* is slated for a worldwide release on December 3, 2026.
The makers describe the film as a reimagined sequel that will retain the essence of the original while presenting a modern, gritty narrative tailored for contemporary audiences. Legend Studios emphasizes its commitment to honoring the legacy of the 2001 classic while ensuring that the production of *Chandni Bar Returns* remains legally compliant and respectful of the original’s cultural impact.
—
**Also Read:**
[Ankita Lokhande turns producer with Chandni Bar sequel; says she wants to pave the way for newcomers]
—
**More Pages:**
– Chandni Bar Box Office Collection
– Bollywood News Live Updates
https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/bollywood/madhur-bhandarkar-objects-chandni-bar-returns-producers-claim-legal-rights-secured/
**US Supreme Court’s New Term to Examine Trump’s Presidential Powers**
*By Chanshimla Varah | October 7, 2025, 11:20 AM*
The United States Supreme Court opened its new term on Monday, with Chief Justice John Roberts swiftly rejecting over 800 pending appeals. Among these was a notable appeal from Ghislaine Maxwell, who challenged her conviction for luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by her late partner, Jeffrey Epstein.
### Focus on Trump’s Expansive Presidential Power
Over the next ten months, a primary focus for the justices will be assessing former President Donald Trump’s broad claims of presidential power. Several key cases related to his administration’s actions are set to be heard this term.
### LGBTQ+ Rights: Therapy Ban Cases
One of the initial cases the court will review concerns state bans on therapy aimed at changing sexual orientation or gender identity. Nearly half of the U.S. states have enacted such bans, making this a critical case for LGBTQ+ rights nationwide.
### Trade and Tariff Case
On November 5, the court will hear a major case addressing Trump’s imposition of tariffs on imports. Two lower courts have ruled that Trump lacked the statutory authority to impose these tariffs, setting the stage for a significant Supreme Court decision.
### Authority Over Independent Agencies
In December, the court will consider a case regarding Trump’s authority to remove members of independent agencies at will. This case has the potential to overturn or significantly narrow a 90-year-old precedent surrounding presidential powers.
### Birthright Citizenship Executive Order
Another significant case pending before the court involves Trump’s executive order that sought to deny birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are either in the country illegally or temporarily. The Trump administration has appealed lower court rulings declaring this order unconstitutional. Arguments on this case may take place in late winter or early spring.
### Federal Reserve Board Dispute
The justices will also conduct an expedited review of Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from her position as a governor on the Federal Reserve Board, a key and influential institution in U.S. financial policy.
### National Guard Troop Deployment Legal Battle
The term will also see a legal dispute stemming from Trump’s efforts to seize control of state National Guard troops and deploy them in cities where he alleged rampant crime, despite opposition from local and state leaders. A federal court in Oregon has barred Trump’s proposed troop deployment to Portland, and an appeals court is set to review this decision in the coming days.
—
As the Supreme Court embarks on this term, many of the cases will have far-reaching consequences on the bounds of presidential authority and the legal landscape surrounding policy and civil rights.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/world/new-supreme-court-term-will-examine-trump-s-presidential-power/story
**US Supreme Court’s New Term to Examine Trump’s Presidential Power**
*By Chanshimla Varah | October 7, 2025 | 11:20 AM*
The United States Supreme Court opened its new term on Monday, marking the beginning of what promises to be a significant judicial session. Chief Justice John Roberts commenced the term by rejecting over 800 pending appeals, including a notable case from Ghislaine Maxwell, who is challenging her conviction related to luring teenage girls for sexual abuse by her late partner, Jeffrey Epstein.
### Focus on Trump’s Presidential Power
A key focus over the next 10 months will be the Court’s examination of former President Donald Trump’s expansive claims of presidential authority. Several high-profile cases connected to Trump’s actions and executive orders are set to be heard, shaping the legal boundaries of presidential power.
### LGBTQ Rights and Conversion Therapy Ban
One of the early cases on the docket involves state bans on therapy aimed at changing sexual orientation or gender identity. Nearly half of the U.S. states have enacted such bans, and the Court’s ruling will have a major impact on LGBTQ rights nationwide.
### Tariffs Imposed by Trump
On November 5, the Supreme Court will hear a significant case revolving around Trump’s imposition of tariffs on imports. Two lower courts previously ruled that Trump lacked the statutory authority to impose these tariffs, and the Court’s decision will clarify the extent of presidential powers in trade matters.
### Case on Removing Independent Agency Members
In December, justices will consider arguments in a case regarding Trump’s authority to remove members of independent agencies at will. This case could overturn or drastically narrow a 90-year-old precedent, significantly altering administrative law.
### Birthright Citizenship Executive Order
The Court has also received a case concerning Trump’s executive order seeking to deny birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are in the country illegally or temporarily. The Trump administration has appealed lower-court rulings that declared the order unconstitutional. This case might be heard later this winter or early spring.
### Federal Reserve Board Dispute
An expedited review is also expected regarding Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook from her position as a governor on the Federal Reserve Board, a vital institution in U.S. financial policy.
### National Guard Troop Deployment Legal Battle
The latest legal battle involves Trump’s attempts to deploy state National Guard troops in cities with high crime rates, against objections from local and state officials. A federal court in Oregon recently barred Trump’s troop deployment to Portland, with an appeals court set to review that decision in the coming days.
—
The Supreme Court’s upcoming term is set to define critical aspects of presidential power and constitutional interpretation, with several landmark cases involving former President Trump likely to have wide-ranging implications. Stay tuned for updates as these cases unfold.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/world/new-supreme-court-term-will-examine-trump-s-presidential-power/story
A lawyer allegedly attempted to hurl a shoe at Chief Justice of India BR Gavai during proceedings in the Supreme Court on Monday, according to reports from lawyers present.
The incident took place while a Bench led by the CJI was hearing the mentioning of cases by lawyers. The lawyer approached the dais, removed his shoe, and tried to throw it towards the judge. Alert security personnel inside the courtroom immediately intervened and prevented the attack.
The lawyer was swiftly escorted out of the court premises. As he was being taken away, he was heard shouting, “Sanatan ka apman nahi sahenge” (We will not tolerate insult of Sanatan Dharma).
Despite the disruption, the Chief Justice remained composed and urged the lawyers present to continue with their arguments. “Don’t get distracted by all this. We are not distracted. These things do not affect me,” the CJI remarked.
The apex court’s security unit has initiated an inquiry into the incident. Further details about the lawyer and the possible motives behind the act are awaited.
*This story has been sourced from a third-party syndicated feed and agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for the dependability, trustworthiness, reliability, or accuracy of the information. Mid-day management and mid-day.com reserve the sole right to alter, delete, or remove content without notice at their absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever.*
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/lawyer-tries-to-hurl-shoe-towards-cji-gavai-in-courtroom-23597429
Multiple government officials have expressed opposition to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s appointment of Maj.-Gen. (Res.) David Zini.
The move has sparked significant controversy, with three former Shin Bet chiefs petitioning the High Court to cancel the appointment.
Maj.-Gen. (Res.) David Zini and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Photo Credit: MAAYAN TOAF/GPO
By SARAH BEN-NUN
