Cassie Ventura’s lawyers react to Diddy’s sentencing: ‘Bravery…inspiration to many’

**Cassie Ventura’s Lawyers React to Diddy’s Sentencing: ‘Bravery. Inspiration to Many’**

*By Apoorva Rastogi | October 4, 2025, 4:46 PM*

Sean “Diddy” Combs’s former girlfriend, Casandra “Cassie” Ventura’s legal team, has issued a response following his recent sentencing.

On Friday, the former music mogul was handed a 50-month prison sentence after a nearly two-month federal trial. Combs was convicted in July on two counts of transportation for prostitution. His sentence also includes four years and two months of supervised release and a $500,000 fine—the maximum penalty allowed.

**Legal Statement**

Ventura’s attorneys, Douglas Wigdor and Meredith Firetog of Wigdor LLP, released the following statement after the sentencing:

*”While nothing can undo the trauma caused by Combs, the sentence imposed today recognizes the impact of the serious offenses he committed. We are confident that with the support of her family and friends, Ms. Ventura will continue healing knowing that her bravery and fortitude have been an inspiration to so many.”*

**Details of Ventura’s Allegations Against Combs**

Ventura was involved in a tumultuous relationship with Combs from 2007 to 2018. During this period, she alleged that Combs organized days-long “freak offs,” during which he hired male escorts for her to engage in sexual acts while he watched.

She also described instances of physical assault and blackmail, where Combs used videos of the “freak-offs” to prevent her from speaking out. In her testimony, Ventura revealed that Combs “controlled” many aspects of her life.

**Overview of the Conviction**

Combs was convicted on two counts related to arranging paid male escorts to cross state lines for drug-fueled sexual encounters with his girlfriends. He was acquitted of the more severe racketeering and sex trafficking charges, which could have carried a life sentence.

Prosecutors claimed that Combs used violence and intimidation to coerce Ventura and another woman into these acts.

**Legal Strategy and Next Steps**

Combs, who pleaded not guilty, is expected to appeal the conviction following sentencing. His defense team acknowledged that he had physically abused his girlfriends but argued that the women willingly participated in the sexual performances.

The defense had advocated for a 14-month sentence, which would have allowed Combs to be released by the end of the year after accounting for time served.

This sentencing marks a significant moment in a high-profile case that has drawn attention to issues of abuse and exploitation in the entertainment industry. Ventura’s legal team underscores her courage amid the ongoing process of healing.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/casandra-cassi-ventura-lawyers-speaks-out-on-diddy-s-sentencing/story

Cassie Ventura’s lawyers react to Diddy’s sentencing: ‘Bravery…inspiration to many’

Sean “Diddy” Combs’s ex-girlfriend, Casandra “Cassie” Ventura’s legal team has responded to his recent sentencing.

In a statement issued shortly after the news broke, Cassie’s attorneys expressed their thoughts on the outcome. They emphasized the importance of accountability and the hope for a positive path forward.

Stay tuned for further updates as more details emerge regarding the case and any potential impact on those involved.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/casandra-cassi-ventura-lawyers-speaks-out-on-diddy-s-sentencing/story

Priya Sachdev ‘destroyed’ Karisma-Sunjay’s marriage, claims his sister

By Apoorva Rastogi | Oct 04, 2025 | 11:15 am

**The Ongoing Kapur Family Dispute: A Closer Look at the Late Industrialist’s 30,000 Crore Estate**

The ongoing dispute over the late industrialist Sunjay Kapur’s massive 30,000 crore estate has taken a dramatic turn. Mandira Kapur Smith, Sunjay Kapur’s sister, has made allegations regarding his third wife, Priya Sachdev, accusing her of contributing to the breakdown of Kapur’s marriage with actress Karisma Kapoor.

### Family’s Opposition to the Relationship

In an exclusive interview with journalist Vickey Lalwani, Mandira revealed that she had known about Sunjay and Priya Sachdev’s relationship since they met on a flight and was deeply unhappy about it.

“You don’t break up a happy marriage,” said Kapur Smith.
“Lolo (Karisma Kapoor) and Sunjay, my brother, were in a good place. I think for another woman to not care about a woman who’s just had a child is in bad taste. You don’t destroy a marriage. Even a happy marriage deserves to be respected. Lolo was also working very hard to make this marriage work.”

Mandira expressed strong disapproval toward the way the marriage ended and criticized Sachdev’s role in it.

### Family Feud and Disapproval of Marriage

Mandira also revealed that the entire Kapur family, including their late father, was against Sunjay Kapur’s relationship with Priya Sachdev.

“He can never marry her. I don’t ever want to see her face. And they can’t have children,” she recalled as her father’s harsh words.

She added, “Nobody stood by them getting married. They should have made it work. Karisma should have been allowed to have her husband.”

### Wedding Absence

Mandira and her sister were noticeably absent at the 2017 wedding of Sunjay Kapur and Priya Sachdev. She explained, “We were very clear that we could not support this because the only thing Dad said to him was: ‘Do not get married and do not have kids.’ If he was here, Priya won’t be a part of this family.”

### Regrets and Reflections

When asked if Karisma Kapoor had reached out during the turbulent period, Mandira admitted there had been silence between them.

“We weren’t actually talking in that time frame. I feel bad because she was my best friend. I wish I’d taken more of a stand for her. I should have stood up for her. I don’t know what I could have done differently, honestly.”

### Legacy and the Inheritance Battle

Sunjay Kapur tragically passed away in June 2025 following a freak accident at a polo match. He is survived by his wife Priya Sachdev and their son, Azarias.

Sunjay and Karisma Kapoor were married from 2003 to 2016. Their children, Samaira and Kiaan, were born in 2005 and 2011, respectively.

Following Kapur’s death, a fierce inheritance battle has erupted between Priya Sachdev and Sunjay’s children from his marriage with Karisma Kapoor, further complicating the Kapur family saga.

Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/sunjay-kapur-s-sister-accuses-priya-of-ruining-karisma-s-marriage/story

Priya Sachdev ‘destroyed’ Karisma-Sunjay’s marriage, claims his sister

**The Ongoing Dispute Over Sunjay Kapur’s 30,000 Crore Estate Takes a New Turn**
*By Apoorva Rastogi | Oct 04, 2025 | 11:15 am*

The ongoing dispute over the late industrialist Sunjay Kapur’s massive ₹30,000 crore estate has taken a new turn. Kapur’s sister, Mandira Kapur Smith, has made startling allegations regarding the circumstances that led to the breakdown of his marriage with actor Karisma Kapoor.

In an exclusive interview with journalist Vickey Lalwani, Mandira claimed that Kapur’s third wife, Priya Sachdev, played a significant role in the dissolution of his marriage with Kapoor. She revealed that she had known about Kapur and Sachdev’s relationship since the two met on a flight, and expressed her unhappiness with how it affected the family.

### Family’s Opposition: “You Don’t Break Up a Happy Marriage”
Mandira Kapur Smith said, “Lolo (Karisma Kapoor) and Sunjay, my brother, were in a good place. I think for another woman to not care about a woman who’s just had a child is in bad taste. You don’t destroy a marriage. And Lolo did not deserve that.”

She continued, “Not even a happy marriage—you don’t break up a marriage that is trying to work on keeping a family together. Lolo was also working very hard to make this marriage work.”

### Family Feud: “Nobody Stood By Them Getting Married”
Mandira revealed that their entire family, including their late father, was strongly opposed to Kapur’s relationship with Sachdev.

“He can never marry her. I don’t ever want to see her face. And they can’t have children,” she recalled their father’s stern words.

“Nobody stood by them getting married. They should have made it work. She (Karisma Kapoor) should have been allowed to have her husband,” Mandira added, emphasizing the family’s disapproval.

### Wedding Absence: “We Didn’t Attend Their Wedding”
Mandira and her sister notably did not attend Kapur and Sachdev’s 2017 wedding.

“We were very clear that we could not support this because the only thing Dad said to him was: ‘Do not get married and do not have kids,’” she said.

“If he was here, Priya won’t be a part of this family,” she concluded.

### Regret: “There Was Silence Between Us”
When asked whether Karisma Kapoor had reached out to her during the fallout, Mandira revealed a period of silence between them.

“We weren’t actually talking in that time frame. I feel bad because she was my best friend. I wish I’d taken more of a stand for her. I should have stood up for her. I don’t know what I could have done differently, honestly,” Mandira confessed.

### Legacy: Kapur’s Death and the Inheritance Battle
Sunjay Kapur passed away in June 2025 after a freak accident during a polo match. He is survived by his wife, Priya Sachdev, and their son, Azarias.

Kapur was previously married to Karisma Kapoor from 2003 to 2016. Together, they had two children: Samaira (born 2005) and Kiaan (born 2011).

The late industrialist’s untimely death has left behind not only a vast fortune but also a bitter inheritance battle between Priya Sachdev and Kapur’s children from his marriage with Karisma Kapoor. The family feud surrounding the estate shows no signs of settling anytime soon.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/sunjay-kapur-s-sister-accuses-priya-of-ruining-karisma-s-marriage/story

Priya Sachdev ‘destroyed’ Karisma-Sunjay’s marriage, claims his sister

By Apoorva Rastogi | Oct 04, 2025 | 11:15 AM

**What’s the story?**

The ongoing dispute over the late industrialist Sunjay Kapur’s massive ₹30,000 crore estate has taken a new turn. Kapur’s sister, Mandira Kapur Smith, has alleged that his third wife, Priya Sachdev, contributed to the breakdown of his marriage with actor Karisma Kapoor.

In an interview with journalist Vickey Lalwani, Mandira revealed that she had known about Kapur and Sachdev’s relationship since they met on a flight—and she was unhappy about it.

**Family’s opposition: “You don’t break up a happy marriage”**

Kapur Smith stated, “Lolo (Karisma Kapoor) and Sunjay, my brother, were in a good place. I think for another woman to not care about a woman who’s just had a child is in bad taste. You don’t destroy a marriage. And Lolo did not deserve that. Not even a happy marriage—you don’t break up a marriage that is trying to work on keeping a family together. Lolo was also working very hard to make this marriage work.”

**Family feud: “Nobody stood by them getting married”**

Mandira further revealed that the entire family, including their late father, was against Kapur’s relationship with Sachdev.

“She can never marry her. I don’t ever want to see her face. And they can’t have children,” she recalled their father’s harsh words.

“Nobody stood by them getting married. They should have made it work. She (Karisma) should have been allowed to have her husband.”

**Wedding absence: “We didn’t attend their wedding”**

Mandira Kapur Smith and her sister did not attend Kapur and Sachdev’s 2017 wedding.

“We were very clear that we could not support this because the only thing Dad said to him was: ‘Do not get married and do not have kids,’” she said. “If he was here, Priya won’t be a part of this family.”

**Regret: “There was silence between us”**

When asked whether Karisma Kapoor had contacted her during this period of family turmoil, Mandira admitted there had been silence.

“We weren’t actually talking in that time frame. I feel bad because she was my best friend. I wish I’d taken more of a stand for her. I should have stood up for her. I don’t know what I could have done differently, honestly.”

**Legacy: Kapur’s death and the inheritance battle**

Sunjay Kapur passed away in June 2025 after a freak accident at a polo match. He is survived by his wife, Priya Sachdev, and their son, Azarias.

Karisma Kapoor and Kapur were married between 2003 and 2016. Their children, Samaira and Kiaan, were born in 2005 and 2011, respectively.

Kapur’s death has left behind not just a huge fortune but also a bitter inheritance battle between Sachdev and his children from Kapoor. The family feud appears far from over.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/sunjay-kapur-s-sister-accuses-priya-of-ruining-karisma-s-marriage/story

Mumbai Cybercrime: 52-Year-Old Police Constable Posted At Bandra Kurla Complex Loses ₹94,103 In Online Fraud

**Mumbai Police Constable Falls Victim to Rs 94,103 Online Fraud**

A police constable attached to the Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) police station was cheated of Rs 94,103 in a sophisticated online fraud.

**The Incident**

Constable Sachin Chavan, 52, who has been posted at the BKC police station for the past six months, became the victim of the scam on September 9. At 7:46 pm, he received a call from an individual falsely claiming to have mistakenly transferred Rs 30,000 into his bank account. The caller requested him to return the amount.

The caller informed Chavan that the money was intended for a hospital and asked him to keep the phone line active while checking his bank messages. Chavan soon received a message confirming that Rs 30,000 had been credited to his account.

**The Fraudulent Transactions**

Following this, the caller provided an account number and asked Chavan to first transfer Rs 5,000, promising further details regarding the remaining balance afterward. Trusting the caller, Chavan transferred Rs 5,000 and shared a screenshot as proof.

Shortly after, the caller sent a link and instructed Chavan to press it twice and enter a code. Without suspecting foul play, Chavan complied. As a result, Rs 77,091 and later Rs 12,012 were debited from his bank account without his authorization.

**Legal Action**

A formal complaint was filed, and a case was registered on October 1 under sections 318(4) (cheating) and 319(2) (cheating by personation) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, along with relevant provisions of the Information Technology Act.

For more exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai and surrounding areas, visit [Budget Properties](https://budgetproperties.in/).
https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/mumbai-cybercrime-52-year-old-police-constable-posted-at-bandra-kurla-complex-loses-94103-in-online-fraud

Karur stampede: Madras HC forms SIT, denies pre-arrest bail to TVK leaders

The court has rejected the anticipatory bail petitions of two senior Tamil Vikatan Katchi (TVK) leaders and criticised both the party and the police over the recent mishap. Additionally, a plea by a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the incident was dismissed. The bench directed her to approach the Madurai court instead, according to PTI reports.

Chief Minister MK Stalin and the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) launched political attacks, blaming the BJP and TVK respectively. Stalin accused the BJP of attempting to exploit the tragedy for political gains. Meanwhile, the DMK slammed actor Vijay for his arrogance, hunger for money, publicity mania, and desire for power. The party stated that Vijay’s challenge to the state government to arrest him was merely an attempt to divert attention from the deaths of 41 people.

In response to the tragedy, a Special Investigation Team (SIT) has been formed under senior Indian Police Service (IPS) officer and Inspector General, North Zone, Asra Garg, PTI reported.

The High Court also held the TVK event organisers, party leadership, and police responsible for lapses that contributed to the stampede, which claimed the lives of several children.

The anticipatory bail pleas of TVK state General Secretary Bussy N Anand and Deputy General Secretary CTR Nirmal Kumar were dismissed. Both have been named in the first information report (FIR), along with a local party leader who has since been arrested. They face charges under sections 105 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), 110 (attempt to commit culpable homicide), 125 (endangering life of others), and 223 (disobedience to order) of the Indian Penal Code.

Furthermore, the court rejected the anticipatory bail petition of TVK Namakkal district secretary Sathish Kumar, who was linked to an attack on a private hospital during Vijay’s public meeting in Namakkal.

Chief Minister Stalin also alleged that the BJP and the Union government show no genuine concern over the stampede and are attempting to capitalise on the tragedy ahead of the 2026 Assembly Elections. He questioned, “Why was a delegation of NDA MPs sent to Karur urgently, while no teams were dispatched for the Manipur riots, Morbi bridge collapse, or Kumbh Mela stampede?”

The DMK continued its criticism of Vijay through its party organ, Murasoli, stating, “Vijay’s arrogance, responsible for the deaths of 41 persons, and his hunger for money, publicity mania, and desire for power, has not subsided yet.” The publication further claimed that his Rs 20 lakh solatium announcement for victims’ families was prompted by pressure. Adding, “By mounting a challenge to arrest him, he is trying to divert attention from the deaths of 41 persons.”

The government has already disbursed solatium to the victims’ families. Meanwhile, the DMK also criticised TVK leaders for arriving late to designated campaign spots, leaving supporters exhausted.
https://www.mid-day.com/news/india-news/article/sit-to-investigate-karur-stampede-says-hc-denies-anticipatory-bail-to-tvk-leaders-23597089

Madras High Court Orders SIT Probe Into Vijay’s TVK Rally Stampede

**Madras High Court Orders SIT Probe Into Karur Stampede at Vijay’s TVK Rally**

Chennai: Days after a tragic stampede at actor Vijay’s Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) rally in Karur claimed 41 lives, the Madras High Court (principal seat in Chennai) on Friday ordered the constitution of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe the incident. The SIT will be headed by Inspector General of Police Asr Garg.

The court strongly condemned the TVK leaders for “abandoning” the innocent people who had gathered to watch Vijay but tragically lost their lives. In addition, the court directed the police to take action against the party’s office bearer, Aadhav Arjuna, for deleting a social media post that called for a Nepal-like Gen Z revolt.

In a related development, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court declined to order a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe, noting that the police investigation was still at a nascent stage. However, the bench instructed the State government not to grant permission for political rallies on highways until a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is established.

Separately, the court dismissed anticipatory bail petitions filed by TVK party general secretary ‘Bussy’ Anand and another office bearer, CTR Nirmal Kumar, both named in the FIR related to the stampede.

Justice N Senthilkumar, presiding over the main case in Chennai, directed the Karur police to hand over all documents related to the FIR to the SIT. The judge expressed concern that the State appeared lenient towards the accused, highlighting that several party leaders fled the scene after many women and children died.

Regretting the lack of remorse from the party leadership, Justice Senthilkumar commented that this attitude reflected their “mental state.” He added, “The court, however, cannot close its eyes. The court cannot be a mute spectator. The court cannot shirk its responsibilities. The entire world has witnessed the sequences as well as consequences of the event.”

Describing the tragedy as a man-made disaster, the judge noted that even the President and Prime Minister had expressed condolences and extended support to the victims and their families.

The judge also took note of a petition mentioning that Vijay was named in the FIR. Citing video footage showing two-wheeler riders getting injured after falling near Vijay’s caravan, Justice Senthilkumar questioned why no hit-and-run case had been registered. He urged the police to suo motu file an FIR based on the available video evidence to ensure a thorough investigation.
https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/madras-high-court-orders-sit-probe-into-vijays-tvk-rally-stampede

Zubeen Garg’s death: Event organizer moves SC, calls allegations ‘ludicrous’

Shyamkanu Mahanta, the organizer of the North East India Festival and an accused in the case related to Assamese singer Zubeen Garg’s death, has approached the Supreme Court.

He is seeking a transfer of the ongoing Assam Police probe to a central agency.

The move aims to ensure a fair and impartial investigation into the matter. The Supreme Court’s decision on this plea is awaited.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/plea-for-fair-investigation-into-zubeen-garg-s-death/story

Zubeen Garg’s death: Event organizer moves SC, calls allegations ‘ludicrous’

Shyamkanu Mahanta, the organizer of the North East India Festival and an accused in the case related to the death of Assamese singer Zubeen Garg, has approached the Supreme Court.

He is seeking the transfer of the ongoing Assam Police investigation to a central agency. Mahanta’s plea requests a more impartial and thorough probe into the matter, amid concerns over the current investigation’s progress.

The Supreme Court will now consider his request for the case to be handled by a federal investigative body.
https://www.newsbytesapp.com/news/entertainment/plea-for-fair-investigation-into-zubeen-garg-s-death/story

Exit mobile version