Trial of 3 Guards Tests New York’s Culture of Incarceration

A rare instance of a prison guard being found guilty of murder has drawn mixed reactions from the public.

Advocates of prison reform welcomed the verdict, seeing it as a step toward greater accountability within the correctional system.

However, many expressed disappointment over the acquittal of two other guards involved in the case, feeling that justice was only partially served.

The case highlights ongoing challenges in addressing misconduct and violence in prisons.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/21/nyregion/trial-of-3-guards-tests-new-yorks-culture-of-incarceration.html

Denver man arrested in assault of pro-Trump ‘No Kings’ counter-demonstrator

Police have arrested a 20-year-old man in connection with an alleged assault during a demonstration in downtown Denver. The incident involved a middle-aged man who interjected himself into the “No Kings” protest, shouted expletives and a slur, then became involved in a street altercation resulting in a serious injury.

According to a Denver Police report, the assault occurred after the older man declared, “Yes Trump,” during the rally near Denver’s Union Station on Saturday afternoon. A video circulating on social media shows the man, wearing a blue New York Giants logo shirt, gesturing at and deriding demonstrators.

The footage captures the man running and then falling face-first onto the pavement. He quickly got up and ran again, only to be tripped and fall onto the street by a curb, hitting his head. Despite bleeding heavily from the left side of his face, the man got up once more and, along with friends, clashed with demonstrators.

Some demonstrators attempted to assist him, pointing to his head and indicating he needed medical attention.

Denver police confirmed on Monday that they arrested Jose Cardenas in connection with the assault. Officers tracked Cardenas from Wynkoop Street—where the assault occurred around 2:30 p.m.—to North Lincoln Street near the intersection with 14th Avenue. Authorities say Cardenas attempted to flee from officers at that location.

Witnesses identified Cardenas as the individual who assaulted the counter-demonstrator. According to the police statement of probable cause for arrest, Cardenas was transported to the Denver Jail and charged with aggravated assault.

The victim has not been identified by police but reportedly suffered a serious laceration to his head.

Stay informed with the latest crime news—sign up to get updates sent straight to your inbox each day.
https://www.denverpost.com/2025/10/20/denver-no-kings-arrest-assault-video-demonstrator/

October 20 In Labor History: Asbestos? More Like As-WORST-us.

On October 20, 1969, a construction worker named Clarence Borel filed suit against 11 companies for asbestos exposure. This key moment in the movement against asbestos reveals the dangers workers faced on the job, the decades-long coverup by companies, and how workers finally began to win compensation.

By the late 19th century, asbestos had become common in American construction. Johns Manville, founded in 1858, soon became the largest asbestos producer in the country. In fact, the company’s founder, H. W. Johns, died in 1898 due to asbestos exposure—though he was unaware of the risks at the time. The company pioneered asbestos-based roofing, insulation, and cement products.

The dangers of asbestos were not unknown. Even the ancient Romans realized asbestos caused illness. Pliny wrote that slaves working with asbestos seemed to die, and proto-masks made from animal bladders were used to protect themselves. Despite this, early warnings were largely ignored as the modern asbestos industry developed.

In 1897, a physician in Vienna wrote the first modern report on the health problems faced by asbestos workers. Awareness of these issues grew in the following decades. Nevertheless, workplaces remained unsafe for a long time. Even with the rise of successful unions in the mid-twentieth century, many workplaces remained hazardous. While unions fought for more obvious safety issues, pollutants such as asbestos were not a major priority, resulting in many workers dying from mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.

Change began in the early 1960s, at least for asbestos workers. When physicians asked a company to share medical records after discovering a cluster of asbestos-related illnesses among its workforce, the company refused. The doctors then contacted the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers, which gladly assisted them.

Though unions generally supported improved workplace safety, they did not fully understand the hazards involved. Their help allowed the doctors to publish a landmark 1965 study strongly affirming the link between asbestos exposure and construction work. The union’s records for death benefits enabled a longer-term study, despite most workers already being deceased.

The racial demographics of asbestos deaths during the peak asbestos use era are striking due to the segregation of construction labor. Between 1990 and 1999, nearly 11,000 Americans died from asbestos-related causes, many exposed decades earlier. An overwhelming 96% of these deaths were men, 93% were white, and 98% were over the age of 55.

By 1998, asbestos-related illness had surpassed black lung disease as the leading cause of workplace deaths related to lung conditions.

Workers had attempted to seek compensation for asbestos-related illnesses for decades. In 1927, a foreman filed the first known suit for damages and won a disability claim in Massachusetts. Lawsuits against Johns Manville began in 1929, and by 1933, the company settled claims from 11 workers in New Jersey.

However, by 1949, facing continued lawsuits, the company opted to withhold information about health risks from workers, covering up the dangers.

In 1969, Clarence Borel, who had worked in construction since 1936, discovered he had contracted asbestosis. His case became pivotal in the fight against asbestos exposure. This occurred alongside the rise of the modern workplace safety movement, which led to the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 1971 and spurred increased union focus on such issues.

Borel testified about the pervasive dust in his work environment:

> “You just move them just a little and there is going to be dust, and I blew this dust out of my nostrils by handfuls at the end of the day, trying to use water too, I even used Mentholatum in my nostrils to keep some of the dust from going down my throat, but it is impossible to get rid of all of it. Even your clothes just stay dusty continually unless you blow it off with an air hose.”

He admitted he suspected the work was dangerous, as were many jobs in the mid-twentieth century. Access to respirators came late and was limited; these were often hot and uncomfortable. Many workers pointed out that the burden of safety rested entirely on them, with companies failing to control airborne asbestos.

Interestingly, union safety attempts sometimes caused complaints among workers. Cultures of work often included risk and discomfort as accepted elements.

Borel filed suit against 11 companies. The jury found 10 guilty of negligence but also found Borel partly responsible. The companies appealed, denying responsibility and questioning how Borel got sick. Borel countered that none of the companies took safety seriously—none warned workers about risks or conducted tests to determine safe exposure levels.

At this point, some companies began settling with Borel to limit their losses. Others fought on, prolonging the case through appeals.

Then, in 1974, the discovery of the so-called “Asbestos Papers” during an inspection of an asbestos factory in Connecticut dramatically altered the legal landscape. These documents definitively showed that companies knew what asbestos did to workers’ lungs and had conspired for decades to cover it up.

This revelation led to many workers, including Borel, routinely winning their court cases. Johns Manville filed for bankruptcy in 1982 to protect itself from lawsuits totaling $2 billion.

Companies pooled funds to pay claims, but the industry was overwhelmed. Claims continue today, as evidenced by the many television ads encouraging people exposed to asbestos to join class-action suits.

While proving such claims can be difficult, and courts often less sympathetic due to the rise of conservative judicial appointments, asbestos exposure at workplaces has declined sharply in recent decades. However, the toll of decades-long exposure continues to affect working-class families.

**Further Reading:**

– Dorceta Taylor, *The Environment and the People in American Cities, 1600s-1900s*
– Carl F. Cranor, *Regulating Toxic Substances: A Philosophy of Science and the Law*
– Michael Bowker, *Fatal Deception: The Terrifying True Story of How Asbestos is Killing America*
– Jeb Barnes, *Dust-Up: Asbestos Litigation and the Failure of Commonsense Policy Reform*
https://www.wonkette.com/p/october-20-in-labor-history-asbestos

Tether Nominates Executives to Juventus Board After Investment in Club

Tether Seeks Board Control at Juventus Following 10.7% Stake Investment

Tether, the issuer behind the stablecoin USDT, is making a strategic move into the world of football by seeking board control at Juventus FC. Earlier this year, Tether invested a 10.7% stake in the Italian football club and now aims to increase its influence by nominating two executives to join Juventus’ board of directors.

### Strategic Investment and Board Nominations

In February and April 2024, Tether acquired a significant 10.7% share in Juventus, signaling its strong interest in the football industry. Since the investment, the company has actively engaged with fans to gather insights and concerns about the club’s management. Emphasizing the need for improved governance and stronger minority representation, Tether has nominated Zachary Lyons, its Deputy Chief Investment Officer, and Francesco Garino, a medical doctor and Juventus supporter, to join the club’s board.

These nominations are set to be voted on during the Juventus shareholder meeting scheduled for November 7, 2024. With this initiative, Tether aims to influence the future direction and governance of the club.

### Focus on Corporate Governance and Transparency

Tether’s push for enhanced corporate governance at Juventus comes amidst a period of leadership instability. In November 2022, Juventus experienced a major upheaval when its entire board resigned following allegations of financial fraud related to players’ salaries. Several executives, including former chairman Andrea Agnelli, faced legal consequences, prompting significant changes in the club’s leadership.

Paolo Ardoino, CEO of Tether, highlighted the company’s commitment to bringing “best-in-class corporate governance” to Juventus. By nominating professionals from diverse backgrounds, Tether seeks to strengthen the club’s management and establish better decision-making processes moving forward.

### Expanding Influence Beyond Football

While Tether’s core business centers around stablecoins, the company has been actively diversifying its investments across various industries. Apart from Juventus, Tether has invested $775 million in Rumble, a video-sharing platform. Additionally, the company has shown interest in artificial intelligence by proposing a joint acquisition of Northern Data, a firm specializing in AI infrastructure.

These strategic investments demonstrate Tether’s broader ambition to build a significant presence beyond the cryptocurrency market, expanding its footprint into traditional sectors such as sports and technology.

### The Road Ahead for Juventus and Tether

The upcoming Juventus shareholder meeting will be a pivotal moment for both the club and Tether. Approval of Tether’s board nominations could lead to a considerable shift in Juventus’ governance structure. With Tether’s involvement, the club may see new leadership dynamics aimed at restoring its reputation and ensuring greater transparency after recent scandals.

As Juventus navigates these changes, Tether’s role could become instrumental in shaping the club’s future trajectory both on and off the field.
https://coincentral.com/tether-nominates-executives-to-juventus-board-after-investment-in-club/

Grand Jury Indicts Former National Security Advisor Bolton for Allegedly Sharing Classified Material

Former National Security Advisor John Bolton has been indicted by a federal grand jury on 18 criminal counts under the Espionage Act. He is accused of sharing information containing classified material related to U.S. national defense.

According to CNN, which cited two sources, the Maryland grand jury indicted Bolton for allegedly sharing classified information—including more than one thousand pages of diary-like notes—with his wife and daughter over email. The indictment also alleges that a “cyber actor,” believed to be Iranian, hacked Bolton’s computer. Bolton reportedly refused to disclose the nature of the classified information communicated through the compromised account.

Bolton served as President Donald Trump’s national security advisor for nearly 18 months until he was fired in 2019. Since then, he has accused the Trump administration of political targeting and maintains that he has done nothing wrong.

During his time after leaving the White House, Bolton wrote a scathing memoir about his experience, in which he described Trump as “unfit” to be president. In response to the indictment reports, President Trump remarked, “I think he’s a bad person. Too bad.”
http://www.cbn.com/api/urlredirect.aspx?u=http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/national-security/2025/october/grand-jury-indicts-former-national-security-advisor-bolton-for-allegedly-sharing-classified-material

John Bolton Becomes Third Trump Foe Indicted

**John Bolton Indicted in Maryland for Alleged Mishandling of Classified Documents**

Former National Security Advisor John Bolton, a longtime critic of President Donald Trump, was indicted Thursday in Maryland. He is under investigation for the potential mishandling of classified documents, becoming the third notable political adversary of Trump to face indictment in recent weeks.

### Key Details

Prior to the charges, Bolton’s legal team defended his handling of the documents. Lowell, a spokesperson, stated, “These are the kinds of ordinary records, many of which are 20 years old or more, that would be kept by a 40-year career official who served at the State Department, as an Assistant Attorney General, the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, and the National Security Advisor. An objective and thorough review will show nothing inappropriate was stored or kept by Ambassador Bolton.”

### Context Around Recent Indictments

Other recent charges against Trump opponents, such as former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, have faced criticism. Career prosecutors reportedly refused to endorse those indictments due to concerns over insufficient evidence. Instead, the charging documents were signed solely by U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, a former Trump defense attorney with no prior prosecutorial experience, who leads the Eastern District of Virginia.

Unlike those cases, the charges against Bolton appear to be backed by career prosecutors who believe the case has more merit.

### FBI Investigation and Hacking Incident

The FBI’s criminal investigation into Bolton began during the Biden administration. It was partly based on information discovered after it was revealed that Bolton’s personal email had been hacked by an unnamed foreign government. While some details related to the hack were cited in court filings concerning searches of Bolton’s home and office, much of the information remains redacted.

### Background on John Bolton

John Bolton is a conservative national security expert who served as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations under President George W. Bush. He later joined the Trump administration as National Security Advisor from 2018 to 2019. After leaving the administration, Bolton became a vocal critic of Trump, publishing a book in 2020 that the Trump administration attempted to block.

The book included explosive allegations, claiming President Trump had limited foreign policy knowledge, granted “personal favors to dictators he liked,” and told Chinese President Xi Jinping that internment camps for Uighurs were “exactly the right thing to do.” Bolton has continued to criticize Trump, updating his book before the 2024 election to warn that Trump is “unfit to be president” and that the president’s “retribution” campaign against his enemies “will consume much of his second term.”

The FBI conducted raids on Bolton’s office and residence soon after he criticized Trump’s handling of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, suggesting the president had made mistakes that “emboldened” Russia. Earlier in the year, Trump had revoked Bolton’s security detail and subsequently attacked him on Truth Social, calling him “really dumb.”

### Political Context and Related Indictments

Bolton’s indictment follows recent federal charges brought against two other Trump critics: former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. Comey faces allegations of lying to Congress in 2020, while James is accused of mortgage fraud related to falsely classifying a property’s use. Both have denied the allegations, and legal experts have expressed skepticism about the strength of those cases.

These indictments represent some of the most significant legal actions taken against Trump’s rivals so far, aligning with Trump’s longstanding promises of “retribution” against political foes.

In addition to these high-profile cases, the administration reportedly continues investigations into other critics, including Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), billionaire donor George Soros and his foundation, former CIA Director James Brennan, and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.

**Further Reading:**
Stay tuned for updates as more information emerges regarding John Bolton’s case and related investigations into political figures associated with Donald Trump’s administration and opponents.
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/finance/john-bolton-becomes-third-trump-foe-indicted/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=john-bolton-becomes-third-trump-foe-indicted

DHS to charge migrants granted humanitarian parole $1K fee

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced on Thursday the implementation of a new $1,000 immigration fee for migrants paroled into the United States.

According to a statement from the department’s public affairs office, the goal of this fee is to “institute accountability and prevent rampant fraud of the parole system.”

In addition to enhancing accountability, the fee is intended to improve oversight of the parole process, ensuring that resources are used effectively and that the system is protected from abuse.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5559567-homeland-security-migrant-parole-fee/

Fmr Nat’l Security Advisor John Bolton indicted on 18 counts, accused of mishandling and sharing classified docs

OAN Staff Blake Wolf, Brooke Mallory and Sophia Flores UPDATE: 2: 05 PM Thursday, October 16, 2025: Former National Security Advisor John Bolton has been indicted on 18 counts of illegally hoarding or sending sensitive national security information by a federal grand jury. The indictment in a Greenbelt, Maryland federal court, alleges that Bolton knowingly transmitted materials related to foreign policy matters after President Trump fired Bolton from the White House in 2019. These sensitive national security documents were shared through a personal email. If found guilty, Bolton faces up to 10 years behind bars on each count of the indictment. 12: 56 PM Wednesday, October 15, 2025: Former National Security Advisor John Bolton is expected to face a federal indictment after being accused of mishandling and transmitting classified government documents using his private AOL email account. While he has not been formally charged, multiple sources suggest that a grand jury in Maryland is expected to issue an indictment soon. The development follows FBI raids on Bolton’s Maryland home and Washington, D. C., office, where agents seized documents labeled “classified,” “confidential,” and “secret” including materials related to weapons of mass destruction and strategic communications. The indictment is anticipated to detail Bolton’s mishandling of classified information during his time as President Donald Trump’s national security advisor, stemming from Trump’s first administration. Bolton allegedly used his personal AOL email account to share and store classified information through daily notes and summaries of his White House activities from 2018 to 2019. These documents reportedly contained sensitive national security details, prompting federal authorities to raid his Bethesda, Maryland, home in August 2025 seeking the “highly sensitive national security” information. The indictment is expected to hit as soon as Wednesday or Thursday. One Justice Department official told the New York Post that the case against Bolton is “airtight.” During the recent raid, FBI agents were able to remove a white binder from Bolton’s home labeled “statement and reflections to allied strikes,” which included folders labeled “Trump I-IV.” The FBI was also able to remove four boxes labeled “printed daily activities,” in addition to “two iPhones, four computers and hard drives, and two USB drives,” according to a Department of Justice filing. The probe into Bolton’s alleged mishandling of classified documents was first introduced in 2020 through a “very specific intelligence capacity,” which exposed Bolton’s decision to allegedly transfer classified documents to his home before Trump fired him in 2019. However, the probe was ultimately dismissed under the prior Biden administration due to “political reasons,” officials at the time stated, although it has since been reopened under FBI Director Kash Patel. Bolton has been a vocal critic of President Trump’s foreign policy following his departure from the administration. Bolton’s tenure under Trump was also marked by significant policy disagreements, particularly regarding approaches to Iran, North Korea, and Afghanistan. These differences led to Bolton’s dismissal in September 2019 with Trump citing “strong disagreements” over foreign policy as the primary reason. His conduct has also attracted bipartisan scrutiny for aggressive tactics, hawkish policies, and potential legal infractions, spanning his tenures in the Bush and Trump administrations, his published works, and current investigations. Notably, as Under Secretary of State for Arms Control, Bolton pressured intelligence analysts to exaggerate evidence of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) to justify the U. S. invasion. He targeted analysts like Christian Westerman, who disputed the claims. Stay informed! Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. What do YOU think? Click here to jump to the comments! Sponsored Content Below Share this post!.
https://www.oann.com/newsroom/fmr-natl-security-advisor-john-bolton-indicted-on-18-counts-accused-of-mishandling-and-sharing-classified-docs/

Florida House rolls out sweeping slate of property tax proposals for 2026 ballot

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — After months of waiting and several committee meetings, the Florida House is set to offer a slate of ideas for sweeping property tax reform in the next legislative session. The proposed constitutional amendments could significantly reshape how homeowners pay property taxes and how local governments fund essential services.

In a memo released Thursday, House Speaker Danny Perez criticized the Republican plans, labeling them politically motivated and potentially harmful to local communities.

Representative Driskell, speaking earlier this month, echoed these concerns. “The harm that these proposals would cause would not outweigh any potential benefits,” she said. She questioned the practical impact of the reforms, asking, “What firehouse would [Governor DeSantis] close in Tampa? What police station would he close in Orlando? What garbage collection would he stop in South Florida?”

Driskell warned that the proposals could leave small, rural counties struggling to fund basic services. “We’d basically be putting them in a situation where they would be living in a welfare state,” she said. “They would be funded by larger counties.”

Democrats argue that genuine affordability relief should focus on property insurance, healthcare, and overall living costs—not just property taxes. Driskell added, “This all seems to be a distraction. We need to focus on real solutions.”

### What’s Next

The House’s property tax reform proposals will be assigned to committees in the coming weeks, with debates expected to begin early in the 2026 session.
https://www.wptv.com/news/state/florida-house-rolls-out-sweeping-slate-of-property-tax-proposals-for-2026-ballot

Exit mobile version