John Bolton Becomes Third Trump Foe Indicted

**John Bolton Indicted in Maryland for Alleged Mishandling of Classified Documents**

Former National Security Advisor John Bolton, a longtime critic of President Donald Trump, was indicted Thursday in Maryland. He is under investigation for the potential mishandling of classified documents, becoming the third notable political adversary of Trump to face indictment in recent weeks.

### Key Details

Prior to the charges, Bolton’s legal team defended his handling of the documents. Lowell, a spokesperson, stated, “These are the kinds of ordinary records, many of which are 20 years old or more, that would be kept by a 40-year career official who served at the State Department, as an Assistant Attorney General, the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, and the National Security Advisor. An objective and thorough review will show nothing inappropriate was stored or kept by Ambassador Bolton.”

### Context Around Recent Indictments

Other recent charges against Trump opponents, such as former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, have faced criticism. Career prosecutors reportedly refused to endorse those indictments due to concerns over insufficient evidence. Instead, the charging documents were signed solely by U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, a former Trump defense attorney with no prior prosecutorial experience, who leads the Eastern District of Virginia.

Unlike those cases, the charges against Bolton appear to be backed by career prosecutors who believe the case has more merit.

### FBI Investigation and Hacking Incident

The FBI’s criminal investigation into Bolton began during the Biden administration. It was partly based on information discovered after it was revealed that Bolton’s personal email had been hacked by an unnamed foreign government. While some details related to the hack were cited in court filings concerning searches of Bolton’s home and office, much of the information remains redacted.

### Background on John Bolton

John Bolton is a conservative national security expert who served as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations under President George W. Bush. He later joined the Trump administration as National Security Advisor from 2018 to 2019. After leaving the administration, Bolton became a vocal critic of Trump, publishing a book in 2020 that the Trump administration attempted to block.

The book included explosive allegations, claiming President Trump had limited foreign policy knowledge, granted “personal favors to dictators he liked,” and told Chinese President Xi Jinping that internment camps for Uighurs were “exactly the right thing to do.” Bolton has continued to criticize Trump, updating his book before the 2024 election to warn that Trump is “unfit to be president” and that the president’s “retribution” campaign against his enemies “will consume much of his second term.”

The FBI conducted raids on Bolton’s office and residence soon after he criticized Trump’s handling of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, suggesting the president had made mistakes that “emboldened” Russia. Earlier in the year, Trump had revoked Bolton’s security detail and subsequently attacked him on Truth Social, calling him “really dumb.”

### Political Context and Related Indictments

Bolton’s indictment follows recent federal charges brought against two other Trump critics: former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. Comey faces allegations of lying to Congress in 2020, while James is accused of mortgage fraud related to falsely classifying a property’s use. Both have denied the allegations, and legal experts have expressed skepticism about the strength of those cases.

These indictments represent some of the most significant legal actions taken against Trump’s rivals so far, aligning with Trump’s longstanding promises of “retribution” against political foes.

In addition to these high-profile cases, the administration reportedly continues investigations into other critics, including Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), billionaire donor George Soros and his foundation, former CIA Director James Brennan, and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.

**Further Reading:**
Stay tuned for updates as more information emerges regarding John Bolton’s case and related investigations into political figures associated with Donald Trump’s administration and opponents.
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/finance/john-bolton-becomes-third-trump-foe-indicted/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=john-bolton-becomes-third-trump-foe-indicted

DHS to charge migrants granted humanitarian parole $1K fee

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced on Thursday the implementation of a new $1,000 immigration fee for migrants paroled into the United States.

According to a statement from the department’s public affairs office, the goal of this fee is to “institute accountability and prevent rampant fraud of the parole system.”

In addition to enhancing accountability, the fee is intended to improve oversight of the parole process, ensuring that resources are used effectively and that the system is protected from abuse.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5559567-homeland-security-migrant-parole-fee/

Fmr Nat’l Security Advisor John Bolton indicted on 18 counts, accused of mishandling and sharing classified docs

OAN Staff Blake Wolf, Brooke Mallory and Sophia Flores UPDATE: 2: 05 PM Thursday, October 16, 2025: Former National Security Advisor John Bolton has been indicted on 18 counts of illegally hoarding or sending sensitive national security information by a federal grand jury. The indictment in a Greenbelt, Maryland federal court, alleges that Bolton knowingly transmitted materials related to foreign policy matters after President Trump fired Bolton from the White House in 2019. These sensitive national security documents were shared through a personal email. If found guilty, Bolton faces up to 10 years behind bars on each count of the indictment. 12: 56 PM Wednesday, October 15, 2025: Former National Security Advisor John Bolton is expected to face a federal indictment after being accused of mishandling and transmitting classified government documents using his private AOL email account. While he has not been formally charged, multiple sources suggest that a grand jury in Maryland is expected to issue an indictment soon. The development follows FBI raids on Bolton’s Maryland home and Washington, D. C., office, where agents seized documents labeled “classified,” “confidential,” and “secret” including materials related to weapons of mass destruction and strategic communications. The indictment is anticipated to detail Bolton’s mishandling of classified information during his time as President Donald Trump’s national security advisor, stemming from Trump’s first administration. Bolton allegedly used his personal AOL email account to share and store classified information through daily notes and summaries of his White House activities from 2018 to 2019. These documents reportedly contained sensitive national security details, prompting federal authorities to raid his Bethesda, Maryland, home in August 2025 seeking the “highly sensitive national security” information. The indictment is expected to hit as soon as Wednesday or Thursday. One Justice Department official told the New York Post that the case against Bolton is “airtight.” During the recent raid, FBI agents were able to remove a white binder from Bolton’s home labeled “statement and reflections to allied strikes,” which included folders labeled “Trump I-IV.” The FBI was also able to remove four boxes labeled “printed daily activities,” in addition to “two iPhones, four computers and hard drives, and two USB drives,” according to a Department of Justice filing. The probe into Bolton’s alleged mishandling of classified documents was first introduced in 2020 through a “very specific intelligence capacity,” which exposed Bolton’s decision to allegedly transfer classified documents to his home before Trump fired him in 2019. However, the probe was ultimately dismissed under the prior Biden administration due to “political reasons,” officials at the time stated, although it has since been reopened under FBI Director Kash Patel. Bolton has been a vocal critic of President Trump’s foreign policy following his departure from the administration. Bolton’s tenure under Trump was also marked by significant policy disagreements, particularly regarding approaches to Iran, North Korea, and Afghanistan. These differences led to Bolton’s dismissal in September 2019 with Trump citing “strong disagreements” over foreign policy as the primary reason. His conduct has also attracted bipartisan scrutiny for aggressive tactics, hawkish policies, and potential legal infractions, spanning his tenures in the Bush and Trump administrations, his published works, and current investigations. Notably, as Under Secretary of State for Arms Control, Bolton pressured intelligence analysts to exaggerate evidence of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) to justify the U. S. invasion. He targeted analysts like Christian Westerman, who disputed the claims. Stay informed! Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. What do YOU think? Click here to jump to the comments! Sponsored Content Below Share this post!.
https://www.oann.com/newsroom/fmr-natl-security-advisor-john-bolton-indicted-on-18-counts-accused-of-mishandling-and-sharing-classified-docs/

Florida House rolls out sweeping slate of property tax proposals for 2026 ballot

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — After months of waiting and several committee meetings, the Florida House is set to offer a slate of ideas for sweeping property tax reform in the next legislative session. The proposed constitutional amendments could significantly reshape how homeowners pay property taxes and how local governments fund essential services.

In a memo released Thursday, House Speaker Danny Perez criticized the Republican plans, labeling them politically motivated and potentially harmful to local communities.

Representative Driskell, speaking earlier this month, echoed these concerns. “The harm that these proposals would cause would not outweigh any potential benefits,” she said. She questioned the practical impact of the reforms, asking, “What firehouse would [Governor DeSantis] close in Tampa? What police station would he close in Orlando? What garbage collection would he stop in South Florida?”

Driskell warned that the proposals could leave small, rural counties struggling to fund basic services. “We’d basically be putting them in a situation where they would be living in a welfare state,” she said. “They would be funded by larger counties.”

Democrats argue that genuine affordability relief should focus on property insurance, healthcare, and overall living costs—not just property taxes. Driskell added, “This all seems to be a distraction. We need to focus on real solutions.”

### What’s Next

The House’s property tax reform proposals will be assigned to committees in the coming weeks, with debates expected to begin early in the 2026 session.
https://www.wptv.com/news/state/florida-house-rolls-out-sweeping-slate-of-property-tax-proposals-for-2026-ballot

No One Should Be Forced to Conform to the Views of the State

Should You Think Twice Before Posting a Protest Flyer on Your Instagram Story?

Or feel pressure to delete that bold JD Vance meme you shared? Now imagine that you could get kicked out of the country—potentially losing your job or education—based on the Trump administration’s dislike of your views on social media.

That threat to free expression and dissent is happening right now, but we won’t let it stand.

“…they’re not just targeting individuals—they’re targeting the very idea of freedom itself.”

Lawsuit Against Viewpoint-Based Surveillance and Suppression

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and co-counsel are representing the United Automobile Workers (UAW), Communications Workers of America (CWA), and American Federation of Teachers (AFT) in a lawsuit against the U.S. State Department and Department of Homeland Security. The suit challenges their viewpoint-based surveillance and suppression of noncitizens’ First Amendment-protected speech online.

The lawsuit asks a federal court to stop the government’s unconstitutional surveillance program, which has silenced both citizens and noncitizens. It has even hindered unions’ ability to associate and communicate with their members.

Press Release | Full Complaint in UAW v. State Department

Targeting the Idea of Freedom

“When they spy on, silence, and fire union members for speaking out, they’re not just targeting individuals—they’re targeting the very idea of freedom itself,” said UAW President Shawn Fain.

The Trump administration built this mass surveillance program to monitor the constitutionally protected online speech of noncitizens lawfully present in the U.S. The program uses AI and automated technologies to scour social media and other online platforms to identify and punish individuals who express viewpoints the government considers “hostile” to “our culture” and “our civilization.”

But make no mistake: no one should be forced to conform to the views of the state.

The Foundation of Democracy

Your free expression and privacy are fundamental human rights, and democracy crumbles without them. We have an opportunity to fight back, but we need you.

EFF’s team of lawyers, activists, researchers, and technologists have been on a mission to protect your freedom online since 1990—and we’re just getting started.

Donate and become a member of EFF today. Your support helps protect crucial rights, online and offline, for everyone.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/10/no-one-should-be-forced-conform-views-state

Jake Haro, father to missing baby Emmanuel, pleads guilty to murder in child’s death

The father of missing baby Emmanuel Haro has pled guilty to murder in Riverside County.

Jake Haro entered a guilty plea to second-degree murder in the death of his 7-month-old son, Emmanuel. This development comes several weeks after the boy’s parents falsely reported him missing in Riverside County.

Haro appeared in a Riverside courtroom on Thursday, where he changed his plea from not guilty to guilty. In addition to the murder charge, he also pled guilty to filing a false police report and assault of a child under 8, according to the Riverside County District Attorney’s Office.

The 32-year-old Haro was arrested alongside Emmanuel’s mother, Rebecca Haro, 41, in connection with the boy’s death in August. Initially, the couple claimed that Emmanuel had been kidnapped after an assailant attacked Rebecca Haro. However, that story was later proven false.
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-10-16/jake-haro-father-to-baby-emmanuel-pleads-guilty

O’Reilly Confronts Tom Homan About ABC Smear, Homan Claps Back Hard [WATCH]

Border Czar Tom Homan pushed back forcefully against accusations aired on ABC claiming he accepted a $50,000 bribe, calling the story false and politically motivated during an exchange with Bill O’Reilly.

O’Reilly opened the discussion by referencing comments made by ABC’s George Stephanopoulos. “I know George Stephanopoulos is one of your best friends. He convicted you on television, okay, of a $50,000 bribe. Stephanopoulos did this on ABC. The Vice President JD Vance defended you, and I thought he did so pretty well, because due process is important. You want to clarify anything about that situation?” O’Reilly asked.

Homan was direct in his denial. “I didn’t take $50,000 from anybody,” he said.

O’Reilly followed up by asking how the accusation reached national coverage. “Okay, how did that get into the mainstream, do you think?”

Homan responded that he believed the story was part of an ongoing campaign against him by left-wing media outlets. “Do you think I have no idea? Look, there’s been hit pieces on me since I came back to this administration,” he explained. “There have to be 30-40 hit pieces on me about how I’m involved with contracts or government deals, when, in fact, day one I came back, I recused myself from any discussions of any contract or any monetary decisions like that, because I used to have a company that did consulting, so I cleared myself.”

Homan emphasized that rather than profiting from his role, he made a personal sacrifice to serve. “Day one, what people don’t talk about is I took a significant, huge pay cut to come back and serve my nation, and I’m not enriching myself doing this job,” he said.

O’Reilly asked whether the repeated attacks bothered him personally. “Does this make you angry that they’re coming at you this way?” he inquired.

Homan replied that he was unfazed by the criticism, saying his focus remains on duty and integrity. “I don’t care what people think about me because I know who I am. I work for the greatest precedent in the history of this nation in my family, and we’re doing the right thing every day,” Homan stated.

The ABC segment that prompted the exchange sparked backlash among conservatives, with many calling it another politically driven attack against Trump administration officials.

Homan’s comments reinforced his reputation for blunt honesty and commitment to border enforcement despite ongoing media scrutiny.
https://www.lifezette.com/2025/10/oreilly-confronts-tom-homan-about-abc-smear-homan-claps-back-hard-watch/

For Mainers impacted by gun violence, red flag referendum is personal

James LaPlante remembers hearing how Robert Card was experiencing paranoia in the months before he killed 18 people and injured a dozen more in the Lewiston mass shooting. It sounded familiar.

Three years earlier, LaPlante’s brother, Stephen, was worried his friends were spreading lies that he was a pedophile and that a grocery store clerk who giggled was in on the rumor. Card had made similar claims to friends and family.

LaPlante contacted police after his brother started stockpiling guns, but police said there wasn’t enough evidence for them to intervene, and LaPlante was unable to get his brother the help he needed to stop him from acting on his worst impulses. In 2020, Stephen died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

His brother’s death is the reason LaPlante now supports a red flag law in Maine—a proposal that would allow family members, in addition to police, to initiate a weapons removal process if a person poses a risk to themselves or others. The law also would eliminate the requirement in Maine’s existing yellow flag law that a person first be taken into custody for a mental health evaluation.

“The big thing for the red flag law for me is it enables family members to take action,” said LaPlante, who lives in South Portland. “And family members are the ones who are going to know if someone is in a mental health crisis.”

### Growing Support for Red Flag Laws in Maine

LaPlante is among dozens of Mainers who have pleaded with lawmakers over the last two years for stronger gun control. After the Legislature failed to take up a red flag proposal last year in the aftermath of the Lewiston mass shooting, gun safety advocates organized a signature gathering campaign to get a citizen’s initiative on the ballot.

That measure will now go to voters statewide on Nov. 4 as **Question 2**.

Many people directly impacted by gun violence support a red flag law—family members like LaPlante, friends who have lost loved ones to gun suicides, survivors of the Lewiston shooting, and victims of other crimes involving firearms.

Opponents, some of whom also survived the mass shooting, say it weakens due process for gun owners and have argued that a red flag law already in place in 21 other states would not have prevented what happened in Lewiston.

“They could have used the yellow flag here in Maine and they never did,” Destiny Johnson, a Lewiston survivor, says in a campaign video released this week urging people to vote no on Question 2.

### ‘It Could Have Allowed Me to Go to the Courts’

LaPlante encouraged his brother to move in with their mother in Naples after he got caught up in drugs and was “hanging with the wrong crowd” in Massachusetts, where the brothers had grown up.

At one point, he said, Stephen was voluntarily committed to a mental hospital after attempting suicide. The move to Maine was good for Stephen at first, LaPlante said, but he still struggled with bipolar disorder that prevented him from working. His mental health worsened when the pandemic hit.

He stopped playing guitar and started focusing on collecting replica and BB guns, and eventually real firearms.

“During COVID, his paranoid ideations very quickly went to, ‘Society is going to collapse and I have to be ready for it, and people are after my stuff,’” LaPlante said. “He started to just amass weapons.”

LaPlante said he got particularly concerned after his brother woke their mother up in the middle of the night while he was on the roof with a rifle looking for people he thought were coming to take their belongings.

Around the same time, he said Stephen became convinced friends of his from Massachusetts were spreading rumors that he was a pedophile.

“Being in that scenario was really hard,” LaPlante said. “I felt stuck.”

LaPlante said he contacted police but was told there wasn’t much they could do unless Stephen committed a crime.

In his research on the yellow flag law, which had just taken effect in July 2020, he found that police were struggling to arrange the mental health assessments needed to confiscate firearms. Stephen died in September.

LaPlante said he believes the outcome could have been different had a red flag law been in place.

“It could have allowed me to go to the courts and say as a family member that I’m concerned he has been suicidal in the past,” he said.

Supporters of the red flag law say it could be especially helpful in reducing firearm suicides, and research has shown that red flag laws in other states can be an effective part of suicide prevention.

### Lewiston Survivors’ Views

While police initially struggled to connect with medical practitioners to conduct the required mental health assessments in the early days of the yellow flag law, a telehealth contract with the Portland nonprofit behavioral health provider Spurwink has since helped streamline the process.

Then, a state investigation into the Lewiston shooting—which found the yellow flag law could have been used by law enforcement— increased awareness and training among police, and its use has skyrocketed.

State officials recently announced the law has been used more than 1,000 times, all but 81 of those coming after the Oct. 25, 2023, mass shooting.

But some survivors still say a red flag law would be beneficial.

Among the most vocal is Arthur Barnard, whose son Artie Strout was killed at Schemengees Bar & Grille. Barnard has lobbied at the State House in favor of the law and last month appeared in an ad on behalf of the Yes on Question 2 campaign.

“Nobody knows if a family member is off-kilter faster than a family member,” Barnard said in an interview. “I believe that. Who knows that person better than their family?”

Jennifer Zanca of Auburn, who was shot in the left shoulder at Schemengees, is also in favor of a red flag law.

Zanca said that while she generally favored gun safety laws prior to the shooting, it made her think harder about what can be done to prevent such violence.

“I just feel like what we’re doing is not working,” she said. “It’s getting worse.”

The red flag proposal offers a more streamlined alternative and gives families a way to remove weapons from a person in crisis, she said.

“I feel safe knowing there are laws in place to take away guns from people who are having a mental health crisis, or who have gone psychotic and their family members see that,” Zanca said.

She was part of a group of four friends who went to Schemengees for dinner following a golf outing the night of the shooting. Among them was Johnson, the woman who recently appeared in the video for Protect Maine − No Red Flag, a group opposing Question 2 that is led by the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine with a powerful lobby.

In testimony before the Legislature last spring, Johnson elaborated on her opposition to a red flag law, saying Mainers need to be able to defend themselves in public places.

“Why would the state of Maine put a red flag law in place now, when they never enforced the yellow flag law to begin with?” she said in written testimony.

### Is Maine’s Current Law Enough?

David Trahan, executive director of the Sportsman’s Alliance, who worked with Gov. Janet Mills to pass the yellow flag law, is a leading opponent of Question 2.

He said he empathizes with anyone impacted by gun violence, including the many victims and survivors who have testified to lawmakers in support of a red flag law.

“But I’d love to sit down and talk with some of them because I believe our (yellow flag) law is better than red flag, and so does the governor, and so do state police,” Trahan said, referring to Mills’ and Maine State Police’s opposition to the red flag proposal.

State police have said that family members can already initiate weapons removal by contacting law enforcement and have expressed concerns that it will be more dangerous for them to try and remove weapons because the changes could mean someone is not already in protective custody when police go to remove their guns.

Supporters of the red flag law refute the idea that weapons removal would be more dangerous, saying law enforcement have inherently dangerous jobs and red flag laws are already working safely in several other states.

Mills has said that the yellow flag law, which she helped draft with gun rights and safety groups, has already proven effective, while also protecting Second Amendment rights. She has argued it’s important for police to be involved in navigating what can be a confusing court process and that it’s the responsibility of law enforcement, not private citizens, to protect the public.

### Advocates Speak Out

LaPlante says he doesn’t see the option to use red flag as something that would be burdensome for family members and said it is set up to work more quickly than the existing law.

“You’re giving people the opportunity to seek help,” LaPlante said. “That’s not a burden.”

He and other proponents acknowledge that it’s not a guarantee to prevent a loved one’s suicide or another mass shooting, and point out that there are other steps Maine could also take to improve gun safety, such as closing background check loopholes and improving access to mental health care.

But they said it’s a step in the right direction and that there’s no harm in giving families the choice of another tool.

“This law is about preventing gun tragedies and saving lives,” said Judi Richardson, whose daughter, Darien Richardson, died after she was shot in a home invasion in Portland in 2010.

Richardson and her husband, Wayne, are gun owners who didn’t think too much about whether Maine’s laws could be improved prior to their daughter being killed, she said.

Then they started connecting with other families around the country who had been impacted by gun violence, and said it opened their eyes to the need for change.

While the home invasion and homicide are still unsolved, Richardson said she can’t say if a red flag law would have helped in her daughter’s case. But she said it can generally improve safety.

“It may not pertain in my situation, but if we can prevent other injuries and deaths, that’s what we’re advocating for,” Richardson said.
https://www.sunjournal.com/2025/10/16/for-mainers-impacted-by-gun-violence-red-flag-referendum-is-personal/

[長崎県]偽電話詐欺関与の疑いで中国籍の男逮捕

長崎県で偽電話詐欺関与の疑い、中国籍の男を逮捕

2025年10月16日 6:00

長崎県警は、偽電話詐欺に関与した疑いで中国籍の男を逮捕しました。詳細な情報や続報については、有料会員限定の記事でご確認いただけます。

また、長崎県内では連続窃盗の容疑で別の男が送検され、捜査が終結しています。

※この記事は有料会員限定の記事です。残り181文字を読むには、7日間無料トライアル(1日37円で読み放題)または年払いプランがおすすめです。

西日本新聞meとは?

https://www.nishinippon.co.jp/item/1411827/

Exit mobile version
Sitemap Index