A day after Trump announced ‘something good may be happening’ about the Russia-Ukraine war, Putin has launched an attack on Kyiv

While President Donald Trump was busy bullying Ukraine into thanking him for his “efforts,” Russia launched another attack on Kyiv. Ironically, the offensive came just a day after Trump suggested there might be favorable developments in peace talks. Recommended Videos After discussions with Ukrainian leadership in Geneva on Sunday, Trump shared a hopeful Truth Social post on Monday. “Is it really possible that big progress is being made in Peace Talks between Russia and Ukraine?” he said, hinting at progress. “Don’t believe it until you see it, but something good just may be happening,” he declared. Earlier on Friday, Zelenskyy expressed his discontent with Trump’s original 28-point plan, which included ceding Ukraine’s eastern territories to Russia. Though Trump initially said that Ukraine “will have to like” his plan, he later clarified that he’s open to suggestions. Then, in Geneva, officials proposed amendments to the plan. Europe’s counterplan to Trump’s 28-point plan The counterplan included a crucial point of discussing territorial exchange at the point of contact, only after a peace agreement. It also increased the cap on the size of its military and tweaked the NATO membership terms. In a joint statement, officials called the talk “constructive, focused, and respectful.” But Russian leadership probably didn’t like it. Putin had backed the previously proposed 28-point plan since it explicitly favored Russia. The original plan, if it had been agreed upon, would’ve snatched away Ukraine’s NATO membership dreams. That’s something Russia has always pressed on, since it makes Ukraine an easier target for them in the future. But since Ukraine rejected the plan and Europe proposed its own deal, Russia lost its cool. Russia attacked Kyiv on Tuesday During the early morning hours on Tuesday, Nov. 25, Moscow launched an explosive attack on Kyiv. According to reports thus far, the attack destroyed several residential buildings, as well as major energy infrastructure. Videos showing a nine-story building in Dniprovskyi were shared on Telegram, providing proof of the attack. Tymor Tkachenko, the head of Kyiv city administration, revealed that at least four people were injured. While Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that Russia hasn’t reviewed the updated plan, it’s being debated. There’s a possibility that the attack was launched in response to amendments proposed to the original 28-point plan. The sudden attack also comes across as a slap in the face of the U. S. administration. Trump claimed to be respected by Russia while brokering the peace deal, but Russia’s actions have proved otherwise. Despite the peace talks being actively pursued, Putin refused to put a pause to his offensive. If anything, it’s a sign that it’s not the U. S., but Russia that’s dictating the peace talks.
https://www.themarysue.com/a-day-after-trump-announced-something-good-may-be-happening-about-the-russia-ukraine-war-putin-has-launched-an-attack-on-kyiv/

Trump Brands Democrats ‘Domestic Terrorists’ and ‘Traitorous Communists’, Demands They Be Jailed for Sedition

US President Donald Trump has sharply escalated his rhetoric against a group of Democratic lawmakers, branding them ‘domestic terrorists’ and ‘traitorous communists’ while demanding they be jailed for alleged sedition. The remarks, made across a series of Truth Social posts over the weekend, were triggered by a video in which the lawmakers reminded service members that they must refuse unlawful orders under United States military law. The clash has intensified political tensions, with lawmakers warning that Trump is using inflammatory language to intimidate them. Claims That Democrats Are a ‘Domestic Terrorist Party’ On Sunday afternoon, Trump shared several screenshots of posts from social media users who criticised the Democratic officials featured in the video. One screenshot accused the Democratic Party of being a ‘Domestic Terrorist party’, while another post described the lawmakers as ‘traitorous communists’. Trump amplified both messages by reposting them to his Truth Social account, adding to his ongoing narrative that the lawmakers had crossed a legal line. In late-night posts on Saturday, Trump went further by calling for the lawmakers to be jailed. He accused them of engaging in ‘seditious behaviour at the highest level’, a phrase he had used earlier in the week, and referenced that such behaviour is ‘punishable by death’. Although Trump later insisted that he was ‘not threatening death’, he maintained that the lawmakers were in ‘serious trouble’ for what they had said in the video. These statements have drawn scrutiny due to their severity and timing, especially as the President continues to be a dominant figure ahead of the next election cycle. Democratic Lawmakers Respond to Trump’s Demands In a written statement published on Thursday, the lawmakers pushed back strongly against Trump’s claims. They argued that ‘what’s most telling is that the President considers it punishable by death for us to restate the law’. They said their video simply outlined long-standing military obligations requiring personnel to reject unlawful commands and that Trump’s characterisation of the message was both inaccurate and threatening. The group noted that their message was rooted in established military code and that they had not issued any directive related to Trump personally. They emphasised that their warnings were general reminders of service members’ legal responsibilities. Slotkin and Crow Warn of Disturbing Rhetoric in TV Interviews Senator Elissa Slotkin, who appeared in the original video, addressed the controversy She said she believed Trump was ‘trying to get us to shut up because he doesn’t want to be talking about this’. Her comments underscored concerns that the President’s reactions were intended to silence or intimidate critics. Representative Jas He said Trump’s response had been ‘very disturbing’ and warned that such language risked inflaming tensions. Crow, a former Army Ranger, noted that the military’s legal responsibilities were clear and that their video was a straightforward reminder of those obligations. Context Behind the Video on Illegal Orders The video at the centre of the clash featured several Democratic lawmakers outlining the legal requirement for US service members to refuse unlawful orders. This long-standing rule is part of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and is intended to prevent abuses of power within the chain of command. Trump perceived the message as a direct criticism of him, leading to the rapid escalation in his online statements. Broader Concerns Raised by Legal and Security Experts The controversy has prompted renewed discussion about the impact of political rhetoric on democratic processes. Some legal observers have questioned the implications of a President describing political opponents as terrorists. Others have warned that invoking terms such as ‘sedition’ and referencing punishments associated with capital offences risks heightening political hostility at a sensitive moment in the national landscape.
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/trump-brands-democrats-domestic-terrorists-traitorous-communists-demands-they-jailed-1757432

Rand Paul laments MTG resignation: ‘Sad to see her voice go away’

“But that’s what an independent voice will help in our country an independent voice within the Republican caucus not to see things always inside the box, but to think of some out of the box solutions. So I think independent voices are important in the Republican Party,” he added. Greene announced she will resign from Congress at the beginning of next year after serving for three terms. That announcement came shortly after she publicly feuded with President Donald Trump over healthcare costs and the Epstein files. Trump was initially Greene’s motivation for getting into politics. Greene began her political career as an elector on Trump’s behalf and won her first election in 2020, taking office right around the time of the Jan. 6 riots. Greene would later defend the Jan. 6 protesters and Trump ultimately pardoned all of them. “I’ve always represented the common American man and woman as a member of the House of Representatives, which is why I’ve always been despised in Washington, D. C., and never fit in,” Greene said in her resignation announcement. CROCKETT CALLS OUT MTG FOR NOT BEING ABLE TO ‘TAKE THE HEAT’ FROM TRUMP Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) also lamented Greene’s resignation, saying he was “very sad for our country but also happy for my friend Marjorie.” Republicans in the House will be down to a 218-seat majority once Greene departs the lower chamber in January.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate/3896386/rand-paul-laments-mtg-resignation/

Zohran Mamdani stands by President Trump criticism despite friendly White House meeting

WASHINGTON New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani didn’t back down in an interview that aired Sunday from past criticism that President Donald Trump acted like a despot and a fascist after a surprisingly friendly White House meeting between the two men. The newly elected democratic socialist and the Republican president have fiercely criticized each other in the past. Trump called Mamdani a “100% Communist Lunatic” in a social media post following the incoming mayor’s election victory, and Mamdani has said Trump was attacking democracy. Yet the two political foils emerged smiling after the meeting Friday and spoke of shared goals. Pressed about his past criticism during a “Meet the Press” interview conducted Saturday, Mamdani said his views remained unchanged. “Everything that I’ve said in the past, I continue to believe,” Mamdani said. “And that’s the thing that I think is important in our politics, is that we don’t shy away from where we have disagreements, but we understand what it is that brings us to that table, because I’m not coming into the Oval Office to make a point or make a stand. I’m coming in there to deliver for New Yorkers.” Trump had brushed aside Mamdani’s criticisms Friday and even jumped in on his defense several times. When a reporter asked if Mamdani stood by his comments that Trump is a fascist, Trump interjected before Mamdani could fully answer the question. “That’s OK. You can just say yes. OK?” Trump said. “It’s easier. It’s easier than explaining it. I don’t mind.” Asked about the fascist criticism on “Meet the Press,” Mamdani said, “That’s something that I’ve said in the past. I say it today. ” Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said on CNN’s “State of the Union” talk show that Trump wants to work with everybody who cares about the future of the American people. “We’re at times disagreeing about policies,” Hassett said, “but I think that the objective of making life better for everybody is something that a lot of people share on the Democratic and Republican side.” Though far apart politically, the White House meeting offered potential political benefits for both men. The incoming mayor was able to meet one-on-one with the president, and Trump got to to talk about affordability, an issue that is increasingly important to voters.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/11/23/mamdani-trump-criticism/

Trump promete fin “de inmediato” a TPS para somalíes en Minnesota, desatando temor y dudas legales

Por JAKE OFFENHARTZ La promesa del presidente Donald Trump de poner fin a las protecciones legales temporales para los somalíes que viven en Minnesota ha desatado una ola de temor en una comunidad inmigrante sumamente arraigada en el estado, así como dudas sobre si la Casa Blanca tiene la autoridad legal para promulgar la directiva tal como se describe. El mandatario publicó la noche del viernes en su plataforma de redes sociales Truth Social que a los residentes somalíes de Minnesota se les retiraría “de inmediato” el Estatus de Protección Temporal (TPS por sus iniciales en inglés), una salvaguarda legal contra la deportación para inmigrantes de ciertos países. El anuncio provocó una respuesta inmediata de algunos líderes estatales y expertos en inmigración, quienes se refirieron a las amenazas de Trump como un intento sin muchos fundamentos legales para sembrar miedo y sospecha hacia la comunidad somalí de Minnesota, la más grande del país. “No hay un mecanismo legal que le permita al presidente poner fin al estatus de protección para una comunidad o estado en particular con el que tenga problemas”, aseguró Heidi Altman, directora de políticas del National Immigrant Justice Center. “Trump está haciendo lo que siempre hace: demagogia contra los inmigrantes sin justificación ni evidencia y usar esa demagogia en un intento por retirar importantes protecciones que salvan vidas”, agregó. La protección para los somalíes ha sido extendida 27 veces desde 1991, después de que las autoridades estadounidenses han determinado que las condiciones en Somalia no son lo suficientemente seguras para que las personas que ya se encuentran en Estados Unidos puedan regresar a ese país. Sin embargo, el gobierno de Trump podría tomar medidas para retirar las protecciones legales para los somalíes a nivel nacional. Pero eso afectaría sólo a una pequeña fracción de las decenas de miles de somalíes que viven en Minnesota. Según un informe elaborado para el Congreso en agosto pasado, únicamente hay 705 somalíes al amparo del TPS a nivel nacional “Soy ciudadana, al igual que la mayoría de los somalíes en Estados Unidos”, señaló la representante por Minnesota Ilhan Omar, una demócrata de origen somalí. “Buena suerte celebrando un cambio de política que realmente no tiene mucho impacto en los somalíes a los que amas odiar”. Aún así, grupos activistas advirtieron que la medida podría avivar el odio contra una comunidad en un momento de creciente islamofobia. “Esto no es sólo un cambio burocrático”, dijo Jaylani Hussein, presidente del Council on American-Islamic Relations para su oficina en Minnesota. “Es un ataque político a la comunidad somalí y musulmana impulsado por una retórica islamofóbica y de odio”. En su publicación en redes sociales, Trump afirmó, sin ofrecer evidencia, que las pandillas somalíes han atacado a los residentes de Minnesota y se refirió al estado como un “centro de actividad fraudulenta para el lavado de dinero”. Fiscales federales han presentado cargos en las últimas semanas contra decenas de personas que forman parte de un plan de fraude de servicios sociales. Algunos de los acusados son originarios de Somalia. El gobernador de Minnesota, el demócrata Tim Walz, ha señalado que su estado se ubica consistentemente entre los más seguros del país. “No es de sorprender que el presidente haya elegido atacar de manera generalizada a toda una comunidad”, señaló Waltz el viernes. “Esto es lo que hace para cambiar de tema”. Activistas comunitarios destacan que la diáspora somalí en Minnesota ha ayudado a revitalizar los corredores del centro de Minneapolis y juega un importante papel en la política del estado. “La verdad es que la comunidad somalí es querida y está profundamente entrelazada en muchos de los vecindarios y comunidades de Minnesota”, subrayó Altman. “Desestabilizar a familias y comunidades nos deja a todos menos seguros, no más”. Como parte de un impulso más amplio por adoptar políticas de inmigración más estrictas, la Casa Blanca ha tomado medidas para retirar varias protecciones que les habían permitido a los inmigrantes permanecer en Estados Unidos y trabajar legalmente. Entre ellas se incluye el fin del TPS para 600. 000 venezolanos y 500. 000 haitianos que recibieron protecciones durante la presidencia de Joe Biden. ___ Esta historia fue traducida del inglés por un editor de AP con la ayuda de una herramienta de inteligencia artificial generativa.
https://www.bostonherald.com/2025/11/22/trump-promete-fin-de-inmediato-a-tps-para-somales-en-minnesota-desatando-temor-y-dudas-legales/

Brooks: The Epstein story? Count me out.

Never before have I been so uncertain about the future. Think of all the giant issues that confront us: artificial intelligence, potential financial bubbles, the decline of democracy, the rise of global authoritarianism, the collapse of reading scores and general literacy, China’s sudden scientific and technological dominance, Russian advances in Ukraine. I could go on and on. So what has America’s political class decided to obsess about over the last several months? Jeffrey Epstein. This is a guy who has been dead for six years and who last was in touch with Donald Trump 21 years ago, Trump has said. Why is Epstein the top issue in American life right now? Well, in an age in which more and more people get their news from short videos, if you’re in politics, the media or online, it pays to focus on topics that are salacious, are easy to understand and allow you to offer self-confident opinions with no actual knowledge. QAnon mentality But the most important reason the Epstein story tops our national agenda is that the QAnon mentality has taken over America. The QAnon mentality is based on the assumption that the American elite is totally evil and that American institutions are totally corrupt. If there is a pizzeria on Connecticut Avenue in Northwest D. C., it must be because Hillary Clinton is running a child abuse sex ring in the basement. The Epstein case is precious to the QAnon types because here, in fact, was a part of the American elite that really was running a sex abuse ring. So, of course, they leap to the conclusion that Epstein was a typical member of the American establishment, not an outlier. It’s grooming and sex trafficking all the way down. (A previous generation of John Birch Society conspiracists were not content to claim Alger Hiss was a communist spy, which he was. They also had to insist that President Dwight Eisenhower was a paid Soviet agent.) Another feature of the QAnon mentality is the conviction that if investigators fail to find evidence to support their febrile imagining, then that is proof that they, too, are part of the cover-up. If the FBI and Justice Department conclude that there was no Epstein client list and there is no evidence that Epstein blackmailed people (as they did conclude), then let’s throw out the rule of law and throw investigations’ raw information onto the internet and let a social media mob sort things out. What could go wrong? Conspiracy thinking is always present at the fringes of society. It goes mainstream only when politicians and other leaders make it so. That’s what Donald Trump, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Nancy Mace, Robert Kennedy Jr. and others have been doing. Who stole the 2020 election? A vast conspiracy! Who runs America? The deep state! We don’t actually have to practice the art of democracy; if we can just reveal the hidden conspiracy, our enemies will be destroyed. I can kind of understand why Machiavellian Republicans would spew conspiracy theories. Those theories stoke cynicism, which serves Republican ends: The government can never be trusted; politicians are all liars. Cynicism causes people to check out of politics. Or, to be more precise, it causes them to care only about politics when they can destroy something. As The Economist noted in an editorial in 2019, “Cynical politicians denigrate institutions, then vandalize them.” It’s a straight line from Candace Owens to Russell Vought. What I don’t understand is why some Democrats are hopping on this bandwagon. They may believe that the Epstein file release will somehow hurt Trump. But they are undermining public trust and sowing public cynicism in ways that make the entire progressive project impossible. They are contributing to a public atmosphere in which right-wing populism naturally thrives. What ‘Epstein class’? I have been especially startled to see Ro Khanna, a House Democrat and one of the most impressive politicians in America, use the phrase “the Epstein class” in his public statements. In an interview with my colleague David Leonhardt this week, Khanna explained that he had gotten the phrase from voters who asked him if he was on the side of “forgotten Americans” or “the Epstein class.” Khanna tried to describe the mentality of the people he encountered: “I realized how much the abuse by rich and powerful men of young girls and the sense of a rape island that Epstein had set up for people embodied the corruption of government. And then many of them saw Donald Trump as fighting this corrupt government.” I know a thing or two about the American elite, ahem, and if you’ve read my work, you may be sick of my assaults on the educated elites for being insular, self-indulgent and smug. But the phrase “the Epstein class” is inaccurate, unfair and irresponsible. Say what you will about our financial, educational, nonprofit and political elites, but they are not mass rapists. That said, I completely understand the challenges Democratic leaders like Khanna are now facing. First, how can you get working-class voters to even listen to your policy ideas unless you first recognize the anger they feel by expressing that same anger? Second, if Trump’s core story is that “the elites betrayed you,” what core story can Democrats tell to register what has happened over the past few decades? These are genuine challenges. If I were a Democratic politician, I might try telling the truth, which in my version would go something like this: The elites didn’t betray you, but they did ignore you. They didn’t mean to harm you. But they didn’t see you in the 1970s as deindustrialization took your jobs; in the ensuing decades as your families and communities broke apart; during all those decades when high immigration levels made you feel like a stranger in your own land. But over the last decade you have made yourself seen. Now the question is: Who is actually going to work with you on your problems? Which party is actually going to help you improve your health outcomes or your kids’ educational outcomes? Which party is actually going to help you achieve the American dream? Will Trump’s war on scientific research or any of the other stuff he’s doing actually do anything to help American workers? If I were a Democratic politician (this role-playing is kind of fun) I’d add that America can’t get itself back on track if the culture is awash in distrust, cynicism, catastrophizing lies and conspiracymongering. No governing majority will ever form if we’re locked in a permanent class war. I’d try to recognize that no political moment is forever. Right now, the dark passions are ascendant. But after one cultural moment, voters tend to hunger for its opposite, which in this case means leaders who project integrity, unity, honesty and hope. The smart play, I’d say, is to rebut conspiracymongering, not abet it. When the giant issues like AI and Chinese dominance come crashing down on us, we will look back on the Epstein moment and ask: “What the hell were we thinking?” David Brooks is a New York Times columnist.
https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/11/22/brooks-the-epstein-story-count-me-out/

EXCLUSIVE: Jeffrey Epstein Was ‘Confident’ He Would Get a Presidential Pardon From Trump — and Lashed Out Behind Bars With ‘Threats’ When He Was Denied Freedom, Famed Author Claims

Nov. 21 2025, Published 6:40 p.m. ET A cocky Jeffrey Epstein was sure his friend and pal Donald Trump would grant him a pardon from his sex crimes and set him free, RadarOnline.com can reveal. When he didn’t, the pedophile became enraged, and allegedly “threatened” some of his past victims. Epstein and Trump were once good friends. The two ran in elite Manhattan social circles from the 80s into the 2000s. The sex offender’s home in Palm Beach was also a short drive from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club, where he was a frequent guest. A resurfaced video from 1992 shows the two men at the club, laughing and pointing out women on the dance floor. So when Epstein was arrested in July 2019 on sex-trafficking charges, investigative reporter and biographer Andrew Lownie said the financier was confident his buddy Trump would use his presidential power as a “get out of jail free” card. “The two had been pretty close; they hadn’t totally parted company,” Lownie shared. “Whether Epstein was justified in thinking this… he kind of thought that he had everyone sewn up, and that Trump would pardon him.” Conflicting Breakup Stories But after the arrest, Trump quickly cut ties with Epstein, telling reporters at the time, “I was not a fan. I had a falling out with him a long time ago.” This came as a shock to the wealthy businessman, who was known to splash large amounts of money on lavish dinner parties for his friends – sometimes with allegedly nefarious outcomes. Lownie said Epstein wasn’t used to being told “no.” “He’d always been able to get out of any of the problems he faced, with smart lawyers and a bit of money and his connections,” Lownie argued, adding that Epstein did not take the rejection well. “When he was told that wouldn’t happen, I was told he made all sorts of threats,” Lownie claimed. “He threatened some of the victims. He threatened Sarah Ferguson. “He could be pretty intimidating.” Epstein Dumped Trump Author Michael Wolff, who exposed Trump in his book Fire and Fury, said Epstein and Trump were practically the same, until they weren’t. “Epstein knew him, really, I think, better than most,” Wolff stated. “I mean, this was a true BFF situation: two playboys very much styling themselves as playboys in that (Hugh) Hefner sense, who palled around for the better part of 15 years.” However, Wolff reports the friendship fell apart in 2004, after the future president “went around Epstein’s back and bid $40million” for the Maison de L’Amitie, an estate neighboring Mar-a-Lago, when he knew the sex creep had eyes on the property. “He was really, really, really pissed,” Wolff claimed Epstein had expressed to him. Trump’s Version of Events Trump has a different memory of events, insisting he was the one to cut ties. Earlier this year, Trump claimed he had Epstein booted from Mar-a-Lago after learning his employees were being “stolen” from his spa. He explained: “People that work in the spa, I have a great spa, one of the best spas in the world at Mar-a-Lago, and people were taken out of the spa, hired by (Epstein). In other words, gone. And other people would come and complain, ‘This guy is taking people from the spa.’ I didn’t know that.” The politician continued: “And then when I heard about it, I told him. I said, ‘Listen, we don’t want you taking our people.’ Whether it was a spa or not a spa, I don’t want him taking people. And he was fine. “Then, not too long after that, he did it again, and I said, ‘out of here.'”
https://radaronline.com/p/jeffrey-epstein-pardon-president-trump/

Texas seeks Supreme Court order to use a congressional map judges held is likely racially biased

By MARK SHERMAN WASHINGTON (AP) Texas on Friday asked the Supreme Court for an emergency order to be allowed to use a congressional redistricting plan pushed by President Donald Trump that is favorable to Republicans in the 2026 elections despite a lower court ruling that it likely discriminates on the basis of race. The state is calling on the high court to intervene to avoid confusion as congressional primary elections approach in March. The justices have blocked past lower-court rulings in congressional redistricting cases, most recently in Alabama and Louisiana, that came several months before elections. Texas redrew its congressional map in the summer as part of Trump’s efforts to preserve a slim Republican majority in the House in next year’s elections, touching off a nationwide redistricting battle. The new redistricting map was engineered to give Republicans five additional House seats, but a panel of federal judges in El Paso ruled 2-1 Tuesday that the civil rights groups that challenged the map on behalf of Black and Hispanic voters were likely to win their case. If the ruling holds for now, Texas could be forced to hold elections next year using the map drawn by the GOP-controlled Legislature in 2021 based on the 2020 census. Texas was the first state to meet Trump’s demands in what has become an expanding national battle over redistricting. Republicans drew the state’s new map to give the GOP five additional seats, and Missouri and North Carolina followed with new maps adding an additional Republican seat each. To counter those moves, California voters approved a ballot initiative to give Democrats an additional five seats there. The redrawn maps are facing court challenges in California, Missouri and North Carolina.
https://www.pressdemocrat.com/2025/11/21/election-2026-redistricting-texas-scotus/

DeSantis, Democrats, environmentalists join forces to oppose new Gulf drilling

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. In a rare display of political alignment, Florida’s top Republicans, Democrats, environmental groups, and even some of President Donald Trump’s closest allies in the state are loudly rejecting the administration’s new plan to expand offshore drilling near Florida’s coast. Gov. Ron DeSantis, who has long insisted Florida’s beaches and military testing zones remain off-limits, renewed his warnings this week, urging Trump to stick with the protections he signed in 2020. DeSantis, Democrats, environmentalists join forces to oppose new Gulf drilling “Now what the Interior Department is proposing to do is really to go back off that policy,” said DeSantis, Friday. “I think that would weaken protections we worked really hard to establish offshore.” The Interior Department’s proposal would open new waters for oil and gas development, aiming to boost domestic production and lower prices. But in Florida, where drilling in state waters is already barred by the state constitution, the idea has landed with a thud. Military, Environment, and Bipartisan Pushback Opposition is emerging from every corner of the state’s political landscape. U. S. Rep. Jimmy Patronis, a Republican whose district includes major military installations, warned new rigs could jeopardize critical national security operations in the Eastern Gulf. “The right hand is not talking to the left hand,” Patronis said. ”The Department of the Interior is hard charging to try to drive down gas prices. So they’re trying to do everything they can to throw it and see what sticks to the wall.” State Trump administration announces plan for new oil drilling off Florida Matthew Daly and Matthew Brown Patronis argues drilling could disrupt hypersonic missile testing and other weapons development within the Gulf Test and Training Range. He’s circulated a letter to the White House, signed by most of Florida’s GOP delegation, reminding federal leaders that military testing and energy exploration “are not compatible.” It comes as environmental groups say the risks extend far beyond defense. “Floridians don’t want their treasure trashed,” said JP Brooker with Ocean Conservancy. He warns that drilling puts fisheries, sea turtles, beaches, and billions in tourism revenue at risk. “It’s a political no-brainer,” said Brooker. “The ocean in Florida is like corn. It’s like corn in Iowa, right? It’s something that you have to care about and care about supporting, regardless of your political background, if you want to have a chance of getting elected.” Democrats Also Sound the Alarm Democrats, too, say the plan is unnecessary and dangerous. “Big oil does not need any more help right now,” said U. S. Rep. Kathy Castor, Thursday evening. “They are doing fine and they hold over 2, 000 active leases in the Gulf already.” Florida Democratic Party Chair Nikki Fried called the proposal a “nonstarter,” pointing to memories of the Deepwater Horizon disaster just 15 years ago. National Politics Biden permanently bans offshore drilling in 625 million acres of ocean David Goldman, Ella Nilsen and Matt Egan, CNN “Florida has a long history of bipartisan support against drilling off our coastlines,” she said in a statement. “Our state’s fragile ecosystem and economy would be irreparably harmed if this proposal were to move forward.” A History of Avoiding Drilling Near Florida The bipartisan resistance echoes earlier victories for drilling opponents: In 2018, voters approved a constitutional amendment banning drilling in state waters. That same year, then-Gov. Rick Scott secured a pledge from Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke that Florida would be protected: “We are not drilling off the coast of Florida.” In 2020, Trump signed a memorandum extending the federal offshore drilling moratorium until 2032.
https://www.wptv.com/news/state/desantis-democrats-environmentalists-join-forces-to-oppose-new-gulf-drilling

Trump urges Treasury Secretary Bessent to take Federal Reserve job

By CHRISTOPHER RUGABER and JOSH BOAK WASHINGTON (AP) For the second time in two days, President Donald Trump said Wednesday that he would like to appoint Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to chair the Federal Reserve. Yet Bessent keeps saying he doesn’t want the job, Trump added, in comments to the U. S.-Saudi Investment Forum. “We’re thinking about him for the Fed, but he wants no part of it, he likes being secretary of the Treasury,” Trump said. “I think we’ll leave him so let’s cross your name off right, officially, right?” Trump has been sharply critical of the current Fed chair, Jerome Powell, whose term ends in May, for not cutting interest rates quickly enough. Trump’s pick as a replacement will almost certainly push for rapid interest rate cuts and likely institute wide-ranging changes in how the Fed operates. Bessent earlier this year published extensive criticisms of the Fed’s groundbreaking efforts to shore up financial markets and the economy after the 2008-2009 Great Recession and during the pandemic. Bessent is heading up the Trump administration’s search for a new Fed chair. Yet despite his protestations, he is also widely seen as a leading potential replacement for Powell. “He’s a top-tier candidate right now,” Stephen Moore, a senior economic adviser to Trump in his first term, said. Trump “wants to shake things up, so I think he wants an outsider.” Two of the five candidates Bessent has named are current Fed officials: Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman. The other three would fit the outsider criteria: Kevin Hassett, currently a top White House economic official; Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor who has been highly critical of the Fed; and Rick Rieder, a senior managing director at asset manager BlackRock. Late Tuesday, in an interview By mid-December, “the president will meet the final three candidates and hopefully have an answer before Christmas,” Bessent said. Associated Press Writer Fatima Hussein contributed to this report.
https://www.redbluffdailynews.com/2025/11/19/federal-reserve-bessent/

Exit mobile version
Sitemap Index