Pro-Palestinian students sue over Northwestern’s mandatory antisemitism training

A pro-Palestinian graduate student group has sued Northwestern University, claiming the school’s mandatory antisemitism training is discriminatory and violates the free speech rights of Arab students, new court papers reveal.

The university began enforcing the training modules, ironically named “Building a Community of Respect and Breaking Down Bias,” in February—months after heated campus anti-Israel demonstrations, according to the lawsuit.

The Northwestern Graduate Workers for Palestine alleges the training uses such a broad definition of antisemitism that it limits political discourse and free speech, labeling them as anti-Jewish. “Northwestern equates criticism of political practices and ideologies with discrimination against Jews themselves,” the complaint filed Wednesday in Illinois federal court states.

The lawsuit, filed by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) on behalf of the student group, seeks to have the training ruled unlawful and eliminated altogether. Plaintiffs also want to remove the disciplinary policy punishing students who do not complete the required training. The suit seeks unspecified damages.

According to court documents, Evanston-based university policy is discriminatory against Palestinian and Arab students by barring them from discussing their national aspirations or protesting alleged mistreatment of their people. The suit charges that Northwestern won’t allow students to oppose a video “dehumanizing Arabs in the process.”

The video, produced by the Jewish United Fund, reportedly includes quotes from Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke interspersed with statements from anti-Israel protesters to suggest “you can’t tell the difference” between the comments, according to a report by the Washington Free Beacon.

The lawsuit alleges the university brands Arab and Palestinian students’ ethnic and religious identities, cultures, and advocacy for their national group’s rights as antisemitic and subject to discipline.

For example, students have been threatened with losing their enrollment or employment status if they do not watch the videos and acknowledge the policies by set deadlines—either by Monday or February 2, 2026, depending on their registration date. “Several members of Grad Workers for Palestine will lose their student status and employment if they do not complete the training,” the filing notes.

At least 300 students have reportedly been blocked from registering for classes because they refused to watch the training video, The Guardian reported last month.

One Ph.D. candidate, Laura Jaliff, told the Evanston Round Table earlier this month that she declined the training because she believed it to be discriminatory. “The number of students who are refusing to take the training on the grounds that it contains damaging political propaganda that has no place in our workplace will inevitably grow,” Jaliff warned.

Students and faculty have widely opposed the training course, arguing the video is “discriminatory and not scholarly,” but the university has not altered its stance, the lawsuit states.

The university’s policy was enacted following anti-Israel protests in April and May 2024, during which students set up encampments on campus. Counter-demonstrators allegedly stole and destroyed property, spat on students, screamed at them, and called Jewish participants “fake Jews,” the suit claims.

One person reportedly told a Jewish student, “You are lucky you are here; if you were in Israel, I’d just shoot you like an animal,” the complaint adds.

Instead of addressing the threats, campus police allegedly cracked down on the pro-Palestinian encampments “with excessive and unreasonable force,” also filing criminal complaints against demonstrators. The Cook County State Attorney’s Office declined to prosecute the four people arrested, the suit notes.

Anti-Israel protesters allegedly vandalized a campus building housing the Holocaust center by scrawling “Death to Israel” and “Intifada Now” on its walls, according to the Washington Free Beacon. Protesters reportedly screamed insults like “dirty Jew” and “Zionist pig” at passing students, the Forward reported.

Former Northwestern president Michael Schill was criticized for his alleged negligence in handling antisemitism on campus and was questioned by a U.S. House committee over the unrest. He resigned last month.

In April, the Trump administration froze $790 million in federal grants and contracts to Northwestern, The Evanston Round Table reported.

Michael Teplitsky, president of the Coalition Against Antisemitism at Northwestern, called the lawsuit “absurd” in a statement to the Free Beacon. “The idea that an antisemitism training could somehow threaten anyone’s civil rights is absurd,” Teplitsky said. “Northwestern worked with JUF [Jewish United Fund] to create a student program aimed at inclusion and understanding—exactly what universities are supposed to do.”

Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers New York Representative Elise Stefanik and Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton last week called on the Trump administration to investigate CAIR’s sources of funding, including “potential ties” to Hamas.

Northwestern University declined to comment on the pending litigation.
https://nypost.com/2025/10/20/us-news/students-sue-over-northwesterns-antisemitism-training/

Dutch Seizure of Nexperia Sparks Corporate Stand-Off in China

**Nexperia China Prioritizes Local Management Amid Dutch Takeover Dispute**

Nexperia China has instructed its employees to follow directives from local management rather than the company’s Dutch headquarters, intensifying an ongoing corporate standoff. This internal directive, communicated through a letter over the weekend, signals clear resistance against the Dutch authorities’ attempt to assert control over the company.

### Background: Dutch Emergency Law and Limited Reach

The Netherlands recently invoked the Goods Availability Act—an emergency law enabling the state to temporarily assume control over companies deemed critical to national security. Using this law, Dutch authorities took control of Nexperia’s parent company and European operations, removing CEO Zhang Xuezheng and restricting significant corporate actions such as relocating units or terminating executives for up to one year.

However, this takeover only applies to the parent entity and its European subsidiaries. Nexperia’s subsidiaries incorporated in mainland China, including plants and offices in Dongguan, Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, and Wuxi, remain outside the scope of Dutch jurisdiction. These Chinese operations are managed locally and employ staff directly compensated by the Chinese entity, reinforcing their operational independence from the Dutch headquarters.

### China’s Export Controls Escalate the Stand-Off

The situation is further complicated by China’s Ministry of Commerce, which has imposed export restrictions on certain finished components manufactured domestically. These controls effectively block Dutch authorities from influencing Chinese operations, given that approximately 70% of Nexperia’s products are assembled at the Dongguan facility.

As a consequence, despite the legal authority granted to the Dutch government over the European parent company, the export restrictions prevent them from redirecting production or accessing product flows originating in China. This development has transformed the dispute into a complex geopolitical and corporate balancing act, with ongoing government-to-government negotiations between the Netherlands and China.

### Competitors Eye Supply Chain Opportunities

The uncertainty surrounding Nexperia’s operations presents a strategic window for rival semiconductor companies. Industry players such as Infineon, ON Semiconductor, STMicroelectronics, and Rohm are reportedly preparing to capture customers concerned about potential supply disruptions, especially in the automotive sector.

Nexperia’s Dongguan plant processes over 50 billion components annually, focusing on high-demand medium-power surface-mount device (SMD) packages, dual-flat no-lead (DFN) formats, and wafer-scale options. Competitors are expected to offer pin-compatible replacement parts for diodes, transistors, and other discrete component families most affected by the export constraints.

Meanwhile, electronics distributors are increasing inventory buffers to meet anticipated demand from automotive and industrial equipment manufacturers seeking alternative sources during this period of heightened geopolitical uncertainty.

The unfolding events at Nexperia highlight the intricate interplay between national security concerns, international trade restrictions, and corporate governance in today’s semiconductor industry. Stakeholders will be closely watching how the situation develops in the coming months.
https://coincentral.com/dutch-seizure-of-nexperia-sparks-corporate-stand-off-in-china/

Signal President Spars With Elon Musk Over Trust in Private Messengers

On Monday, a major outage at Amazon Web Services disrupted a large number of websites and apps, including the end-to-end encrypted messenger Signal. In response, X Executive Chairman and Chief Technical Officer Elon Musk declared that he no longer trusts Signal. “I don’t trust Signal anymore,” Musk stated plainly.

Signal President Meredith Whittaker responded to Musk’s post on X, emphasizing the app’s reputation: “Signal is trusted by the security and hacker community, and hundreds of millions of others, BECAUSE they can examine it, and because on examination, it has shown to be robust, private, and secure—for over a decade.”

### Musk’s Promotion of X Chat

In recent months, Musk has been promoting the use of X Chat as a secure, encrypted communication method between users. However, security experts argue that any encrypted messaging app should be open source to be truly trusted with secure communications. After all, how can users be sure what the app is doing if they cannot review the code themselves?

X labels X Chat—intended to eventually replace the traditional direct messaging system—as beta software on their platform. While there were reports in 2018 that X (then known as Twitter) was testing end-to-end encryption, the feature did not receive an official support announcement until 2023. The company has also stated plans to make it easier for users to verify the safety and security of their chat features.

Jack Dorsey, co-founder of X (originally Twitter) and former CEO, was supportive of moving towards end-to-end encryption during his tenure. More recently, Dorsey developed a geographically-focused messaging app called Bitchat over a weekend. Bitchat gained attention during the recent overthrow of the Nepalese government because of its mesh networking features, which allow it to function locally without internet access. An app with similar capabilities, FireChat, was used during the Hong Kong protests as early as 2014.

### Signal Is Not Perfect Either

Of course, Signal itself is not without flaws and has faced criticism over the years. One common concern raised by security researchers was Signal’s reliance on phone numbers, which many viewed as a privacy risk. The app has recently addressed this issue by allowing users to sign up with just a username.

Notably, Whittaker’s comments about Signal’s openness and verifiability faced pushback from multiple developers in the Bitcoin community. Peter Todd, known for contributing to Bitcoin Core and for being suggested as the alleged Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto in a recent HBO documentary, pointed out that app stores on Android and iOS hinder users’ ability to confirm that the open-source code published by Signal matches the app installed on their devices.

Todd’s work with Bitcoin Core emphasizes reproducible builds, a process that allows end users to verify that the software they run is built from the exact open-source code released to the public. Similarly, Steve Lee, who leads Bitcoin open-source development grant provider Spiral, highlighted an open issue related to reproducible builds for Signal on Android.

Bitcoin purists also criticize Signal for relying on centralized infrastructure, which contributed to the AWS-related downtime experienced recently. This reliance is seen as a drawback compared to decentralized networks like Bitcoin.

### Striking a Balance

Whether discussing Bitcoin or private messaging, there are often trade-offs between achieving perfect privacy and security versus creating a user-friendly app that people will actually use. Signal remains the gold standard for encrypted messaging, but encouraging more competition in this space is beneficial—so long as such alternatives offer privacy that is truly verifiable and trustworthy.
https://gizmodo.com/signal-president-spars-with-elon-musk-over-trust-in-private-messengers-2000674571

Golden Knights captain Mark Stone considered week-to-week due to wrist injury

Vegas Golden Knights captain Mark Stone is considered week-to-week with a wrist injury, coach Bruce Cassidy said Monday. Stone was injured in the third period of the Golden Knights’ 6-1 win over Calgary on Saturday.

This season, Stone has accumulated 13 points (two goals, 11 assists), just two points behind teammate and NHL leader Jack Eichel, who leads with 15 points.

“I feel for him,” Cassidy said. “He’s always bounced back well, that’s the good news. When we do get him back, whether that’s short, medium, or long term, we don’t know yet.”

In Stone’s absence, Brandon Saad will move to the top line, joining Eichel and Ivan Barbashev, who will shift to right wing. On the power play, Stone had contributed eight points, helping Vegas rank second in the league.

Mitch Marner will take over Stone’s role at the goal line on the power play, while defenseman Shea Theodore will be promoted to the top unit.

The Knights, currently holding a 4-0-2 record, are preparing for their toughest test of the young season. They will face the undefeated Carolina Hurricanes (5-0-0) at home, despite being short-handed among their forward lines and blue line.

Stone joins forward Brett Howden and defenseman Noah Hanifin on the injured list. Howden, sidelined with a lower-body injury, has resumed skating but will not be available against the Hurricanes. Hanifin remains out with an undisclosed injury and has not resumed skating since Vegas’ 6-5 shootout loss to Los Angeles in the season opener.
http://lasvegassun.com//news/2025/oct/20/golden-knights-captain-mark-stone-considered-week/

Why was Kam Jones arrested? Pacers rookie’s shocking involvement in police chase explored

Indiana Pacers rookie Kam Jones was arrested on Monday by Indiana State Police following a chase in Indianapolis.

According to reports, Jones was asked to stop on southbound I-65 around 10 a.m. However, the situation escalated, leading to a police pursuit.

Further details regarding the incident and any charges are yet to be released. We will provide updates as more information becomes available.
https://www.sportskeeda.com/basketball/news-why-kam-jones-arrested-pacers-rookie-s-shocking-involvement-police-chase-explored

Dolphins’ Mike McDaniel drops another crazy take on effort vs Browns

Somehow, Mike McDaniel is still the Miami Dolphins head coach, and he’s sticking with Tua Tagovailoa at quarterback. Additionally, he’s continuing to say unusual things, recently dropping another surprising take about the team’s effort against the Cleveland Browns, as reported by Marcel Louis-Jacques on X.

“I don’t have an opinion on the two teams in the game, because we didn’t participate in the game, in my opinion,” McDaniel said. While he acknowledged that Miami’s “want to” was there, he criticized their desire to execute the actual assignment or game plan as lacking.

Regardless of these comments, the Dolphins are now trying to regroup and climb out of the mess left behind by a 31-6 thrashing at the hands of the Browns.

### Mike McDaniel Sticking with Tua Tagovailoa

It seems strange that McDaniel hasn’t pulled the plug on Tagovailoa as the starter. At this point, it doesn’t look like the six-year veteran will be able to lead the team to a victory anytime soon. And a win soon may be the only thing that secures McDaniel’s future with the organization.

When asked about Tagovailoa’s status, McDaniel emphasized that his decisions won’t be based on emotion. “It will be tape-driven,” he said. “I will have to take a look at the tape. But before watching the tape, I don’t want to over-conclude anything.”

He added, “I think, when you turn the ball over, you know, it is the number one indicator of wins and losses. And it negatively affects the team. I think there’s multiple factors in those turnovers. I know at least one or two of them were extremely preventable from Tua, and he knows that just wasn’t good enough. We’ll watch the tape and change our style of play if we [have] to.”

### Tagovailoa’s Struggles

Unfortunately for the Dolphins, Tagovailoa currently leads the NFL in a category no quarterback wants to: interceptions. He has thrown 10 interceptions as Miami has stumbled to a disappointing 1-6 record.

Tagovailoa’s poor play is certainly an issue, but McDaniel’s team also didn’t seem prepared to face the Browns, who notched just their second win of the season. When teams show up not ready to play, the responsibility almost always falls on the head coach.

As the season progresses, all eyes will be on McDaniel and Tagovailoa — whether changes are coming and if Miami can turn things around before it’s too late.
https://clutchpoints.com/nfl/miami-dolphins/dolphins-news-mike-mcdaniel-crazy-take-effort-browns

Solar energy startup Active Surfaces wins inaugural PITCH.nano competition

The inaugural PITCH.nano competition, hosted by MIT.nano’s hard technology accelerator START.nano, provided a platform for early-stage startups to present their innovations to MIT and Boston’s hard-tech startup ecosystem.

The grand prize winner was Active Surfaces, a startup generating renewable energy exactly where it is needed through lightweight, flexible solar cells. Active Surfaces aims to reimagine how photovoltaics are deployed in the built environment with its ultralight, peel-and-stick panels. Shiv Bhakta MBA ’24, SM ’24, CEO and co-founder, delivered the winning presentation to an audience of entrepreneurs, investors, startup incubators, and industry partners at PITCH.nano on September 30.

Active Surfaces received the grand prize of 25,000 nanoBucks—equivalent to $25,000—that can be spent at MIT.nano facilities.

“Why has MIT.nano chosen to embrace startup activity as much as we do?” asked Vladimir Bulović, MIT.nano faculty director, at the start of PITCH.nano. “We need to make sure that entrepreneurs can be born out of MIT and can take the next technical ideas developed in the lab out into the market, so they can make the next millions of jobs that the world needs.”

Bulović explained that the journey of a hard-tech entrepreneur takes at least 10 years and $100 million. By linking open tool facilities to startup needs, MIT.nano can make those first few years a little easier, helping more startups reach the scale-up stage.

“Getting VCs [venture capitalists] to invest in hard tech is challenging,” explained Joyce Wu SM ’00, PhD ’07, START.nano program manager. “Through START.nano, we provide discounted access to MIT.nano’s cleanrooms, characterization tools, and laboratories for startups to build their prototypes and attract investment earlier and with reduced spend. Our goal is to support the translation of fundamental research to real-world solutions in hard tech.”

In addition to discounted access to tools, START.nano helps early-stage companies become part of the MIT and Cambridge innovation network.

Inspired by the MIT 100K Competition, PITCH.nano was launched this year as a new opportunity to introduce hard-tech ventures to the investor and industry community. Twelve startups delivered presentations that were evaluated by a panel of four judges—venture capitalists and startup founders themselves.

“It is amazing to see the quality, diversity, and ingenuity of this inspiring group of startups,” said judge Brendan Smith PhD ’18, CEO of SiTration, a company that was part of the inaugural START.nano cohort. “Together, these founders are demonstrating the power of fundamental hard-tech innovation to solve the world’s greatest challenges in a way that is both scalable and profitable.”

The startups presenting at PITCH.nano spanned a wide range of focus areas:

– **Climate, Energy, and Materials:** Addis Energy, Copernic Catalysts, Daqus Energy, VioNano Innovations, Active Surfaces, and Metal Fuels
– **Life Sciences:** Acorn Genetics, Advanced Silicon Group, and BioSens8
– **Quantum and Photonics:** Qunett, nOhm Devices, and Brightlight Photonics

A common thread among these companies is their use of MIT.nano to advance their innovations.

“MIT.nano has been instrumental in compressing our time to market, especially as a company building a novel, physical product,” said Bhakta. “Access to world-class characterization tools normally out of reach for startups lets us validate scale-up much faster. The START.nano community accelerates problem-solving, and the nanoBucks award is directly supporting the development of our next prototypes headed to pilot.”

In addition to the grand prize, a 5,000 nanoBucks audience choice award went to Advanced Silicon Group, a startup developing a next-generation biosensor to improve testing in pharma and health tech.

Now in its fifth year, START.nano has supported 40 companies across diverse market areas including life sciences, clean tech, semiconductors, photonics, quantum, materials, and software. Fourteen START.nano companies have graduated from the program, proving its success in helping early-stage ventures progress from prototype to manufacturing.

“I believe MIT.nano has a fantastic opportunity here,” said judge Davide Marini, PhD ’03, co-founder and CEO of Inkbit, “to create the leading incubator for hard tech entrepreneurs worldwide.”
https://news.mit.edu/2025/active-surfaces-wins-inaugural-pitchnano-competition-1020

Hailey Bieber could hardly sit in her corseted couture at Academy Museum Gala

Hailey Bieber was fully committed to the look at this past weekend’s Academy Museum Gala. Wearing a corseted ensemble from Schiaparelli Couture, she stunned on the blue carpet as paparazzi eagerly snapped her photos.

Once inside the event, however, the glamorous appearance gave way to a more challenging reality. While Bieber looked every inch the picture of high fashion standing upright, sitting down proved to be difficult. The design’s extreme corseting was less than forgiving, causing the model to awkwardly recline once she was seated.

The Rhode founder later shared a collection of photos on Instagram from the evening, including one where she is leaning against the banquette at dinner, clearly unable to sit comfortably at the table while her meal was served.

The dress itself was a masterpiece: crafted from brown silk moiré, it featured a sculpted cone-style bra cup and an eye-catching high slit secured with a crystal fastening. Around her waist, a nude-toned, boned corset sculpted an exaggerated hourglass silhouette, fashioned from the same silk moiré fabric.

This striking look was the closing piece for Schiaparelli’s Spring 2025 Couture show back in January. According to Harper’s Bazaar, it was crafted using vintage ribbons, adding a unique touch to the couture design.

Bieber wasn’t the only celebrity to embrace bold fashion choices at the gala. With stars like Kim Kardashian attending in her Margiela Couture face covering, it was clear that many were willing to push style boundaries in the name of fashion.

Despite the challenges posed by the dress, Bieber shared warmly on Instagram, writing, “Always a beautiful night @academymuseum 🤎.” It was evident that the look didn’t deter her from enjoying a fabulous evening celebrating among Los Angeles’ most stylish stars.
https://pagesix.com/2025/10/20/style/hailey-bieber-couldnt-sit-in-her-corseted-schiaparelli-couture-gown-at-academy-museum-gala/

Rockets’ Kevin Durant delivers ‘no-brainer’ admission after signing $90 million extension

Although Kevin Durant remains one of the best scorers in the NBA today, he is nearing the end of his illustrious career. Ergo, the two-year, $90 million contract extension he signed with the Houston Rockets on Sunday could be the last deal he ever agrees to in this league. Such a decision cannot be made lightly.

The two-time Finals MVP is extremely confident in this union, however, identifying Space City as the most optimal path forward.

“I’m excited,” Durant told reporters on Monday, per Adam Wexler of SportsTalk 790. “That was the intent when I came here, was to try to be with this group as long as possible. It was a no-brainer to sign on that line.”

The future Hall of Famer took a discount to stay in Houston for the next few seasons, forgoing a chance to earn up to $120 million in order to give the organization added financial flexibility. The Rockets can now turn their attention to locking up versatile forward Tari Eason before Monday’s 6 p.m. ET deadline to sign players to rookie-scale extensions. Franchise pillar and All-Defensive First-Team selection Amen Thompson will be eligible for a new deal next summer.

Durant is willing to make this sacrifice because he, like many others, firmly believes this franchise can contend for a championship during the 2025-26 campaign. The 37-year-old can do his part to help that blueprint come to fruition—free from answering questions about money.

### Durant Is All In on the Rockets

“Just talking to [general manager Rafael Stone and head coach Ime Udoka], and how they wanted to build the team and how I see myself in this organization, I just thought it was a perfect contract for us,” Durant said. “I’m glad we can get that out of the way. We won’t have to worry about external noise throughout the season if I didn’t have a contract signed. So, we can just worry about basketball and focus on the season.”

Following the devastating Fred VanVleet injury, Kevin Durant is even more valuable to Houston. Besides the high-level offense he is expected to provide—26.6 points while shooting 52.7 percent from the field and 43.0 percent from behind the 3-point line last season—the six-time All-NBA First-Teamer brings loads of experience to a roster that still features plenty of young players.

Durant is not often heralded as a vocal leader, but he has a ton of hoops-based wisdom to offer. Houston will try to glean as much as it can from him over the next three years (including a $43 million player option for 2027-28). All the on-court contributions will definitely be of use as well.
https://clutchpoints.com/nba/houston-rockets/rockets-news-kevin-durant-no-brainer-admission-90-million-extension

October 20 In Labor History: Asbestos? More Like As-WORST-us.

On October 20, 1969, a construction worker named Clarence Borel filed suit against 11 companies for asbestos exposure. This key moment in the movement against asbestos reveals the dangers workers faced on the job, the decades-long coverup by companies, and how workers finally began to win compensation.

By the late 19th century, asbestos had become common in American construction. Johns Manville, founded in 1858, soon became the largest asbestos producer in the country. In fact, the company’s founder, H. W. Johns, died in 1898 due to asbestos exposure—though he was unaware of the risks at the time. The company pioneered asbestos-based roofing, insulation, and cement products.

The dangers of asbestos were not unknown. Even the ancient Romans realized asbestos caused illness. Pliny wrote that slaves working with asbestos seemed to die, and proto-masks made from animal bladders were used to protect themselves. Despite this, early warnings were largely ignored as the modern asbestos industry developed.

In 1897, a physician in Vienna wrote the first modern report on the health problems faced by asbestos workers. Awareness of these issues grew in the following decades. Nevertheless, workplaces remained unsafe for a long time. Even with the rise of successful unions in the mid-twentieth century, many workplaces remained hazardous. While unions fought for more obvious safety issues, pollutants such as asbestos were not a major priority, resulting in many workers dying from mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases.

Change began in the early 1960s, at least for asbestos workers. When physicians asked a company to share medical records after discovering a cluster of asbestos-related illnesses among its workforce, the company refused. The doctors then contacted the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers, which gladly assisted them.

Though unions generally supported improved workplace safety, they did not fully understand the hazards involved. Their help allowed the doctors to publish a landmark 1965 study strongly affirming the link between asbestos exposure and construction work. The union’s records for death benefits enabled a longer-term study, despite most workers already being deceased.

The racial demographics of asbestos deaths during the peak asbestos use era are striking due to the segregation of construction labor. Between 1990 and 1999, nearly 11,000 Americans died from asbestos-related causes, many exposed decades earlier. An overwhelming 96% of these deaths were men, 93% were white, and 98% were over the age of 55.

By 1998, asbestos-related illness had surpassed black lung disease as the leading cause of workplace deaths related to lung conditions.

Workers had attempted to seek compensation for asbestos-related illnesses for decades. In 1927, a foreman filed the first known suit for damages and won a disability claim in Massachusetts. Lawsuits against Johns Manville began in 1929, and by 1933, the company settled claims from 11 workers in New Jersey.

However, by 1949, facing continued lawsuits, the company opted to withhold information about health risks from workers, covering up the dangers.

In 1969, Clarence Borel, who had worked in construction since 1936, discovered he had contracted asbestosis. His case became pivotal in the fight against asbestos exposure. This occurred alongside the rise of the modern workplace safety movement, which led to the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 1971 and spurred increased union focus on such issues.

Borel testified about the pervasive dust in his work environment:

> “You just move them just a little and there is going to be dust, and I blew this dust out of my nostrils by handfuls at the end of the day, trying to use water too, I even used Mentholatum in my nostrils to keep some of the dust from going down my throat, but it is impossible to get rid of all of it. Even your clothes just stay dusty continually unless you blow it off with an air hose.”

He admitted he suspected the work was dangerous, as were many jobs in the mid-twentieth century. Access to respirators came late and was limited; these were often hot and uncomfortable. Many workers pointed out that the burden of safety rested entirely on them, with companies failing to control airborne asbestos.

Interestingly, union safety attempts sometimes caused complaints among workers. Cultures of work often included risk and discomfort as accepted elements.

Borel filed suit against 11 companies. The jury found 10 guilty of negligence but also found Borel partly responsible. The companies appealed, denying responsibility and questioning how Borel got sick. Borel countered that none of the companies took safety seriously—none warned workers about risks or conducted tests to determine safe exposure levels.

At this point, some companies began settling with Borel to limit their losses. Others fought on, prolonging the case through appeals.

Then, in 1974, the discovery of the so-called “Asbestos Papers” during an inspection of an asbestos factory in Connecticut dramatically altered the legal landscape. These documents definitively showed that companies knew what asbestos did to workers’ lungs and had conspired for decades to cover it up.

This revelation led to many workers, including Borel, routinely winning their court cases. Johns Manville filed for bankruptcy in 1982 to protect itself from lawsuits totaling $2 billion.

Companies pooled funds to pay claims, but the industry was overwhelmed. Claims continue today, as evidenced by the many television ads encouraging people exposed to asbestos to join class-action suits.

While proving such claims can be difficult, and courts often less sympathetic due to the rise of conservative judicial appointments, asbestos exposure at workplaces has declined sharply in recent decades. However, the toll of decades-long exposure continues to affect working-class families.

**Further Reading:**

– Dorceta Taylor, *The Environment and the People in American Cities, 1600s-1900s*
– Carl F. Cranor, *Regulating Toxic Substances: A Philosophy of Science and the Law*
– Michael Bowker, *Fatal Deception: The Terrifying True Story of How Asbestos is Killing America*
– Jeb Barnes, *Dust-Up: Asbestos Litigation and the Failure of Commonsense Policy Reform*
https://www.wonkette.com/p/october-20-in-labor-history-asbestos

Exit mobile version
Sitemap Index